GR
Granite Ridge Resources, Inc. (GRNT)·Q1 2025 Earnings Summary
Executive Summary
- Q1 2025 delivered strong operational execution: production rose 23% YoY to 29,245 Boe/d (50% oil), Adjusted EBITDAX $91.4M, and Adjusted EPS $0.22, with LOE/unit improving 13% YoY to $6.17/Boe .
- Versus S&P Global consensus, Adjusted/Primary EPS beat ($0.22 vs $0.198), while S&P-standardized revenue was slightly below ($116.3M* vs $118.4M*) and EBITDA came in below ($76.0M* vs $87.4M*). Company-reported oil & gas sales were $122.9M, reflecting definitional differences versus S&P standardized revenue ; S&P data marked with asterisks and disclaimer below.
- 2025 guidance reaffirmed: 28–30k Boe/d, 51–53% oil, capex $300–$320M, LOE $6.25–$7.25/Boe, taxes 6–7% of sales, cash G&A $25–$27M; dividend maintained at $0.11 per share .
- Balance sheet/liquidity improved: borrowing base raised to $375M post quarter-end; pro forma liquidity $140.8M at 3/31; net debt/TTM Adjusted EBITDAX 0.7x .
- Potential stock catalysts: EPS beat and cost/LOE traction; reaffirmed 2025 guide despite volatility; offset by EBITDA miss vs S&P metrics and capex above consensus due to opportunistic acquisition timing .
What Went Well and What Went Wrong
-
What Went Well
- Production and cash flow outperformed internal plans: “generated $91 million of Adjusted EBITDAX, surpassing our internal projections,” driven by strong new well performance/timing across multiple basins .
- Cost structure improved: LOE fell to $6.17/Boe (−13% YoY); operating margin improved to 87% from 83% YoY; tracking to low end of LOE guidance .
- Portfolio/hedge strength and liquidity: ~75% production hedged through 2026; borrowing base increased to $375M, pro forma liquidity $140.8M; leverage 0.7x .
- Management quote: “We achieved 23% year-over-year daily production growth and generated $91 million in Adjusted EBITDAX…driven by strong new well performance and favorable timing across multiple basins.”
-
What Went Wrong
- S&P-standardized EBITDA and revenue missed S&P consensus (EBITDA $76.0M* vs $87.4M*; standardized revenue $116.3M* vs $118.4M*), despite company-reported sales of $122.9M . Values with asterisks from S&P Global.
- Non-cash headwinds: loss on commodity derivatives ($14.9M) and loss on equity investments ($10.0M) weighed on GAAP EPS (diluted $0.07) .
- Capex above expectations: total Q1 capex ~$106M vs consensus ~$87M as management executed a $14M opportunistic acquisition; supportive strategically, but a near-term variance .
Financial Results
P&L vs Prior Periods (Company-reported and S&P-standardized where noted)
Notes: Values marked with asterisks are retrieved from S&P Global and may reflect standardized definitions that differ from company presentations. Values retrieved from S&P Global.*
Q1 2025 vs S&P Global Consensus
Notes: All numbers in this table are from S&P Global; values marked with asterisks are retrieved from S&P Global. Company-reported oil & gas sales were $122.9M . Values retrieved from S&P Global.*
KPIs and Operating Metrics (Q1 2025)
- Average daily production: 29,245 Boe/d; Oil 14,752 Bbl/d; Gas 86,960 Mcf/d .
- Oil & gas sales: $122.9M; oil $91.85M; gas & related $31.08M .
- Realized prices (ex-derivatives): oil $69.18/Bbl; gas $3.97/Mcf .
- LOE: $16.2M ($6.17/Boe); Production taxes: $8.4M (6.8% of sales); G&A: $7.5M ($2.84/Boe) .
- Operating cash flow: $76.1M; OCF before working capital changes: $86.7M .
- Capex: $105.8M total (development $71.4M; acquisitions $34.4M); 10 acquisitions in Delaware/Utica adding 12.0 net locations .
- Wells: 13.7 net TIL; 126 gross (15.1 net) wells in process at 3/31 .
- Balance sheet: debt $250.0M; cash $16.1M; liquidity $90.8M at 3/31; pro forma liquidity $140.8M after borrowing base step-up .
