Sign in

Steven Croley

Chief Policy Officer and General Counsel at FORD MOTOR
Executive

About Steven Croley

Steven P. Croley is Ford’s Chief Policy Officer and General Counsel, a role he has held since July 2021. He was 59 years old as of February 1, 2025 . Prior to Ford, he was a partner at Latham & Watkins (2017–2021) and served as General Counsel of the U.S. Department of Energy (2014–2017) . During his tenure, Ford recorded 2024 revenue of $185 billion (+5% YoY) and delivered EBIT of about $10.2 billion, while the company’s 2024 annual bonus plan paid at a 69% business performance factor, reflecting shortfalls (notably in quality) against plan metrics .

Past Roles

OrganizationRoleYearsStrategic impact
Ford Motor CompanyChief Policy Officer and General CounselJul 2021 – PresentOversees global policy and legal; sits among executive officers listed by the company .
Latham & Watkins (Washington, D.C.)Partner2017 – 2021Senior legal practice experience prior to joining Ford .
U.S. Department of EnergyGeneral Counsel2014 – 2017Led DOE legal function; federal regulatory and policy expertise relevant to Ford’s sustainability and regulatory environment .

External Roles

OrganizationCapacityYearsNotes
Latham & WatkinsPartner2017 – 2021Private practice (pre-Ford) .
U.S. Department of EnergyGeneral Counsel2014 – 2017Federal agency leadership role .

Fixed Compensation

  • Not disclosed for Croley. Ford’s proxy discloses detailed compensation only for the “Named Executives” (NEOs), and Croley is not listed among the 2024 NEOs; therefore his base salary, target bonus and actual bonus are not itemized in the proxy tables .

Performance Compensation

Ford’s executive programs (applicable to officers) emphasize performance alignment; design details and 2024 outcomes are below.

  • Annual Performance Bonus Plan (company-wide design for executives)

    • 2024 metrics: Company Adjusted EBIT Margin; Quality (Repairs/1,000 in first 90 days); Global EV Retail Volume; Connected Services Revenue .
    • 2024 business performance factor (company result applied within individual determinations): 69% .
    • Plan mechanics: capped at 200% for maximum achievement; zero payout if below minimum thresholds .
  • Long-Term Incentive (LTI) Program

    • Award types: RSUs (time-vested) and PSUs; options have not been granted since 2020 .
    • RSUs: vest ratably over three years .
    • PSUs: for 2024 grants, 100% based on 3-year relative TSR versus an auto OEM peer set; payout range 0%–200% of target .
    • Double-trigger change-in-control protection applies to equity grants .
Incentive TypeMetric(s)Weighting2024 Target2024 Actual/PayoutVesting/Timing
Annual BonusAdjusted EBIT Margin; Quality; Global EV Retail Volume; Connected Services RevenueNot separately disclosed in excerptCompany-set per plan69% business performance factor (company) Cash paid after year-end per plan
PSU (2024 grant)Relative TSR vs auto peers100%Target TSR vs peer set0%–200% final payout range (performance-period result dependent) 3-year performance period; shares settle after period
RSUTime-basedN/AN/AN/AVests ratably over 3 years

Equity Ownership & Alignment

  • Initial ownership on joining: Croley reported no beneficial ownership upon appointment in July 2021 (Form 3) .
  • Pledging/hedging: Ford states no director or executive officer had pledged common stock; officers are prohibited from hedging and face strict limits on pledging (only above guideline holdings and with CEO/OGC pre-approval) .
  • Stock ownership guidelines: Ford imposes officer-level ownership requirements; all NEOs were compliant at 12/31/2024. Guidelines count directly/indirectly owned shares and RSUs (excluding options and unearned PSUs) .
  • Option usage: Company has not granted stock options since 2020, reducing potential forced-exercise pressures and repricing risks .

Employment Terms

  • Role and tenure: Chief Policy Officer and General Counsel since July 2021; elected among executive officers by the Board per by-laws .
  • Change-in-control: Equity grants include double-trigger CIC provisions; time-based RSUs vest ratably; PSUs measure 3-year rTSR .
  • Clawback: Incentive grants include clawback provisions, aligning with governance best practices .
  • Hedging/pledging restrictions: Officers cannot hedge Ford stock; pledging is restricted as described above .
  • Retirement/severance framework: Ford maintains legacy DB plans (GRP/DB SERP/BEP-GRP/ESAP) and DC-oriented FRP/DC SERP structures; executives hired on/after 1/1/2004 are offered FRP/DC SERP rather than DB plans. Plan eligibility is governed by plan terms and hire dates; company-level descriptions are disclosed (not individual participation) .

Risk Indicators & Governance Notes

  • Say-on-pay support and oversight: Ford emphasizes pay-for-performance, independent compensation consultants, capped payouts, clawbacks, and stock ownership guidelines; say-on-pay has been “consistently supported” in recent years .
  • Compensation risk assessment: Committee concludes programs balance risk and reward and do not encourage excessive risk-taking .
  • No pledging/hedging by executives: Reduces misalignment or forced-selling risks .

Investment Implications

  • Alignment: Croley’s incentives are governed by the same enterprise frameworks as other officers—annual bonuses tied to financial/operational milestones (including quality, EV adoption, services revenue) and LTI heavily weighted to 3-year relative TSR—indicating strong linkage to Ford+ execution and shareholder value creation .
  • Selling pressure: Absence of stock options since 2020 and company-wide prohibition on hedging plus stringent pledging limits reduce mechanical selling/derisking pressures that can distort insider trading signals .
  • Retention: Three-year RSU vesting, three-year PSU performance periods, double-trigger CIC, and stock ownership guidelines promote multi-year retention and alignment, though individual severance/contract specifics for Croley are not disclosed (non-NEO) .
  • 2024 payouts signal: The 69% business performance factor for 2024 bonuses highlights accountability to quality and profitability; it likely dampened cash bonus outcomes and underscores management’s sensitivity to execution risk on quality, EV economics, and connected services scale-up .

Best AI for Equity Research

Performance on expert-authored financial analysis tasks

Fintool-v490%
Claude Sonnet 4.555.3%
o348.3%
GPT 546.9%
Grok 440.3%
Qwen 3 Max32.7%

Best AI for Equity Research

Performance on expert-authored financial analysis tasks

Fintool-v490%
Claude Sonnet 4.555.3%
o348.3%
GPT 546.9%
Grok 440.3%
Qwen 3 Max32.7%