Sign in

Diarmuid B. O’Connell

Director at DANADANA
Board

About Diarmuid B. O’Connell

Diarmuid B. O’Connell, 61, has served as an independent director of Dana Incorporated since 2018. He is Chair of the Technology & Sustainability Committee and a member of the Audit Committee, bringing deep electrification and corporate strategy experience from Tesla (2006–2017) and prior roles in government and industry .

Past Roles

OrganizationRoleTenureCommittees/Impact
Tesla, Inc.VP, Business & Corporate Development; executive team memberJul 2006–Sep 2017Led OEM partnerships and EV ecosystem strategy
Fair (vehicle subscription)Chief Strategy Officer; Global Head of Business Development & PartnershipsJan 2018–Apr 2019Growth strategy for digital auto subscriptions
U.S. State DepartmentChief of Staff for Political-Military AffairsNot disclosedPolicy/operational support to U.S. military
AccentureCorporate strategy consultantNot disclosedStrategy and operations advisory
Real Time LearningCo-founder (educational software)Not disclosedEarly-stage product/market development
McCann Erickson Worldwide; Young & RubicamSenior executiveNot disclosedMarketing leadership

External Roles

OrganizationRoleTenureCommittees/Impact
Albemarle CorporationDirectorCurrentEV materials exposure; industry expertise
VolvoCars ABDirectorCurrentOEM perspective; electrification
Clarios LLCDirectorCurrentBattery ecosystem; energy storage

Board Governance

AttributeDetail
IndependenceIndependent; Board annually affirms independence of all non-management directors including O’Connell
CommitteesAudit Committee member; Technology & Sustainability Committee Chair
AttendanceAll directors attended ≥75% of aggregate Board/committee meetings (Board: 18; Committees: 23 total). Tech & Sustainability met 4; Audit met 9; Compensation met 5; Nominating & Governance met 5 (committee counts contextual)
Years of ServiceDirector since 2018
Lead Independent DirectorKeith E. Wandell (chairs executive sessions of non-management directors)

Fixed Compensation (Non-Employee Director)

ComponentAmount ($)
Annual Board retainer (cash)130,000
Audit Committee member fee10,000
Technology & Sustainability Committee chair fee20,000
Cash fees earned (2024 actual)160,000 (sum above)

Performance Compensation (Director Equity and Company Metrics)

ItemDetail
Annual Director RSU grant (standard structure)$165,000 grant value; annual award equivalent to 12,359 RSUs granted Feb 14, 2024; vested in full on Feb 14, 2025; subject to accelerated vesting on death/disability/age 73/change-in-control
O’Connell 2024 Stock Awards (reported)$169,969 (includes dividend equivalents)
O’Connell outstanding stock awards at 12/31/202412,784 RSUs (including dividend equivalents)
Director stock ownership guideline5x annual cash retainer = $650,000; all directors met or are on track within 5 years

Performance metrics apply to executive compensation (contextual governance signal; directors do not have performance-based pay):

  • Annual Incentive Plan metrics (NEOs): Adjusted EBITDA (40%), Adjusted Free Cash Flow (40%), Net New Business (20% of financial component; financials = 80% of AIP), plus 20% individual goals .
  • LTIP metrics (NEOs): Pre-tax ROIC (40%), Adjusted Free Cash Flow (40%), Relative TSR vs S&P 1500 Autos & Components (20%) over 3 years .

Other Directorships & Interlocks

CompanySectorPotential Overlap/ConflictNotes
Albemarle CorporationSpecialty chemicals; EV materialsBattery materials influential to EV supply chain; monitor any Dana relationshipsIndependence affirmed; no material director relationships disclosed beyond board service
VolvoCars ABAutomotive OEMOEM perspectives; potential indirect customer overlapNo director-related party transactions disclosed; policy governs approvals
Clarios LLCEnergy storage (batteries)Battery supply ecosystem; aftermarket relevanceNo pledging/hedging permitted; independence affirmed

Expertise & Qualifications

  • Electrification and EV strategy leadership from Tesla executive team tenure .
  • Corporate strategy, partnerships, and government policy experience (State Department, Accenture) .
  • Technology and sustainability oversight as committee chair; relevant to cybersecurity and innovation governance .

Equity Ownership

MetricValue
Beneficial ownership (as of Feb 25, 2025)33,257 shares; less than 1% of class; none pledged
Outstanding stock awards (director RSUs)12,784 (includes dividend equivalents)
Shares outstanding (record date)145,724,477 (context for %; table denotes “*” <1%)

Insider transactions (Form 4 filings):

DateTransactionSecurityQuantity/ResultNotes
Feb 20, 2024RSU grant; vests in 1 yearRSUsAnnual grant equivalent to 12,359 RSUsGrant structure per director plan; vest Feb 14, 2025
Jan 29, 2025Code J (asset division)Common stockBeneficially owned 20,473 after transactionDivision of assets per filing
Sep 2, 2025Dividend equivalent rightsDERs (economic equivalent of shares)Notional creditsDERs credited with RSU awards

Election support (April 2025 Annual Meeting):

ItemVotes
Diarmuid B. O’Connell – For122,778,328
Diarmuid B. O’Connell – Withheld1,791,166

Governance Assessment

  • Board effectiveness: O’Connell chairs Technology & Sustainability and sits on Audit, aligning his EV/technology expertise with oversight of innovation, cybersecurity, and risk; Board met 18 times in 2024 and all directors met ≥75% attendance, supporting engagement .
  • Independence and conflicts: Board affirmatively determined O’Connell is independent; Dana’s Related-Party Transactions Policy requires Audit Committee approval for transactions >$120k; no material director relationships disclosed and Section 16 filings were timely in 2024 (no delinquencies) .
  • Compensation and alignment: 2024 director pay mix for O’Connell is balanced—$160,000 cash plus $169,969 equity; directors face 5x retainer stock ownership guidelines ($650,000) and no hedging/pledging is allowed, enhancing alignment and risk controls .
  • Shareholder signals: Strong re-election support (~98.6% For vs Withheld) and prior year say-on-pay support (90% in 2024) indicate investor confidence in governance/compensation frameworks .
  • RED FLAGS to monitor: External board roles in EV supply chain (Albemarle, Clarios) could create perceived conflicts if transactions emerge; Icahn agreement embeds board composition/committee participation rights—investors should monitor influence dynamics and potential decision constraints .