Q4 2024 Earnings Summary
- Enbridge is successfully integrating its U.S. gas utilities acquisitions, leading to new growth opportunities, including significant projects in power generation and data centers. They are seeing strong customer growth in states like North Carolina, Utah, and Ohio, and expect to invest about $3 billion annually across their utility franchise, earning strong returns.
- Enbridge's renewable power segment is performing well, with competitive advantages leading to opportunities in renewable projects. They have fully contracted power with high-quality blue-chip customers like Amazon, AT&T, and Toyota, and these projects are accretive to cash flow and earnings per share.
- Enbridge is progressing on key natural gas projects, such as the Aspen Point T-North expansion, with support from the BC government, and is confident in advancing the Rio Bravo pipeline despite regulatory changes. This indicates strong future growth potential in their gas transmission business.
- Potential impact of U.S.-Canada tariffs could affect Enbridge's cross-border energy flows, leading to possible volume reductions or increased costs, with uncertainty about who will bear the economic burden despite management's confidence that the impact would be negligible.
- Higher U.S. interest rates than expected may impact Enbridge's financials more than anticipated, potentially preventing them from reaching the top end of their guidance range for 2025.
- Challenges in the renewables sector, such as supply chain issues and underperformance of public renewable companies, might pose risks to Enbridge's renewable power projects despite management's assertion of their low-risk model.
| Metric | YoY Change | Reason |
|---|---|---|
Total Revenue | ↑ 44% (from CAD 11,298 million in Q4 2023 to CAD 16,217 million in Q4 2024) | Higher commodity sales and amplified operating activity drove the revenue increase. The current period benefited from improved performance of commodity sales as seen in prior Q3 and Q4 improvements, compounded by additional contributions from newly acquired assets. |
Operating Income (EBIT) | ↑ 33% (from CAD 1,845 million in Q4 2023 to CAD 2,447 million in Q4 2024) | Enhanced operational efficiency and higher toll revenues contributed to the EBIT increase. The improvements reflect a continuation of previous period gains and operational optimization including better integration of new acquisitions, which offset earlier lower revenue contributions. |
Net Income | ↓ 68% (from CAD 1,568 million in Q4 2023 to CAD 493 million in Q4 2024) | Despite stronger topline and operating income, net income fell sharply. Factors such as higher financing costs, increased depreciation/amortization expenses, and the impact of non-operational adjustments (e.g., derivative losses or absence of previous tax benefits) significantly eroded earnings. |
EPS – Basic and Diluted | ↓ 73% (from CAD 0.82 in Q4 2023 to CAD 0.22 in Q4 2024) | The EPS decline mirrors the net income drop, reflecting lower earnings per share. The decrease is a consequence of the same factors affecting net income, including increased expenses and adverse non-cash adjustments, which were less favorable in the current period compared to its previous period. |
Cost of Goods Sold (COGS) | ↑ 55% (from CAD 5,388 million in Q4 2023 to CAD 8,362 million in Q4 2024) | A significant rise in COGS is primarily due to increased commodity costs and higher gas distribution costs. This increase is consistent with the scale-up in operations as revenue grew, and it reflects a higher cost base compared to the previous period. |
| Topic | Previous Mentions | Current Period | Trend |
|---|---|---|---|
U.S. Gas Utility Acquisitions Integration | Q1 and Q2 discussed detailed acquisition closures, integration progress, and customer base expansion (e.g., East Ohio Gas, Ohio, Utah, North Carolina) | Q4 emphasized that integration is “going really well” with benefits from customer solutions sharing and regional demographic growth | Consistently robust integration, with an increasing focus on cross-regional synergies. |
Funding Uncertainty | Q1 noted about 10–15% of financing still to be secured, while Q2 confirmed funding was fully complete and the ATM program was canceled | Q4 did not explicitly mention funding uncertainty but underlined capital discipline and the ability to self‑fund growth projects | A clear reduction in funding uncertainty, indicating improved clarity and confidence. |
