Sign in

You're signed outSign in or to get full access.

Anuradha Muralidharan

Chief Operating Officer at Expensify
Executive
Board

About Anuradha Muralidharan

Anuradha “Anu” Muralidharan, 42, is Chief Operating Officer (since Jan 2021) and a director of Expensify (joined board at IPO) with prior leadership in product and payments operations; she holds a B.E. (BITS Pilani) and an MBA (Cornell) . Company performance context: Expensify’s FY2024 net income was -$10.1M and the pay-versus-performance TSR proxy measure implies $100 invested on 12/31/2021 was worth $7.60 at 12/31/2024, underscoring significant equity underperformance during her tenure as COO and director .

IndicatorFY2022FY2023FY2024
Net Income ($000s)(27,009) (41,455) (10,055)
TSR value of $100 (12/31/2021 baseline)$20.06 $5.61 $7.60

Past Roles

OrganizationRoleYearsStrategic Impact
ExpensifyCOOJan 2021–PresentLeads operations and payments execution; board member since IPO .
ExpensifyDirector of Product OperationsJan 2018–Jan 2021Scaled product ops in run-up to IPO .
ExpensifyHead of Payment OperationsAug 2015–Jan 2018Built payments operations foundation .
MarqetaVice PresidentPre-2015Payments domain leadership .
CitibankVice PresidentPre-2015Financial services operating experience .
OracleEngineering rolesEarly careerEnterprise engineering experience .

External Roles

  • No other public company directorships disclosed for Ms. Muralidharan in the 2025 proxy .

Fixed Compensation

Component20232024Notes
Salary ($)710,601 860,371 Company’s framework treats “Salary” as actual target comp paid, inclusive of amounts contributed to equity purchase plan .
Target Bonus %Expensify does not maintain a performance-based bonus program .
Actual Bonus ($)No annual performance bonus program; discretionary bonuses possible but none reported for 2024 .

Performance Compensation

  • Annual cash bonus plan: none. Expensify explicitly states it does not maintain a performance-based bonus program; the Compensation Committee may award discretionary bonuses, though none were reported for Ms. Muralidharan in 2024 .
  • Compensation algorithm: Executive and employee target pay is set via a semi-annual peer-matching algorithm with weighted voting by leadership tier; it is not tied to company financial metrics (e.g., revenue/EBITDA/TSR) . NEOs are required to allocate at least 30% of target comp to equity programs (can elect up to 100%) .
  • Equity under 2021 Stock Purchase and Matching Plan: Company matched at a 5% annualized rate (1/20 per share retained), with purchases each quarter at market price; Ms. Muralidharan contributed 32% of target comp to equity programs in 2024 (20% to the plan) . The plan issues fully vested matching shares at purchase, and management also granted fully vested discretionary shares in 2024 (see table below) .
Equity Incentive ElementMetricWeightingTargetActual/PayoutVesting
Annual bonus (cash)None
RSUs (legacy 2021 grant)Service-basedN/AN/AOngoing scheduled vesting (see Equity Awards table)12.5% of total RSUs vest quarterly over 8 years, half Class A/half LT50 .
Stock Purchase & MatchingParticipation rateN/A≥30% of target comp contributed to equity programsAnu: 32% (20% to purchase plan)Matching shares fully vested at purchase dates .
Discretionary Shares (2024)N/AN/AN/A134,023 fully-vested shares ($311,751)Fully vested upon grant; eligible for matching .

Equity Ownership & Alignment

  • Beneficial Ownership (as of April 22, 2025):
    • Voting power: 1.6% .
    • Shares by class: Class A 111,518 (includes 36,300 options exercisable within 60 days), LT10 114,140 (2.7%), LT50 134,208 (1.7%) .
ClassShares% of Class% of Total Voting Power
Class A111,518 <1%
LT10114,140 2.7%
LT50134,208 1.7%
Aggregate voting power1.6%
  • Stock ownership build policy: NEOs must contribute ≥30% of target comp to equity programs (plan or legacy programs). For 2024, Ms. Muralidharan contributed 32% (20% to the purchase/match plan), supporting alignment, though not a formal ownership multiple guideline .
  • Hedging and margin: Prohibited by insider trading policy; public options and short sales prohibited .
  • Pledging: Limited-pledge policy permits up to 25% of holdings as collateral (excluding margin loans). No specific pledging disclosed for Ms. Muralidharan; CEO Barrett disclosed pledging of Class A shares (separate from Ms. Muralidharan) .
  • Section 16 compliance: The company disclosed some delinquent Form 4 filings for Ms. Muralidharan (multiple reports late), a minor administrative flag .

Outstanding Equity Awards (as of 12/31/2024)

TypeGrant/Vesting DetailsQuantityPriceMarket Value Basis
Options3/1/202130,800$7.21
Options9/16/20215,500$12.97
RSUs9/15/2021; 12.5% vesting quarterly through 8 years; each RSU = 0.5 Class A + 0.5 LT50120,400 (unvested at 12/31/2024)$403,340 at $3.35 close on 12/31/2024
In-the-money check (12/31/2024)Closing price referenceWith $3.35 close, both option strikes ($7.21, $12.97) were out-of-the-money at year-end 2024 .

