Sign in

You're signed outSign in or to get full access.

EM

EnLink Midstream, LLC (ENLC)·Q2 2024 Earnings Summary

Executive Summary

  • Q2 2024 adjusted EBITDA was $306.0M, with net income of $67.0M, net cash from operations of $162.6M, and free cash flow after distributions of $53.3M; leverage ended at 3.3x and the quarter was seasonally weaker in Louisiana but broadly “in line with expectations.”
  • Management highlighted operational execution: Tiger II (Permian) entered service in May, boosting capacity and Permian run-rate for 2H; Jefferson Island Storage Hub expansion reached FID ($85M, +8 Bcf to ~10 Bcf working gas, service 2028).
  • Capital allocation remained shareholder-friendly: ~$50M of unit repurchases in Q2; authorization was raised post-quarter to $250M (from $200M) amid strong FCF and lower near-term CCS spend; ~10% of units repurchased since late 2021.
  • Guidance cadence: Company reiterated tracking close to the midpoint of its FY 2024 adjusted EBITDA range ($1.31B–$1.41B), with 2H weighted to Q4 on normal Louisiana NGL seasonality, storage-related activity, Tiger II full ramp, and Matterhorn JV contribution.
  • Potential stock catalysts: acceleration in Permian volumes from Tiger II, Louisiana gas/storage projects, expanded buyback authorization, and the forthcoming in-service of Matterhorn (September) aiding 4Q contribution.

What Went Well and What Went Wrong

What Went Well

  • Tiger II came online in May, supporting Permian growth and a higher 2H run-rate; Q2 Permian segment profit was $93.1M with volumes up (gathering +7% q/q; +17% y/y; processing +6% q/q; +14% y/y). “This plant relocation strategy represents an efficient capital allocation…”
  • Louisiana strategy advancing: reached FID on Jefferson Island Storage Hub brownfield expansion (+8 Bcf; ~$85M; low-to-mid single-digit EBITDA multiples; service by 2028), and continued Phase 2 debottlenecking (“Henry to River” 210 MMcf/d).
  • Balance sheet and capital returns: leverage at 3.3x; maintained $0.1325/unit distribution; ~$50M buybacks in Q2; authorization expanded to $250M post-quarter; ~$200M Series B preferreds purchased after quarter.

What Went Wrong

  • Seasonality and normalization in Louisiana led to lower sequential segment profit ex-derivatives (−39% q/q; −9% y/y), following outsized Q1 weather-driven activity.
  • North Texas margins showed a full-quarter impact from the onetime contract reset; Q2 segment profit $52.4M and −11% q/q ex-derivatives, −28% y/y ex-derivatives.
  • CCS progress slower than anticipated; ENLC and ExxonMobil are reassessing Pecan Island and pursuing financial agreement discussions for value recognition; timing depends on emitters’ pace.

Financial Results

MetricQ2 2023Q1 2024Q2 2024
Revenues ($USD Millions)$1,530.1 $1,647.9 $1,551.1
Net Income ($USD Millions)$89.9 $50.0 $67.0
Diluted EPS ($/unit)$0.12 $0.03 $0.07
Adjusted EBITDA ($USD Millions)$333.6 $337.7 $306.0
Net Cash from Operations ($USD Millions)$315.7 $293.3 $162.6
Free Cash Flow After Distributions ($USD Millions)$95.7 $74.0 $53.3
Net Income Margin % (Net Income/Revenue)5.9% 3.0% 4.3%
Adjusted EBITDA Margin % (Adj. EBITDA/Revenue)21.8% 20.5% 19.7%
Segment Profit ($USD Millions)Q2 2023Q1 2024Q2 2024
Permian— (grew ~10% y/y, +10% q/q ex items) $89.0 $93.1
Louisiana— (−9% y/y, −39% q/q ex derivatives) $110.4 $84.3
Oklahoma— (−5% y/y, +14% q/q ex items) $85.7 $103.5
North Texas— (−28% y/y, −11% q/q ex derivatives) $59.8 $52.4
Operating KPIsQ2 2023Q1 2024Q2 2024
Permian Gathering & Transportation (MMBtu/d)1,732,200 1,899,300 2,033,300
Permian Processing (MMBtu/d)1,617,400 1,745,300 1,850,400
Permian Crude Handling (Bbls/d)155,400 164,700 191,100
Louisiana Gathering & Transportation (MMBtu/d)2,345,600 2,753,900 2,819,700
NGL Fractionation (Bbls/d)179,000 183,700 175,300
Oklahoma Gathering & Transportation (MMBtu/d)1,253,800 1,144,400 1,219,000
Oklahoma Processing (MMBtu/d)1,204,600 1,090,900 1,173,200
North Texas Gathering & Transportation (MMBtu/d)1,593,600 1,449,900 1,473,100
North Texas Processing (MMBtu/d)740,000 668,800 677,500

Note: Segment profit Q2 2023 absolute values not disclosed in press releases; y/y and q/q directional changes per management commentary.

