Sign in

You're signed outSign in or to get full access.

GT

GSI TECHNOLOGY INC (GSIT)·Q3 2025 Earnings Summary

Executive Summary

  • Q3 FY2025 revenue was $5.414M (+2% y/y; +19% q/q) and gross margin rebounded to 54.0% from 38.6% in Q2, driven by higher revenue, mix, and absence of severance costs that impacted the prior quarter; operating loss improved to $(4.055)M and EPS was $(0.16) .
  • Management initiated Q4 FY2025 guidance: revenue $5.4–$6.2M and gross margin 55–57%, implying further sequential margin expansion as SRAM demand normalizes and cost actions flow through .
  • Mix metrics show continued SRAM recovery: SigmaQuad at 39.1% of shipments (vs 38.6% in Q2) and Nokia at 4.4% of revenue (down from 17.8% in Q2), while military/defense shipments were 30.0%; management also cited a key SRAM customer tied to AI chip manufacturing as a 2025 growth driver .
  • APU roadmap advanced: Gemini-II first silicon is functional with software workarounds; second spin planned for mass production; PLATO (LLM-focused, low-power) launched as next-gen with 12–18 month timeline; SBIR activity expanded with a U.S. Army Phase 1 award up to $250k and ongoing milestones with AF/RL and SDA .
  • Street consensus via S&P Global could not be retrieved at time of analysis; beat/miss vs Wall Street estimates cannot be assessed (S&P Global data unavailable).

What Went Well and What Went Wrong

  • What Went Well

    • Gross margin recovery to 54.0% (from 38.6% in Q2) on higher revenue, improved mix, and absence of prior-quarter severance costs; operating loss narrowed to $(4.055)M and EPS improved to $(0.16) .
    • Strengthening SRAM trajectory with normalized inventories and rising demand from a key customer integral to leading AI chip manufacturing: “We anticipate this customer to become our largest revenue contributor in fiscal 2025.” — CEO Lee-Lean Shu .
    • APU milestones: Gemini-II functional first silicon (software workarounds), on-track February tape-out and May availability; PLATO for edge LLMs launched with a faster, lower-cost path versus prior 3D plan .

  • What Went Wrong

    • Revenue remains low on an absolute basis ($5.414M) and EPS is still negative (GAAP), highlighting ongoing scale challenges and reliance on legacy SRAM while APU ramps .
    • Nokia revenue dropped to $239k (4.4% of net revenues) from $812k (17.8%) in Q2, and military/defense shipments retreated sequentially to 30.0% (press release), reflecting mix and customer-specific variability .
    • Transcript vs press release discrepancy: management remarks referenced military/defense shipments as 25% on the call vs 30.0% in the press release; we anchor to the press release for official KPI and note the variance for caution .

Financial Results

MetricQ3 2024Q1 2025Q2 2025Q3 2025
Revenue ($USD Millions)$5.318 $4.671 $4.550 $5.414
Gross Margin (%)55.9% 46.3% 38.6% 54.0%
Operating Loss ($USD Millions)$(6.685) $(4.657) $(5.584) $(4.055)
Net Income (Loss) ($USD Millions)$(6.601) $1.078 (includes $5.737M gain) $(5.458) $(4.029)
Diluted EPS ($)$(0.26) $0.04 (one-time gain) $(0.21) $(0.16)
Total OpEx ($USD Millions)$9.660 $6.818 $7.341 $6.978
  • Notes: Q1 FY2025 EPS benefited from a $5.737M gain on a sale-leaseback transaction . Q3 FY2025 commentary attributes gross margin recovery to higher revenue, product mix, and removal of severance effects .

Segment/KPI Mix (Shipments and Customer Concentration)

KPIQ1 2025Q2 2025Q3 2025
Nokia Revenue ($USD Thousands)$998 (21.4% of rev) $812 (17.8%) $239 (4.4%)
Military/Defense Shipments (% of shipments)31.9% 40.2% 30.0% (press release); Call cited 25%
SigmaQuad Shipments (% of shipments)36.3% 38.6% 39.1%

Balance Sheet/Liquidity Snapshot

MetricQ1 2025Q2 2025Q3 2025
Cash & Cash Equivalents ($USD Millions)$21.765 $18.356 $15.085
Working Capital ($USD Millions)$25.7 $21.1 $17.9
Stockholders’ Equity ($USD Millions)$38.002 $33.284 $29.933

Estimate Comparison

  • S&P Global consensus data was unavailable at the time of retrieval; beat/miss vs estimates cannot be determined (S&P Global consensus unavailable).

