EH
Eve Holding, Inc. (EVEX)·Q2 2025 Earnings Summary
Executive Summary
- Q2 2025 reflected heavier development spend and a larger net loss as Eve accelerated engineering, supplier engagement, and prototype work; net loss was $64.7M, R&D $45.7M, SG&A $8.2M, and cash consumption $56.9M while cash ended at $242.7M and total liquidity reached $375.5M .
- Eve announced its first firm order (Revo/OHI) for up to 50 eVTOLs plus TechCare services (~$250M potential value), began collecting PDPs, and added Beta to its propulsion suppliers, preserving design optionality and program agility .
- The first flight of the full-scale engineering prototype is now expected “in the next few months” and toward the end of the year, with five conforming prototypes planned for certification and Means of Compliance targeted by year-end; certification remains targeted for 2027 .
- Relative to estimates, revenue was in line with pre‑revenue expectations ($0), while EPS missed Wall Street consensus (actual roughly −$0.21 vs −$0.16*)—primarily due to higher R&D and a non‑cash warrant liability mark‑to‑market of $9.5M . Values retrieved from S&P Global*.
- Near‑term stock narrative catalysts: firm order conversion and PDPs, supplier optionality with Beta, liquidity sufficiency through 2026, and milestone timing clarity (first flight and certification path) .
What Went Well and What Went Wrong
What Went Well
- First binding framework agreement: Revo/OHI for up to 50 aircraft plus TechCare services (~$250M potential); “this firm order means that we'll begin to collect pre‑delivery payment” .
- Supplier strategy strengthened: Eve “bringing Beta Company to complement our suppliers list,” adding propulsion flexibility and FAA‑experienced partner; “Nidec and Beta are complementary” .
- Ecosystem traction and backlog: Preorder backlog
2,800 aircraft ($14B list value), 14 TechCare customers (~$1.6B potential), and 21 Vector customers, demonstrating multi‑product adoption .
What Went Wrong
- EPS miss and larger net loss driven by higher R&D and derivative mark: net loss $64.7M; R&D $45.7M YoY increase; $9.5M non‑cash warrant mark—pressuring EPS relative to consensus .
- Cash use stepped up sequentially: operations consumed $56.9M in Q2 vs $25.3M in Q1—reflecting timing of payables and accelerated program activity .
- Timeline nuance: first flight framed as “in the next few months” and toward year‑end; conforming prototypes and certification work continue, implying tight execution schedule to maintain a 2027 certification target .
Financial Results
Income Statement Trend and EPS vs Estimates
Values for EPS marked with * retrieved from S&P Global.
Values retrieved from S&P Global*.
Operating Expenses
Cash and Liquidity
Segment Breakdown
- Not applicable: Company is pre‑revenue and does not report segment revenues .
KPIs and Program Metrics
Guidance Changes
Earnings Call Themes & Trends
Management Commentary
- “We unveiled our full scale mock up at the Paris Air Show... announced our first firm order... bringing Beta Company to complement our suppliers list... schedule remains unchanged with expected TAP certification and entering the service in 2027” .
- “This firm order means that we'll begin to collect pre‑delivery payment... We expect that to start producing revenues in 2027” .
- “Nidec continues committed... Beta comes in with a startup mindset and adds agility... strong relationship with FAA” .
- CFO: “Eve invested $55M during the second quarter... SG&A around $8M... net loss of $64M... operations consumed $57M... total liquidity of $375M... sufficient... through 2026” .
Q&A Highlights
- Cash burn and guidance: Management expects FY 2025 cash use toward the low end of $200–$250M, leveraging Embraer resources; Q2 cash use reflected timing and accelerated testing .
- Flight test cadence and prototypes: Five conforming prototypes remain the plan; hover and transition phases prioritized before cruise, with potential for a sixth prototype .
- Competitive landscape: Joby‑Blade transaction viewed as supportive of eVTOL ecosystem; Eve maintains multi‑OEM relationships and does not see it impacting backlog .
- Supplier differences: Beta vs Nidec motors differ in cooling, architecture, controls, and integration; battery development with BAE unchanged; tip speed/noise requirements maintained .
- Funding outlook: Liquidity sufficient into mid‑2027 with standby facilities and grants; options include shelf equity and long‑term loans given Embraer affiliation .
Estimates Context
- Q2 2025: Revenue in line with consensus ($0.0*); EPS missed (actual roughly −$0.21* vs consensus −$0.16*), driven by higher R&D and a $9.5M non‑cash warrant fair‑value charge . Values retrieved from S&P Global*.
- FY 2025: Consensus EPS −$0.6076*; with R&D intensity and milestone timing, sell‑side may fine‑tune quarterly cadence though the full‑year range appears consistent with heavier development spending . Values retrieved from S&P Global*.
- Target Price Consensus Mean: $7.75* currently, indicating constructive medium‑term expectations tied to program execution milestones*. Values retrieved from S&P Global*.
Key Takeaways for Investors
- Conversion matters: The Revo/OHI firm order and PDPs validate demand and begin cash inflows ahead of 2027 entry into service—track further LOI conversions in Brazil/U.S. .
- Supplier optionality de‑risks propulsion: Adding Beta alongside Nidec maintains design flexibility and could support schedule robustness; monitor Beta/Nidec integration test results .
- Execution milestones drive narrative: First flight timing (hover/transition/cruise) and publication of Means of Compliance by YE 2025 are key stock catalysts—watch testing cadence updates .
- Liquidity runway adequate: $375.5M total liquidity through Q2 and the Aug 14 $230M registered direct raise bolster funding into certification—reducing near‑term financing overhang .
- Estimates likely stick to pre‑revenue: EPS can remain sensitive to non‑cash derivatives and R&D phasing; expect quarterly variance but a consistent FY loss path aligned with accelerated development .
- Ecosystem breadth is strategic: TechCare and Vector traction (14 and 21 customers, respectively) underpin services optionality and potential earlier revenue streams than aircraft deliveries .
- Competitive dynamics supportive: Multi‑OEM platform relationships and industry consolidation steps (e.g., Joby‑Blade) may validate demand; Eve’s backlog breadth and Embraer support remain differentiators .
Footnote: Values marked with * retrieved from S&P Global.