Sign in

Kelley A. Cwiklinski

Executive Vice President and Chief Commercial Lending Officer at CITIZENS & NORTHERN
Executive

About Kelley A. Cwiklinski

Kelley A. Cwiklinski is 61 and serves as Executive Vice President and Chief Commercial Lending Officer at Citizens & Northern Bank, appointed in February 2023 after leading Commercial Lending since January 2021; she joined C&N via the Covenant Bank acquisition in July 2020 and previously served as EVP & Chief Lending Officer at Covenant Bank (2015–2020). She holds an Associate’s Degree in Business Administration from Mercer County Community College and has nearly four decades of commercial lending and credit leadership experience . Corporate performance under her tenure includes 2024 net income of $25.96 million (up from $24.15 million in 2023), ROAE of 9.76%, ROAA of 1.00%, and an annual incentive framework linked to PPNR-NCOs/Average Equity vs peers; CZNC’s five‑year TSR (from 12/31/2019) was 85.52 vs the peer index at 128.85 as of 2024 .

Past Roles

OrganizationRoleYearsStrategic Impact
Citizens & Northern BankEVP & Chief Commercial Lending OfficerFeb 2023–presentLeads commercial lending strategy and portfolio growth; pay-for-performance tied to bank profitability metrics
Citizens & Northern BankSVP & Director of Commercial LendingJan 2021–Feb 2023Directed commercial lending post‑acquisition integration, product/portfolio execution
Citizens & Northern BankRegional Commercial Lending ExecutiveJul 2020–Jan 2021Led regional commercial origination/relationships following Covenant Bank acquisition
Covenant BankEVP & Chief Lending OfficerJan 2015–Jun 2020Built and scaled commercial lending operations; risk/credit oversight
Prior banking rolesCommercial lending and credit positions1985–2014Progressive roles in lending and credit across banking institutions

External Roles

OrganizationRoleYearsNotes
None disclosedNo public company director or external governance roles disclosed in proxy .

Fixed Compensation

MetricFY 2023FY 2024
Base Salary ($)292,000 306,600
Discretionary Bonus (“holiday award”) ($)500 500
Non‑Equity Incentive Plan Compensation ($)46,782 82,146
Stock Awards Grant‑Date Fair Value ($)21,856 58,375
All Other Compensation ($)46,905 38,544
Total Compensation ($)408,043 486,165

2024 All Other Compensation breakdown:

ComponentFY 2024 ($)
Employer contributions to ESOP6,900
Employer 401(k) contributions16,500
SERP contribution0
Group term life & LTD premiums3,980
Dividends on restricted stock1,564
Perquisites and personal benefits9,600
Total38,544

Notes:

  • 2024 NEO base salaries rose 3–5%; Ms. Cwiklinski’s increase was ~5% YoY .
  • No stock options were awarded in 2022–2024 (equity delivered via RSAs/PRSAs) .

Performance Compensation

Annual incentive structure (2024):

MetricWeightTargetActualPayout (% of base)Vesting
Corporate Earnings Performance: (PPNR–NCOs)/Avg Equity vs peers45% 100%126.00% 14.2% Cash in year paid
KPI: Avg Deposits (ex brokered)10% $2.010B$1.996B 1.4% Cash
KPI: Net Interest Income (FTE)7.5% $82.0M$79.9M 1.3% Cash
KPI: Noninterest Income (ex Wealth)7.5% $17.6M$18.7M 2.8% Cash
KPI: Wealth Management Revenue10% $10.0M$10.5M 3.8% Cash
KPI: Efficiency Ratio10% 65.0%68.04% 1.0% Cash
Individual Performance10% 2.5% Cash
Total100%26.8% of base

Long‑term incentives (2024 grants):

Grant TypeGrant DateSharesLTI as % of 2023 BaseGrant‑Date FMV/ShareVesting
Time‑based RSAsJan 31, 20241,365 10.0% $21.385 1/3 on each anniversary over 3 years, contingent on satisfactory performance
Performance RSAs (PRSAs)Feb 20, 20241,520 10.0% $19.20 1/3 annually over 3 years; performance each year vs peers on (PPNR–NCOs)/Avg Equity (≥35th pctile) and (PPNR–NCOs)/Avg Assets (≥65th pctile)

Performance outcomes and mechanics:

  • 2024 PRSA tranche vested fully across 2022–2024 grant cycles; 2024 company results met thresholds (PPNR–NCOs/Avg Equity 12.01% vs peer median 10.94%; PPNR–NCOs/Avg Assets 1.22% vs peer 1.14%) .
  • KRIs gating KPIs were within acceptable ranges; thus KPI portions paid out .