Data Center and Digital Infrastructure Expansion | Q1 highlighted rising natural gas demand from data centers and the importance of integrated full‐path energy solutions; Q2 emphasized opportunities in Ontario, AI involvement, and early-phase projects | Q4 maintained focus on powering data centers through multi-megawatt projects, citing regional customer growth though AI was implicit | Steady and enhanced focus on digital infrastructure with continued emphasis on scalability and evolving AI opportunities. |
Natural Gas Pipeline Expansion and Favorable Rate Cases | Q1 and Q2 outlined multiple pipeline projects (e.g., Tennessee Ridgeline, Whistler JV, Texas Eastern settlements) and early favorable regulatory outcomes | Q4 reported further expansion projects (e.g., Blackcomb pipeline, Aspen Point T‑North) with successful rate case settlements and regulatory approvals | Ongoing progress with pipeline expansions and consistently favorable regulatory settlements. |
Renewable Power Segment Performance and Supply Chain Challenges | Q1 mentioned strong performance on offshore wind and renewable projects; Q2 provided limited details on renewables and none on supply chain challenges | Q4 reported record renewable power results and highlighted strong supply chain capabilities as a competitive advantage | Improved segment performance with strengthened supply chain resilience and a record-setting output. |
Regulatory, Tariff, and Political Risks | Q1 focused on regulatory challenges (Ohio, Ontario), and climate policy alignment; Q2 discussed rate cases (Ohio, Texas Eastern), political risk management, and forest fire risks | Q4 detailed negotiated settlements (Aspen Point T‑North, Texas Eastern) and downplayed tariff risks, while still acknowledging broader political factors | A consistent area of focus with decreasing uncertainty thanks to successful regulatory resolutions. |
Capital Management and High Capital Expenditure Pressures | Q1 and Q2 emphasized a $6–7 billion annual CapEx guidance, asset sales, and maintaining a tight leverage range (4.5x–5x) along with capital recycling initiatives | Q4 reiterated a strong commitment to capital discipline, highlighted a $26 billion backlog, and stressed the ability to self‑fund $8–9 billion in growth projects | Consistent focus on disciplined capital management with an increasing narrative around robust project backlogs and recycling. |
Export Terminal Operations and Growth in Permian Volumes | Q1 detailed strategic dock acquisitions and storage expansion at Ingleside; Q2 discussed record export volumes and capacity growth initiatives (e.g., Gray Oak open season) | Q4 further expanded the Ingleside facility with additional docks and highlighted pipeline expansions to support increasing export volumes | A continually upward trend in terminal expansion and volume growth, reinforcing a strong market position in the Permian. |
Operational Risks from Natural Disasters and Competitive Pressure (TMX pipeline) | Q1 provided minimal mention; Q2 noted the risk of forest fires and competitive pressure from the TMX pipeline while showing resilience through record volumes | Q4 did not emphasize these risks explicitly but mentioned strong mainline throughput despite TMX service, indirectly implying effective management | A diminishing emphasis on these risks, suggesting improved risk management and competitive positioning. |
-
Tariff Impact on Enbridge
Q: How would tariffs affect Enbridge's operations and capital allocation?
A: CEO Gregory Ebel indicated that unless tariffs are very high and prolonged, Enbridge does not anticipate significant changes to its capital allocation strategy. The company expects the impact on volumes to be negligible due to sticky demand and integrated customer models. Any tariff costs would likely be shared among stakeholders. Enbridge's diversified assets, including gas and liquids infrastructure and export facilities, position it well to mitigate potential tariff effects. ** ** -
Investment in Long-Haul Pipelines
Q: Will Enbridge invest in pipelines like Northern Gateway if Canada supports it?
A: Gregory Ebel stated that Enbridge would consider investing in projects like Northern Gateway only if significant legislative and regulatory changes occur. This includes federal endorsement of such projects as being in the national interest, meaningful permitting reforms, and strong indigenous participation with financial backing. Without coordinated action from federal and provincial governments, Enbridge is unlikely to greenlight such investments. -
Growth in Western Canada
Q: What are the growth prospects in the WCSB and Alberta?
