Coterra Energy Inc. (CTRA) Q3 2025 Earnings Summary
Executive Summary
- Q3 2025 delivered strong operations with production near the high end of guidance (785.0 MBoepd; oil 166.8 MBopd; gas 2,894.6 MMcf/d) and solid cash generation (Discretionary Cash Flow $1.15B; Free Cash Flow $0.53B) . Adjusted EPS was $0.41 and GAAP EPS $0.42 .
- Versus S&P Global consensus, EPS was modestly below ($0.41 vs $0.43 cons) while standardized revenue missed (≈$1.68B vs $1.75B cons); Adjusted EBITDA was roughly in line (≈$1.09B vs $1.09B cons) — see Estimates Context for details and S&P disclaimer.*
- FY25 guidance raised/tightened: total equivalent to 772–782 MBoed (from 755–780), gas to 2.925–2.965 Bcf/d (from 2.875–2.950), oil tightened to 159–161 MBopd; Q4 guide: 770–810 MBoed, oil 172–178 MBopd, capex ≈$530M .
- Capital returns and balance sheet: $0.22 dividend declared; repaid $250M of term loans in Q3 (now $600M repaid YTD) and resumed buybacks in October; net debt/Adj Pro Forma EBITDAX ~0.8x .
- Potential stock catalysts: FY25 production raise and Q4 oil ramp, 2026 “soft” outlook (capex modestly down with 0–5% BOE and ~5% oil growth), and activist pressure following Kimmeridge’s letter urging strategic changes .
What Went Well and What Went Wrong
-
What Went Well
- Production execution: All streams beat midpoints (~2.5%) and total volumes near the high end of Q3 guidance; 48 net wells turned in-line and DCF/FCF of $1.15B/$0.53B showcased capital efficiency .
- Permian integration: Management cites cost-per-foot down ~10% on acquired assets, LOE run-rate savings targeted at ~15% with microgrids potentially halving power costs, supporting stronger returns in Northern Delaware .
- Long-term positioning: Management reiterated a balanced oil/gas portfolio and expects 2026 capex modestly down while maintaining growth; “Coterra has never been stronger or better positioned” .
- Quote: “We are pleased with our strong operational execution… Our nine rig and three completion crew program in the Permian… is generating strong returns at today’s prevailing prices” .
-
What Went Wrong
- Unit costs ticked up: Q3 unit operating cost rose to $9.81/boe (from $9.34 in Q2) on mix and workovers; mgmt expects Q4 to trend toward the annual midpoint .
- Permian TILs slightly light vs guide: 38 net TILs vs 40–50 guided, pushing activity into Q4, though overall annual ranges still expected to be met .
- Waha exposure headwind: Weak Waha gas prices weighed on realizations; company is pursuing long-haul pipes and in-basin power netbacks to improve basis/price .
- Activist overhang: Kimmeridge’s letter criticized governance and strategy, advocating a Permian pure-play focus; management acknowledged the letter but emphasized multi-basin benefits .
Financial Results
Consolidated results (GAAP and non-GAAP)
Notes: Adjusted metrics per company definitions with reconciliations in the release tables .
Production and price KPIs
Segment production (daily)
Additional Q3 detail: Permian oil 160.1 MBopd; Marcellus gas 1,977.6 MMcf/d; Anadarko oil 6.5 MBopd/NGL 31.9 MBopd .
Versus S&P Global Consensus (EPS, revenue, EBITDA)*
Notes: EPS “Actual” uses company Adjusted EPS where applicable for comparability with consensus; S&P revenue/EBITDA reflect standardized definitions and can differ from reported “operating revenues”/Adjusted EBITDAX. Values retrieved from S&P Global.*
Guidance Changes
Earnings Call Themes & Trends
Management Commentary
- Strategy and positioning: “We remain committed to a long-term path of consistency, profitable growth, and value creation… Our low breakevens and deep inventory… provide the opportunity to deliver through the cycles” .
