HG
HERTZ GLOBAL HOLDINGS, INC (HTZ)·Q1 2025 Earnings Summary
Executive Summary
- Q1 2025 showed operational progress but a top-line and earnings miss vs Street: revenue fell 13% YoY to $1.81B and adjusted EPS was -$1.12, as Hertz ran an intentionally tighter fleet and faced a 5% pricing decline; however, vehicle depreciation per unit fell to $353 on fleet rotation and rising residuals .
- Versus consensus, Hertz missed on revenue ($1.81B vs $2.01B*) and adj. EPS (-$1.12 vs -$0.98*), and adj. EBITDA (-$325M vs -$247M*), with management attributing revenue softness to accelerated infleeting ahead of tariffs, the Easter shift, and mix decisions favoring lower-depreciating vehicles .
- Management reiterated North Star targets (DPU < $300, RPU > $1,500, DOE/day low $30s) and expects Q2 EBITDA ≈ breakeven and Q3 positive EPS, underpinned by the younger fleet and foundational revenue management upgrades; liquidity was $1.2B and credit facilities were extended to de-risk maturities .
- Near-term stock catalysts: confirmation of sub-$300 DPU in Q2, rate stabilization into summer, execution of Amadeus-driven RM uplift, and progress on deleveraging (ATM authorization); risks include macro demand moderation in corporate/government inbound and tariff-driven parts/maintenance costs .
What Went Well and What Went Wrong
-
What Went Well
- Depreciation per unit fell sharply to $353/month (down ~40% YoY), reflecting disciplined “Buy Right, Hold Right, Sell Right” fleet rotation; model year 2025 vehicles are already sub-$300 DPU .
- Direct operating expense improved by $92M YoY, with DOE/day down 4% QoQ despite lower volume; utilization rose 240 bps YoY to 79% .
- Strategic financing actions extended the First Lien RCF (~$1.7B to March 2028) and U.S./EU ABS maturities, strengthening flexibility; liquidity stood at $1.2B .
- Quote: “Our ‘Back-to-Basics Roadmap’ is working… capitalizing on our fleet as our most dominant economic lever keeps us agile” — CEO Gil West .
-
What Went Wrong
- Revenue declined 13% YoY to $1.81B on an 8% smaller fleet and 5% pricing decline; RPU fell 3% YoY to $1,264/month, pressured by Easter timing, leap year, and margin-accretive mix shifts .
- Adjusted Corporate EBITDA remained negative at -$325M (margin -18%) and adjusted EPS was -$1.12; both missed consensus as pricing underperformed in late March/early April and accelerated infleeting created local market over-supply .
- Non-vehicle interest expense and SG&A remained elevated YoY, and management highlighted continued insurance and rent headwinds; DOE/day down only 1% YoY on a volume-adjusted basis .
Financial Results
YoY comparison and vs Estimates (Q1 2025):
Values marked with * were retrieved from S&P Global.
Segment breakdown (Q1 2025):
KPIs across quarters:
Guidance Changes
Earnings Call Themes & Trends
Management Commentary
- “Disciplined fleet management, revenue optimization, and rigorous cost control are driving meaningful results… our fleet is our most dominant economic lever” — CEO Gil West .
- “Q1 depreciation expense decreased 45% YoY… DPU was $353… we expect gross DPU below $300 in Q2” — CFO Scott Haralson .
- “We are in the early stages of a multiyear transformation journey with Amadeus to modernize revenue management and deliver incremental EBITDA on a regular basis” — CCO Sandeep Dube .
- Financing and liquidity: “RCF extended to March 2028; ABS extensions… expect to end Q2 with >$1B liquidity even if make‑whole is paid” — CFO Scott Haralson .
Q&A Highlights
- Local-market overfleeting from accelerated deliveries hurt utilization and pricing temporarily in late March/early April; macro fleet remains tight and down 8% YoY .
- Tariff exposure minimal for MY2025 (previously agreed pricing); benefits expected through residuals pricing dynamics .
- DOE target low‑30s will require scale and efficiency; aiming to reach North Star metrics around 2027 .
- RPD stabilization seen in recent weeks; path to Q2 EBITDA breakeven assumes modest RPD improvement into the summer .
- Strategy to prune lower-margin channels while leaning into premium brand direct and partner volume, off-airport, and mobility to improve unit economics .
Estimates Context
- Q1 2025 vs S&P Global consensus: Revenue $1.81B vs $2.01B* (miss), Adjusted Diluted EPS -$1.12 vs -$0.98* (miss), Adjusted Corporate EBITDA -$325M vs -$247M* (miss). Management cited pricing softness around Easter and accelerated infleeting as transient, with RM upgrades and mix shifts expected to lift margins through 2025–2026 .
- Forward context: Management expects Q2 2025 EBITDA ≈ breakeven and Q3 positive EPS; North Star metrics reaffirmed (DPU < $300, RPU > $1,500, DOE/day low $30s), implying potential upward revisions to H2 profitability if pricing and utilization trends hold .
Values marked with * were retrieved from S&P Global.
Key Takeaways for Investors
- Depreciation normalization is arriving faster-than-expected (sub‑$300 DPU targeted in Q2), materially improving unit economics; watch Q2 print for confirmation .
- Revenue miss was driven by tactical capacity and calendar effects; evidence of recent rate stabilization and utilization improvement supports Q2 breakeven guidance .
- Foundational RM and mix initiatives (Amadeus, off‑airport/mobility, direct/partner channels) are designed to be margin-accretive across a large revenue base; execution will be key to closing the gap to Street expectations .
- Liquidity and refinancing actions materially de-risk near-term maturities; ATM authorization adds deleveraging optionality, potentially equity-value accretive via interest savings .
- Near-term focus: pricing momentum into summer, sustained utilization gains, DOE/day trajectory, and retail vehicle sales mix supporting residual gains (record retail quarter in Q1) .
- Medium-term thesis: achieving North Star metrics by ~2027 could support >$1B EBITDA run-rate; tailwinds include residual value strength and diversified demand, but macro corporate/government softness remains a risk to RPD .
- Position sizing should reflect transition risk and sensitivity to macro demand/tariffs; catalysts include Q2/Q3 inflection to positive EPS and visible progress on deleveraging .