G&
Gaming & Leisure Properties, Inc. (GLPI)·Q2 2025 Earnings Summary
Executive Summary
- Q2 2025 delivered record revenue ($394.9M, +3.8% YoY), AFFO ($276.1M, +4.4% YoY), and Adjusted EBITDA ($361.5M, +6.2% YoY), underpinned by recent acquisitions, contractual escalators, percentage rent adjustments, and development fundings .
- Full-year 2025 AFFO guidance was nudged up at the low end to $1.112–$1.118B ($3.85–$3.87/share), from $1.109–$1.118B ($3.84–$3.87/share), reflecting expected $130M Joliet funding at a 7.75% cap rate and ~$338M remaining H2 development funding; dividend declared at $0.78 in Q2 .
- Versus S&P Global consensus: revenue was a modest miss, GAAP EPS missed driven by a non-cash provision for credit losses ($53.7M), while company-reported Adjusted EBITDA was strong; FFO/share consensus exceeded GAAP FFO/share, but AFFO/share printed $0.96 , S&P values marked with *.
- Strategic catalysts include Bally’s lease reallocation ($28.9M annual rent moved to Bally’s Master Lease II with revised guarantees), tribal financing (Ione) advancing, PENN’s Joliet relocation funding, forward interest rate swaps hedging anticipated notes, and an active sale-leaseback/development pipeline .
What Went Well and What Went Wrong
-
What Went Well
- “Another quarter of record revenue, AFFO and Adjusted EBITDA,” with total revenue +3.8% YoY to $394.9M, AFFO +4.4% to $276.1M, Adjusted EBITDA +6.2% to $361.5M .
- Bally’s assets “performing very well” and lease changes improved structural alignment; $28.9M annual rent reallocated to Bally’s Master Lease II with new Bally’s entity guarantees .
- Pipeline execution: Boyd master lease extensions, Ione tribal project funding ($25.8M to date; $110M commitment at 11% rate), PENN’s $130M Joliet relocation at 7.75% cap rate .
-
What Went Wrong
- GAAP EPS impacted by non-cash macro modeling: provision for credit losses rose to $53.7M in Q2 due to downside GDP/tariff scenario inputs (TREPP/Oxford), despite all tenants current on rent .
- Consensus comparison optics: slight revenue miss vs S&P; GAAP FFO/share and SPGI EBITDA “actual” appear below consensus, while company Adjusted EBITDA was strong—non-GAAP versus GAAP definitional mismatch drove confusion , S&P values marked with *.
- Lease guarantee changes created investor questions; management clarified corporate guarantee remains on Bally’s Master Lease II; residual Casino Queen lease lacks parent guarantee but has guarantees from Bally’s entities due to restricted/unrestricted group considerations .
Financial Results
EBITDA and Net Income margins (S&P Global):
Values retrieved from S&P Global.*
Estimates vs Actuals (Q2 2025, S&P Global):
Values retrieved from S&P Global.* Note: Company Adjusted EBITDA was $361.5M, reflecting non-GAAP addbacks .
Segment/Lease Revenue Contribution (Q2 2025):
Key KPIs:
Guidance Changes
Assumptions exclude future M&A/ATM beyond noted items .
Earnings Call Themes & Trends
Management Commentary
- “The second quarter marked another quarter of record revenue, AFFO and Adjusted EBITDA… expected to drive continued financial growth in the second half of 2025.”
- “DraftKings at Casino Queen and The Queen Baton Rouge properties were transferred to Bally's Master Lease II… annual rental income of $28.9 million will be reallocated… replaced by a guarantee from several Bally's entities.”
- “We have funded $25.8 million… for the Ione Band of Miwok Indians… a first-of-its-kind financing agreement between a federally recognized tribe and a real estate investment trust.”
- “PENN… intended to utilize $130 million for the relocation of Hollywood Casino Joliet… GLPI will receive a 7.75% cap rate on the funding.”
- CFO: “Operating expenses increased… primarily resulting from a non-cash adjustment in the provision for credit losses due to a more pessimistic forward-looking economic forecast… all our rent payments are current.”
Q&A Highlights
- Bally’s guarantees and lease structure: Clarified Master Lease II retains parent guarantee; residual Casino Queen lease moved assets to unrestricted group with subsidiary guarantees, aligning with Bally’s capital structure .
- Provision for credit losses drivers: TREPP/Oxford macro scenarios (tariff/GDP downside case) drove non-cash provision despite current tenant payments; management views it as modeling-required, not fundamental .
- Tribal pipeline and NIGC process: Advanced discussions across multiple tribes; GLPI will not fund without final NIGC approval; potential announcements in coming months .
- Hedging/financing: Forward-starting SOFR swaps ($100M + $100M) to hedge anticipated bond issuance; spreads tight; team monitoring rates to add hedges opportunistically .
- New York downstate: GLPI open to multi-party structures; emphasizes underwriting each property on standalone merits, coverage >2x, and accretive spread to cost of capital .
Estimates Context
- Q2 revenue slightly below S&P consensus (Actual $394.9M vs $398.0M), reflecting minor timing/mix effects; company still printed record revenue , S&P*.
- GAAP EPS missed (Actual $0.54 vs $0.751), due largely to the non-cash credit loss provision required under ASC 326 modeling; AFFO/share printed $0.96 (flat QoQ, +YoY), more relevant to REIT valuation , S&P*.
- SPGI EBITDA “actual” vs consensus showed a miss (315.6 vs 365.6), but company’s Adjusted EBITDA was $361.5M (+6.2% YoY), underscoring the definitional gap and non-GAAP addbacks (straight-line rent, credit loss provision, etc.) , S&P*.
- FFO/share consensus exceeded GAAP FFO/share (0.968 vs 0.79); analysts likely to recalibrate GAAP metrics for credit-loss modeling while holding AFFO trajectories given raised FY guidance , S&P*.
Values retrieved from S&P Global.*
Key Takeaways for Investors
- AFFO trajectory intact and slightly improved at the low end; dividend increased to $0.78 and annualized $3.12 supports income thesis .
- The apparent GAAP EPS/EBITDA misses are driven by non-cash modeling (credit loss provision) and GAAP vs non-GAAP definitions; Adjusted EBITDA and AFFO performance demonstrate core cash flow strength .
- Near-term catalysts: PENN Joliet funding (Aug 1) at 7.75% cap rate; ~$338M H2 development funding cadence; watch Bally’s Chicago progress and communications .
- Bally’s lease reallocation and guarantees clarified; coverage ratios across master leases are comfortable (1.69x–2.72x), mitigating tenant credit volatility concerns .
- Balance sheet prudence: Forward SOFR hedges ahead of potential notes; weighted average debt cost ~5.06% and leverage targeted within ~5.5x, preserving flexibility for sale-leasebacks and tribal deals .
- Continued sale-leaseback and development opportunity set; management emphasizes underwriting discipline (coverage >2x, accretive spreads), with optionality in New York downstate and Southeast expansion .
- Trading setup: Focus on AFFO delivery vs GAAP noise, guidance execution, and deal flow updates (PENN, Bally’s Chicago/Las Vegas, tribes) as stock reaction catalysts .