FH
FULLER H B CO (FUL)·Q1 2025 Earnings Summary
Executive Summary
- Q1 2025 delivered resilient top-line and a clean beat vs consensus: revenue $0.789B (-2.7% YoY; +1.9% organic) and adjusted EPS $0.54, beating S&P Global consensus of ~$0.769B revenue and ~$$0.495 EPS; adjusted EBITDA was $114M, at the high end of guidance, with margin 14.5% . Values with * are from S&P Global; see disclaimer below.
- Guidance maintained: FY25 adjusted EBITDA $600–$625M, adjusted EPS $3.90–$4.20, operating cash flow $300–$325M; Q2 adjusted EBITDA guided to $150–$160M .
- Segment mix: Engineering Adhesives (EA) margin expanded to 18.7% (+180 bps YoY) on pricing, restructuring, and ND Industries; HHC organic revenue +4% but margin compressed on raw materials; BAS revenue +2% with stable margin .
- Balance sheet/cash: net debt rose to $2.07B (3.5x TTM adjusted EBITDA) largely due to acquisitions; cash from operations was -$52.9M as working capital built with revenue growth; buybacks of 678K shares executed opportunistically .
- Near-term stock catalysts: price realization and raw material moderation, continued EA margin uplift, roofing/data-center exposure in BAS, and opportunistic buybacks; management reiterated a path toward >20% EBITDA margin via footprint streamlining and portfolio optimization .
What Went Well and What Went Wrong
-
What Went Well
- Beat vs consensus: Adjusted EPS $0.54 vs ~$0.495*; revenue $0.789B vs ~$0.769B*; EBITDA delivered at high end of the range . Values with * are from S&P Global; see disclaimer below.
- EA margin expansion: EA adjusted EBITDA margin rose to 18.7% (+180 bps YoY) on favorable pricing/raws, restructuring, and ND Industries acquisition contribution .
- BAS strategic positioning: strength in roofing/data centers; new eco spray adhesive (PG‑1 EF ECO2) supports labor-constrained installs and ESG specs; “we are in the right spaces…delivering innovation” .
-
What Went Wrong
- HHC margin compression: adjusted EBITDA margin fell to 12.7% from 17.1% YoY as raw material inflation (notably hydrogenated hydrocarbon resins) outweighed price/volume; pricing realization lagged in prior quarter .
- Working capital and cash flow: cash from operations was -$52.9M vs +$47.4M last year on higher working capital needs associated with growth; full-year cash flow expected to be 2H-weighted .
- Leverage drift: net debt rose to $2.07B (3.5x) vs 3.1x at FY24; management slowed M&A pipeline timing and prioritized buybacks amid market volatility .
Financial Results
Q1 2025 vs S&P Global Consensus
Values with * are from S&P Global.
Segment Performance (Q1 2025 vs Q1 2024)
Key KPIs
Guidance Changes
Note: Subsequent to Q1, FUL raised FY25 adjusted EBITDA to $615–$630M and adjusted EPS to $4.10–$4.30 in its Q2 release (context only) .
Earnings Call Themes & Trends
Management Commentary
- “I’m encouraged by our first quarter financial performance and positive organic sales growth…we remain focused on pricing discipline, market share gains, and effectively managing our cost structure…drive our business toward our greater than 20% EBITDA margin target.” — Celeste Mastin, CEO .
- “EBITDA of $114 million, which was at the high end of our guidance range…Foreign exchange negatively impacted adjusted EBITDA by approximately $5 million year-on-year.” — John Corkrean, CFO .
- “Our strategy to produce in the same region where we sell…acts as a natural hedge against currency fluctuations…reduces our exposure to tariffs. On average, 97% of what we sell in a region is produced in the same region.” — Celeste Mastin .
- “We expect to continue to repurchase shares throughout the year on an opportunistic basis…we have temporarily slowed the timing of M&A transactions (given leverage 3.5x).” — John Corkrean .
- “In the solar space, it remains very competitive…repositioning away from cheaper Chinese panels…margins will appreciate significantly.” — Celeste Mastin .
Q&A Highlights
- Tariffs/pre-buying: Management saw no meaningful pre-buying; customers remain cautious; durable goods weak in U.S. .
- HHC pricing/margin trajectory: Pricing expected up 1–2% FY; last three quarters HHC EBITDA margin targeted 15–17% as pricing executes and raw cost headwinds subside .
- Working capital/cash: CFO reaffirmed FY operating cash flow $300–$325M (2H-weighted), with working capital as the main swing factor and sequential profit improvement expected .
- Solar headwind quantified: FY solar revenue expected down ~20% YoY; ~$20M EBITDA drag at ~35% flow-through .
- China trends: HHC/EA performing well; EA up high-teens ex-solar in China; consumer electronics relatively soft; taking share in EVs and electronics .
Estimates Context
- Q1 2025 beat vs S&P Global consensus on both revenue and adjusted EPS: revenue $0.789B vs ~$0.769B*, adjusted EPS $0.54 vs ~$0.495* . Values with * are from S&P Global.
- EBITDA consensus comparability: company reports adjusted EBITDA of $114M; consensus methodologies may differ from company’s adjusted basis; management judged performance at the high end of guidance . Values retrieved from S&P Global.
Key Takeaways for Investors
- Q1 set a constructive tone: revenue and EPS beat, EBITDA at the high end of guidance, despite raw material inflation and FX headwinds .
- HHC margin repair is the key swing factor: pricing actions are in flight and expected to normalize margins to 15–17% over the next three quarters; monitor price realization and raw trends .
- EA is a bright spot: margin expansion and acquisition synergies should continue to support profitability even as solar remains a top-line headwind .
- BAS levered to data centers/roofing: innovation (PG‑1 EF ECO2) and spec wins in priority end-markets underpin stable growth/margins .
- Balance sheet watch: leverage at 3.5x TTM adjusted EBITDA (post M&A) necessitates disciplined capital allocation; buybacks may continue opportunistically while M&A pacing slows .
- FY guide intact post-Q1 (later raised in Q2): near-term catalysts include Q2 EBITDA delivery ($150–$160M) and continued margin expansion on price/raw actions .
- Tactical implication: favor setups into prints where pricing traction and raw moderation can drive sequential EBITDA margin improvement; sensitivity to durable goods demand and FX remains .
S&P Global disclaimer: Values marked with * are retrieved from S&P Global.