A: Enbridge sees strong opportunities in production growth within the Western Canada Sedimentary Basin (WCSB) and Alberta. The company is focusing on quick-hit, permit-light, low multiple brownfield projects on the liquids front to serve markets on both sides of the border. This growth contributes to Enbridge's confidence in continuing its expansion through the decade. -
Renewable Energy Performance
Q: How is Enbridge's renewable energy business performing amid industry challenges?
A: Enbridge reported record results in its renewables segment, emphasizing its focus on low-risk, fully contracted projects with high-quality counterparties like Amazon, AT&T, and Toyota. By leveraging supply chain capabilities and avoiding speculative risks, the company achieves strong returns that are accretive to cash flow and earnings per share. Enbridge sees ongoing opportunities in renewables, supported by its competitive advantages. -
Data Center Power Demand
Q: What is Enbridge's exposure to data center power demand growth?
A: Enbridge is actively engaging with data center operators and executing projects to meet their significant power needs. The company is involved in approximately 5 gigawatts of power generation projects across jurisdictions like North Carolina, Utah, Ontario, and Ohio. These projects drive natural gas demand and present substantial growth opportunities for Enbridge. ** ** -
Integration of U.S. Gas Utilities
Q: How is the integration of U.S. gas utilities progressing, and are there growth opportunities?
A: The integration is going well, with Enbridge seeing anticipated growth. The company experiences strong customer additions, modernization opportunities, and tailwinds from electrification and power generation needs. Enbridge supports data center growth and natural gas power generation across its utilities, contributing to significant demand and investment opportunities. -
2025 Guidance and Tailwinds
Q: What could drive Enbridge toward the top end of its 2025 guidance?
A: CFO highlighted factors such as the exchange rate remaining above $1.35, colder weather boosting demand, and potential overperformance in EBITDA. However, higher U.S. interest rates could offset these tailwinds. Overall, Enbridge is comfortable with its guidance range, with possible benefits from favorable exchange rates and weather conditions. -
Strategic Focus Amid Uncertainty
Q: Is Enbridge bolstering parts of the energy value chain due to political uncertainty?
A: Enbridge has proactively strengthened its gas portfolio, including distribution and transmission assets, storage facilities, and new deals out of the Permian Basin. The company believes it is well-positioned with its diversified portfolio to navigate political uncertainties and capitalize on growth opportunities in both gas and liquids sectors. -
Rio Bravo Pipeline Status
Q: What is the status of the Rio Bravo pipeline amid regulatory changes?
A: Cynthia Hansen explained that the Rio Bravo pipeline, now managed through the Whistler joint venture, is progressing through the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's (FERC) supplemental environmental impact statement process. Enbridge expects to continue working with FERC to advance the project, expressing confidence that it will proceed despite regulatory developments. -
Gas Utilities ROEs
Q: How did gas utilities' realized ROEs compare to allowed ROEs in 2024?
A: Enbridge's U.S. gas utilities met their expected and allowed ROEs, with steady performance and no exposure to weather-related variances. In Ontario, warmer weather impacted realized ROEs, leading to returns below allowed levels, but exact figures will be available later in the year. On a weather-normalized basis, returns are around 10%. -
Aspen Project Permitting
Q: What is the update on permits for the Aspen project on T-North?
A: Cynthia Hansen reported that the British Columbia government is supporting the Aspen Point project, with major approvals received from the Canada Energy Regulator (CER). Enbridge continues to work through remaining permits and views the project positively, anticipating growth opportunities in the region. -
Tariff Cost Sharing
Q: Who would bear the cost if tariffs were enacted?
A: Management believes the impact of tariffs on volumes would be negligible due to sticky demand and integrated customer models. Any tariff costs would likely be shared among producers, refiners, and consumers, varying by region and existing refining options. Enbridge continues to see full nominations on its system, indicating strong demand despite tariff discussions.
Research analysts covering ENBRIDGE.