FT
FARO TECHNOLOGIES INC (FARO)·Q1 2025 Earnings Summary
Executive Summary
- Q1 2025 was solid operationally: revenue of $82.9M at the upper end of guidance, non-GAAP gross margin 57.7% above guidance, and non-GAAP EPS $0.33 above the high end; adjusted EBITDA reached $12.5M (15.0% margin) .
- Year-over-year revenue declined 1.6%, but margins expanded sharply (GAAP gross margin +560 bps; non-GAAP +590 bps) on supply chain localization and pricing actions, yielding GAAP net income of $0.9M vs. a $(7.3)M loss last year .
- Management guided Q2 2025 revenue to $79–$87M with non-GAAP gross margin 57.0–58.5% and non-GAAP EPS $0.20–$0.40, while proactively addressing tariff uncertainty via price increases (1% enacted in April) and potential production repatriation .
- Strategic catalysts: new products (Leap ST in January; Blink in April with ~$1M preorders) and two global partnerships (Topcon launched; metrology OEM to be announced in Q4’25), supporting net orders growth of 6% YoY and backlog build in Q1 .
What Went Well and What Went Wrong
-
What Went Well
- Non-GAAP gross margin reached 57.7%, above guidance, with sequential improvement vs. a seasonally strong Q4 driven by supply chain localization and price actions; adjusted EBITDA margin rose to 15.0% .
- Product cycle momentum: Leap ST (late Jan) and Blink (Apr 15) are expanding SAM and driving early orders; refreshed Quantum X arm, Focus scanners, Orbis mobile scanner, CAM2 and Zone software showed strong uptake .
- Partnerships: Topcon launched its product to customers in April; management expects each partnership to contribute low eight figures annually as channel scale ramps .
- Quote: “Q1 was an inflection point… net orders… grew by 6% year-over-year… we delivered… $12.5 million of adjusted EBITDA, or 15.0% of revenue” — Peter Lau .
-
What Went Wrong
- Americas softness (U.S., Mexico, Canada) tied to tariff-related uncertainty; management assumes Q2 hardware market down ~10% YoY as a prudent stance .
- Revenue down 1.6% YoY; recurring revenue grew modestly, but hardware/software dollars were nearly flat, highlighting macro pressure despite product refresh tailwinds .
- Free cash flow of $2.24M (down vs. $3.81M in Q1 2024), reflecting higher investment outlays; adjusted free cash flow declined to $3.14M .
- Analyst concern: cadence and late-quarter hardware behavior amid tariff uncertainty; management is cautious, planning for downside scenarios and preserving profitability .
Financial Results
Segment breakdown
KPIs and cash metrics
Geographic revenue mix (Q1 2025 vs. prior year)
Guidance Changes
Q1 2025 guidance performance vs. guidance
Earnings Call Themes & Trends
Management Commentary
- Strategic execution: “We’re very pleased with our strong start… Q1 was an inflection point… net orders… grew by 6% YoY… $12.5 million of adjusted EBITDA, or 15.0% of revenue, surpassing our forecasts” — Peter Lau .
- Margin drivers: “We continued to see year-over-year productivity gains driven by our ongoing supply chain localization efforts as well as nominal contributions from price increases launched at the start of the year” — CFO Matt Horwath .
- New products: “Leap ST… exceeded our expectations… Blink… automates… delivering insights through our Sphere XG cloud platform… early reception has exceeded expectations with close to $1 million in preorders” — Peter Lau .
- Tariff playbook: “A 36% reciprocal tariff on Thailand… about a $9 million impact to gross margin… total impact… $10 million… we would expect to cover the full impact with a low single-digit price increase… enacted a 1% price increase in April” — Peter Lau .
- Localization option: “We believe we can stand up localized manufacturing in the United States in less than 6 months with minimal to no investment” — Peter Lau .
Q&A Highlights
- Hardware trajectory and quarter-end cadence: Management is cautious but sees early Q2 pacing better than Q1; assuming hardware down ~10% YoY is prudence, not current run-rate, with potential upside to the higher half of Q2 guidance if trends hold .
- New products tailwind timing: Leap had limited Q1 time; acceleration expected in Q2; Blink launched mid-April with ~$1M preorders, contributing to Q2 and beyond .
- Partnerships: Topcon launch underway; metrology OEM announcement planned for Q4’25; partnerships not expected to be delayed by macro, may even accelerate in down markets .
- Macro/tariffs: Americas softness and auto sector uncertainty; management monitoring demand elasticity and discount controls, with multiple scenarios to preserve earnings and cash .
Estimates Context
- Wall Street consensus via S&P Global was unavailable for FARO this quarter due to a CIQ mapping issue, so direct beat/miss vs. Street could not be assessed. Values would normally be retrieved from S&P Global.
- Relative to company guidance, results were decisively stronger: non-GAAP EPS $0.33 vs. $0.10–$0.30 guided, non-GAAP gross margin 57.7% vs. 55.0–56.5%, and revenue at the upper end ($82.9M vs. $77–$85M) — indicative of potential upward estimate revisions to margins and EPS if sustained .
Key Takeaways for Investors
- Margin expansion is the core story: localization and pricing drove non-GAAP GM to 57.7% and adjusted EBITDA margin to 15.0%; continued focus suggests durability through Q2 despite macro uncertainty .
- Product cycle should underpin organic growth: Leap ST and Blink expand SAM with strong early demand; refreshed hardware/software portfolio and Sphere XG workflows broaden use-cases and customer access .
- Partnerships increase distribution leverage: Topcon is live, with low eight-figure annual contribution potential; metrology OEM to broaden reach in late 2025; backlog built in Q1 supports near-term visibility .
- Tariff mitigation is actionable: price increases (1% enacted) and potential US repatriation within ~6 months, plus Latin America shipping changes reduce tariff base; management expects low elasticity given product ROI .
- Near-term setup: Q2 guide implies nominal YoY growth at midpoint with margins resilient; if hardware declines moderate vs. the down ~10% assumption, upside within the range is plausible .
- Cash discipline intact: operating cash flow positive in Q1 and six consecutive quarters of OCF generation; liquidity strong ($102.6M cash and short-term investments) .
- Watch narrative drivers: sustained margin outperformance, product adoption rates, and partnership revenue realization are likely stock catalysts; tariff policy outcomes and Americas demand cadence are key risk variables .