FP
Flux Power Holdings, Inc. (FLUX)·Q1 2026 Earnings Summary
Executive Summary
- Q1 FY26 revenue declined sequentially and year-over-year amid a temporary pause in customer orders tied to tariff uncertainty and near-term macro caution; revenue of $13.2M and gross margin of 28.6% were both down vs Q4 FY25 and Q1 FY25 .
- The quarter missed Wall Street consensus on both revenue ($13.18M vs $14.11M) and EPS (-$0.14 vs -$0.12); EBITDA was materially below consensus as mix shifted to lower-capacity products; management pointed to tariffs, mix and government shutdown impacts * .
- Subsequent order momentum rebounded early in Q2 FY26 with ~$2.4M in repeat orders and a large new airline customer, expanding Flux’s North American airline coverage to eight; UL certifications (UL EE across material handling; UL 1973 for 80V GSE) broaden addressable markets and support adoption .
- Liquidity strengthened post-quarter via ~$9.2M net proceeds from an equity offering and $4.6M net proceeds from a pre-funded warrant placement; borrowing capacity remains available under a $16M facility, reinforcing working capital and product roadmap acceleration .
- Near-term stock catalysts: certification-driven TAM expansion, order recovery signals, and cost actions; risks include persistent tariff headwinds and mix pressure on margins .
What Went Well and What Went Wrong
What Went Well
- UL EE Listing across the entire material handling portfolio and UL 1973 Listing for the 80V GSE solution, unlocking new TAM in chemical, oil & gas, agriculture processing, pharma, and GSE/AGV/AMR opportunities .
- Early Q2 order recovery highlighted by ~$2.4M in repeat orders and a large airline order; airline footprint doubled to eight North American carriers vs last year, supporting GSE electrification penetration .
- Software strategy advanced: SkyEMS/SkyBMS 2.0 moved from beta to production with multiple paying customers; management targets every battery to be cloud-connected and is adding AI-driven features .
- “It is our goal that every battery ship be cloud connected, and we are working hard towards this goal.” — CEO Krishna Vanka .
What Went Wrong
- Revenue and margins compressed on order pauses tied to tariff uncertainty and macro caution; gross margin fell to 28.6% from 32.4% YoY and from 34.5% in Q4, with mix shift to lower energy capacity products .
- Q1 missed consensus on revenue and EPS; adjusted EBITDA deteriorated to -$1.7M vs +$0.6M in Q4, reflecting lower volumes and mix *.
- Management cited additional near-term headwinds including the government shutdown; while seeing signs of recovery, visibility remains cautious into Q2 before strengthening expected in Q3 (calendar Q1 2026) .
Financial Results
Quarterly Trend (oldest → newest)
Q1 FY26 vs Prior Year and Consensus
Notes: Values retrieved from S&P Global.*
Balance Sheet and Liquidity Snapshot
Operating KPIs and Commercial Highlights
Guidance Changes
Note: No formal numerical guidance ranges were provided; commentary was qualitative.
Earnings Call Themes & Trends
Management Commentary
- “First quarter revenue reflected a temporary pause in customer orders due to the uncertainty surrounding the tariff situation and overall near-term caution on the macroeconomic environment.” — CEO Krishna Vanka .
- “We have begun to see order activity materially rebound in the second quarter, highlighted by multi-million-dollar orders… and a more recent large order from a major new airline customer.” — CEO .
- “Gross margin… decreased… mainly from lower sales combined with a shift in mix to our lower energy capacity products.” — CFO Kevin Royal .
- “We completed two capital raises totaling $13.8 million… used for working capital… to accelerate our product development roadmap.” — CEO .
- “We received UL EE Listing across our material handling portfolio… opening up a new $1B total addressable market… and UL 1973 Listing for our 80V… GSE industry.” — CEO ; corroborated by press release .
Q&A Highlights
- Order trends: Management sees evidence of a rebound post-quarter with ~$2.4M material handling orders and a significant airline order; expects strengthening in Q3 FY26 (calendar Q1 2026) while acknowledging ongoing tariff and government shutdown headwinds .
- GSE adoption: Airlines continue to move to lithium; near-term tariffs caused a pause, but broader trend remains supportive; expanded airline customer base to eight .
- Margin/operations: Mix shifted to lower-capacity products; ongoing cost reductions and workforce right-sizing; capital raised to support product redesigns aimed at lowering costs and improving gross profit .
Estimates Context
- Q1 FY26 performance versus S&P Global consensus: Revenue $13.18M vs $14.11M estimate (miss); EPS -$0.14 vs -$0.12 estimate (miss); EBITDA -$1.93M vs -$0.39M estimate (miss). Management attributed the variance to tariff-driven order pauses and lower-capacity mix * .
- Q2 FY26 consensus implies sequential improvement: Revenue $16.11M; EPS -$0.06; EBITDA -$0.747M; aligns with management’s commentary on order recovery and improving trends into Q3 FY26 *.
- Coverage depth: Primary EPS estimates count = 1 for Q1 and 2 for Q2; Revenue estimates count = 2 for Q1 and 3 for Q2, indicating limited sell-side coverage for FLUX*.
Notes: Values retrieved from S&P Global.*
Key Takeaways for Investors
- Q1 miss was driven by external tariff uncertainty and product mix; watch Q2 order cadence and margin mix as leading indicators for sequential recovery .
- Certifications (UL EE, UL 1973) expand TAM and de-risk adoption in regulated industrial segments; this can catalyze sales cycles and support premium pricing .
- Software transition is real: multiple paying customers on SkyEMS/SkyBMS 2.0 and AI roadmap; recurring revenue and fleet intelligence can improve stickiness and lifetime value .
- Liquidity improved via ~$13.8M combined net proceeds; monitor deployment into cost-down redesigns and working capital to support growth without diluting margins .
- Near-term risks: tariff policy volatility, potential mix headwinds, and macro caution; mitigating levers include cost reductions, sourcing diversification, and solution selling .
- Medium-term: If order momentum sustains and certifications unlock new verticals (chemical/oil & gas/pharma/AGVs/AMRs), margin trajectory could normalize back toward mid-30s as mix and volume improve .
- Trading lens: Watch for follow-on order announcements, backlog updates, and margin commentary in mid-February; positive signals on GSE and material handling wins may act as catalysts .