- Hedge book (selected): 2025 oil collars 2.43MM bbls floors ~$61–62; ceilings ~$77–78; 2025 gas collars 7.34 Bcf floors ~$3.22; ceilings ~$4.00; 2025 gas swaps 8.44 Bcf at ~$3.57 .
Guidance Changes
Management explicitly reaffirmed all 2025 guidance items on May 8–9, 2025 .
Earnings Call Themes & Trends
Management Commentary
- Strategy and execution: “Our first quarter results highlight the quality of our asset base… We achieved 23% year-over-year daily production growth and generated $91 million in Adjusted EBITDAX…driven by strong new well performance and favorable timing across multiple basins.”
- Operated Partnerships returns: “With every dollar we invest…we are targeting full cycle returns of greater than 25%, and we are pleased that the results to-date align with those expectations.”
- Cost and margin: “On an operating margin basis, we improved from 83%…to 87% this year…repeatable cost structure improvements.”
- Capital discipline: “We have non-consented well proposals that do not meet our return threshold and identified approximately $30 million in CapEx [we] can swiftly cut or defer if market conditions require.”
- Risk management: “With low leverage and a robust hedge book covering approximately 75% of current…production through 2026, we are well-prepared to capitalize on opportunities.”
Q&A Highlights
- Acquisition contribution/timing: ~450 Boe/d for 2025 from Q1 acquisitions (Delaware), minimal Q1 impact due to late close; ~$9M revenue implication cited by management .
- LOE outlook: Tracking toward the low end of the $6.25–$7.25/Boe range for 2025 .
- Drivers of Q1 beat vs internal: One Delaware pad online earlier; Utica pads early; existing wells returning from offset frac sooner; Waha price improvement allowed choke openings on gassy Delaware pad .
- Oil cut and gas outperformance: Oil in line; gas better than expected; guidance stays 51–53% oil; if miss, likely due to stronger gas .
- Partnership pace: Operating one rig now (from two) due to prudence; partnerships to be ~25% of 2025 production; D&C execution competitive with top basin operators; considering DUCs if prices soften .
Estimates Context
- S&P Global consensus (Q1 2025): EPS $0.1975 vs actual $0.22 (beat); standardized revenue $118.4M* vs actual $116.3M* (miss); EBITDA $87.4M* vs $76.0M* (miss). Company-reported oil & gas sales were $122.9M (different definition vs S&P standardized revenue) . Values retrieved from S&P Global.*
- Implications: EPS beat should support upward revisions to 2025 EPS. EBITDA shortfall vs S&P standard (and higher capex vs expectations) may temper near-term EBITDA/FCF estimates; management reaffirmed FY guide (production/costs), which may anchor revisions to mix/quarterly cadence rather than full-year totals .
Key Takeaways for Investors
- Granite Ridge executed a high-quality quarter: higher production, tighter costs, and an EPS beat vs S&P consensus, underpinned by diversified exposure and disciplined capital allocation .
- Guidance unchanged and credible: stable production and cost guide with flexibility to modulate Operated Partnership spend if oil weakens; dividend intact at $0.11 .
- Balance sheet/liquidity robust: 0.7x net debt/TTM Adjusted EBITDAX and expanded borrowing base ($375M) provide ample runway to pursue accretive deals and manage volatility .
- Watch mix and gas leverage: management flagged potential for higher-than-expected gas volumes (positive cash impact at current pricing), which could modestly lower oil cut versus guidance midpoint .
- Near-term trading lens: EPS beat and reaffirmed guide likely constructive; EBITDA miss vs S&P and capex above consensus could limit multiple expansion until quarterly cadence proves through 1H25 .
- Medium-term thesis: Operated Partnerships scaling with targeted >25% returns, improving cost structure, and option value in gas-weighted inventory (Haynesville/dry gas EF) create a path to sustained cash flow growth and continued shareholder returns .
Appendix: Additional Data
- Cash flow: Net cash from operations $76.1M; OCF before working capital $86.7M .
- Taxes and other items: Production & ad valorem taxes were 6.8% of sales; GAAP losses on derivatives ($14.9M) and equity investments ($10.0M) affected GAAP EPS .
- Dividend: Board declared $0.11 per share payable June 13, 2025 (record May 30, 2025) .
Disclosure on standardized data: Values marked with asterisks (*) are retrieved from S&P Global and may reflect standardized definitions that differ from company presentations. Values retrieved from S&P Global.