Sign in

You're signed outSign in or to get full access.

John Casella

John Casella

Chief Executive Officer at CASELLA WASTE SYSTEMSCASELLA WASTE SYSTEMS
CEO
Executive
Board

About John Casella

John W. Casella (age 74) serves as Chairman, Chief Executive Officer, and Secretary of Casella Waste Systems; he has been a director since 1993 and Chairman since 2001, and will transition to Executive Chairman effective January 1, 2026 as part of a CEO succession plan . He joined his brother Doug a year after the company’s founding and has led the company for ~five decades, driving expansion across the eastern U.S. . Under his leadership, FY2024 revenue increased by $292.7 million (23.1%) with Adjusted EBITDA up $66.0 million (22.4%), and 5‑year TSR rose 129.9% (12/31/2019–12/31/2024); FY2024 net income declined due to higher D&A from acquisitions, while Adjusted Free Cash Flow increased 23.4% .

Past Roles

OrganizationRoleYearsStrategic Impact
Casella Waste Systems, Inc.Chief Executive Officer1976–2025Led multi-decade growth of an integrated solid waste and resource solutions platform across the eastern U.S.
Casella Waste Systems, Inc.Chairman of the Board2001–presentChairs classified board; oversees strategy, with Lead Director providing independent counterbalance
Casella Waste Systems, Inc.Director1993–presentLong-tenured director with deep industry expertise

External Roles

  • Not disclosed in the filings reviewed.

Fixed Compensation

YearBase Salary ($)Target Bonus % of SalaryActual Bonus Payout ($)Actual Payout vs Target
2024763,732 150% 1,306,845 114.1%
2023739,692 150% 653,199 58.9%
2022647,149 1,675,105

Performance Compensation

  • Annual cash incentive design (FY2024) tied to Company performance only; four metrics with a Free Cash Flow “gate.” Weightings: Adjusted Operating Income (45%), Adjusted Free Cash Flow (45%), Improvement in Total Recordable Incident Rate (5%), Improvement in Turnover Rate (5%) .
  • FY2024 results produced an overall payout of 114.1% of target; Committee adjusted AOI and FCF targets pro‑rata for the Whitetail acquisition to preserve goal rigor and avoid windfalls .
Metric (FY2024)WeightMinimum (0%)Threshold (60%)Target (100%)150% PayoutMaximum (200%)ActualPayout %
Adjusted Operating Income ($mm)45% 102.7 106.6 110.1 113.2 118.5 104.3 24.1%
Adjusted Free Cash Flow ($mm; Gate $128.3mm)45% 129.0 145.1 146.1 148.3 154.7 158.3 200%
Improvement in TRIR5% 5.25 5.09 4.99 5.08 64.8%
Improvement in Turnover Rate5% 29.4% 28.1% 27.2% 26.6% 100%
Overall Payout114.1%

Equity Ownership & Alignment

  • Beneficial ownership (as of March 31, 2025): John holds 512,887 Class A shares and 494,100 Class B shares (50% of Class B), for 6.85% combined voting power; the dual‑class structure concentrates voting influence despite modest Class A economic ownership .
HolderClass A Shares% Class AClass B Shares% Class BCombined Voting %
John W. Casella512,887 * 494,100 50.0% 6.85%
  • Unvested/Outstanding equity (12/31/2024): RSUs vest in 3 equal annual installments; PSUs vest at end of 3‑year period on Adjusted FCF and Adjusted EBITDA with a Relative TSR multiplier; RSUs have change‑in‑control accelerated vesting if terminated without cause within 12 months .
Award TypeGrant DateUnvested/Unearned SharesNotes
RSUs3/11/20221,470 Time‑based; annual vesting over 3 years
RSUs3/10/20234,199 Time‑based
RSUs3/12/20245,060 Time‑based
PSUs (2023 grant, target)3/10/202318,896 3‑yr performance (2023–2025) with Relative TSR multiplier
PSUs (2024 grant, target)3/12/202415,181 3‑yr performance (2024–2026) with Relative TSR multiplier
  • 2024 realized vesting: 2022 PSU cohort vested at 220% of target; John received 29,106 shares (performance above max on financial goals plus a 110% Relative TSR multiplier at the 71.7th percentile) .
  • Options: No options outstanding as of 12/31/2024; John exercised 27,940 options during 2024 .
  • Ownership guidelines: CEO must hold ≥3× base salary; all executive officers (except the newly joined CFO) were compliant as of March 1, 2025 .
  • Hedging/pledging policy: Prohibits hedging and pledging/margin transactions for executives and directors, with rare pledge exceptions requiring CFO/GC review and Audit Committee approval for directors/executives .