Guidance Changes

MetricPeriodPrevious GuidanceCurrent GuidanceChange
Adjusted EBITDAFY 2024$1.31B–$1.41B (set in Feb/maintained in Q1) Tracking near midpoint; no quarterly guidance; 2H weighted to Q4 Maintained
Common Unit Repurchase AuthorizationFY 2024$200M (Jan) $250M (post-Q2) Raised
Distribution per UnitQ2 2024$0.1325 (Q1) $0.1325 declared; paid Aug 14 Maintained
CCS Capital PlaceholderFY 2024~$50M placeholder in plan “Less likely” to spend all $50M; slower project timing Likely Lower
Louisiana Storage (JISH)Stage 1N/AFID: +8 Bcf to ~10 Bcf working gas; ~$85M; service 2028; low-to-mid single-digit EBITDA multiples New project
Matterhorn JV timing2024Target late AugIn service September; 4Q financial contribution expected Slight delay (weather)

Earnings Call Themes & Trends

TopicQ4 2023 (Q-2)Q1 2024 (Q-1)Q2 2024 (Current)Trend
AI/data center power demandMacro tailwinds cited; positioning in demand centers “Staggering” power demand forecasts; gas likely key baseload contributor Encouraged by potential for new gas power generation/data centers, esp. North Texas Building pipeline of opportunities
CCS strategyExpanded Exxon scope; reassessing Pecan Island; Bridgeport CO2 project online CCS slower; pursuing definitive terms; potential uplift if 2024 CCS spend reduced Unable to find alternative CO2 transport projects with Exxon; pursuing financial agreement; timing uncertain Slower execution; monetization path evolving
Louisiana gas & storage3-phase strategy outlined; marketing +9 Bcf storage expansion Executed “Henry to River” debottlenecking (210 MMcf/d); storage marketing underway JISH Stage 1 FID (+8 Bcf); volumes up; normal NGL seasonality impacted Q2 Securing contracts; moving to FID
Permian capacityTiger II expected Q2; continued relocation strategy Tiger II starting; next plant timing flexible via relocations Tiger II online; likely Midland Basin next relocation; decision progressing Capacity stepping up; more relocations
Commodity exposure/hedging~90% fee-based; hedged 2024 gas/Waha; programmatic liquids hedging Reiterated hedge coverage; +/− $5 WTI ⇒ ~±$6M EBITDA ~90% fee-based; well-hedged; layering 2025 hedges; North Texas rate reset visible Stable margins with hedges

Management Commentary

  • “For the quarter, we generated $306 million of adjusted EBITDA… These results were in line with our expectations and drove solid free cash flow after distributions of approximately $53 million.” — CEO Jesse Arenivas
  • “We successfully brought online our third relocated processing plant in the Permian, Tiger II… [relocation] represents an efficient capital allocation with significant cost savings and shorter period-to-end service.” — CEO Jesse Arenivas
  • “We will expand our JISH working gas storage capacity to approximately 10 Bcf from 2 Bcf today… The project will cost approximately $85 million, and we expect to begin injecting gas in 2028.” — CCO Dilanka Seimon
  • “Our segments drove $306 million in adjusted EBITDA… we anticipate our second half 2024 results will be weighted towards the fourth quarter.” — CFO Ben Lamb
  • “We took a significant step towards simplifying our balance sheet through the purchase of nearly $200 million of our Series B preferreds… [buybacks] over 10% of total units outstanding.” — CFO Ben Lamb

Q&A Highlights

  • Second-half ramp drivers: Tiger II full utilization, Louisiana NGL seasonality, storage-related activity, and initial Matterhorn JV contribution in 4Q; normal pattern has Q4 as strongest quarter.
  • Permian NGL transport contracts: ENLC markets ~220 kb/d and controls ~150 kb/d; pipeline capacity expirations over 3–4 years likely allow lower recontracting T&F rates as capacity increases.
  • Louisiana project pipeline: Advancing Phase 1 renewals for 2025, continuing debottlenecking projects, and evaluating next storage expansion (JISH vs Napoleonville) to optimize economics.
  • Next processing plant: Likely Midland Basin relocation; decision progressing with customers; 2025 capital likely shift away from CCS toward Louisiana, roughly offset overall.
  • CCS timing: Market maturing slowly; ENLC well positioned with pipes and proximity to sequestration; timing uncertain and paced by emitters’ decisions.
  • Commodity/contract dynamics: ~90% fee-based; hedged Waha basis; North Texas margin decline reflects full-quarter onetime contract reset, expected to stabilize.

Estimates Context

  • Wall Street consensus from S&P Global was unavailable for ENLC Q2 2024 in our system, so we cannot provide a beat/miss vs Street for EPS/revenue/EBITDA. Investors should note seasonality and management’s 2H/Q4 weighting in evaluating intra-year cadence.
    Note: Consensus estimates via S&P Global were unavailable for ENLC at this time.

Key Takeaways for Investors

  • Q2 2024 was “in line” operationally, with adjusted EBITDA of $306.0M and FCFAD of $53.3M, despite Louisiana seasonality; leverage at 3.3x supports continued capital returns.
  • Tiger II online in May lifts Permian capacity and volumes into 2H; management is progressing a likely Midland Basin relocation for the next plant, enabling capital-efficient growth.
  • Louisiana remains a structural growth lever: Phase 1 renewals largely captured, Phase 2 debottlenecking progressing, and JISH storage FID adds +8 Bcf working gas with attractive returns.
  • Capital allocation is supportive: ~$50M Q2 buybacks, authorization increased to $250M post-quarter, and reduction of Series B preferreds simplifying capital structure.
  • Expect a stronger Q4: seasonality in NGLs, planned storage activity, and Matterhorn JV contribution; monitor execution and any incremental projects or recontracting updates.
  • CCS provides optionality but is slower; ENLC is pursuing a financial agreement around Pecan Island value and continuing discussions across Gulf Coast; near-term cash use favors core projects/buybacks.
  • Risk watch: onetime resets in North Texas/Oklahoma now reflected; commodity sensitivity limited by fee-based model and hedging, but volume cadence remains tied to producer activity and LNG/industrial demand.