EI
Equillium, Inc. (EQ)·Q4 2024 Earnings Summary
Executive Summary
- Q4 2024 was mixed: revenue declined sharply quarter-over-quarter, but operating discipline kept OpEx lower and the company emphasized positive longer-term outcomes from the Phase 3 EQUATOR study despite missing the Day 29 primary endpoint .
- EPS beat Wall Street consensus: Q4 2024 actual EPS was $(0.16) vs S&P Global consensus of $(0.31); revenue was $4.392M vs a consensus of $0.0*, reflecting recognition tied to the terminated Ono agreement .
- Strategic milestones are front‑and‑center: Equillium submitted Breakthrough Therapy designation and secured an FDA meeting on a potential Accelerated Approval path for first‑line aGVHD, with feedback expected in May 2025; BLA targeted for 1H 2026, subject to capital .
- Liquidity: cash and short‑term investments were $22.6M at 12/31/24; runway into Q3 2025, down from prior commentary of runway into Q4 2025, highlighting financing needs tied to regulatory strategy .
What Went Well and What Went Wrong
What Went Well
- Statistically significant and clinically meaningful longer‑term outcomes in Phase 3 EQUATOR for first‑line aGVHD: CR at Day 99 (44.9% vs 28.6%), duration of CR (median 336 vs 72 days), and failure‑free survival (median 154 vs 70 days); favorable safety/tolerability profile .
- Positive Phase 2 topline in moderate‑to‑severe ulcerative colitis: clinical remission 23.3% vs 20.0% (adalimumab) and 10.0% (placebo); endoscopic remission 16.7% vs 16.7% (adalimumab) and 6.7% (placebo) .
- Management secured an FDA meeting and requested Breakthrough Therapy designation; quote: “We expect feedback from the FDA during May 2025 and, if positive, subject to raising additional capital, we would plan to submit a biologics license application during the first half of 2026.” — Bruce Steel, CEO .
What Went Wrong
- EQUATOR primary endpoint miss at Day 29 (complete response and overall response rate), requiring reliance on longer‑term endpoints and regulatory dialogue for path forward .
- Revenue fell materially q/q following the Ono agreement termination backdrop and lower recognized funding/amortization in Q4 vs Q3 .
- Runway shortened to Q3 2025; prior quarter commentary suggested runway into Q4 2025 contingent on operational measures, highlighting increased urgency for capital .
Financial Results
Core P&L vs Prior Periods and Prior Year
Notes: Net Income Margin derived from reported revenue and net income in cited sources.
Operating Expenses
Balance Sheet / Liquidity
Q4 2024 vs Wall Street Consensus (S&P Global)
Values with asterisks retrieved from S&P Global.
Segment Breakdown / KPIs
- No revenue segments disclosed; revenue consisted entirely of itolizumab development funding and amortization of Ono upfront payment (terminated Asset Purchase Agreement) .
- Clinical KPIs emphasized: longer‑term efficacy signals (CR Day 99, duration of CR, failure‑free survival) in EQUATOR; UC Phase 2 remission endpoints achieved .
Guidance Changes
Earnings Call Themes & Trends
(Equillium did not publish a Q4 2024 earnings call transcript in our document set; themes below are synthesized from company press releases and 8‑Ks.)
Management Commentary
- Bruce Steel, CEO: “While we did not meet Day 29 outcomes of complete response - our primary endpoint - and overall response rate, itolizumab did demonstrate statistically significant and clinically meaningful benefit in important longer-term outcomes, including complete response at Day 99, duration of complete response and failure-free survival.”
- “We have submitted a request for Breakthrough Therapy designation and have been granted a meeting with the FDA to discuss the potential for Accelerated Approval… We expect feedback from the FDA during May 2025 and, if positive… we would plan to submit a biologics license application during the first half of 2026.”
- Q3 context (Ono exit, acceleration): “We have enrolled over 150 patients in EQUATOR… temporarily paused enrollment to review clinical options… potential to accelerate our timeline to topline data to the first quarter of 2025…”
Q&A Highlights
- No Q4 2024 earnings call transcript was found in our document set; therefore Q&A themes and clarifications are unavailable. We searched for an earnings-call-transcript between 2025‑03‑01 and 2025‑04‑30 and found zero documents [ListDocuments result].
Estimates Context
- Q4 2024 EPS beat: actual $(0.16) vs S&P Global consensus $(0.31)*, a positive surprise driven by lower G&A/R&D vs prior periods and recognized revenue tied to the Ono agreement .
- Q4 2024 revenue beat: actual $4.392M vs S&P Global consensus $0.0*, reflecting amortization/funding recognition despite the termination of the Ono agreement .
- Implications: Given the primary endpoint miss, consensus models may shift to incorporate the FDA’s view on the longer‑term outcomes; EPS/OpEx assumptions likely to depend on capital timing and regulatory path clarity.
Values marked with asterisks retrieved from S&P Global.
Key Takeaways for Investors
- Regulatory “binary” in May 2025: FDA feedback on Breakthrough Therapy and Accelerated Approval could be a major inflection point for valuation and financing prospects .
- Despite primary endpoint miss, EQUATOR’s longer‑term endpoints (CR at Day 99, duration of CR, failure‑free survival) offer a potential regulatory narrative; monitor FDA’s stance on surrogate/longer‑term endpoints in aGVHD .
- Liquidity is the gating factor: runway into Q3 2025 and BLA planned for 1H 2026 are contingent on raising capital; financing timing and structure will drive dilution and program continuity .
- UC program adds optionality: positive Phase 2 topline supports broader itolizumab franchise value beyond aGVHD, diversifying clinical risk .
- Operating discipline evident: OpEx trended lower into Q4; continued G&A/R&D optimization may cushion EPS while the company navigates regulatory decisions .
- Estimate revisions: Expect sell‑side to recalibrate on the back of the EPS/revenue beat and evolving regulatory outlook; key modeling variables are financing assumptions, CMC/BLA timing, and potential accelerated pathway acceptance.
- Trading lens: Near‑term catalysts are heavily event‑driven (FDA meeting outcome). Positioning should consider scenario analysis around accelerated approval vs additional data requirements, and financing overhang.