Sign in

You're signed outSign in or to get full access.

K. Christopher Farkas

Vice President and Chief Financial Officer at CURTISS WRIGHTCURTISS WRIGHT
Executive

About K. Christopher Farkas

K. Christopher “Chris” Farkas is Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Curtiss‑Wright (CW) since May 2020, after serving as VP Finance (2017–2020), Corporate Controller (2014–2017) and Assistant Corporate Controller (2009–2014) . He is 55 years old (as of the FY2023 10‑K), holds a B.S. in Accounting (Central Connecticut State), an MBA (Purdue, Krannert) and an Executive MBA (ESCP Europe), and is a CPA (NJ) . Under the executive pay plans he oversees, CW delivered 3‑year TSR at the 94th percentile vs peers and 2024 performance of 9.3% adjusted organic sales growth, $547M adjusted operating income, and working capital at 20.8% of sales .

Past Roles

OrganizationRoleYearsStrategic Impact
Curtiss‑WrightCFO (Vice President & Chief Financial Officer)2020–presentFinance leadership; investor relations; capital allocation; controls and reporting .
Curtiss‑WrightVice President of Finance2017–2020Oversaw finance FP&A and corporate finance; succession to CFO .
Curtiss‑WrightVice President & Corporate Controller2014–2017Led internal/external reporting, accounting policy, SEC disclosure .
Curtiss‑WrightAssistant Corporate Controller2009–2014Corporate consolidation and controls foundation .
Newmark Grubb ACRESCFO & COOPre‑2009Operational finance leadership; real estate services (prior to CW) .
Parker Hannifin (Control Systems division)CFO & Compliance OfficerPre‑2009Division‑level P&L and compliance leadership .
United Technologies (Pratt & Whitney Engine Center, other roles)Controller/leadership rolesPre‑2009Manufacturing finance and operational controls .

External Roles

  • No current public company directorships disclosed for Farkas .

Fixed Compensation

Metric (USD)202220232024
Base Salary$542,308 $577,923 $607,708
Target Bonus % of Salary80% 80% 80%
Annual Incentive Paid (ICP)$341,000 $861,441 $937,891
Stock Awards – PSUs (grant‑date FV)$439,941 $489,720 $514,248
Stock Awards – RSUs (grant‑date FV)$329,956 $367,290 $385,686
Long‑Term Plan – Cash PUP Payout$75,348 $427,500 $660,000
Change in Pension Value$0 $329,106 $565,983
All Other Compensation$29,694 $39,381 $38,150
Total Compensation$1,758,247 $3,092,361 $3,709,665

Perquisites in 2024 included company auto ($16,840), financial planning ($14,680), and executive physical ($4,067) .

Performance Compensation

Annual Incentive (ICP) – 2024 design and results

ComponentWeightThresholdTargetMaximumActual ResultPayout Factor
Operating Income (Adjusted)30%$500.0M $522.0M $548.1M $547M 195%
Organic Sales Growth20%3.0% 5.0% 8.0% 9.3% 200%
Working Capital (% of Sales)30%25.1% 22.8% 21.7% 20.8% 200%
Individual Objectives (Farkas)20%2.0=50% 3.0=100% 5.0=200% 4.3 (score) 165%
  • 2024 ICP payout to Farkas totaled $937,891 .
  • Company-wide, NEO ICP awards averaged ~188% of target given outperformance .
  • 2025 ICP changes: Operating Income metric replaced with Operating Margin; weights unchanged (WC 30%, OM 30%, OSG 20%, Individual 20%) .

Long‑Term Incentives (LTI) – structure, targets, outcomes

ItemDetail
2024 LTI target value (as % of base salary)210% for Farkas
Mix and metricsPSUs (40%): 3‑year relative TSR vs peer group; PUPs (30%): 3‑yr avg Total Sales Growth (60%) and Adjusted EPS Growth (40%); RSUs (30%): time‑based, cliff vest at 3 years .
PSU payout curve (2024‑2026 cycle)25th/50th/75th percentile TSR → 50%/100%/200% of target; cap at 100% if absolute TSR negative .
2022‑2024 PSU outcome200% of target on TSR at 94th percentile vs peers .
2022‑2024 PUP outcomeTotal payout 200% (8.7% 3‑yr avg sales growth; 15.7% 3‑yr avg adjusted EPS growth; each mapping to max) → Farkas $660,000 .

Equity Ownership & Alignment

Beneficial ownership and instruments

ItemAmount/Policy
Shares beneficially owned (Feb 20, 2025)24,398 shares; includes 11,686 time‑based restricted shares; 4,516 shares held in trust (shared voting) .
% of shares outstanding≈0.065% (24,398 / 37,703,216 outstanding) .
ESPP participation (2024)Purchased 81 shares at 15% discount via ESPP .
OptionsNo stock options outstanding or granted; option exercises = 0 in 2024; the 2024 Omnibus Plan is not currently used for options .

