ES
EXACT SCIENCES CORP (EXAS)·Q3 2019 Earnings Summary
Executive Summary
- Q3 2019 delivered strong topline and operational progress: revenue $218.8M (+85% YoY), Cologuard volumes 456K (+89% YoY), gross margin 76% (+130 bps), and average revenue per test of $479 while cost per test improved to $114 .
- Guidance: FY19 revenue raised/maintained to $802–$810M and Q4 revenue guided to $221–$229M; FY19 Cologuard volume 1.67–1.68M tests; CapEx trimmed to ~$185M (from ~$200M in Q2) .
- Strategic milestones: FDA approved label expansion to ages 45–49, implemented Epic EHR, began new Madison lab processing, initiated BLUE‑C pivotal for Cologuard 2.0; early payer coverage includes Aetna, CareFirst, Blue Shield of California .
- Potential stock catalysts: execution on Q4 guide amid holiday seasonality, adoption ramp from 45–49 label and electronic ordering via Epic/Veeva, and clarity on Cologuard 2.0 and blood test development timelines .
What Went Well and What Went Wrong
What Went Well
- Record operational metrics: revenue $218.8M (+85% YoY), 456K tests (+89% YoY), gross margin 76% (+130 bps), cost per test down to $114 .
- Strategic infrastructure: Epic EHR implemented; new lab increasing capacity to 7M tests/year, supporting scalability and future electronic ordering lift .
- Innovation momentum: FDA 45–49 label expansion; promising Cologuard 2.0 markers (92% specificity, 92% cancer sensitivity, 65% precancer sensitivity) and BLUE‑C pivotal initiation .
What Went Wrong
- Market share ticked lower vs Q2 (5.2% in Q3 vs 5.7% in Q2), highlighting competitive dynamics and mix effects despite volume growth .
- Operating expenses rose to ~$202M (+56% YoY) including transaction/integration costs for Genomic Health and higher Pfizer-related fees, keeping the company at a net loss ($40.5M, EPS -$0.31) .
- Q4 outlook acknowledges seasonal downtick in completed tests per physician due to holidays, tempering near-term utilization growth despite broader adoption drivers .
Financial Results
Quarterly Financials and Operating Metrics
Notes: Dashes indicate data not disclosed in the referenced primary documents for that period.
Year-over-Year Comparison (Q3)
KPI Highlights
Guidance Changes
Earnings Call Themes & Trends
Management Commentary
- “We screened 456,000 people with Cologuard in the third quarter… delivered $219 million in revenue… implemented Epic’s EHR… and prepared for the Genomic Health combination.” — Kevin Conroy, CEO .
- “Third quarter gross margin was 76%… cost of sales improved to $114 per test… we expect Q4 cost per test in the low to mid $120 range.” — Jeff Elliott, CFO .
- “FDA approved our label expansion… providing access to Cologuard for the 19 million average risk unscreened Americans ages 45 to 49… increasing its total addressable market by $3 billion to $18 billion.” — Kevin Conroy .
- “At 92% specificity, the new markers were 92% sensitive for cancers and 65% sensitive for precancerous polyps… we’re initiating BLUE‑C.” — Kevin Conroy .
Q&A Highlights
- Seasonality and Q4 guide: Management expects a slight sequential downtick in completed tests per physician in Q4 due to holidays; 2018 was an exception given unique tailwinds, but long-term utilization per physician should rise materially .
- Pfizer productivity: Exact and Pfizer reps are at the point where productivity typically ramps; collaboration on shared targets yields higher penetration; productivity should improve annually .
- Electronic ordering impact: Electronic orders drive ~20%+ higher ordering (health system bidirectional) and >60% more vs fax in broader provider comparisons; Epic should unlock wider adoption and lower costs .
- Compliance: Q3 compliance 67%; expecting at least 66% in Q4 due to seasonal effects; long-term aiming >70% .
- Blood-based CRC positioning: Likely annual test with pricing pressure; not expected to displace Cologuard/colonoscopy; USPSTF inclusion timeline likely 2026–2027 .
Estimates Context
- Wall Street consensus (S&P Global) for Q3 2019 revenue and EPS was unavailable due to S&P Global request limits at the time of retrieval; as a result, we cannot quantify beat/miss versus consensus for this quarter. Values were intended to be sourced from S&P Global but were not retrievable due to API limits.
- Given raised/maintained FY revenue guidance ($802–$810M) and new Q4 guide ($221–$229M), Street models may need to reflect improved cost per test and CapEx moderation, while incorporating holiday seasonality in Q4 utilization .
Key Takeaways for Investors
- Execution remains strong: revenue growth, margin expansion, and cost-per-test reductions, supported by infrastructure scaling (Epic, new lab) .
- Near-term: Expect holiday-driven utilization softness, but Q4 revenue guide and per-test economics should anchor expectations; watch for Veeva rollout productivity in 1H20 .
- Medium-term: 45–49 label expansion and payer coverage adoption are catalysts to broaden TAM and accelerate provider adoption, especially as electronic ordering scales .
- Innovation: BLUE‑C pivotal and Cologuard 2.0 specificity gains can further enhance the health-economics case and adoption; liver test data at AASLD may add optionality .
- Pfizer partnership: Continued lift expected from coordinated targeting across shared accounts and health systems; monitor service fee dynamics and ROI .
- Capital intensity easing: CapEx trimmed to ~$185M for FY19; operating expense cadence guided modestly higher in Q4 but flat G&A/R&D excluding Genomic Health costs .
- Watch market share/mix: Q3 share at 5.2% vs 5.7% in Q2; sustained volume growth should remain the primary driver, but share/mix trends warrant monitoring .
Appendix References
- Q3 2019 Press Release (8‑K 2.02): Revenue, test volume, per-test economics, margins, operating expenses, net loss/EPS, FY19 guidance .
- Q3 2019 Earnings Call: Guidance detail (Q4, OpEx, CapEx), Epic/Veeva, 45–49 label expansion and payer coverage, BLUE‑C/Cologuard 2.0 data, Pfizer partnership commentary, compliance .
- Q2 2019 Press Release (8‑K 2.02): Revenue, test volume, per-test economics, margins, FY19 guidance .
- Q1 2019 Earnings Call: Revenue, test volume, per-test economics, margins, Epic/CRM plans, compliance .