Sign in

Amy E. Curran

Executive Vice President and Director of Commercial Lending at HERITAGE FINANCIAL CORP /WA/
Executive

About Amy E. Curran

Amy E. Curran is Executive Vice President and Director of Commercial Lending at Heritage Bank, a role she has held since 2023; she joined the Bank in 2015 as a Commercial Team Leader in the Seattle region. She is age 62 and is listed among Heritage’s executive officers, but is not a named executive officer (NEO) in the proxy’s compensation tables, so individual pay details are not publicly disclosed . For context on the company’s recent performance underpinning incentive designs, Heritage’s 2023 results reflected industry headwinds with EPS and net income declines, offset by loan growth and a focus on cost actions .

Performance MetricFY 2022FY 2023
Total Assets$6.98B $7.17B
Net Income$81.9M $61.8M
Diluted EPS$2.31 $1.75
Total Loans, Net$4.00B $4.29B
Total Deposits$5.92B $5.60B
Overhead Ratio2.06% 2.33% (Adj. 2.31% for incentive)
Dividends Paid$0.84 $0.88

Past Roles

OrganizationRoleYearsStrategic Impact
Heritage BankExecutive Vice President, Director of Commercial Lending2023–PresentLeads commercial lending; aligns production, credit, and portfolio management to corporate objectives
Heritage BankCommercial Team Leader (Seattle)2015–2022Built and led regional commercial banking team; drove production and relationships in Seattle market

External Roles

  • No external public-company directorships or committee roles disclosed in HFWA proxy materials .

Fixed Compensation

  • Individual base salary, target bonus, and equity grants for Curran are not disclosed (she is not a NEO and thus her pay is not itemized in Summary Compensation or grants tables) .

Performance Compensation

Heritage’s incentive architecture cascades through most executives and management, linking annual MIP payouts to objective corporate metrics and long-term PSUs to three-year, peer-relative goals .

  • Annual MIP corporate scorecard (applies to NEOs and cascades to most executives):
MetricWeightingThresholdTargetMaximumActual FY 2023Notes
Diluted EPS40% (NEO), 35% for CCO$2.29 $2.69 $3.09 $1.75 EPS emphasis increased in 2023 vs. 2022
Net Charge-Offs (Recoveries) / Avg Loans20% (NEO), 30% for CCO0.12% 0.07% 0.02% (0.01%) Credit quality remained strong
Overhead Ratio40% (NEO), 35% for CCO2.50% 2.40% 2.25% 2.33% (Committee adjusted 2 bps for a one-time $1.5M fee)
  • Long-term equity (performance-vested PSUs) framework (NEOs; cascades to senior leaders as determined):
MetricWeightingThresholdTargetMaximumPayout Mechanics
ROATCE (peer-relative)50%25th percentile 50th percentile 75th percentile 0%–150% of target; 4% incremental vesting per percentile point from threshold to target, 2% from target to max
3-Year TSR (peer-relative)50%25th percentile 50th percentile 75th percentile Same schedule as above
  • Vesting schedules (applies to NEO awards; used broadly across programs):
    • RSUs: ratable three-year vesting (March 15 annually) .
    • PSUs: three-year cliff vest based on peer-relative performance on TSR and ROA/ROATCE .
    • Company enforces clawback policy (updated Nov 2023 per SEC/Nasdaq) on performance-based cash and equity .

Equity Ownership & Alignment

  • Individual beneficial ownership (shares and RSUs) for Curran is not itemized in the Security Ownership table (which lists directors and NEOs only) .
  • Stock ownership guidelines:
    • CEO: ≥3x base salary; other NEOs: ≥1.5x base salary; all NEOs were in compliance as of Dec 31, 2024 .
    • Directors: ≥3x annual cash retainer; all were in compliance as of Dec 31, 2024 .
  • Hedging/Pledging:
    • Anti-hedging policy prohibits hedging of HFWA stock; pledging discouraged, and to the company’s knowledge none of the NEOs or directors have pledged shares .
  • Say-on-pay support:
    • 2024 say-on-pay received >98% approval, signaling strong shareholder alignment with compensation practices .

Employment Terms

  • No individual employment agreement, severance multiple, or change-in-control terms are disclosed for Curran in proxy materials (NEO agreements and CEO transitional terms are summarized, but not her) .
  • Company policies:
    • Clawback policy updated Nov 7, 2023 to comply with SEC/Nasdaq (superseding prior 2014 policy) .
    • No tax gross-ups; no option repricing without shareholder approval; no single-trigger acceleration for service-based awards .
    • Regulatory guardrails: compensation risk assessment confirmed incentives are not reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect (Dec 2024) .

Performance & Track Record Context

  • PSU cycle payout evidence (for NEO awards; illustrates program rigor and cyclicality):
Metric (2021 Grant Cycle, measured through FY 2023)WeightingThresholdTargetMaximumActualPayout vs Target
Return on Average Assets (peer-relative)50%25th percentile 50th percentile 75th percentile 45th percentile 80%
3-Year TSR (peer-relative)50%25th percentile 50th percentile 75th percentile 17th percentile 0%
Total Payout40% of target

Compensation Peer Group (Benchmarking signals)

  • Peer set used for compensation benchmarking in 2023 included 20 commercial banks (e.g., Amerant, TriCo, Byline, Veritex) with asset and market-cap ranges generally 0.5x–2.0x HFWA .
  • HFWA ranked ~18th percentile market cap and ~13th percentile assets versus the peer median at 12/31/2023 .

Investment Implications

  • Alignment: Incentives tied to EPS, credit quality (net charge-offs), and cost discipline (overhead ratio), plus ROATCE and 3-year TSR for long-term equity, support shareholder-value creation and prudent risk-taking; these metrics cascade through senior management, likely including Commercial Lending leadership roles .
  • Retention risk: Curran’s individual equity holdings and award vesting schedules are not disclosed, limiting visibility on unvested equity and potential selling pressure; monitor future proxies and Forms 4 for signal on ownership changes and vesting events .
  • Governance strength: Anti-hedging, no tax gross-ups, clawback compliance, and strong say-on-pay (>98% in 2024) reduce misalignment and governance risk, supporting confidence in incentive quality even without individual disclosure .
  • Watchpoints: Given bank-cycle sensitivity, changes to EPS/credit metrics and any revisions to performance targets or peer constructs should be tracked for pay-for-performance integrity and potential easing/tightening of goals .