GI
Gitlab Inc. (GTLB)·Q1 2026 Earnings Summary
Executive Summary
- Q1 FY26 delivered 27% y/y revenue growth to $214.5M, modestly above S&P Global consensus, with non-GAAP operating margin of 12% and record adjusted FCF of $104.1M; DBNRR was 122% and RPO/cRPO grew 40%/34% y/y, reinforcing visibility .
- Versus estimates (S&P Global), revenue beat by ~$1.3M and non-GAAP diluted EPS beat by ~$0.02; note the beat was “skinny,” with CFO citing a higher SaaS mix and back-end weighted linearity (fewer days in the quarter vs last year) . Values retrieved from S&P Global.*
- FY26 guidance maintained on revenue ($936–$942M) but raised on non-GAAP operating income ($117–$121M) and non-GAAP EPS ($0.74–$0.75), reflecting operating leverage; Q2 revenue guided to $226–$227M with 16–17c non-GAAP EPS .
- Key catalysts: continued Ultimate mix (52% of ARR) and Duo adoption, new FedRAMP Moderate authorization for GitLab Dedicated for Government, and deeper AWS Amazon Q integration; management reiterated a 22% projected non-GAAP tax rate framework for FY26 .
What Went Well and What Went Wrong
-
What Went Well
- Strong unit economics and cash generation: adjusted FCF of $104.1M (49% margin) on seasonally strong collections; non-GAAP op margin expanded to 12% from -2% y/y .
- AI momentum and Ultimate mix: Duo first-time purchases +35% q/q; Ultimate reached 52% of ARR; Q1 DBNRR 122% driven ~80% by seats, ~15% tier upgrades (Ultimate), ~5% yield .
- Federal and enterprise traction: FedRAMP Moderate authorization; public sector outperformed expectations in Q1; notable wins/expansions across regulated verticals (e.g., NatWest, Forvia Hella, R+V Versicherung) .
-
What Went Wrong
- Narrow beat on top line and EPS vs consensus with back-end linearity; CFO called out higher SaaS mix and fewer days vs Q1 last year; management kept FY26 revenue guide unchanged despite robust bookings metrics .
- Net new customer adds >$5k showed pressure at the low end (SMB/low mid-market price sensitivity), though CFO said it didn’t impact financials; mix dynamics (expand/contract into $5k bucket) were the main driver .
- GAAP operating loss widened sequentially as seasonality shifted from Q4 to Q1; GAAP opex included FX losses and ongoing JiHu-related expenses (~$3.1M non-GAAP in Q1; ~$18M FY26 modeled) .
Financial Results
Quarterly performance (oldest → newest):
Actual vs S&P Global consensus (quarterly):
Values retrieved from S&P Global.*
Revenue mix / “segments”:
KPIs and go-to-market indicators:
Guidance Changes
Notes: WADSO = weighted average diluted shares outstanding.
Earnings Call Themes & Trends
Management Commentary
- Strategic platform/AI differentiation: “We are the only AI-native cloud-agnostic model-neutral DevSecOps platform capable of running anywhere…with a unified data store” (CEO) .
- AI go-to-market: “We now include chat and code suggestions with Premium and Ultimate…to lower barriers to adoption…with a smooth upgrade path to Pro and Enterprise” (CEO) .
- Demand/mix insights: “Q1 DBNRR was driven by…~80% seats, ~5% yield, ~15% tier upgrades” (CFO) .
- Cash generation: “There is nothing anomalous…we generated over $100 million in free cash flow [in Q1]” (CFO) .
- Federal momentum: “We had a really great quarter in first quarter in federal. We overexceeded our expectations…” (CFO) .
- Guidance philosophy: “No change in guidance philosophy; assuming same macro since April continues” (CFO) .
Q&A Highlights
- Beat quality and linearity: Analysts flagged a “skinny beat”; CFO cited higher SaaS mix, back-end weighted linearity, and fewer days y/y; maintained revenue guide with raised profit metrics .
- Customer additions: Net new >$5k adds affected by SMB/low mid-market price sensitivity; not financially material; main variance was expansions/ contractions across the $5k bucket .
- AI competitive positioning: Customers often run bake-offs (Duo vs Copilot/Cursor/Windsurf); management confident on wins and on upcoming Duo Workflow agentic AI .
- Free cash flow: Seasonality from Q4 billings to Q1 collections; no one-time items; record adjusted FCF .
- Federal exposure: Public sector ~12% ARR; strong Q1; FedRAMP Moderate for Dedicated for Government bolsters pipeline .
Estimates Context
- Q1 FY26 vs S&P Global: Revenue $214.509M vs $213.247M*; non-GAAP diluted EPS $0.17 vs $0.152* (modest beat on both) . Values retrieved from S&P Global.*
- Q4 FY25 vs S&P Global: Revenue $211.431M vs $206.482M*; non-GAAP diluted EPS $0.33 vs $0.228* (clear beat) . Values retrieved from S&P Global.*
- Implications: Expect modest upward revisions to FY26 profitability (already reflected in raised non-GAAP op income/EPS guidance) with revenue consensus likely stable given unchanged FY26 revenue guide .
Key Takeaways for Investors
- Execution remains solid: durable 27–31% revenue growth cadence over the last three quarters with expanding non-GAAP margins and record Q1 cash conversion .
- Profitability guidance raised: FY26 non-GAAP operating income and EPS moved higher despite unchanged revenue guide—operational leverage and pricing/mix (Ultimate, Duo, SaaS/Dedicated) are key drivers .
- AI is a multi-quarter catalyst: broader Duo packaging (Chat/Code in Premium/Ultimate), Duo Enterprise for Premium, and Duo Workflow agents in private beta, plus Amazon Q GA bundle, should support attach and expansion .
- Federal tailwind: FedRAMP Moderate authorization plus Q1 public sector outperformance position GTLB well in FY26 for regulated workloads (Dedicated for Government) .
- Visibility is improving: RPO +40% y/y and cRPO +34% y/y support sustained growth; Ultimate mix at 52% enhances ARPU and upsell potential .
- Watch list: monitor linearity and SMB sensitivity; track Duo Workflow milestones (public beta, GA) and Ultimate land/expand trends; observe SaaS mix impact on revenue recognition and quarterly beats .
- Near-term trading lens: modest consensus beats plus raised profit guide can support sentiment; incremental news on federal wins, Duo Workflow beta/GA, or large enterprise consolidations could be upside catalysts .
Tables and figures sourced from company filings and transcripts as cited. Values retrieved from S&P Global* where noted.