Sign in

You're signed outSign in or to get full access.

Thomas Lauer

President at FIDUS INVESTMENT
Executive
Board

About Thomas C. Lauer

Thomas C. Lauer, 57, is President of Fidus Investment Corporation (since September 2016), a director (since IPO in June 2011), a manager of Fidus Investment Advisors, LLC (the external advisor), and a member of the advisor’s investment committees. He holds a BBA and an MBA from the University of Notre Dame’s Mendoza College of Business . FDUS delivered a 12.4% total return on NAV and 20.1% market total return in 2024; portfolio fair value reached $1.09B with a 13.3% weighted average yield on debt investments, providing context for performance during Lauer’s tenure as President since 2016 .

  • Board status: “Interested Director” due to his advisor role; not independent .
  • Governance context: Board chaired by CEO Edward H. Ross; no Lead Independent Director; independent directors meet in executive session each meeting .
  • Education: University of Notre Dame (BBA, MBA) .

Past Roles

OrganizationRoleYearsStrategic Impact
Fidus Partners, LLCManaging Partner2008–Jun 2011Built lower middle-market investment banking platform; predecessor to advisor; informs sourcing and underwriting .
Allied Capital CorporationManaging Director; member of Management Committee (2006–2008), Private Finance IC (2005–2008), Senior Debt Fund IC (2007–2008)2004–2008Direct lending and mezzanine investing experience; committee roles signal portfolio and risk governance depth .
GE CapitalGlobal Sponsor Finance GroupSponsor finance execution and underwriting foundation .
Wachovia/First Union SecuritiesLeveraged Capital GroupLeveraged finance and capital markets expertise .
Intel CorporationPlatform Components DivisionOperating exposure in technology/manufacturing .

External Roles

OrganizationRoleYearsNotes
Fidus Investment Advisors, LLCManager; Investment Committee member2011–presentAdvisor responsible for origination, underwriting, monitoring and valuation processes .
Fidus Mezzanine Capital, L.P. (Fund I) BoardDirector (board includes all Company directors)Subsidiary board oversight; BDC-level governance extends to Fund I .

Fixed Compensation

Executives do not receive direct compensation from FDUS; they are employees/affiliates of the external advisor. Interested directors (including Lauer) receive no director fees .

PersonBase SalaryTarget Bonus %Actual BonusDirector Cash FeesNotes
Thomas C. Lauer$0No direct Company comp; interested directors not paid by FDUS .

FDUS paid its advisor $37.1M in 2024 (base management fee $18.6M net of waiver, income incentive fee $18.5M) and reimbursed $2.6M of administrative expenses; $0.7M of capital gains incentive fee was accrued GAAP but none payable .

Performance Compensation

Company-level performance pay to executives is not applicable. However, the advisory fee construct drives incentives for the platform Lauer helps manage.

Incentive ElementMetricHurdle/StructureRateVesting/When Paid
Income Incentive FeePre-incentive fee Net Investment Income (NII)2.0% quarterly hurdle on prior-quarter weighted average net assets; 100% catch-up between 2.0%–2.5%; 20% above 2.5%20%Quarterly, in arrears .
Capital Gains Incentive FeeCumulative realized gains net of realized losses and unrealized depreciationNo hurdle; cumulative “since-inception” construct20%Annually, in arrears; accruals on unrealized gains possible .
Base Management FeeAverage total assets (ex cash)Quarterly calc1.75% annualizedQuarterly, in arrears .

Key implications:

  • Rising base rates can more easily clear the 2% quarterly hurdle, potentially increasing income fees without proportional gains to common shareholders .
  • Incentives can favor structures with PIK/deferred interest and asset growth via leverage, creating alignment risks if not actively overseen by independent directors .

Equity Ownership & Alignment

HolderShares Beneficially Owned% of Shares OutstandingOwnership Dollar RangeOptions/RSUs Outstanding
Thomas C. Lauer81,6000.24% (calc: 81,600 / 34,731,661)Over $1,000,000None exercisable within 60 days .

Additional alignment factors:

  • No company stock options outstanding within 60 days; reduces near-term forced exercises/selling .
  • Hedging: The Code of Business Conduct does not expressly prohibit hedging by insiders, a governance softness; pledging policy not disclosed in the proxy .
  • Advisor IC members (incl. Lauer) also report dollar ranges of FDUS stock ownership; Lauer reported “Over $1,000,000” .

Employment Terms

  • Employment status: Employee/manager of the external advisor; not employed by FDUS. No Company-level employment agreement, severance, or change-of-control (CoC) terms disclosed for Lauer .
  • Advisory/Administration agreements: Board renewed both to June 20, 2025; fees, services, and termination rights governed by these contracts (60-day termination for admin) .
  • Non-compete/non-solicit/garden leave: Not disclosed at Company level; would sit with the advisor, not FDUS.

