EG
Essent Group Ltd. (ESNT)·Q2 2025 Earnings Summary
Executive Summary
- Strong quarter with EPS of $1.93, a clear beat versus S&P Global consensus $1.71*; total revenue of $319.1M slightly topped $318.2M consensus*. Loss ratio fell to 6.6% and MI expense ratio improved to 15.5%, driving high-quality earnings and ROE uplift .
- Credit trends remained favorable: default rate declined to 2.12% (from 2.19% in Q1), while cure activity continued; net premiums were stable and investment income modestly higher QoQ .
- Capital strength and returns: PMIERs sufficiency at 176% with $1.579B excess; Board declared a $0.31 dividend; YTD through July 31, ESNT repurchased 6.8M shares for $387M, with $260M remaining under the $500M authorization .
- Strategic/catalyst: Moody’s upgraded Essent Guaranty to A2 and Group senior debt to Baa2; management underscored valuation-sensitive buybacks and highlighted embedded value and persistency tailwinds as potential stock drivers .
What Went Well and What Went Wrong
What Went Well
- Operating leverage: MI expense ratio improved to 15.5% (from 18.7% in Q1), contributing to EPS outperformance and lower combined ratio; CFO emphasized lower operating expenses QoQ .
- Credit performance: Default rate decreased to 2.12% from 2.19% in Q1; loss ratio dropped to 6.6% from 13.1% in Q1, reflecting favorable cures and stable performance .
- Strategic positioning and tone: “Our second quarter performance demonstrates the strength of our business model… We believe that our buy, manage and distribute operating model uniquely positions Essent…” — CEO Mark Casale .
What Went Wrong
- Defaults still elevated YoY: Default rate 2.12% vs 1.71% a year ago; cure rate in Q2 was 26% vs 66% in Q1; average claim severity 67%, reflecting seasonality and hurricane cohort dynamics .
- Title headwinds: Management reiterated title is unlikely to be a near-term earnings contributor given rates and transaction volumes .
- Premium mix softness YoY: Net premiums earned down modestly vs Q2’24 ($248.8M vs $251.9M), with risk-share and title premiums also lower YoY .
Financial Results
Consolidated P&L (oldest → newest)
MI Segment Margins (oldest → newest)
Segment Net Premiums Earned (oldest → newest)
Key Performance Indicators (oldest → newest)
Guidance Changes
Earnings Call Themes & Trends
Management Commentary
- Strategy and model durability: “Our second quarter performance demonstrates the strength of our business model… buy, manage and distribute… uniquely positions Essent within a range of economic scenarios to generate high quality earnings.” — Mark Casale .
- Capital strength and ratings: “Moody’s upgraded Essent Guaranty’s IFS to A2 and Essent Group’s senior debt to Baa2… reflect our consistent strong results, high quality insured portfolio… and comprehensive reinsurance program.” — Mark Casale .
- Capital returns: “Our Board has approved a common dividend of $0.31… year to date through July 31, we repurchased nearly 7 million shares for approximately $390 million.” — Mark Casale .
- Operating discipline: CFO noted MI expense ratio improvement to 15.5% (from 18.7% in Q1) and steady net average premium rate of 36 bps .
Q&A Highlights
- Home price outlook and pricing: Management expects varied HPA by MSA, with some 5–10% declines being “healthy.” Pricing is calibrated at market level with “markets of focus,” guided by supply, job growth, and income trends .
- Defaults seasonality and outlook: New defaults up YoY but decelerating; normalization to seasonal patterns expected; embedded equity dampens claim probability even as defaults ebb/flow .
- Buyback sizing and capital framework: Buybacks are valuation-sensitive, supported by excess capital; management discussed embedded value in IIF and investment portfolio as underpinning repurchases .
- Persistency by vintage: Lower persistency in ‘23 and aging ‘20–’21 vintages seen as natural; seconds/home equity less prevalent in MI cohort; lock-in effects still meaningful .
- EssentEDGE and technology: Credit engine delivers yield premium vs peers; selective AI could enhance speed/efficiency; considering third credit bureau integration .
Estimates Context
Consensus vs Actual (S&P Global)
Values retrieved from S&P Global.
Notes: EPS consensus 1.70843*; revenue consensus $318.245M*; surprise percentages calculated from S&P Global consensus values and reported actuals.
Key Takeaways for Investors
- Quality beat: Strong EPS beat on lower loss ratio and improved MI expense ratio; revenue inline to slightly above — supportive for positive estimate revisions near term .
- Credit benign, reserves stable: Default rate edged down QoQ; cure activity intact; management maintained conservative hurricane-related reserving approach .
- Capital deployment a catalyst: Accelerated buybacks and stable dividend underpin TSR; management sees undervaluation vs embedded value and persistency tailwinds .
- Balance sheet resilience: PMIERs sufficiency at 176% and ratings upgrade enhance confidence in downside protection and capacity to write into recovery .
- Macro sensitivity: NIW recovered QoQ; broader housing unlock likely requires improved affordability; management prepared to flex pricing and share as cycles shift .
- Watch list: Default seasonality into 2H, title losses staying modest, reinsurance economics as ceding increases, and any change in HPA trends by MSA .
- Medium-term thesis: Persistency plus investment yield support earnings; when refi/purchase cycles re-accelerate, NIW growth and premium earnings can compound — with capital returns smoothing the path .
S&P Global estimates disclaimer: Items marked with an asterisk (*) are values retrieved from S&P Global.