2024 Equity Flows under Stock Purchase and Matching Plan

Element2024 Amount
Discretionary fully-vested shares granted to Ms. Muralidharan134,023 shares; $311,751 value at grant
Matching structure1/20th share per share retained (5% matching rate in 2024)

Note: The proxy’s table of shares purchased and matched contains formatting anomalies; we therefore rely on the clearly reported discretionary share grants and plan mechanics rather than the corrupted purchase rows for Ms. Muralidharan .

Employment Terms

  • Employment type: At-will; standard confidential information and invention assignment agreements .
  • Severance: No cash severance or benefits upon involuntary termination disclosed for NEOs (including Ms. Muralidharan) .
  • Change-in-control: No specific CIC cash severance disclosed; RSU acceleration terms beyond service vesting were not specified in the proxy .
  • Clawback: Nasdaq-compliant clawback effective Nov 1, 2023 covering erroneously awarded incentive-based compensation for 3 years preceding a restatement .
  • Trading/hedging policy: Hedging, short sales, publicly traded options, and margin transactions prohibited; limited pledging permitted up to 25% under pre-approved guidelines .

Board Governance & Roles

  • Board tenure and role: Director since IPO; currently serves on both the Executive Committee and Compensation Committee, reflecting a dual role as executive officer and director .
  • Committee memberships:
    • Executive Committee: Authorized to exercise broad board powers while the Voting Trust controls >50% voting power; members include Barrett, Schaffer, Mills, Vidal, and Muralidharan .
    • Compensation Committee: Not independent (controlled company exemption); members include Barrett (chair), Schaffer, Mills, Vidal, and Muralidharan; executives participate in compensation deliberations except when addressing their own exceptions .
    • Audit Committee: Independent; Ms. Muralidharan is not a member .
  • Independence context: Expensify is a Nasdaq “controlled company” (Voting Trust ~84.3% voting power) and elects exemptions from majority-independent board and fully independent compensation committee; this reduces standard minority shareholder protections .
  • Board processes: All directors attended ≥75% of meetings in FY2024; executive sessions of independent directors occur at least annually; the board has neither a chair nor a lead independent director .
  • Director compensation: Employee-directors (including Ms. Muralidharan) receive no additional director fees; non-employee director retainers and equity are paid per the disclosed program .

Compensation Structure (Mix and Trends)

Metric20232024YoY Change
Salary ($)710,601 860,371 +21.1%
Stock Awards ($)220,354 319,242 +44.9%
Options Granted in YearNone disclosed None disclosed Shift away from options maintained

Observations:

  • Mix shifted further toward stock awards and fully-vested discretionary share grants in 2024, with no new option grants and legacy options OTM at year-end 2024, lowering option-related risk but increasing near-term liquidity of awards once granted .
  • Absence of a formal performance bonus program or explicit financial KPIs in pay raises alignment depends on the internal algorithm and mandatory equity contributions rather than revenue/EBITDA/TSR outcomes .

Risk Indicators & Red Flags

  • Governance: Non-independent compensation committee (includes executives and Ms. Muralidharan), controlled-company exemptions, and no chair/lead independent director heighten independence concerns .
  • Trading/ownership: Limited-pledging allowed; no pledge disclosed for Ms. Muralidharan; hedging/shorts/margin prohibited . Some delinquent Section 16 filings disclosed for Ms. Muralidharan .
  • Performance-pay linkage: No performance bonus or explicit metric-based variable pay; pay-setting algorithm not tied to financial metrics and may weaken pay-for-performance alignment .
  • Severance/CIC: No severance protections disclosed; could pose retention risk in volatile markets, though long-dated RSU vesting provides ongoing unvested value .

Investment Implications

  • Alignment and selling pressure: Mandatory equity contributions (32% of target comp; 20% via purchase plan) and substantial unvested RSUs (120,400 units) support alignment, but fully-vested discretionary share grants and quarterly RSU vesting create a cadence that could translate into periodic insider selling for liquidity, contributing to technical supply headwinds if sales occur; legacy options are OTM at year-end 2024, limiting option-exercise supply for now .
  • Pay-for-performance concerns: With no bonus plan and an internal algorithm decoupled from financial KPIs, cash/equity outcomes are not explicitly contingent on revenue, EBITDA, or TSR; given multi-year TSR underperformance, this framework may draw scrutiny from governance-focused investors despite the required equity contributions .
  • Retention vs. cost: No severance or CIC cash benefits reduces downside shareholder cost in a turnover event but may elevate flight risk unless offset by continuing RSU vesting value; clawback enhances downside protection in case of restatement .
  • Governance overhang: The controlled-company structure, dual executive/director roles, and a non-independent compensation committee (including Ms. Muralidharan) imply elevated governance risk; monitoring of say-on-pay feedback and any future independence transitions is warranted .
  • Compliance note: Reported late Section 16 filings for Ms. Muralidharan are administrative but worth tracking given heightened ESG scrutiny .

Overall: For trading, watch quarterly vesting cycles and 8-year RSU cadence for potential insider supply, and governance headlines tied to the controlled company structure. For fundamentals-driven investors, the lack of KPI-linked pay may limit confidence in pay-for-performance alignment until equity performance stabilizes or the compensation framework evolves .