GB
Green Brick Partners, Inc. (GRBK)·Q3 2025 Earnings Summary
Executive Summary
- Q3 2025 revenue and EPS beat consensus: revenue $499.091M vs $456.642M* consensus; diluted EPS $1.77 vs $1.475* consensus. Homebuilding gross margin was 31.1% (−160 bps YoY; +70 bps seq), marking a 10th consecutive quarter ≥30% .
- Demand held up despite affordability headwinds: net new orders 898 (+2.4% YoY; record Q3), cancellations 6.7% (−180 bps YoY, −320 bps seq), sales pace ~2.9/month/community; incentives for new orders rose to 8.9% (↑280 bps YoY; ↑100 bps seq; moderated late in quarter as rates fell) .
- Balance sheet remains a differentiator: debt-to-capital 15.8% (homebuilding 15.3%), net debt-to-capital 9.8% (homebuilding 9.5%), cash $142M, total liquidity $457M .
- Strategic expansion on track: Trophy’s first Houston community broke ground; model home construction began in October with sales targeted for the spring selling season; Austin expected to “basically double” in 2026; Houston <100 closings in 2026 (growing meaningfully in 2027) .
What Went Well and What Went Wrong
-
What Went Well
- Sustained industry-leading margins: “For the tenth consecutive quarter, our gross margins remained above 30%,” with Q3 homebuilding gross margin at 31.1% (helped by a $4.8M warranty reserve adjustment adding ~90 bps) .
- Demand resilience and low churn: Record Q3 net orders (898, +2.4% YoY) and cancellation rate of 6.7%, among the lowest in public peers; sales pace increased slightly YoY to just under 3.0 per community .
- Cycle-time and cost execution: Cycle times improved by nine days YoY; Trophy’s DFW cycle time under 100 days (lowest in its history); labor/material costs down ~$2,250 per home YoY .
-
What Went Wrong
- Revenue and EPS declined YoY: revenue −4.7% YoY; diluted EPS −10.6% YoY as incentives and pricing actions addressed affordability pressure .
- Pricing/incentive pressure: ASP for delivered homes fell 4.2% YoY to $523.7K; incentives for net new orders rose to 8.9% (↑280 bps YoY; ↑100 bps seq) .
- Backlog contracted: backlog revenue $465.589M (−20.0% YoY) and backlog units 675 (−16.6% YoY), reflecting a higher proportion of quick move-ins and faster cycle times .
Financial Results
Actual vs S&P Global Consensus (Q3 2025)
Values marked with * were retrieved from S&P Global.
Revenue Mix
Key Operating KPIs
Notes: Q3 gross margin benefited from a $4.809M warranty reserve adjustment (+90 bps); YTD impact +30 bps .
Guidance Changes
Earnings Call Themes & Trends
Management Commentary
- “For the tenth consecutive quarter, our gross margins remained above 30%, continuing to lead the public homebuilding industry.” — Jim Brickman, CEO
- “Incentives for net new orders… increased to 8.9%. Incentives moderated during the quarter from a peak in July as the average 30-year mortgage rate declined.” — Jed Dolson, President & COO
- “Our backlog value… decreased 20% YoY due to a higher proportion of quick move-in sales coupled with a nine-day improvement in average construction cycle time.” — Jeff Cox, CFO
- “We believe tariffs will have a minimal impact on our earnings next year…” — Jed Dolson
- “We expect Austin to basically double from where it was this year. Houston will… get sub 100 closings next year and that’ll grow meaningfully in 2027.” — Jim Brickman
- “Next year we’ll be breaking out financial services separately… That will slightly help our SG&A.” — Jim Brickman
Q&A Highlights
- Gross margin outlook: Company does not guide quarterly gross margin; stressed strategic advantages from low-cost, self-developed infill lots to support industry-leading margins despite volatility .
- Incentives and mortgage rate buy-downs: Advertised target rate “just under 5%”; cost of buy-downs eased as rates fell; company did not chase to 4% buy-downs .
- Market/region dynamics: Higher incentives generally in Atlanta relative to Texas due to different buyer mix; Trophy’s spec model enables flexibility without large backlog protection needs .
- Growth roadmap: Austin expected to double in 2026; Houston <100 closings in 2026, scaling in 2027; GRBK Mortgage rollout to balance of Texas by YE 2025 and to Houston/Atlanta early 2026 .
- Cost buckets: Land/lot prices stabilizing to slightly down; lumber at year-long lows; labor availability improved; subs at ~65%–70% capacity .
Estimates Context
- Q3 2025 actuals vs S&P Global consensus: Revenue $499.091M vs $456.642M*; EPS $1.77 vs $1.475*; both on two estimates* .
- Implication: Street likely raises near-term revenue/EPS marks modestly given strong beat and >30% margin durability despite incentive pressure; note that backlog declined and incentives remain elevated, which could temper out-year gross margin assumptions .
Values marked with * were retrieved from S&P Global.
Key Takeaways for Investors
- Clear beat on both revenue and EPS, with a 10th straight quarter of ≥30% gross margin despite affordability headwinds; margin aided by warranty reserve release but underpinned by self-developed infill lot advantage .
- Demand quality remains high: record Q3 orders, low cancellations, stable sales pace—suggesting pricing power to balance pace vs. margin even as incentives normalize with rates .
- Backlog contraction reflects deliberate quick move-in strategy and faster cycle times—supportive for near-term closings but implies less revenue visibility; watch order intake and starts alignment .
- GRBK Mortgage is scaling quickly and broadening to new markets, potentially improving capture and offering rate flexibility to support sales while slightly reducing reported SG&A in 2026 .
- Texas expansion (Austin, Houston) is a multi-year volume catalyst; 2026–2027 outlook benefits from a five-year lot supply and strong Trophy share, with Austin doubling and Houston ramping .
- Balance sheet strength (net debt/cap
10%, $457M liquidity) provides dry powder to invest through cycles and support opportunistic land development ($300M FY25 maintained) . - Near-term trading: Positive set-up on beats and >30% margin narrative; monitor incentive trajectory, order momentum into 4Q, and any tariff/commodity reversals that could affect 2026 margin assumptions .