Sign in

Edward Rockwell

Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary at EPAM SystemsEPAM Systems
Executive

About Edward Rockwell

Edward Rockwell, 57, is Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary at EPAM, overseeing global legal activities and advising senior leadership and the Board; he joined in October 2018 after senior legal roles at Red Hat, DDN Storage, and Hewlett‑Packard. He holds a BA in Foreign Affairs (University of Virginia) and a JD (University of Richmond School of Law), and serves on the board of the Greater Philadelphia Chapter of the Association of Corporate Counsel . During his tenure, EPAM’s revenues grew from $1.84B in FY2018 to $4.73B in FY2024 (CAGR ~13%), and EBITDA rose from $283M to $693M, underscoring sustained scale and profitability improvement over time (see Performance table; values from S&P Global)*.

Past Roles

OrganizationRoleYearsStrategic Impact
Red HatVice President & Assistant General Counsel2014–2018Led a global legal team supporting all sales/operations during significant growth .
DDN StorageGeneral Counsel & VP, Legal and HR2012–2014Led legal and HR; enterprise storage sector expertise .
Hewlett‑Packard (HP)VP & Associate General Counsel; GC for HP Services, HP Americas, HP SoftwareVarious (prior to 2012)Ran major business-unit legal functions; 5 years in Milan leading EMEA/global outsourcing services legal teams .

External Roles

OrganizationRoleYears
Association of Corporate Counsel – Greater Philadelphia ChapterBoard of DirectorsCurrent as disclosed

Fixed Compensation

Item2024Notes
Base salaryNot disclosedRockwell is an executive officer but not a Named Executive Officer (NEO); individual pay elements are not in the Summary Compensation Table .
Target bonus %Not disclosedCompany sets executive cash incentive targets annually; disclosure provided for NEOs only .
Actual annual bonusNot disclosedCorporate funding for 2024 executive pool was 72% (applies to NEO framework; see performance section) .
PerquisitesNo excessive perquisites policyCompany states no excessive perquisites for NEOs; policy-level disclosure .

Performance Compensation

Annual Cash Incentive Framework (company-level mechanics applicable to executive officers)

MetricWeighting2024 Target2024 ActualPayout/FundingVesting/Timing
Revenue growth (YoY)50% (equal focus with profitability)6.6%0.8%Overall corporate funding factor 72%; Committee noted revenue metric earned 0% and profitability metric 144% for 2024 (combination produced 72% corporate funding) .Paid after fiscal year-end .
Adjusted income from operations (% of revenue)50% (equal focus with revenue)15%16.5%See above (144% on profitability portion referenced by Committee letter) .Paid after fiscal year-end .
  • 2024 company performance (for context): Revenue +0.8% to $4.728B; income from operations +8.6%; GAAP diluted EPS +11.0% .
  • NEO cash incentive targets and actual payouts are disclosed; Rockwell’s individual payout is not disclosed as he is not an NEO .

Long-Term Equity Incentives (program design)

Instrument2024 Design2025 DesignVesting/PerformanceNotes
PSUs (Key Executive Performance Stock Program)Introduced in 2024; material portion of LTI mix50% of equity mix3‑year performance period; metrics include adjusted EPS, adjusted revenue, and relative TSR; earned after full 3‑year period .Strengthens pay‑for‑performance linkage .
Time‑based RSUsSignificant component50% of equity mix4‑year vesting (time‑based) .
Stock optionsIncluded in 2024 mixDiscontinued beginning 2025Typical vesting schedule historically; no new grants from 2025 .

Equity Ownership & Alignment

ItemDetail
Total beneficial ownership18,156 shares as of March 14, 2025 .
Ownership as % of outstanding~0.03% (18,156 / 57,068,646 shares outstanding as of Mar 14, 2025) .
Vested vs unvestedNot disclosed for Rockwell. Beneficial ownership table methodology includes RSUs/Options exercisable within 60 days for each person .
Pledging/HedgingProhibited for employees and directors under insider trading policy .
Stock ownership guidelinesNon‑CEO executive officers must hold shares equal to 2x annual salary; hold 50% of net shares until compliant (effective 2023) .
Compliance statusCompany discloses compliance for CEO and NEOs; no individual statement for Rockwell (not an NEO) .

Recent Insider Transactions (Forms 5; ESPP purchases)

DateFormTransactionSharesPriceNote
10/31/2024Form 5Acquisition via ESPP47$160.35Voluntary report; period 5/1/2024–10/31/2024 .
04/30/2024Form 5Acquisition via ESPP41$184.15Voluntary report; period 11/1/2023–4/30/2024 .
10/31/2023Form 5Acquisition via ESPP41$184.93Voluntary report; period 5/1/2023–10/31/2023 .
04/30/2023Form 5Acquisition via ESPP31$240.07Voluntary report; period 11/1/2022–4/30/2023 .
10/31/2022Form 5Acquisition via ESPP31$245.23Voluntary report; period 5/1/2022–10/31/2022 .

