Sign in

You're signed outSign in or to get full access.

Timothy Hayes

Director at Health In Tech
Board

About Timothy Hayes

Timothy Hayes (age 76) is an independent director of Health In Tech, Inc. (HIT) since December 2024. He holds a B.S. in Accounting from California State University, Sacramento (1982), was a California CPA until retirement in 2014, and brings deep tax and audit expertise from Deloitte & Touche where he served as a senior tax manager (1989–2008) . The board determined he is independent under Nasdaq and SEC rules; he serves as Audit Committee Chair and is designated an “audit committee financial expert” under Item 407 of Regulation S‑K .

Past Roles

OrganizationRoleTenureCommittees/Impact
Deloitte & ToucheSenior Tax Manager1989–2008Led tax planning, audit representation; extensive financial accounting and audit experience
California Franchise Tax BoardTax Auditor1986–1989Conducted corporate and individual tax audits (state franchise and income)
California State Board of EqualizationSales Tax Auditor1985–1986Performed California Sales Tax audits of businesses

External Roles

OrganizationRoleTenureCommittees/Impact
California Taxpayers AssociationBoard Member1994–2006Advocacy in state tax policy; governance experience (no public company boards disclosed in last five years)

Board Governance

  • Board composition: six members; independence determined for all except CEO Tim Johnson and CFO Julia Qian; Hayes is independent .
  • Committees and roles: Audit Committee member and Chair (Hayes); Compensation Committee member; Nominating & Corporate Governance Committee member. Audit committee independence affirmed, and Hayes qualifies as an audit committee financial expert .
  • Audit Committee charter responsibilities include oversight of financial statements, auditor independence, internal controls, related‑party transaction pre‑approval, and legal/regulatory compliance .
  • Board meeting attendance: No board meetings held in 2024 due to IPO timing (Dec 24, 2024); 2025 attendance rates not yet disclosed .
  • Election outcome: Re‑elected Oct 3, 2025 with 148,025,015 votes “For,” 21,453 “Abstain,” and 1,873,265 broker non‑votes; quorum represented ~99.33% of outstanding voting power .

Director Election (2025)

NomineeForAbstainBroker Non‑Vote
Timothy Hayes148,025,015 21,453 1,873,265
  • Governance policies:
    • Insider trading policy prohibits margining, short sales, and derivatives; extends to >10% holders; Rule 10b5‑1 plans permitted with constraints .
    • Clawback policy adopted for incentive compensation of executive officers and designated employees; recovery of excess incentive pay based on restatement; director‑specific clawback not specified .
    • Indemnification agreements executed with directors (Dec 2024) per Nevada law; D&O insurance authorized .

Fixed Compensation

ComponentAmountTimingNotes
Annual Board Retainer (Cash)$40,000 Paid quarterly Non‑employee directors
Annual Board Retainer (Restricted Stock)$80,000 Granted at annual meeting; vests after one year Prorated for new directors
Audit Committee Chair Fee$20,000 Paid quarterly Hayes as Chair
Compensation Committee Chair Fee$10,000 Paid quarterly Not applicable to Hayes (member)
Nominating & Governance Chair Fee$10,000 Paid quarterly Not applicable to Hayes (member)

No director compensation was paid for FY2024 due to the December 2024 IPO; policy applies prospectively (2025 onward) .

Performance Compensation

Award TypePerformance Metric(s)Target/DesignVesting/TriggerNotes
Director Restricted StockNone (time‑based service) Not performance‑linked Vests after one year of board service Equity grants at annual meeting; prorated for new directors
Plan‑level Performance Awards (RSUs/PSUs/SARs)Available under 2024 PlanCommittee discretion Per award agreement; can accelerate on change in control No director‑specific performance metrics disclosed

Other Directorships & Interlocks

  • No other public company directorships for Hayes disclosed in the prior five years; biographical section lists public boards when applicable (none for Hayes) .
  • Compensation Committee interlocks: none; committee members not employees; no cross‑board executive overlaps disclosed .

Expertise & Qualifications

  • Financial/accounting and audit expertise; former CPA (California) through 2014; designated audit committee financial expert .
  • Tax policy experience via California Taxpayers Association board tenure .
  • Education: B.S. Accounting (California State University, Sacramento, 1982) .

Equity Ownership

HolderClass A Shares% of Class AClass B Shares% of Class B% Total Voting Power
Timothy Hayes128,474 (includes restricted stock) <1% <1%

Director stock ownership guidelines not disclosed; Section 16 compliance reported timely for insiders, with one late Form 3 for a different individual; no pledging or hedging permitted by policy .

Governance Assessment

  • Strengths:

    • Independent director with deep audit/tax experience; Audit Committee Chair and designated financial expert—a meaningful positive for financial reporting oversight in a newly public company .
    • Clear director pay mix with significant equity ($80k RS) fostering alignment; committee chair fee structure compensates added oversight duties .
    • Robust governance scaffolding: insider trading prohibitions (hedging/margin), clawback for incentive pay, codified committee charters, indemnification in line with Nevada law .
  • Considerations / potential investor signals:

    • Dual‑class structure centralizes voting power; executives hold all Class B (10 votes/share), with directors and officers as a group controlling 100% of Class B—this reduces minority influence on governance matters despite strong director election margins .
    • Equity plan amendments increase potential dilution and authorize Class B awards to executive officers only; although not directly applicable to directors, it signals heightened entrenchment risk via voting rights concentration .
    • 2024 attendance data unavailable due to IPO timing; monitoring 2025 meeting cadence and committee activity will be important to evaluate engagement .
  • Related‑party and conflicts:

    • No related‑party transactions attributed to Hayes; audit committee pre‑approves related party transactions; disclosures primarily refer to historical arrangements tied to the CEO (Roscommon) .

Overall, Hayes’ profile strengthens audit rigor and board independence, with tangible ownership and committee leadership supporting investor confidence; governance risks stem from the company’s dual‑class voting concentration and potential dilution from equity plan amendments rather than from Hayes’ activities .