Sign in

You're signed outSign in or to get full access.

Inderpal Singh

General Counsel at IMMUNIC
Executive

About Inderpal Singh

Inderpal Singh is General Counsel of Immunic, Inc., serving since June 2021; he is 59 years old and brings 20+ years of global biopharma legal leadership across Pfizer, Biogen, Merck KGaA, and Sandoz . He holds a law specialization from Johannes-Gutenberg University (Mainz) and executive MBAs from the University of Mannheim and INSEAD; he was named as a designated company proxy alongside the CFO, reflecting governance trust and responsibility . Company performance over his tenure shows depressed TSR and losses typical of clinical-stage biotech: value of a $100 investment in Immunic fell to $6.54 in 2024 (from $9.81 in 2023 and $9.16 in 2022), while net income remained negative (−$100.5m in 2024, −$93.6m in 2023, −$120.4m in 2022) .

Past Roles

OrganizationRoleYearsStrategic Impact
Sandoz International GmbHGlobal Legal Head of Biopharma2018–2021Led legal for biopharma across development, regulatory, medical, commercial, BD, alliances, and market access
Merck KGaAGlobal Legal Head, Global Manufacturing and Supply; Regional Counsel MEA, CIS & Turkey2015–2017Oversight of manufacturing/supply legal and regional commercial legal strategies
Biogen Idec International GmbHLegal Director (Europe)2013–2015Supported European operations and compliance for innovator biotech
Pfizer Deutschland GmbH / Pfizer Inc.Senior legal positions~15 years (dates not disclosed)Progressive corporate/commercial legal leadership in large-cap pharma

External Roles

No public company or nonprofit board roles disclosed for Mr. Singh in company filings .

Fixed Compensation

  • Not disclosed: Mr. Singh is not a named executive officer (NEO), and the proxy’s Summary Compensation Table covers CEO, Executive Chairman, CMO, CFO, and COO only .

Performance Compensation

  • Equity option repricing program (approved at the March 4, 2024 special meeting): Mr. Singh held 180,000 “Eligible Options” with a weighted average exercise price of $12.2228 and a weighted average remaining term of 7.63 years; repriced options were set to a new exercise price equal to the greater of $1.72 or 110% of closing price on the Repricing Date (other terms unchanged) to address retention and competitiveness .
  • Standard vesting mechanics at Immunic (illustrative from NEO disclosures): options typically vest 25% at first anniversary and then in monthly installments over the following 36 months, supporting retention and long-term alignment (company-wide pattern) .
Equity Incentive Detail202220232024
Company TSR – $100 Investment (Value at Year End)$9.16 $9.81 $6.54
Company Net Income ($USD Millions)−$120.4 −$93.6 −$100.5
Singh Eligible Options (Count)180,000
Singh Eligible Options – Wtd Avg Exercise Price ($)$12.2228
Singh Eligible Options – Wtd Avg Remaining Term (Years)7.63
Repricing Design – New Exercise Price ($)≥$1.72 or 110% of closing price

Equity Ownership & Alignment

  • Options: 180,000 options subject to the 2024 repricing (see above), enhancing potential alignment if the stock recovers .
  • Hedging/derivatives: Company insider trading policy prohibits officers from engaging in publicly-traded options and other derivative transactions, including hedging designed to reduce risk of holding company securities, improving alignment with shareholders .
  • Pledging: No specific pledging disclosures for Mr. Singh; policy language focuses on prohibiting derivatives/hedging rather than pledging collateral .
  • Clawback: Immunic adopted an exchange-listing-compliant compensation recovery policy effective October 2, 2023, covering incentive-based compensation for current/former executive officers upon a restatement, regardless of fault .

Employment Terms

  • Role and tenure: General Counsel; joined June 2021 (4+ years as of the April 22, 2025 proxy) .
  • Governance standing: Designated proxy holder for shareholder meetings (with CFO), indicating seniority and trust in corporate governance processes .
  • Non-compete/non-solicit: Not separately disclosed for Mr. Singh; Immunic references general confidentiality/ethics governance frameworks and policies in filings .

Compensation Structure Analysis

  • Equity-heavy retention strategy: 2024 special meeting repricing targeted underwater options for employees, directors, and executive officers, including Mr. Singh (180k options), signaling reliance on options rather than cash to retain talent in a volatile biotech market .
  • Share pool increases: Omnibus equity plan expanded twice (to 19,448,871 shares in March 2024 and to 26,448,871 in June 2025), supporting broad-based equity incentives but contributing to potential dilution .

Compensation Peer Group and Process

  • The Compensation Committee engages Aon as independent consultant for executive and director pay benchmarking and practices; committee independently sets goals, evaluates performance, and oversees compensation risk .

Say‑on‑Pay & Shareholder Feedback

MeetingProposalForAgainstAbstain
June 11, 2024 Annual MeetingAdvisory approval of NEO compensation47,604,179 2,218,350 59,604

Strong support suggests investor acceptance of Immunic’s pay practices amid equity plan expansions and option repricing .

Risk Indicators & Red Flags

  • Option repricing of underwater awards (2024): A retention tool but often viewed as a governance red flag without performance reconditioning; Immunic justified it on competitiveness grounds and used a premium exercise price (≥$1.72) to balance incentives .
  • Ongoing dilution authorization: Increases to equity plan share reserves in 2024 and 2025 expand potential dilution; watch grant intensity and burn rates .
  • Negative net income trend: Persistent losses inherent to clinical-stage biotech elevate capital needs and dilution risk, impacting realized value of equity awards .

Investment Implications

  • Alignment: Singh’s equity exposure (180k options) and prohibition on hedging support alignment; the 2024 repricing enhances potential motivational value if the stock rebounds .
  • Retention: Company-wide repricing and expanded share pools point to equity-centric retention; this reduces near-term cash burn but raises dilution sensitivity—monitor grant pacing and future share increases .
  • Governance quality: Strong say‑on‑pay support and formal clawback policy are positives; however, repricing is a governance tradeoff that should be weighed against execution progress in Phase 3 programs and capital strategy .