Observation: Recent filings show small periodic ESPP purchases; no sales are reflected in these specific Form 5 disclosures .

Employment Terms

TopicKey Terms
Start date / tenureJoined EPAM October 2018; serving as SVP, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary .
Employment agreementsEPAM typically does not enter formal employment/change‑in‑control agreements for executives (offer letters used); exception disclosed for a Swiss NEO, not applicable to Rockwell .
Severance plan (adopted June 23, 2025)Executive Severance Plan covers executive officers selected by the Committee; non‑CIC termination (without Cause/for Good Reason): lump sum = 1x base salary + target bonus; 12 months COBRA; unpaid prior‑year bonus if earned; 12‑month acceleration of time‑based RSUs vesting .
Change‑in‑control (CIC) economicsQualifying CIC termination (3 months before to 12 months after CIC): lump sum = 1.5x base salary + target bonus (2x for CEO); 18 months COBRA (24 months for CEO); unpaid prior‑year bonus if earned; 100% acceleration of all equity (PSUs at greater of target or actual unless award agreement states otherwise) .
Equity treatment – generalDouble‑trigger acceleration if awards are not assumed and the executive experiences qualifying termination after a change in control; retirement, death/disability, and cause are addressed with specific (forfeiture/vesting) rules; post‑retirement PSU earning per award terms .
ClawbackDodd‑Frank/NYSE‑compliant compensation recoupment policy effective 2023; applies to incentive‑based compensation upon financial restatements regardless of misconduct .
Hedging/pledgingProhibited for employees and directors .
Tax gross‑upsCompany policy states no excise tax gross‑ups; severance plan uses best‑net approach (full pay or cut‑back to avoid 4999 excise tax) .
Non‑compete/Non‑solicitSeverance benefits conditioned on execution of release and continued compliance with restrictive covenants; violation can cease/require repayment of benefits .
Plan administrationCompensation Committee administers; ERISA “top hat” unfunded welfare plan; plan info lists General Counsel as agent for service .

Company Performance (context for pay-for-performance)

MetricFY 2018FY 2019FY 2020FY 2021FY 2022FY 2023FY 2024
Revenues ($)1,842,912,000*2,293,798,000*2,659,478,000*3,758,144,000*4,824,698,000*4,690,540,000*4,727,940,000*
EBITDA ($)282,814,000*347,681,000*441,130,000*628,203,000*799,052,000*681,468,000*692,928,000*

Values retrieved from S&P Global.*

Governance, Compensation Design, and Shareholder Feedback

  • Compensation design best practices include double‑trigger CIC vesting, meaningful ownership guidelines (CEO 10x salary; non‑CEO executives 2x), annual say‑on‑pay, robust clawback, prohibition on repricing/options without shareholder approval, and no hedging/pledging .
  • 2024 say‑on‑pay support: 93.7%, reflecting shareholder approval of program changes including the new PSU program and equity mix evolution .
  • 2025 mix eliminates options; NEO equity from 2025: 50% PSUs / 50% RSUs (CEO 50% PSUs / 50% RSUs) .

Investment Implications

  • Alignment and incentives: Introduction of PSUs (adj. EPS, adj. revenue, relative TSR) and elimination of options in 2025 strengthens pay‑for‑performance and reduces leverage to option volatility; meaningful ownership guidelines and anti‑pledging policy reinforce alignment .
  • Retention and change‑in‑control economics: The June 2025 Executive Severance Plan formalizes severance (1x non‑CIC; 1.5x CIC; equity acceleration with PSUs at ≥ target or actual), which improves retention certainty but modestly increases potential CIC costs; benefits are conditioned by double‑trigger and restrictive covenants .
  • Insider trading pressure: Recent filings show small ESPP purchases and no reported sales in these disclosures, suggesting limited near‑term selling pressure from Rockwell; beneficial ownership at 18,156 shares is modest relative to shares outstanding (~0.03%) .
  • Transparency: As a non‑NEO executive, Rockwell’s individual pay levels are not disclosed, limiting precision in pay-for-performance calibration; nonetheless, company‑wide funding and program mechanics indicate strong linkage to revenue and profitability outcomes (2024 corporate funding 72%) .

Sources: Executive biography, roles, and ages ; compensation design, metrics, outcomes, and policies ; beneficial ownership ; equity treatment on termination/CIC ; Executive Severance Plan (June 26, 2025) .