- Portfolio advantages: “We think we’re seeing benefits of… a multi-basin, multi-commodity company” . “Highest PVIs in our portfolio are coming from our Marcellus project” .
- Capital outlook: “A current snapshot suggests that capital should be down modestly [in 2026]… while still maintaining production parameters” .
- Marketing: “We are prepared to be patient and not front-run demand increases… approximately 30% of Coterra’s gas production [is] in diversified arrangements” .
- Balance sheet and returns: “We reinitiated our share buyback program… [and] are making meaningful progress… getting our leverage back to around 0.5x net debt to EBITDA” .
Q&A Highlights
- Costs and LOE: Q3 LOE uptick tied to workovers; mgmt expects Q4 moderation and year to finish near midpoints .
- Buybacks vs deleveraging: With term loans largely reduced, management is “feathering in” buybacks while continuing deleveraging; aims to return to robust payout levels similar to prior years .
- 2026 capex: “Soft” guide suggests modestly down capex while maintaining growth; flexibility retained to adjust to commodity conditions .
- Waha and takeaway: Waha weakness acknowledged; pursuing long-haul pipe options and in-basin power deals to improve realizations and flow assurance .
- Activism: Management acknowledged the Kimmeridge letter, reiterating benefits of the multi-basin model without engaging on specifics .
Estimates Context
- Q3 2025 vs S&P Global consensus: EPS $0.41 vs $0.43 (miss); standardized revenue ≈$1.68B vs $1.75B (miss); standardized EBITDA ≈$1.09B vs $1.09B (in line). On a reported basis, GAAP operating revenues were $1.817B and Adjusted EBITDAX $1.084B (definitions differ from S&P standardized metrics) . Values retrieved from S&P Global.*
- Trajectory: Q2 EPS beat ($0.48 vs $0.45) and Q1 in line ($0.80 vs $0.80), while revenue was modestly below in Q1–Q2 on standardized basis.*
Where models may adjust: higher Q4 oil mix (172–178 MBopd guide) and raised FY gas volumes could prompt upward tweaks to Q4/FY volume and cash flow forecasts; LOE normalization in Q4 would support margins .
Key Takeaways for Investors
- Production momentum continues into Q4 with an oil-weighted ramp (172–178 MBopd), while FY25 volume guidance increased; expect a supportive mix shift near term .
- Despite Q3 unit cost uptick, management expects normalization in Q4; cost synergies in the Permian plus microgrid power savings represent tangible 2026 margin levers .
- Gas price/basis headwinds (Waha) are being mitigated by portfolio diversification (LNG, power, long-haul pipes), suggesting resiliency through gas cycles .
- Balance sheet strengthening remains a priority (term loans down $600M YTD) with opportunistic buybacks resumed — a constructive setup for higher capital returns in 2026 .
- The 2026 “soft” guide balances capital discipline (modestly down capex) with 0–5% BOE and ~5% oil growth, reinforcing a durable FCF profile across cycles .
- Activist scrutiny introduces potential strategic/governance actions; monitoring Board responses could be an incremental catalyst or overhang .
- Near-term trading lens: modest headline miss vs consensus (EPS/revenue) may be offset by raised FY volumes, Q4 oil inflection, and clear cost/return progress — positioning shares for narrative improvement as execution continues .
Appendix: Additional Disclosures and Data Points
- Dividend: $0.22/share payable Nov 26, 2025; annualized yield reference 3.8% at $23.40 (as of Oct 30, 2025 close) .
- Capital structure and liquidity: Total debt $3.9B, cash $98M, undrawn $2.0B revolver; total liquidity ≈$2.1B; net debt/Adj Pro Forma EBITDAX 0.8x (TTM) .
- Q4 2025 guide specifics: Total production 770–810 MBoepd; oil 172–178 MBopd; gas 2.775–2.925 Bcf/d; capex ≈$530M .
Footnote: *Values retrieved from S&P Global.