EC
EXELON CORP (EXC)·Q2 2025 Earnings Summary
Executive Summary
- Q2 2025 operating EPS was $0.39, down year over year from $0.47 and down sequentially from $0.92 (Q1), as timing of ComEd distribution earnings, storm costs at PECO, and higher interest/credit loss expense at PHI offset rate increases; full-year adjusted EPS guidance of $2.64–$2.74 was reaffirmed .
- Versus S&P Global consensus, Q2 EPS modestly beat ($0.39 vs $0.368*), while revenue was slightly below ($5.43B vs $5.45B*); EBITDA was below consensus (actual $1.70B vs $1.79B*)—mix and storms drove the variance and were highlighted by management as transitory headwinds* .
- Management emphasized energy security policy momentum, large-load interconnection progress (17+ GW pipeline with another ~16 GW under study), and balanced financing (100% of 2025 equity needs priced; ~22% of 2026 pre-priced), supporting the 5–7% 2024–2028 EPS CAGR target .
- Dividend of $0.40 per share was declared for payment on September 15, 2025, maintaining payout discipline (~60% of adjusted EPS) .
- Near-term catalysts: Q4 plan refresh (transmission and large-load updates), MD PSC outcomes on multi‑year plan reconciliations, ComEd MRP reconciliation, and ongoing large-load tariff proceedings .
What Went Well and What Went Wrong
What Went Well
- Sustained top‑quartile reliability across all utilities; CEO: “disciplined execution… operational excellence… balanced investment strategy” underpinning guidance reaffirmation .
- Rate increases supported revenue: PECO electric/gas and BGE distribution rate updates drove improved operating earnings YoY; ComEd and PHI saw higher distribution/transmission revenue from updated recovery mechanisms .
- Financing execution: ~80% of planned 2025 long-term debt completed; 100% of 2025 equity ($700M) and ~22% of 2026 pre-priced via ATM, reducing rate volatility and supporting balance sheet flexibility .
What Went Wrong
- ComEd and PHI earnings pressure: timing of distribution earnings and lower transmission peak load at ComEd; lower MD MYP reconciliation impacts plus higher credit loss and interest at PHI .
- Storm costs: PECO faced “one of the largest in recent history” with peak outages >325k customers in June, resulting in higher O&M and anticipated deferral petition to PA PUC for extraordinary costs .
- Corporate headwinds: $50M Customer Relief Fund and higher interest expense at HoldCo weighed on Q2 EPS; management cited these as one‑time/managed impacts within the annual plan .
Financial Results
Headline Financials (oldest → newest)
Consensus vs Actuals (S&P Global; oldest → newest)
Values marked with * retrieved from S&P Global.
Segment Operating Revenues and Net Income
Guidance Changes
Earnings Call Themes & Trends
Management Commentary
- CEO Calvin Butler: “We remain focused on delivering long‑term value through operational excellence, customer affordability solutions and a balanced investment strategy… as we reaffirm our financial guidance” .
- CFO Jeanne Jones: “Q2 adjusted operating earnings of $0.39 per share, overcoming an active start to the summer storm season… we remain on track to deliver within our full‑year earnings guidance range” .
- On energy security and generation: “States… can proactively bring control, certainty, and cost benefits by pursuing options outside of the capacity market, including regulated generation” .
- On large‑load growth: pipeline “holding firm at more than 17 gigawatts,” with another “16 gigawatts… under study” and IL tariff proposals to efficiently connect ≥50 MW while protecting existing customers .
Q&A Highlights
- Regulated generation posture: Management supports state‑partnered utility‑owned generation for certainty/control and customer benefits; timing clarity likely next year, contingent on MD procurement outcomes (3 GW dispatchable generation solicitation) .
- Transmission opportunity: $10–$15B beyond the plan, with timing and inclusions expected at Q4 refresh; equity financing rule of thumb ~40% for incremental capex (for competitive opportunities only upon certainty) .
- Large‑load process: Active cluster studies in IL and Mid‑Atlantic; announcements likely in Q3–Q4 as studies complete; IL tariff formalizes deposits, cluster studies, and TSAs for ≥50 MW .
- Customer bill impact: BGE bill impact ~$1.50/month; broader increases $1.50–$4/month across jurisdictions tied to PJM capacity results; near‑term mitigation via EE/DR, with longer‑term generation solutions pursued .
Estimates Context
- Q2 2025: EPS beat and revenue/EBITDA slight miss vs S&P Global consensus—EPS $0.39 vs $0.368*, revenue $5.43B vs $5.45B*, EBITDA $1.70B vs $1.79B*; management cited ComEd timing, PECO storms, and PHI interest/credit loss as drivers .
- Sequentially, Q1 2025 exceeded consensus (EPS $0.92 vs $0.861*, revenue $6.71B vs $6.45B*)* .
- FY 2025 consensus EPS ~$2.70* aligns with reaffirmed guidance midpoint ($2.69), suggesting limited estimate revision urgency absent regulatory outcomes and Q4 plan updates* .
Values marked with * retrieved from S&P Global.
Key Takeaways for Investors
- Q2 quality of miss/beat: modest EPS beat with transitory headwinds (storms, timing) and continued rate‑driven revenue strength; full‑year guidance intact .
- Execution on financing de‑risks plan: ~80% 2025 debt and 100% 2025 equity priced; ~22% of 2026 pre‑priced—supports funding of $38B capex and 7.4% rate base growth .
- Policy backdrop improving: MD procurement and IL tariff proposals could unlock regulated generation and transmission opportunities—watch Q4 refresh for incorporation into the base plan .
- Large‑load (AI/data centers) remains a multiyear growth vector: 17+ GW pipeline plus ~16 GW under study; tariff clarity may accelerate interconnections across IL/MA/DC .
- Near‑term watch items: MD MYP reconciliation orders; ComEd $268MM reconciliation (staff initial views noted); PECO storm deferral petition outcome—each could influence H2 earnings trajectory .
- Income profile and payout: dividend $0.40 per quarter maintained; payout discipline (~60% of adjusted EPS) consistent with low‑risk T&D strategy .
- Trading lens: Q4 plan update and regulatory decisions are the likely catalysts; interim estimate changes should be modest barring outsized storm events or policy surprises .