Sign in

Thomas Lauer

President at FIDUS INVESTMENT
Executive
Board

About Thomas C. Lauer

Thomas C. Lauer, 57, is President of Fidus Investment Corporation (since September 2016), a director (since IPO in June 2011), a manager of Fidus Investment Advisors, LLC (the external advisor), and a member of the advisor’s investment committees. He holds a BBA and an MBA from the University of Notre Dame’s Mendoza College of Business . FDUS delivered a 12.4% total return on NAV and 20.1% market total return in 2024; portfolio fair value reached $1.09B with a 13.3% weighted average yield on debt investments, providing context for performance during Lauer’s tenure as President since 2016 .

  • Board status: “Interested Director” due to his advisor role; not independent .
  • Governance context: Board chaired by CEO Edward H. Ross; no Lead Independent Director; independent directors meet in executive session each meeting .
  • Education: University of Notre Dame (BBA, MBA) .

Past Roles

OrganizationRoleYearsStrategic Impact
Fidus Partners, LLCManaging Partner2008–Jun 2011Built lower middle-market investment banking platform; predecessor to advisor; informs sourcing and underwriting .
Allied Capital CorporationManaging Director; member of Management Committee (2006–2008), Private Finance IC (2005–2008), Senior Debt Fund IC (2007–2008)2004–2008Direct lending and mezzanine investing experience; committee roles signal portfolio and risk governance depth .
GE CapitalGlobal Sponsor Finance GroupSponsor finance execution and underwriting foundation .
Wachovia/First Union SecuritiesLeveraged Capital GroupLeveraged finance and capital markets expertise .
Intel CorporationPlatform Components DivisionOperating exposure in technology/manufacturing .

External Roles

OrganizationRoleYearsNotes
Fidus Investment Advisors, LLCManager; Investment Committee member2011–presentAdvisor responsible for origination, underwriting, monitoring and valuation processes .
Fidus Mezzanine Capital, L.P. (Fund I) BoardDirector (board includes all Company directors)Subsidiary board oversight; BDC-level governance extends to Fund I .

Fixed Compensation

Executives do not receive direct compensation from FDUS; they are employees/affiliates of the external advisor. Interested directors (including Lauer) receive no director fees .

PersonBase SalaryTarget Bonus %Actual BonusDirector Cash FeesNotes
Thomas C. Lauer$0No direct Company comp; interested directors not paid by FDUS .

FDUS paid its advisor $37.1M in 2024 (base management fee $18.6M net of waiver, income incentive fee $18.5M) and reimbursed $2.6M of administrative expenses; $0.7M of capital gains incentive fee was accrued GAAP but none payable .

Performance Compensation

Company-level performance pay to executives is not applicable. However, the advisory fee construct drives incentives for the platform Lauer helps manage.

Incentive ElementMetricHurdle/StructureRateVesting/When Paid
Income Incentive FeePre-incentive fee Net Investment Income (NII)2.0% quarterly hurdle on prior-quarter weighted average net assets; 100% catch-up between 2.0%–2.5%; 20% above 2.5%20%Quarterly, in arrears .
Capital Gains Incentive FeeCumulative realized gains net of realized losses and unrealized depreciationNo hurdle; cumulative “since-inception” construct20%Annually, in arrears; accruals on unrealized gains possible .
Base Management FeeAverage total assets (ex cash)Quarterly calc1.75% annualizedQuarterly, in arrears .

Key implications:

  • Rising base rates can more easily clear the 2% quarterly hurdle, potentially increasing income fees without proportional gains to common shareholders .
  • Incentives can favor structures with PIK/deferred interest and asset growth via leverage, creating alignment risks if not actively overseen by independent directors .

Equity Ownership & Alignment

HolderShares Beneficially Owned% of Shares OutstandingOwnership Dollar RangeOptions/RSUs Outstanding
Thomas C. Lauer81,6000.24% (calc: 81,600 / 34,731,661)Over $1,000,000None exercisable within 60 days .

Additional alignment factors:

  • No company stock options outstanding within 60 days; reduces near-term forced exercises/selling .
  • Hedging: The Code of Business Conduct does not expressly prohibit hedging by insiders, a governance softness; pledging policy not disclosed in the proxy .
  • Advisor IC members (incl. Lauer) also report dollar ranges of FDUS stock ownership; Lauer reported “Over $1,000,000” .

Employment Terms

  • Employment status: Employee/manager of the external advisor; not employed by FDUS. No Company-level employment agreement, severance, or change-of-control (CoC) terms disclosed for Lauer .
  • Advisory/Administration agreements: Board renewed both to June 20, 2025; fees, services, and termination rights governed by these contracts (60-day termination for admin) .
  • Non-compete/non-solicit/garden leave: Not disclosed at Company level; would sit with the advisor, not FDUS.

