CW
CALIFORNIA WATER SERVICE GROUP (CWT)·Q1 2025 Earnings Summary
Executive Summary
- Q1 2025 EPS of $0.22 beat Wall Street consensus of $0.16; revenue of $204.0M missed consensus of $215.4M. The variance is largely due to non-recurring interim rate relief recorded in Q1 2024; on a non-GAAP comparable basis, revenue rose 13% and EPS rose sharply versus Q1 2024 non-GAAP . EPS consensus and revenue consensus values retrieved from S&P Global.*
- Management highlighted progress on the 2024 California General Rate Case (GRC); although a global settlement wasn’t reached, evidentiary hearings are planned for May with parties aligned on keeping the case on schedule .
- Regulatory tailwinds in Q1 included $27.2M escalation step increases effective Jan 1, Palos Verdes surcharge approval ($3.8M) and rate base inclusion ($14.2M), and Hawaii Ka’anapali rate approval effective May; dividend continuity (321st consecutive quarterly dividend) supports yield visibility .
- Liquidity remains strong with $44.5M unrestricted cash, $45.7M restricted cash, and $315M available credit; Q1 CapEx was $110.1M, continuing the infrastructure investment plan and underpinning expected rate base growth trajectory .
What Went Well and What Went Wrong
What Went Well
- EPS beat vs consensus: $0.22 actual vs $0.16 estimate; management cited rate changes, usage, and approved advice letters (drought and Palos Verdes) adding ~$0.07/share to EPS . EPS consensus values retrieved from S&P Global.*
- Regulatory progress: 2024 California GRC remains on schedule with hearings in May; parties (commissioner, judge, advocates) emphasize timeliness, improving odds of an on-time outcome vs prior cycle .
- Capital deployment and dividend continuity: $110.1M CapEx in Q1 2025; 321st consecutive quarterly dividend declared at $0.30 and anticipated 2025 annual dividend of $1.24 (including Jan special $0.04) .
What Went Wrong
- Revenue miss vs consensus: $204.0M actual vs $215.4M estimate; headwind mainly from non-recurring Q1 2024 interim rate relief (GAAP YoY down $66.7M), though non-GAAP comps show underlying growth . Revenue consensus values retrieved from S&P Global.*
- Cost pressures and margin: Depreciation and amortization rose to $36.0M due to new assets; water production costs remained elevated at $63.0M; EBIT margin % for Q1 2025 was lower than recent quarters as the rate relief timing normalized* . EBIT margin values retrieved from S&P Global.*
- Uncertainty on tariffs and financing markets: Management flagged potential tariff impacts on materials and continued volatility in debt/equity markets as watch items, requiring disciplined cost management .
Financial Results
GAAP vs Non-GAAP YoY Comparison (Q1)
Notes: Q1 2024 GAAP included $90.3M revenue and $65.8M net income from 2023 interim rate relief; non-GAAP adjusts for these effects .
Sequential and Recent Trend
Values with asterisk retrieved from S&P Global.
Versus Estimates (Q1 2025)
Values marked * retrieved from S&P Global.
Operating Details and KPIs
Segment breakdown: Not disclosed in Q1 press materials; Company reports consolidated results .
Guidance Changes
Earnings Call Themes & Trends
Management Commentary
- “We are pleased with our strong start to 2025… we remain focused on achieving a timely and constructive resolution to our 2024 California GRC” — Martin A. Kropelnicki, CEO .
- CFO on EPS drivers: “Rate changes and increased customer usage… contributed $0.20 per share, and approval of two advice letters… contributed $0.07 per share” .
- Regulatory tone: “Commissioner… judge and the advocates have all indicated desire to keep the rate case on schedule… I’m a lot more bullish this time” — CEO .
- Macro vigilance: “Too early to tell [on tariffs]… we remain guardedly optimistic… disciplined budgetary approach… markets whipsawed since April” — CEO/CFO .
Q&A Highlights
- GRC settlement status and path: No global settlement; company pursuing undisputed items to streamline hearings; major issues (decoupling, rate design, capital plans) likely litigated .
- Tariff and supply chain impacts: Materials sourced globally; teams managed COVID-era constraints; continued focus on cost discipline amidst uncertainty .
- Results quality vs internal expectations: Better-than-typical first-quarter performance driven by tighter budgets, improved water mix alignment, and step increases of $27.2M feeding tariffs .
- ATM program: Intends to renew; timing targeted for spring; sizing under finance committee review .
Estimates Context
- Q1 2025 EPS beat: $0.22 actual vs $0.16 consensus; positive surprise of $0.06 (+37.5%)* .
- Q1 2025 revenue miss: $203.973M actual vs $215.436M consensus; negative surprise of -$11.463M (-5.3%)* .
- Estimate coverage is light (EPS: 2 estimates; Revenue: 3), increasing the potential for post-print revisions as analysts normalize for non-GAAP comparables and regulatory developments.* Values marked * retrieved from S&P Global.
Key Takeaways for Investors
- Underlying growth is stronger than GAAP YoY suggests due to Q1 2024 interim rate relief; non-GAAP comps show 13% revenue growth and EPS rising to $0.22 .
- EPS beat vs consensus and clear regulatory milestones (escalation increases, surcharges, Hawaii rates) are near-term support; revenue miss should be contextualized by prior-year non-recurring items .
- GRC cadence is the main stock narrative: hearings in May and aligned parties on schedule reduce delays risk vs the 2021 cycle; watch decoupling and capital plan outcomes as valuation catalysts .
- Defensive liquidity and active CapEx ($110.1M) underpin rate base growth; cost of capital extension to 2026 anchors ROE visibility (10.27%) .
- Macro watch items: potential tariffs, market volatility, and wholesale water rates could pressure costs; management is emphasizing expense discipline .
- Dividend continuity (321st consecutive quarter; anticipated $1.24 annual in 2025) supports total return and income investor appeal .
- Trading implications: near term, EPS beat vs revenue miss likely nets out neutral-to-positive if the market focuses on normalized non-GAAP trajectory and GRC schedule adherence; medium term, rate case resolution and rate base growth drive the thesis.