Performance Compensation (Equity) Details

DateInstrumentAmount/TermsVest/MeasurementFair Value
3/12/2024RSUs5,060 units 3 equal annual installments (service-vesting) $474,982
3/12/2024PSUs15,181 target (max 36,434) Performance in FY2026 on Adjusted FCF (50%) and Adjusted EBITDA (50%); Relative TSR multiplier (80–120%) vs Russell 2000 over 2024–2026 $1,599,318
2022 PSU vestPSUs (2022 grant)220% achievement (29,106 shares to John) Metrics achieved at 200%; TSR at 71.7th percentile → 110% multiplier

The Compensation Committee adjusted PSU targets pro‑rata for Whitetail (2024) and Whitetail/Royal (2025–2026) acquisitions to preserve rigor and align pay with shareholder outcomes .

Employment Terms

  • Contract/term: Employment agreement (initial 3‑year term, auto‑renews annually) .
  • Non‑compete/non‑solicit: 2‑year non‑compete within 300 miles of any company facility; 2‑year non‑solicit of customers/employees after termination (non‑compete inapplicable if he voluntarily resigns without severance unless the company pays base salary/benefits during the period) .
  • Severance (without cause): 3× (i) highest prior base salary (paid per payroll) plus (ii) the higher of most recent bonus or 50% of base salary (lump sum), plus accrued comp and 3 years of benefits .
  • Good reason/change‑in‑control: If he resigns for “good reason” (requires a change‑in‑control plus specified adverse changes) or “qualified good reason” (specified adverse changes), he receives severance as above plus an excise tax gross‑up intended to offset any Section 4999 excise taxes . Equity plan uses double‑trigger CIC vesting; RSUs vest if terminated without cause within 12 months post‑CIC .
  • Clawback: Amended and Restated Clawback Policy (Oct 2023) to recoup excess incentive‑based compensation for the prior 3 years upon an accounting restatement, with enhanced recovery for misconduct/fraud .

Board Governance

  • Board structure: Classified board (3 classes); John is a Class III director (term through 2027) and serves as Chairman and CEO; Joe Doody is Lead Director. All committees (Audit; Compensation and Human Capital; Nominating and ESG) are fully independent .
  • Meetings/attendance: The Board met 7 times in FY2024; each incumbent director attended ≥75% of combined Board and committee meetings .
  • Independence: John is not independent; a majority of directors are independent per Nasdaq rules .
  • Say‑on‑pay results: 97.7% support at 2024 Annual Meeting; 96%+ support in 2023, indicating strong shareholder alignment on pay design .

Compensation Structure Analysis

  • Mix and at‑risk pay: Majority of CEO compensation is performance‑based; 75% of annual equity granted in PSUs; caps on bonus payouts; no long‑term cash incentives .
  • Metric selection and rigor: Annual plan focuses on Adjusted Operating Income and Adjusted FCF with safety/turnover ESG metrics; acquisition‑related goal adjustments preserve rigor and avoid windfalls .
  • Equity emphasis and outcomes: High PSU weighting with FCF/EBITDA targets and TSR modifier; recent cohorts (2021, 2022) vested at 220% on strong financial performance and above‑median TSR .
  • Peer group/context: Peer set used for context includes GFL Environmental, Waste Connections, Waste Management, and Republic Services (not targeted 1:1 due to size) .

