ED
EMPIRE DISTRICT ELECTRIC CO (EDE)·Q4 2015 Earnings Summary
Executive Summary
- Q4 2015 EPS was $0.23 (basic and diluted) on net income of $9.9M, down 10.9% YoY from $0.26 on $11.1M as exceptionally mild weather (mildest fourth quarter in 30 years) reduced volumes; electric on‑system kWh fell 6.3% YoY and retail gas volumes fell 27.2% YoY .
- Electric segment gross margin rose $2.3M YoY on new Missouri rates effective July 26, 2015, but higher depreciation (+$1.8M), interest (+$1.0M) and lower gas margin (−$1.4M) weighed on consolidated results .
- 2016 weather‑normalized EPS guidance was set at $1.38–$1.54 on Feb 4, 2016, then was lowered by $0.10–$0.12 to $1.26–$1.44 to reflect merger‑related transaction costs tied to Algonquin/Liberty Utilities’ acquisition of Empire; approx. $15–$17M total transaction costs with ~50% payable in 2016 and ~$4.5M in Q1 2016 .
- Stock reaction catalyst: the announced all‑cash acquisition at $34.00 per share (21% premium to Feb 8 close) by Algonquin’s Liberty Utilities on Feb 9, 2016 likely dominated trading and expectations, overshadowing near‑term fundamentals .
What Went Well and What Went Wrong
-
What Went Well
- Electric margin +$2.3M YoY on the back of Missouri retail rate increases implemented July 26, 2015; improved customer counts also supported revenue .
- Lower maintenance and repair expense in the quarter (−$1.9M) provided a partial offset to other cost headwinds .
- Management highlighted consistent execution despite weather headwinds; “We continued to consistently execute our operating and financial plans during the fourth quarter of 2015…” — Brad Beecher, President & CEO .
-
What Went Wrong
- Exceptionally mild weather drove down volumes: total on‑system electric sales −6.3% YoY; retail gas volumes −27.2% YoY; gas segment gross margin −$1.4M YoY .
- Cost headwinds: depreciation and amortization +$1.8M, interest expense +$1.0M, operating expense +$1.5M, and lower AFUDC (−$0.6M impact to earnings) pressured profitability .
- Ongoing regulatory lag effects from Asbury AQCS costs (in service Dec 15, 2014) through July 26, 2015 rate effective date, and expectation of similar lag around Riverton combined cycle recovery timing .
Financial Results
Note: The press releases present margins and profitability, not total revenues for Q4 2015; gross margin is shown below where available .
- Consolidated P&L and Margin Snapshot
- Segment/Sales KPIs
Context and drivers:
- YoY in Q4: Electric margin +$2.3M (rates) but weather/volumetric factors −$8.0M; Gas margin −$1.4M on −27.3% sales decline; maintenance −$1.9M, but D&A +$1.8M, interest +$1.0M, AFUDC change −$0.6M to earnings .
- Full‑year 2015: net income $56.6M vs $67.1M in 2014; EPS $1.29 diluted; under‑recovery prior to new rates, higher O&M, D&A, taxes, interest; weather also weighed; electric on‑system sales −1.8% YoY .
Guidance Changes
Earnings Call Themes & Trends
Note: A Q4 2015 earnings call was scheduled for Feb 5, 2016; however, a full transcript was not available via the tools. Themes below reflect disclosures across Q2–Q4 press releases.
Management Commentary
- Strategic message: Execution amid adverse weather with ongoing rate base growth. “We continued to consistently execute our operating and financial plans during the fourth quarter of 2015 even though confronted by exceptionally mild weather…” — Brad Beecher, President & CEO .
- Earnings drivers (Q4): Rate increases added ~$4.4M to electric revenues (net of Missouri base fuel recovery), but weather and volumetric factors reduced revenues by ~$8.0M; gas margin down ~$1.4M as sales fell 27.3% .
- Full year context: Higher O&M (+$2.9M), maintenance (+$1.7M), D&A (+$7.3M), taxes (+$2.1M), interest (+$3.2M), and lower AFUDC (−$2.2M) drove a ~$10.5M decline in net income YoY, largely reflecting under‑recovery timing .
- 2016 outlook: Weather‑normalized EPS initially $1.38–$1.54 assumes 30‑year average weather, <1% energy growth, Oct 1, 2016 Missouri rate effective date at filed $33.4M, and higher operating costs from Riverton; later reduced to $1.26–$1.44 due to merger transaction costs .
Q&A Highlights
- A Q4 2015 earnings call occurred Feb 5, 2016, but a full transcript was not available via the tools; therefore, Q&A themes and any guidance clarifications from the live call could not be verified from primary sources .
Estimates Context
- Wall Street consensus (S&P Global) for Q4 2015 EPS and revenue was unavailable via the GetEstimates tool for this ticker, so we cannot assess beats/misses versus S&P consensus at this time. Values via S&P Global were unavailable due to missing mapping in our tool; therefore no estimate comparisons are shown.
- Actuals: Q4 2015 EPS $0.23 (basic and diluted) vs Q4 2014 $0.26; net income $9.9M vs $11.1M; gross margin $96.1M vs $94.7M; electric margin $87.8M vs $85.5M .
Key Takeaways for Investors
- Weather overshadowed fundamentals in Q4; underlying electric margin benefited from Missouri rates, but cost inflation (D&A, interest, taxes) and gas weakness compressed earnings power near term .
- Regulatory lag remains a core swing factor: Asbury AQCS recovery began mid‑2015; Riverton combined cycle recovery expected to be partial in 2016, implying continued lag until rate alignment .
- 2016 guidance reset lower due to acquisition transaction costs (−$0.10–$0.12), which is a one‑time overhang rather than a deterioration in underlying operations; near‑term EPS trajectory will include ~$4.5M of Q1 2016 transaction expense .
- Short‑term trading is likely dominated by merger arbitrage to the $34.00 cash takeout price, reducing sensitivity to quarterly fundamentals in the interim .
- Volume volatility from weather persists; downside risk to gas margin in mild periods; upside in normalized conditions — watch winter/summer degree‑day patterns vs 30‑year norms .
- SPP Integrated Market and fuel recovery revenue shifts are largely neutral to margin (offset in fuel expense), so focus on base rate progress and cost trajectory rather than top‑line swings tied to SPP .
- Dividend continuity maintained ($0.26 per quarter at the time); post‑closing capital structure and regulatory commitments should be monitored under Liberty Utilities’ ownership .