Board Governance (service history, committees, independence)

  • Board class/tenure: Class II director since June 2011; up for re-election in 2025 to serve through 2028 .
  • Independence: “Interested Director” due to advisor roles (manager and IC member) .
  • Committees: Audit and Nominating committees consist solely of independent directors; Lauer is not a member .
  • Attendance: In 2024, Board met 6 times; Audit 9; Nominating 3; all directors attended 100% and attended the 2024 annual meeting .
  • Leadership: CEO Edward H. Ross is Chairman; Board has no Lead Independent Director; independent directors meet in executive session each Board meeting; Audit Chair (Anstiss) acts as liaison .

Dual-role implications:

  • CEO is also Chair; Lauer is an interested director and President. The Board cites mitigants: fully independent committees, executive sessions, CCO access, and liaison role for the Audit Chair .

Related Party and Conflicts (trading signals and governance risk)

  • Lauer is a manager of the advisor; advisor fee structure (base + income + capital gains fees) creates potential conflicts (incentives to grow assets/fees, favor PIK, and leverage). The Board reviews/renews the advisory agreement annually and independent directors oversee valuations and fees .
  • Co-investment and allocations governed by SEC exemptive order and allocation policy; independent “required majority” must approve co-investment decisions .
  • “Fidus” name is licensed from Fidus Partners; certain advisor personnel are also members of Fidus Partners, creating additional related-party touchpoints .

Performance & Track Record (context for pay-for-performance)

Metric20232024
Portfolio Fair Value ($mm)957.91,090.5
Total Return (NAV basis)15.1%12.4%
Total Return (Market basis)17.8%20.1%
Weighted Avg Debt Yield13.3% (as of 12/31/24)

Additional market reference:

  • NAV per-share premium/discount ranged from -3.4% to +11.2% across 2024 quarters; last close on Mar 20, 2025 was $20.47 .

Director Compensation (for comparison)

Director TypeAnnual Cash RetainerMeeting FeesCommittee Chair Fees
Independent Directors$60,000$5,000 per regular Board mtg; $2,500 per additional Audit mtgAudit Chair +$10,000; Nominating Chair +$5,000
Interested Directors (incl. Lauer)$0$0$0

Compensation Structure Analysis (alignment, retention, and red flags)

  • Shift in mix: Company pays no executive comp; compensation is via advisor economics. Equity grants, options, vesting schedules, and CoC severance for Lauer at the Company are not applicable/not disclosed .
  • Incentive metrics: Advisor compensation tied to NII (quarterly hurdle/catch-up) and realized gains; risk factors note potential preference for PIK and asset growth to maximize fees—important for trading and payout modeling .
  • Clawbacks/tax gross-ups: Not disclosed at Company level given no exec pay; none cited for director cash fees .
  • Hedging/pledging: Hedging not expressly prohibited for insiders; pledging not addressed—soft spot relative to best practices .

Say-on-Pay & Shareholder Feedback

No say-on-pay proposal in 2025; proposals were director elections and authorization to issue shares below NAV (subject to limits and conditions) .

Expertise & Qualifications

  • 30+ years investing debt/equity in lower middle market; extensive IC experience at Allied Capital and the advisor; Notre Dame BBA/MBA .
  • Board deems Lauer’s experience valuable for investment oversight and strategy .

Equity Ownership & Insider Activity Notes

  • Beneficial ownership: 81,600 shares; less than 1% of outstanding (Over $1,000,000 value range) .
  • Options/RSUs: None exercisable within 60 days across the Company’s common stock, limiting mechanical exercise-related selling .
  • Insider trading policy exists; no explicit prohibition on hedging .

Employment & Contracts (Retention/Transition)

  • No Company employment agreement, severance, or CoC provisions for Lauer; retention linked to advisor economics and governance continuity (annual advisory agreement renewal) .
  • Advisor agreements can be terminated per terms; admin agreement has 60-day termination right .

Investment Implications

  • Alignment: Lauer’s personal stock ownership and long role as President support alignment, but the advisor fee structure (1.75% base, 20% NII over hurdle with catch-up, 20% capital gains) can create incentives toward asset growth, leverage, and PIK-heavy structures—monitoring NII quality (cash vs PIK), leverage, and fee capture is critical for payout sustainability .
  • Governance: As an “interested” director and President under a Chair/CEO structure, independence relies on the efficacy of the independent Audit and Nominating Committees, executive sessions, and valuation oversight. The absence of a Lead Independent Director and a permissive hedging stance are modest governance drawbacks to factor into risk premia .
  • Retention risk: With no Company-level employment or severance economics (comp paid by the advisor), retention hinges on advisor health and incentives; annual advisory agreement renewals and independent oversight mitigate but do not eliminate platform-dependence risk .
  • Trading signals: Watch for shifts in income mix (PIK vs cash), NAV vs price premium/discount dynamics around below-NAV issuance authorizations, and any changes in advisory fee waivers. Director/insider Form 4 activity analysis would further calibrate selling pressure, but was not disclosed in the proxy; rely on ongoing filings for updates .