Related Party Transactions (Governance Risk Indicators)

  • Casella Construction, Inc. (owned by John Casella, his son, and his brother/vice chairman): Company purchased $7,761,659 in services in FY2024 (with $477,265 outstanding at year‑end); company also provides services to Casella Construction ($242,125 revenue in FY2024). Large related‑party construction bids follow strict multi‑bid and third‑party tabulation procedures .
  • Real estate leases with Casella Associates, LLP (owned by John and Doug Casella): $34,127 monthly aggregate rent with CPI escalators; HQ lease runs to Feb 2039; Montpelier facility to May 2039 .
  • Historical landfill post‑closure obligations (Bola, Inc., owned by John and Doug): $14,561 paid in FY2024; $16,824 accrued as of 12/31/2024 .
  • Family employment: Son/daughter employed (compensation and equity awards disclosed) .

Equity Grants and Vesting Schedules (Detail)

YearRSUs (#)PSUs Target (#)PSU Max (#)Notes
20245,060 15,181 36,434 RSUs vest over 3 years; PSUs measured in 2026 with TSR multiplier
20236,298 18,896 45,350 PSUs measured in 2025 with TSR multiplier

Director Service, Roles, and Dual-Role Implications

  • Service history: Director since 1993; Chairman since 2001; CEO and Chair dual role with Lead Director to balance agendas, information flow, and executive sessions of independents .
  • Committee roles: John does not serve on the independent Board committees; committee membership comprised solely of independent directors .
  • Independence and control: Dual‑class structure (10 votes per Class B share) provides the Casella family with significant voting influence (John and Doug collectively hold 100% of Class B), which can raise minority shareholder protection considerations, though Say‑on‑Pay support remains high .

Say‑on‑Pay & Shareholder Feedback

  • Advisory support: 97.7% “FOR” in 2024; 96.6% “FOR” in 2023, signaling strong investor endorsement of program design .
  • Consultant: Pay Governance LLC engaged as independent advisor to the Compensation and Human Capital Committee .

Expertise & Qualifications

  • Long‑tenured industry operator with deep experience in solid waste operations, strategic planning, and regulatory/public policy; led acquisitions and integration programs; recognized for sustainability focus and employee safety/retention metrics embedded in incentives .

Work History & Career Trajectory

  • Joined company leadership in 1976 and has served as CEO since then; led growth from a regional hauler to a diversified resource solutions company .

Compensation Committee Practices

  • Committee composed entirely of independent directors; uses an independent consultant; administers clawback; evaluates risk in compensation; adjusts acquisition impacts to maintain goal rigor .

Employment & Change‑of‑Control Economics (Key Terms)

ProvisionSummary
Severance (termination without cause)3× highest base salary (payroll schedule) + the higher of most recent bonus or 50% of base (lump sum) + accrued amounts; 3 years of benefits
Good Reason / Qualified Good ReasonGood Reason requires a change‑in‑control plus adverse changes; Qualified Good Reason covers specified adverse changes; both trigger severance and excise tax gross‑up
Non‑compete / Non‑solicit2 years; non‑compete within 300 miles of any company facility; non‑solicit of customers/employees
CIC equity vestingDouble‑trigger under plan; RSUs vest if terminated without cause within 12 months post‑CIC
Clawback3‑year lookback on incentive compensation upon restatement; enhanced recovery for misconduct/fraud

Investment Implications

  • Pay-for-performance alignment: High PSU weighting and rigorous FCF/EBITDA targets with a TSR overlay tie realized pay to value creation; recent 220% PSU vestings corroborate strong execution but also introduce larger equity deliveries that can create near‑term selling pressure as shares vest .
  • Governance watch‑items: Dual role (Chair/CEO) is mitigated by an empowered Lead Director and fully independent committees; however, the dual‑class structure and recurring related‑party transactions (construction, real estate) elevate governance risk and may influence minority investor perceptions and cost of capital .
  • Retention and transition: Strong severance protections, strict non‑compete, and ownership guidelines reduce retention risk; announced CEO succession (John to Executive Chairman; effective 1/1/2026) provides visibility into leadership continuity while modestly reducing key‑man risk .
  • Incentive design durability: The committee’s practice of pro‑rata target adjustments for acquisitions preserves incentive rigor and reduces windfall risk amid active M&A, supporting confidence in future pay‑performance linkage .

Peer benchmarking (GFL, WCN, WM, RSG) is used for context rather than strict targeting, reflecting the company’s smaller scale vs. large‑cap peers and reducing peer‑driven pay inflation risk .