Sign in

Jim Farley

Chief Executive Officer at FORD MOTOR
CEO
Executive
Board

About Jim Farley

James D. Farley, Jr. (age 62) is President and Chief Executive Officer of Ford Motor Company and has served as a director since 2020; he became CEO on October 1, 2020 and added the role of President, Ford Model e, in March 2022 . Under his tenure, Ford reported record 2024 revenue of ~$185 billion (+5% y/y), Company adjusted EBIT of ~$10.2 billion, and adjusted EBIT margin of 5.5%; cumulative TSR declined 13% in 2024 as net income increased by $1.5 billion, reflecting mixed execution across quality and cost targets . Before joining Ford in November 2007, Farley spent 17 years in leadership positions at Toyota; he serves on The Business Council’s executive committee, indicating strong external networks relevant to industry transformation .

Past Roles

OrganizationRoleYearsStrategic Impact
Ford Motor CompanyPresident & CEOOct 2020–presentLeads Ford+ transformation; focused on digital/EV strategy; delivered record 2024 revenue and progress in software/services while facing quality and cost challenges .
Ford Motor CompanyPresident, Ford Model eMar 2022–presentDrives EV and software initiatives central to Ford+ profitability and recurring revenue strategy .
Ford Motor CompanyChief Operating OfficerOversaw global markets and operations including PD, Purchasing, Manufacturing, Quality, and AV partnerships; scale operational leadership .
Ford Motor CompanyPresident, New Businesses, Technology & StrategyLed strategic transformation toward higher growth/margins via smart, connected vehicles and experiences .
Ford Motor CompanyEVP & President, Global MarketsLed global business units, Lincoln, Global Marketing & Sales, and EV strategy/business model development .
Ford Motor CompanyEVP & President, Ford Europe, Middle East & Africa2015–2017Turnaround and regional leadership experience; underpins current international restructuring .
Ford Motor CompanyEVP, Global Marketing, Sales & ServiceBrand/commercial leadership across Ford’s portfolio .
Ford Motor CompanyGroup VP, Global Marketing and Canada/Mexico/South AmericaRegional P&L/marketing leadership in the Americas .
ToyotaVarious leadership positions~1990–200717-year track record at Toyota; deep industry grounding .

External Roles

OrganizationRoleYearsRelevance
The Business CouncilMember; Executive CommitteeHigh-level policy/peer engagement supporting industry insights and influence .

Fixed Compensation

YearBase Salary ($)Target Bonus (% of Salary)Actual Bonus Paid ($)Notes
20241,700,000 200% 1,618,740 Business performance factor 69%; Farley assigned 69% individual performance factor; actual payout equals ~47.6% of target ($1.61874M ÷ $3.4M) .
20231,700,000 2,399,040 Prior year reference from SCT; program design similar, details in CD&A .
20221,700,000 2,754,000 Prior year reference from SCT .

Performance Compensation

Annual Performance Bonus Plan (2024)

  • Plan design metrics: Company Adjusted EBIT Margin; Quality (Repairs/1,000 in first 90 days); Global Electric Vehicle retail volume; Connected Services revenue .
  • Results: Business performance factor 69%; maximum opportunity 200% of target; final payouts reflect business factor and assigned individual performance factor (Farley: 69%) .
MetricWeightingTargetActual/AssessmentPayout LinkageVesting/Timing
Company Adjusted EBIT MarginNot disclosed Not disclosed 2024 adjusted EBIT margin 5.5% (company-wide) Included in 69% business factor Cash bonus paid in 2025 for 2024 performance .
Quality (Repairs/1,000, 90 days)Not disclosed Not disclosed Quality challenges largely drove lower business factor Included in 69% business factor Cash in 2025 .
Global EV Retail VolumeNot disclosed Not disclosed Best-ever global EV sales; retail volume fell short of targets Included in 69% business factor Cash in 2025 .
Connected Services RevenueNot disclosed Not disclosed Progress in software/services; subscriptions up ~40% y/y; >50% gross margins cited at company level Included in 69% business factor Cash in 2025 .

Long-Term Incentive Plan (LTIP) – 2024 Grants

  • Structure: RSUs vest ratably over 3 years (33%/33%/34%); PSUs have 3-year performance period; 2024 PSU design is 100% three-year rTSR relative to a PSU peer group (modifier) .
  • Change-in-control: Double-trigger for equity; RSU/option vesting acceleration and treatment described in plan footnotes .
Grant TypeGrant DateTarget Units (#)Grant Date Fair Value ($)Key Terms
PSUs (2024 cycle)3/4/2024764,835 14,149,448 3-year performance; 100% rTSR weighting; payouts modulated; dividends accrue and pay in cash upon grant of final award .
RSUs (annual)3/4/2024509,890 6,495,999 Vest 33%/33%/34% over 3 years; dividend equivalents accrue/pay in cash on vest .
Annual Cash Target2/23/2024 (approval)Target $3,400,000 Non-equity incentive opportunity underpinning bonus plan .