Board Governance (service history, committees, independence)

  • Board class/tenure: Class II director since June 2011; up for re-election in 2025 to serve through 2028 .
  • Independence: “Interested Director” due to advisor roles (manager and IC member) .
  • Committees: Audit and Nominating committees consist solely of independent directors; Lauer is not a member .
  • Attendance: In 2024, Board met 6 times; Audit 9; Nominating 3; all directors attended 100% and attended the 2024 annual meeting .
  • Leadership: CEO Edward H. Ross is Chairman; Board has no Lead Independent Director; independent directors meet in executive session each Board meeting; Audit Chair (Anstiss) acts as liaison .

Dual-role implications:

  • CEO is also Chair; Lauer is an interested director and President. The Board cites mitigants: fully independent committees, executive sessions, CCO access, and liaison role for the Audit Chair .

Related Party and Conflicts (trading signals and governance risk)

  • Lauer is a manager of the advisor; advisor fee structure (base + income + capital gains fees) creates potential conflicts (incentives to grow assets/fees, favor PIK, and leverage). The Board reviews/renews the advisory agreement annually and independent directors oversee valuations and fees .
  • Co-investment and allocations governed by SEC exemptive order and allocation policy; independent “required majority” must approve co-investment decisions .
  • “Fidus” name is licensed from Fidus Partners; certain advisor personnel are also members of Fidus Partners, creating additional related-party touchpoints .

Performance & Track Record (context for pay-for-performance)

Metric20232024
Portfolio Fair Value ($mm)957.91,090.5
Total Return (NAV basis)15.1%12.4%
Total Return (Market basis)17.8%20.1%
Weighted Avg Debt Yield13.3% (as of 12/31/24)

Additional market reference:

  • NAV per-share premium/discount ranged from -3.4% to +11.2% across 2024 quarters; last close on Mar 20, 2025 was $20.47 .

Director Compensation (for comparison)

Director TypeAnnual Cash RetainerMeeting FeesCommittee Chair Fees
Independent Directors$60,000$5,000 per regular Board mtg; $2,500 per additional Audit mtgAudit Chair +$10,000; Nominating Chair +$5,000
Interested Directors (incl. Lauer)$0$0$0

Compensation Structure Analysis (alignment, retention, and red flags)

  • Shift in mix: Company pays no executive comp; compensation is via advisor economics. Equity grants, options, vesting schedules, and CoC severance for Lauer at the Company are not applicable/not disclosed .
  • Incentive metrics: Advisor compensation tied to NII (quarterly hurdle/catch-up) and realized gains; risk factors note potential preference for PIK and asset growth to maximize fees—important for trading and payout modeling .
  • Clawbacks/tax gross-ups: Not disclosed at Company level given no exec pay; none cited for director cash fees .
  • Hedging/pledging: Hedging not expressly prohibited for insiders; pledging not addressed—soft spot relative to best practices .

Say-on-Pay & Shareholder Feedback

No say-on-pay proposal in 2025; proposals were director elections and authorization to issue shares below NAV (subject to limits and conditions) .

Expertise & Qualifications

  • 30+ years investing debt/equity in lower middle market; extensive IC experience at Allied Capital and the advisor; Notre Dame BBA/MBA .
  • Board deems Lauer’s experience valuable for investment oversight and strategy .

Equity Ownership & Insider Activity Notes

  • Beneficial ownership: 81,600 shares; less than 1% of outstanding (Over $1,000,000 value range) .
  • Options/RSUs: None exercisable within 60 days across the Company’s common stock, limiting mechanical exercise-related selling .
  • Insider trading policy exists; no explicit prohibition on hedging .

Employment & Contracts (Retention/Transition)

  • No Company employment agreement, severance, or CoC provisions for Lauer; retention linked to advisor economics and governance continuity (annual advisory agreement renewal) .
  • Advisor agreements can be terminated per terms; admin agreement has 60-day termination right .

Investment Implications

  • Alignment: Lauer’s personal stock ownership and long role as President support alignment, but the advisor fee structure (1.75% base, 20% NII over hurdle with catch-up, 20% capital gains) can create incentives toward asset growth, leverage, and PIK-heavy structures—monitoring NII quality (cash vs PIK), leverage, and fee capture is critical for payout sustainability .
  • Governance: As an “interested” director and President under a Chair/CEO structure, independence relies on the efficacy of the independent Audit and Nominating Committees, executive sessions, and valuation oversight. The absence of a Lead Independent Director and a permissive hedging stance are modest governance drawbacks to factor into risk premia .
  • Retention risk: With no Company-level employment or severance economics (comp paid by the advisor), retention hinges on advisor health and incentives; annual advisory agreement renewals and independent oversight mitigate but do not eliminate platform-dependence risk .
  • Trading signals: Watch for shifts in income mix (PIK vs cash), NAV vs price premium/discount dynamics around below-NAV issuance authorizations, and any changes in advisory fee waivers. Director/insider Form 4 activity analysis would further calibrate selling pressure, but was not disclosed in the proxy; rely on ongoing filings for updates .