1I
1stdibs.com, Inc. (DIBS)·Q1 2025 Earnings Summary
Executive Summary
- Q1 2025 delivered modest top-line growth and margin stability: net revenue $22.55M (+2% YoY), gross margin 72.4% (flat YoY), and non-GAAP adjusted EBITDA margin -7.8% (better YoY) .
- Versus S&P Global consensus, revenue was a small beat ($22.35M est. vs $22.55M actual), while EPS was a slight miss (-$0.13 est. vs -$0.14 actual); beats/misses were not large enough to change the narrative materially* .
- Guidance for Q2 2025 implies softer conditions (GMV $85–$92M, revenue $21.2–$22.5M, adjusted EBITDA margin -14% to -10%), with management citing conversion moderation in April and cautious discretionary demand .
- Key stock catalysts: ongoing market-share gains despite contracting end markets, improving organic traffic and conversion, and expanding ML-driven pricing/shipping initiatives; near-term pressure stems from macro/tariff-related demand headwinds and lower take rates .
Values retrieved from S&P Global.*
What Went Well and What Went Wrong
What Went Well
- Market share gains for the fifth straight quarter; GMV up 3% YoY to $94.7M with double-digit growth in jewelry and fashion: “GMV and revenue exceeded the midpoint of guidance and adjusted EBITDA margins exceeded the high end” .
- Organic traffic returned to growth as site performance and SEO improvements took hold: “We returned to organic traffic growth in the first quarter… over 70% of our traffic is organic” .
- ML-based pricing fully launched across verticals; visibility of estimated pricing improved buyer conversion: “ML pricing models are currently live in all verticals… elevating 1stdibs estimate prominence led to higher conversion” .
What Went Wrong
- GAAP net loss widened to -$4.81M (vs -$3.30M YoY); GAAP EPS -$0.14 vs -$0.08 YoY, reflecting higher operating expenses and provision for transaction losses (4% of revenue) .
- Take rate declined ~30 bps YoY due to mix shift toward higher-value orders, pressuring transaction revenue yield .
- Conversion moderated sequentially and dropped in April, concentrated in consumer furniture; management warned of macro-driven volatility (tariffs, housing softness, negative wealth effect) .
Financial Results
Headline P&L and Margins (oldest → newest)
KPIs and Marketplace Metrics (oldest → newest)
Q1 2025 vs S&P Global Consensus
Values retrieved from S&P Global.*
Guidance Changes
Earnings Call Themes & Trends
Management Commentary
- “GMV and revenue exceeded the midpoint of guidance and adjusted EBITDA margins exceeded the high end… Our product-led growth strategy is delivering a better buyer and seller experience” — CEO David Rosenblatt .
- “We returned to organic traffic growth in the first quarter… improvements in SEO and direct traffic… over 70% of our traffic is organic” — CEO David Rosenblatt .
- “We forecast second quarter GMV of $85M to $92M… and adjusted EBITDA margin loss of 14% to 10%… reflects… softening of conversion in April… and moderating AOV growth” — CFO Tom Etergino .
- “Take rates were down approximately 30 bps year-over-year due primarily to a shift to higher value orders” — CFO Tom Etergino .
- “We are now focused on… surfacing [ML] pricing recommendations to buyers… and improving our accuracy to spur seller adoption” — CEO David Rosenblatt .
Q&A Highlights
- Conversion sustainability: April conversion drop isolated to consumer furniture; traffic stable; focus remains on long-term drivers (product, funnel optimization) .
- Seller churn normalization: Post subscription pricing changes, churn trends normalizing; listings prioritized over seller count; expected normalization in Q2 .
- Active buyers growth: Growth is a function of conversion; management expects continued vigilance given macro uncertainty .
- Market share measurement: Benchmarking GMV vs syndicated credit card data for online furniture/luxury; share gains continued .
- ML pricing adoption: >90% adoption below $9k; lower above $9k due to fewer data points; ML expanding to shipping pre-quotes and customer service agent initiatives .
Estimates Context
- Q1 2025 revenue slightly beat S&P Global consensus ($22.35M est. vs $22.55M actual); GAAP EPS slightly missed (-$0.13 est. vs -$0.14 actual)* .
- Q2 2025 consensus ahead of quarter was ~$22.10M revenue; company guided $21.2–$22.5M; EPS consensus -$0.17, consistent with guided margin pressure dynamics* .
- Estimates likely adjust modestly: revenue trajectory broadly intact; EPS revisions skew down near-term given lower gross margin range and higher headcount-related costs .
Values retrieved from S&P Global.*
Key Takeaways for Investors
- Slight revenue beat and minor EPS miss signal steady execution amid macro softness; topline growth supported by conversion and organic traffic improvements .
- Q2 guide implies caution (conversion moderation, lower-end gross margin, ~4% provision for transaction losses); near-term EPS risk persists .
- Structural positives: market-share gains, ML-driven pricing and shipping pre-quotes, and product velocity in funnel optimization should sustain medium-term growth .
- Mix-driven take-rate compression (~30 bps YoY) and higher-value order mix are watch items for revenue yield; AOV/median order value rising is supportive .
- Balance sheet remains strong ($101M cash/investments); ongoing buybacks (~$33.4M cumulative) provide capital return and potential support on weakness .
- Narrative moving the stock near-term: delivery vs Q2 guidance, April/May conversion trends in consumer furniture, ML adoption at higher price points, and organic traffic momentum .
- Medium-term thesis: if organic growth and conversion continue while expenses stay disciplined (flat headcount), operating leverage can emerge at mid-single-digit revenue growth as housing/luxury cycle normalizes .
Additional Data (Cross-References)
- Q1 2025 results: net revenue $22.545M, gross profit $16.322M, GAAP net loss -$4.806M, GAAP EPS -$0.14, adjusted EBITDA -$1.748M (margin -7.8%), cash+ST investments $101.0M .
- Q4 2024 comparison: revenue $22.770M, gross margin 72.3%, adjusted EBITDA margin -7.2% .
- Q3 2024 comparison: revenue $21.190M, gross margin 71.0%, adjusted EBITDA margin -14.1% .