Outstanding and Vesting Equity (as of 12/31/2024)

InstrumentQuantityTerms/PriceVesting/ExpiryValue Reference
Stock Options – exercisable1,659,954 $6.96 strike Expire 08/04/2030; vested 33%/33%/34% on 8/5/2021, 8/5/2022, 8/5/2023 In-the-money at $9.90 YE price; see company footnotes on option value methodology .
Unvested RSUs959,670 Standard 33/33/34 schedule; certain retirement/CIC conditions apply YE market value $9,500,733 at $9.90/sh .
Unearned PSUs (2022–2024 cycles at target basis)2,026,109 3-year cycles; subject to performance and rTSR modifier YE market/payout value $20,058,479 at $9.90/sh (target assumption) .
2024 Vesting Activity1,878,887 vested 2024Value realized on vesting $23,392,143 .

PSU Performance-to-Metrics Snapshot (as of 12/31/2024)

PSU Grant YearPerformance-to-Metrics (as of 12/31/24)
2022 Grant79%
2023 Grant0%
2024 Grant150%

Equity Ownership & Alignment

  • Beneficial ownership: 5,680,305 shares of Ford common stock; options exercisable within 60 days to acquire 1,659,954 additional shares; no individual director/executive owned >0.14% of outstanding common stock as of Feb 1, 2025 .
  • Ownership guidelines and compliance: Officers have 5 years to meet guidelines; all Named Executives were compliant at 12/31/2024; Farley holds Ford stock worth more than 30x his base salary (based on Jan 31, 2025 closing price $10.08) .
  • Hedging/pledging: Hedging prohibited; pledging limited to shares in excess of guideline and subject to prior approvals; as of Feb 1, 2025, no director or executive officer had pledged shares .
  • Alignment: 2024 LTIP fully equity-based (PSUs, RSUs), with PSUs tied 100% to rTSR for 2024 grants; RSUs accrue dividend equivalents but pay only upon vest .

Employment Terms

ProvisionSummary
Agreement referenceEmployment Agreement (Exhibit 10‑O to 2024 10‑K) .
Severance (involuntary not for cause within 5 years of appointment)One year base salary plus annual bonus target; removal of any outstanding vesting requirements on 2020 stock option grant; contingent on 2‑year non‑compete and waiver/release .
Change in Control (CIC)Double-trigger: CIC plus resignation for “good reason” within protected period (2 years post‑CIC) triggers benefits; “good reason” includes pay reductions, failure to pay compensation, loss of incentive opportunities (below 80% of pre‑CIC), material diminution of responsibilities, or failure by successor to assume obligations; no duplicative payments—greater of overlapping benefits on item-by-item basis .
Termination Benefits (as of 12/31/2024)Voluntary: $0; Retirement Eligible: $1,633,221; CIC: $29,996,671; Involuntary Not for Cause: $5,100,000; Death/Disability: $16,284,858 (assumptions as disclosed) .
ClawbacksIncentive grants include clawback provisions; RSUs subject to clawback and forfeiture for non‑compete and inimical conduct .
PensionsFarley does not participate in pension benefit plans (no change in pension value reported) .
Options/Equity CIC treatmentDouble-trigger for equity grants; specific RSU/option treatment described, including immediate vesting in certain CIC scenarios if not replaced by comparable awards and six‑month minimum tenure met .

Board Governance

  • Board service and roles: Director since 2020; not assigned to Board committees (N/A); employee director (not independent) .
  • Leadership structure: Separate Chair (Executive Chair William Clay Ford, Jr.) and CEO; Lead Independent Director is John L. Thornton; independent committees (Audit, Compensation, Nominating) composed entirely of independent directors .
  • Governance policies: Annual say‑on‑pay; robust ownership guidelines; hedging prohibited and pledging limited; no option repricings; no options granted since 2020; double‑trigger CIC provisions for equity .