Guidance Changes

MetricPeriodPrevious GuidanceCurrent GuidanceChange
Net RevenuesQ4 FY2025—$5.4–$6.2M Initiated
Gross MarginQ4 FY2025—55–57% Initiated
Net RevenuesQ3 FY2025$4.7–$5.5M (issued with Q2 results) —Outcome: $5.414M (within/near top end)
Gross MarginQ3 FY202550–52% (issued with Q2 results) —Outcome: 54.0% (above guidance)

Earnings Call Themes & Trends

TopicQ1 FY2025 (Jul 2024)Q2 FY2025 (Oct 2024)Q3 FY2025 (Jan 2025)Trend
APU roadmap (Gemini-II; PLATO)First silicon working; software workarounds; libraries in progress; sampling early 2025; exploring strategic partners On track; preparing Gemini-II benchmarks; early mention of PLATO (edge LLM) Gemini-II tape-out Feb, availability May; second spin planned; PLATO 12–18 mo path for edge LLMs Accelerating execution and clarity
SRAM demand/inventoryWeak SigmaQuad; lower mil/defense; building pipeline to offset Early turnaround; customers depleting inventory; new AI manufacturing-related SRAM opportunity Sequential revenue recovery; key customer expected to be largest in FY2025 Improving normalization and new driver
Government (SBIR)Phase II AF/RL and SDA progressing; pipeline ~$6M Continued progress; YOLO deliverables targeted; awaiting new contract start U.S. Army Phase 1 up to $250k announced; milestones on AF/RL and SDA continue Expanding awards and milestones
SAR applicationsTwo SAR evaluations; one paused for documentation Gemini-II evaluations at defense/aero; satellite use-case benchmarking Ongoing progress; preparing Gemini-II board deliveries; additional aero evaluations Steady pipeline maturation
Strategic alternativesSpecial committee, Needham engaged Process ongoing Process ongoing; focus on strategic/funding options Ongoing evaluation

Management Commentary

  • Strategic posture: “Increased operational efficiency and SRAM sales improvement position us for stability as we continue to evaluate strategic alternatives.” — CEO Lee-Lean Shu .
  • APU progress: “Gemini-II… is on track for a February tape-out with availability in May… combining advanced neural networks with SAR… to tackle challenges in defense and aerospace.” — CEO Lee-Lean Shu .
  • Next-gen chip: “We can leverage Gemini-II’s architecture to accelerate the development of PLATO… ultra-low-power design will target… edge AI and large language model solutions.” — CEO Lee-Lean Shu .
  • Government traction: “We are preparing to deliver a YOLO algorithm for the Air Force Research Labs in the current quarter… we have received 45% of the $1.25M [SDA] contract and will receive the balance upon the board’s delivery.” — VP Sales Didier Lasserre .
  • SRAM demand driver: “We anticipate [a key AI manufacturing-related customer] to become our largest SRAM customer in fiscal year 2025.” — CEO Lee-Lean Shu .

Q&A Highlights

  • Gemini-II benchmarks and disclosure: Management plans to publish benchmarks (starting with YOLOv3, then YOLOv5) as software libraries are completed; white paper envisioned post-completion .
  • Strategic alternatives scope: Needham’s mandate is to surface and evaluate strategic and financing alternatives to grow and invest in the company rather than near-term share price support; process continues .
  • Use of AI in development: Algorithms/libraries are developed internally (Israel team), with benchmarks to be shared upon completion .

Estimates Context

  • S&P Global consensus data could not be retrieved at time of analysis; therefore, we cannot determine beat/miss versus Wall Street revenue or EPS estimates for Q3 FY2025 (S&P Global consensus unavailable).
  • Implication: With guidance for Q4 FY2025 at $5.4–$6.2M revenue and 55–57% GM, Street models may need to reflect higher sequential gross margin assumptions given Q3’s 54.0% actual (above prior guidance) .

Key Takeaways for Investors

  • Margin inflection underway: Q3 GM at 54.0% (above prior 50–52% guidance) and Q4 guide 55–57% signal mix/efficiency benefits are taking hold; operating loss narrowed q/q .
  • SRAM recovery + new AI-linked customer: Sequential revenue growth (+19% q/q) and management’s expectation of a key AI-manufacturing customer becoming the largest contributor in FY2025 underpin near-term revenue stability .
  • APU catalysts in next 1–2 quarters: Gemini-II tape-out (Feb) and availability (May), plus public YOLO benchmarks, are tangible proof-points; PLATO targets edge LLMs with a 12–18 month path and potential co-funding partners .
  • Government validation expands: New U.S. Army Phase 1 (up to $250k) and ongoing AF/RL and SDA milestones support technical credibility and offer near-term, non-dilutive funding vectors .
  • Liquidity runway narrowed q/q: Cash fell from $18.356M (Q2) to $15.085M (Q3) as working capital/equity also declined; continued margin progress and revenue normalization are important to extend runway absent new financing .
  • Watch for mix variability: Nokia fell to 4.4% of revenue and military/defense shipments declined sequentially; ongoing customer/mix swings can affect quarterly GMs .
  • Process risk: Strategic alternatives process continues without specified timeline; successful execution on APU milestones and customer wins could be pivotal for valuation and funding optionality .