Outstanding awards and vesting schedule (selected)

Award TypeGrant DateTarget/UnitsVest/Performance PeriodExpected Vesting
Retention RSU (time‑based)12/16/20215,660Time‑based12/15/2026 .
RSU (annual)3/14/20241,601Cliff vestMarch 2027 .
PSU (2022 grant)3/17/20222,956TSR vs peers (2022–2024)Earned early 2025 .
PSU (2023 grant)3/16/20232,885TSR vs peers (2023–2025)Earn early 2026 .
PSU (2024 grant)3/14/20242,134TSR vs peers (2024–2026)Earn early 2027 .

Alignment policies

  • Ownership guidelines: CEO 5x salary; NEOs reporting to CEO 3x salary; others 2x. Mandatory 50% net‑share hold on vested/exercised equity until guideline met .
  • Clawbacks: Sarbanes‑Oxley recoupment policy plus Dodd‑Frank compliant no‑fault restatement clawback covering Section 16 officers (3‑year lookback) .
  • Hedging/pledging: Prohibited for directors and employees; no hedging instruments; no pledging or margin accounts for equity from plan awards .

Employment Terms

Severance and change‑in‑control (CIC)

  • At‑will severance: If involuntarily terminated without cause (or certain qualifying events), CFO receives one year’s base salary plus one year’s target bonus and at least one year of benefits; 12‑month non‑compete; consulting, release required .
  • CIC protection: Double‑trigger; payout equals 2.5x (base salary + greater of target bonus or prior year ICP), lump sum within 10 days; benefits continuation for 2–3 years; applicable if terminated without cause or resigns for good reason within 12 months post‑CIC (24 months for CEO) .

Illustrative potential payouts (as of 12/31/2024)

ScenarioK. C. Farkas
Retirement/Voluntary Termination$3,417,340
Termination for Cause$760,654
Termination Without Cause$4,723,794
CIC Termination (Double‑Trigger)$9,811,738
Death$6,156,456

Compensation Structure Diagnostics

  • Pay mix and targets: NEO total direct compensation targets generally set at market median (50th percentile) with above/below pay for performance; ~56% of NEO target pay is performance‑based; CEO ~65% .
  • Peer group (2024): AAR, Ametek, Barnes Group, BWX Technologies, Crane, Hexcel, Huntington Ingalls, ITT, Kratos Defense, Mercury Systems, Moog, Parsons, Teledyne, TransDigm, Triumph Group, Woodward .
  • Say‑on‑Pay: 92% support at 2024 annual meeting; program unchanged for 2024 given positive feedback .
  • Risk controls: Caps on payouts; diversified metrics (top/bottom line and balance sheet); multi‑year vesting; robust ownership, clawbacks; individual component can be set to zero for risk concerns .

Performance & Track Record

  • Corporate results under incentive framework (2024): 9.3% adjusted organic sales growth, $547M adjusted operating income, working capital at 20.8% of sales; 3‑yr TSR at the 94th percentile vs peers .
  • 2022–2024 long‑term performance: PSU and PUP cycles paid at maximum 200% based on top‑quartile TSR and strong 3‑year sales/EPS growth .
  • CFO individual execution: Scored 4.3/5 (165% factor) on 2024 individual objectives for implementing a new financial management system and leading investor communications, including Investor Day participation .

Pension and Deferred Compensation (Alignment/Retention)

PlanYears CreditedPresent Value (12/31/2024)
Qualified Pension (Retirement Plan)16$605,006
Non‑Qualified Restoration Plan16$1,806,916
  • Executive Deferred Compensation: NEOs may defer salary/bonus/cash LTI; 2024 plan crediting rate 6.66% (30‑yr Treasury avg Nov 2023 + 2%); Farkas had no 2024 contributions shown .

Risk Indicators & Red Flags

  • Hedging/pledging prohibited; no option repricing/backdating; no CIC tax gross‑ups; strong clawbacks .
  • Related‑party transactions: None disclosed for executives in 2024 .
  • Legal proceedings: None disclosed for executives (past 10 years) .
  • Governance: Executive Compensation Committee independent; FW Cook as independent consultant .

Compensation Committee Analysis

  • Committee: Dean M. Flatt (Chair), Anthony J. Moraco, William F. Moran, Robert J. Rivet .
  • Philosophy: Pay for performance; balanced ST/LT metrics; explicit use of relative TSR and publicly released numbers for transparency .

Investment Implications

  • Pay‑for‑performance alignment is strong: ICP and LTI outcomes directly mapped to publicly disclosed sales growth, operating income, working capital, and peer‑relative TSR; maximum payouts aligned with top‑quartile 3‑year results .
  • Insider‑selling pressure around vesting: Significant RSU cliffs (e.g., 12/15/2026 retention RSU; March 2027 annual RSUs) and PSU settlements (early 2026/2027) could create periodic Form 4 activity; mandatory 50% net‑share hold mitigates immediate selling .
  • Retention and change‑in‑control: One‑year cash severance (base+target) is moderate; 2.5x CIC multiple is within market and double‑trigger; this reduces retention risk in strategic scenarios while avoiding single‑trigger windfalls .
  • Alignment safeguards: Prohibitions on hedging/pledging, robust clawbacks, and ownership guidelines support long‑term shareholder alignment and reduce governance risk .
Notes: All figures and policies cited from CW 2025 DEF 14A, CW 2024/2023 10‑K, and related 8‑Ks as referenced inline.