Equity Ownership & Alignment

Ownership itemDetail
Total beneficial ownership29,711 shares; includes 4,600 restricted shares; <1% of outstanding
Shares outstanding (record date)15,467,390 (Feb 5, 2025)
Non‑vested shares (12/31/2024)4,018 shares; $74,735 market value
OptionsNone outstanding; no option awards 2022–2024
Ownership guidelinesEVPs must own ≥1× prior‑year base salary; currently, all NEOs meet requirements
Hedging/PledgingHedging prohibited; no pledging disclosures noted
ClawbackExecutive compensation subject to clawback upon restatement; aligned with Nasdaq standards

Upcoming vesting supply (based on schedules):

  • RSAs: 1/3 of 1,365 shares on 1/31/2025, 1/31/2026, 1/31/2027 (subject to performance in role) .
  • PRSAs: 1/3 of 1,520 shares on 2/20/2025, 2/20/2026, 2/20/2027 contingent on annual performance thresholds vs peer group .

Employment Terms

Contract elementProvision
Agreement effective dateFeb 1, 2023; extended through Jan 31, 2026; auto‑extends 12 months unless 90‑day notice before renewal
Compensation eligibilityAnnual cash incentive and stock‑based awards per Committee decisions; full participation in employee benefit plans
PerquisitesAutomobile allowance or use of Bank‑owned vehicle (no club membership for Ms. Cwiklinski)
Non‑compete / Non‑solicit12 months post‑termination; within 35 miles of any office
Good Reason / CauseCustomary definitions; termination rights if not cured within 30 days after notice
Severance multiples1.5× with change‑in‑control; 1.0× absent change‑in‑control; benefits continuation 18 months (CIC) and 1 year (non‑CIC)
Double‑trigger mechanicsLump sum payable upon termination without Cause or for Good Reason following a change in control (double trigger)

Quantitative severance scenarios (as of 12/31/2024):

ScenarioCash ($)Health & Welfare ($)Restricted Stock Acceleration ($)Life Insurance ($)
Termination without Cause/Good Reason – before CIC447,621 15,944
Termination without Cause/Good Reason – upon/after CIC671,432 23,916 74,735
Death723,186

Compensation Structure Analysis

  • Mix skewed toward variable pay: 2024 annual incentive paid 26.8% of base; LTI at 20% of prior base delivered 50% RSAs and 50% PRSAs with annual performance vetting—tight alignment to peer‑relative profitability (PPNR‑based) .
  • No stock options; equity shifted to RSAs/PRSAs in recent years—lower risk, stronger retention via multi‑year vesting; no repricing/modifications disclosed .
  • Performance metric change: company‑selected measure moved from Core ROAE to (PPNR–NCOs)/Average Equity in 2024—arguably a more risk‑adjusted revenue proxy; target corporate payout remains centered at peer median .
  • Clawback and anti‑hedging in place; no 280G excise tax gross‑ups—shareholder‑friendly posture .

Related Party Transactions

  • No related person transactions requiring disclosure for 2024; insider lending governed by Regulation O with market terms and normal risk .

Say‑On‑Pay & Shareholder Feedback

  • 2024 say‑on‑pay approval ~82%; Compensation Committee maintained program structure and philosophy following the vote .

Investment Implications

  • Alignment and retention: Multi‑year RSA/PRSA structures and ownership guidelines tether total pay to peer‑relative profitability; hedging prohibition and clawback reduce misalignment risk .
  • Near‑term selling supply: Scheduled vesting of RSAs/PRSAs in Q1–Q1 each year could add tradable float; 4,018 non‑vested shares as of 12/31/2024 indicates a modest pipeline vs float, but watch vest windows for incremental supply .
  • Pay-for-performance integrity: KPIs and PPNR‑relative scoring produced a 126% corporate payout in 2024 while efficiency ratio missed target; overall annual incentive remains balanced and risk‑gated by KRIs .
  • Change‑in‑control economics: Double‑trigger severance at 1.5× cash plus benefits and equity acceleration is standard for community banks; not excessive, but implies manageable retention risk in M&A scenarios .
  • Signal to monitor: Sustained improvement in PPNR‑NCOs vs peers will drive PRSA vesting and cash payouts; conversely, deterioration could reduce realized comp and retention value. Five‑year TSR underperformance vs peer index suggests upside depends on execution in deposit mix, NII stabilization, and fee growth .