FH
Fortrea Holdings Inc. (FTRE)·Q3 2025 Earnings Summary
Executive Summary
- Revenue of $701.3M grew 3.9% YoY and beat S&P Global consensus by 9.0% ($643.2M est. vs. $701.3M actual). Adjusted diluted EPS of $0.12 missed consensus by ~$0.04 (est. $0.162) as pass-through mix and reintroduced variable comp weighed on margins .
- Book-to-bill improved to 1.13x (TTM 1.07x) and backlog reached $7.644B; management raised FY25 revenue guidance to $2.70–$2.75B and narrowed adjusted EBITDA guidance to $175–$195M .
- Operating execution improved: DSO fell to 33 days, Q3 operating cash flow was ~$87M and free cash flow ~$80M; available liquidity exceeded $500M, aided by a $25M divestiture milestone and a tender offer to repurchase up to $75.7M senior secured notes .
- Strategic narrative: sales win rates were the highest in six quarters, particularly in biotech; AI-enabled “Accelerate Risk Radar” and digital tools (iCRA, Start My Day) are driving measured productivity gains and client NPS improvements .
- Key stock-reaction catalysts: revenue beat with raised FY revenue outlook, but margin compression vs. last year (gross margin 17.5% vs. 22.0% in Q3’24) and EPS miss on higher pass-throughs and compensation likely tempered enthusiasm near term .
What Went Well and What Went Wrong
What Went Well
- “Fortrea delivered a solid performance that met expectations” with revenue $701.3M, adjusted EBITDA $50.7M, book-to-bill 1.13x, and backlog >$7.6B; win rates reached the highest level in six quarters, doubling with biotech QoQ .
- Operating cadence and client delivery improved: time-to-site selection reduced 33%; recruitment accelerated by three months in a complex respiratory study; phase 2 Alzheimer’s enrollment finished five months early; NPS improved YoY .
- Cash discipline and liquidity: Q3 operating cash flow ~$87M and FCF ~$80M; DSO down 13 days sequentially to 33; undrawn revolver and liquidity >$500M; debt paydown actions including a tender offer for senior secured notes .
What Went Wrong
- Margins compressed: adjusted EBITDA fell to $50.7M (vs. $64.2M in Q3’24) and gross margin to 17.5% (vs. ~22.0% in Q3’24), driven by higher pass-through mix, reintroduced variable comp, and lower R&D tax credits .
- EPS miss vs. consensus: adjusted diluted EPS of $0.12 came in below S&P Global consensus (~$0.162), despite the revenue beat, as mix and compensation limited flow-through .
- Slight uptick in cancellations and competitive pricing pressure (particularly in FSP); mix in clinical pharmacology requires external sites for large bioequivalence cohorts, raising pass-throughs and diluting margins .
Financial Results
Quarterly Actuals
Q3 2025 vs Prior Periods
Actual vs S&P Global Consensus
*Values retrieved from S&P Global.
KPIs and Balance Sheet
Narrative drivers:
- Clinical Pharmacology: higher demand, larger pass-through mix; healthy utilization; some large bioequivalence studies necessitate multi-site execution .
- Clinical Development: recent net new awards with increased pass-throughs; lower FFP revenue .
Guidance Changes
Earnings Call Themes & Trends
Management Commentary
- CEO strategic pillars: “Commercial excellence… Operational excellence… Financial excellence,” with focus on right-sizing, margin expansion in 2026, and consistent backlog growth .
- Client engagement: “Our win rates improved significantly, reaching the highest level in six quarters… with biotech clients, our win rates doubled compared to the prior quarter” .
- Technology productivity: “Accelerate Risk Radar… uses AI and ML to automate risk identification and suggest mitigation strategies… iCRA mobile app… Early users report 5–10% efficiency gains” .
- Margin path: “I don’t see any structural reason why we can’t return back to more industry-standard margins… it’s going to take… right-sizing… and consistent delivery of book-to-bill” .
Q&A Highlights
- Pricing and margin leverage: Management is vigilant on pricing, willing to walk away from deals; revenue beats driven by pass-through mix reduce EBITDA flow-through; focus on direct service fee revenue to restore margin leverage .
- Biotech vs. large pharma: Decision timelines improving in biotech; large pharma resilient amid tariff/pricing uncertainty; RFP volumes up ~40% QoQ for new-to-Fortrea customers, win rates doubled in biotech .
- FSP: Sequential RFP increase, but longer cycles; cautious participation to avoid unattractive margin work .
- Cancellations: Slight increase but within historical range; lower exposure to vaccines/government-funded programs helps resilience vs. peers .
- 2026 outlook: Too early for guidance; focus remains on executing cost programs and improving SG&A through 2026 .
Estimates Context
- Revenue beat: Q3 revenue $701.3M vs. $643.2M consensus (+9.0%); Q2 $710.3M vs. $631.5M (+12.5%); Q1 $651.3M vs. $607.9M (+7.2%) .
- EPS outcome: Q3 adjusted diluted EPS $0.12 vs. ~$0.162 consensus (miss ~$$0.04); Q2 $0.19 vs. $0.075 (beat); Q1 $0.02 vs. $(0.066) (beat) .
- Consensus values above are from S&P Global; EBITDA consensus appears to reference GAAP EBITDA, which is not directly comparable to management’s adjusted EBITDA disclosure—focus estimate comparisons on revenue and adjusted EPS for clarity.*
*Values retrieved from S&P Global.
Key Takeaways for Investors
- Revenue momentum and backlog health are improving; raised FY25 revenue guidance signals confidence in pipeline conversion and burn, but pass-through mix continues to limit margin expansion near term .
- EPS miss vs. consensus and YoY margin compression reflect reinvestment in variable compensation and mix; watch for 2H pass-through moderation and SG&A savings ramp to support margin recovery .
- Liquidity is robust (>$500M), with Q3 OCF/FCF strength and revolver undrawn; debt tender offers and DSO improvements provide additional balance-sheet flexibility .
- Commercial execution is a bright spot (record win rates, biotech improvement); AI-enabled productivity tools and NPS gains support sustained delivery, potentially aiding pricing discipline over time .
- Near-term trading: revenue beat and guidance raise are positives; EPS miss and margin pressure may cap upside until mix/SG&A trajectory is clearer—watch Q4 margin and cash flow prints .
- Medium-term thesis: No structural impediments to returning to peer-level margins per management; execution on right-sizing, direct service fee growth, and backlog diversity are the key levers for 2026 .
- Risk monitoring: Competitive pricing in FSP, cancellation trends, and pass-through intensity; regulatory/macro headlines (tariffs, pricing) could affect decision timing and mix .