Compensation Structure Analysis

  • Mix and at-risk pay: Majority of Farley’s target total direct compensation is variable and equity-based; 2024 base salary unchanged; 2024 stock awards $20.65 million vs cash bonus $1.62 million—clear emphasis on long-term equity .
  • Metrics and rigor: 2024 bonus plan incorporated quality and growth levers (EV volume, connected services) alongside profitability (adjusted EBIT margin); business factor at 69% signals accountability on quality/cost; 2024 PSUs are 100% rTSR, reinforcing shareholder alignment but increasing exposure to market beta .
  • Equity program features: RSUs vest over 3 years (sell pressure potential around vest dates); PSUs have 3‑year cycles with performance-to-metrics snapshot showing variability (2022: 79%; 2023: 0%; 2024: 150% as of 12/31/24), introducing outcome dispersion across cycles .
  • Severance/change-in-control: Moderate cash severance (1x salary + target bonus), double-trigger CIC, and 2‑year non‑compete mitigate retention risk without excessive cash guarantees .

Performance & Track Record Highlights

  • 2024 operating performance: Record revenue ~$185B (+5% y/y); adjusted EBIT ~$10.2B; adjusted EBIT margin 5.5% .
  • Quality and cost: “Three months in service” quality improved 21% since 2020; safety recalls reduced 45% between 2022–2024; nevertheless, quality/cost targets were missed in aggregate (business factor 69%) .
  • Strategic execution: Ford Pro revenue $67B (+15% y/y), EBIT ~$9B (13.5% margin); software/services 13% of Ford Pro EBIT; EV milestones delivered albeit retail shortfalls vs targets; growing paid software subscriptions (~865k; ~40% y/y) with >50% gross margins .
  • TSR context: Cumulative TSR fell 13% in 2024; pay-versus-performance discussion attributes swings in Compensation Actually Paid largely to stock price variability across 2020–2024 .

Compensation Peer Group, Say‑on‑Pay, and Committee

  • Peer group: December 2024 compensation survey peer group comprised 84 companies; retained certain industrial/defense names (3M, GE Aerospace, Honeywell, Northrop Grumman, General Dynamics) for key positions .
  • Say‑on‑pay: Company indicates compensation practices have been “consistently supported” by shareholders; engagement conducted during 2024 as programs evolved under Ford+ (percentages not specified) .
  • Compensation committee: Comprised entirely of independent directors (John C. May, Lynn Vojvodich Radakovich, John L. Thornton, John S. Weinberg); independent consultant retained annually .

Director Service Details (dual-role implications)

ItemDetail
Board ServiceDirector since 2020; employee director (non‑independent) .
CommitteesNone (N/A); only independent directors serve on Audit, Compensation, Nominating committees .
Chair/CEO SeparationRoles are separated; Executive Chair is William Clay Ford, Jr.; Lead Independent Director is John L. Thornton—mitigates CEO/Chair concentration concerns .
Independence/ConflictsIndependent committee structure and Lead Independent Director provide counterbalance to CEO’s board role .

Investment Implications

  • Alignment and retention: Farley’s ownership far exceeds guidelines (>30x salary), hedging prohibited, no pledging reported—strong alignment with shareholders and low governance red flags on stock use .
  • Incentive signals: 2024 bonus factor at 69% indicates emphasis on quality and profitability rigor; 2024 PSUs 100% rTSR heightens market-aligned pay outcomes; PSU performance dispersion across cycles (2022: 79%; 2023: 0%; 2024: 150% as of YE) suggests variable realized equity, supporting performance sensitivity .
  • Supply/technical overhang: RSUs vest on a 3‑year 33/33/34 cadence; 1.88M shares vested in 2024, creating periodic taxable events that can translate to selling pressure around vest dates, though there’s no evidence of pledging; sizable in-the-money options (2020 grant) also add potential event‑driven flows near expiries (2030) .
  • Risk controls: Moderate severance (1x salary + target bonus), double‑trigger CIC, two‑year non‑compete, and clawbacks suggest pay practices that balance retention with shareholder protections .
  • Execution watch‑items: Sustained quality improvements and cost reductions remain key to unlock incentive upside and support TSR; Ford Pro’s profitable growth and software monetization are positive levers under Farley’s strategy, while EV retail volumes and margin targets are ongoing hurdles to monitor .

Best AI for Equity Research

Performance on expert-authored financial analysis tasks

Fintool-v490%
Claude Sonnet 4.555.3%
o348.3%
GPT 546.9%
Grok 440.3%
Qwen 3 Max32.7%

Best AI for Equity Research

Performance on expert-authored financial analysis tasks

Fintool-v490%
Claude Sonnet 4.555.3%
o348.3%
GPT 546.9%
Grok 440.3%
Qwen 3 Max32.7%