Sign in

You're signed outSign in or to get full access.

IN

INFINITY NATURAL RESOURCES, INC. (INR)·Q3 2025 Earnings Summary

Executive Summary

  • Q3 2025 showed strong operations with 39% YoY production growth to 36.0 MBoe/d, a company-record single-day rate of 47.9 MBoe/d in October, and adjusted EBITDAX of $60.0M; however, revenue of $79.7M was below consensus while EPS beat on company-reported figures .
  • Management raised full-year 2025 production guidance to 33.5–35 MBoe/d and narrowed total development CapEx to $270–$292M, signaling higher confidence in the back-half execution and capital discipline .
  • The Board authorized a $75M share repurchase program; at ~15.6M Class A shares outstanding, management highlighted potential to retire >40% of Class A shares at ~$11.50, framing a powerful capital return catalyst alongside a robust liquidity position ($304M) following a borrowing base increase to $375M on Oct 1 .
  • Costs improved materially: cash operating costs fell to $6.09/BOE (vs $9.42/BOE last year), and adjusted EBITDAX margin expanded to $18.12/Boe (vs $16.48 in Q2), aided by increased natural gas weighting and operational efficiency .
  • Near-term stock narrative catalysts: buyback execution, continued Pennsylvania gas turn-in-lines (six wells planned for Q4), declining per-unit costs, and the potential 2026 deep dry gas Utica test discussion, balanced by commodity-price sensitivity and tariff/macro headwinds noted on the call .

What Went Well and What Went Wrong

What Went Well

  • Production outperformance and operational execution: 39% YoY growth to 36.0 MBoe/d; 10 wells turned to sales in Q3 (six Ohio oil, four Pennsylvania gas); record 47.9 MBoe/d single-day rate in October .
  • Costs and margins improved: cash operating costs down to $6.09/BOE; adjusted EBITDAX margin $18.12/Boe, with management emphasizing top-tier margins vs Appalachian peers and continued cost declines as gas volumes ramp .
  • Strategic flexibility and asset “ground game”: ~3,000 net acres acquired across ~350 transactions in Q3, increasing working interests and effectively adding ~one net well to 2025 at the same spend; guidance raised, liquidity expanded .
    • Quote: “These working interest additions are among the highest returning dollars we invest…” .

What Went Wrong

  • Revenue below consensus: Q3 revenue was $79.7M vs S&P Global consensus of ~$85.8M, despite strong production; EPS beat, but revenue miss may temper top-line sentiment (see Estimates Context) .
  • Tariffs and macro noted as development cost/efficiency factors and potential headwinds; management cited tariffs impacting dollar-per-foot costs though tracking well vs plan .
  • Prior midstream constraints (Q2 Ohio) forced temporary curtailments and sequencing changes; resolved by Q3, but illustrates operational risk in third-party infrastructure (important for modelers tracking Ohio oil projects) .

Financial Results

MetricQ1 2025Q2 2025Q3 2025
Total Revenues ($USD Millions)$85.165*$74.476 $79.726
Diluted EPS ($USD)$2.1582*$1.18 $0.65
Adjusted EBITDAX ($USD Millions)$57.246 $49.641 $60.049
Adjusted EBITDAX Margin ($/Boe)$23.96 $16.48 $18.12
Cash Operating Costs ($/Boe)$8.42 $7.93 $6.09

Values with asterisk retrieved from S&P Global.

Vs estimates (Q3 2025):

MetricConsensusActualSurprise
Revenue ($USD Millions)$85.831$79.726 Miss: -$6.105
Primary EPS ($USD)$0.458$0.65 Beat: +$0.192
EBITDA ($USD Millions)$60.840$60.049 (Adj. EBITDAX proxy) Slight miss: -$0.791

Values in the Consensus column retrieved from S&P Global. Note: Company reports Adjusted EBITDAX; we present it as the nearest proxy to consensus EBITDA.

Segment/Production Breakdown

MetricQ2 2025Q3 2025
Net daily production Ohio (MBoe/d)19.5 21.0
Net daily production Pennsylvania (MBoe/d)13.6 15.0
Production mix – Oil19% 22%
Production mix – NGLs18% 14%
Production mix – Natural Gas63% 64%

KPIs

KPIQ2 2025Q3 2025
Wells turned to sales1 oil-weighted well in Q2 Ohio 10 wells (6 Ohio oil-weighted, 4 PA gas-weighted)
Lateral feet placed into sales (gross)83k feet across six wells placed in Q1 (context) and 86k feet in July post-Q2 close (context) ~162k feet across ten wells
Stages pumped (completed)777 stages (8 wells completed) 442 stages across 6 wells completed; record >16 stages in 24 hours
Single-day net production record47.9 MBoe/d (October)

Guidance Changes

MetricPeriodPrevious GuidanceCurrent GuidanceChange
Net daily productionFY 202532–35 MBoe/d 33.5–35 MBoe/d Raised/Narrowed to high end
Total development CapEx (D&C + midstream)FY 2025Combined high end $249–$292M (D&C $240–$280 + midstream $9–$12) $270–$292M Narrowed upward at low end
Borrowing baseAs of Oct 1, 2025$—$375M; Liquidity $304M Increased
Share repurchase authorizationProgramNoneUp to $75M Class A shares New program

Earnings Call Themes & Trends

TopicPrevious Mentions (Q1 & Q2)Current Period (Q3)Trend
AI/power gen demand for gasQ2: In-basin demand/egress; AI/power gen potentially supplanting new pipeline needs, improving pricing outlook Continued constructive view on gas; strong PA gas performance; hedging remains prudent Positive tailwind for gas
Supply chain/midstreamQ2: Ohio midstream constraint temporarily curtailed; resolved post-quarter No anticipated midstream constraints; building out own gas midstream Improving reliability
Tariffs/macroQ2: Cost focus; macro volatility discussed generally CFO: Tariffs affect costs, but tracking well vs plan Manageable headwind
Product/asset performanceQ1–Q2: Strong PA Marcellus wells; long laterals in Ohio Utica Best-producing projects in both states; record operational stats Continuing outperformance
Rigs/pace of activityQ2: ~1.2 rigs in 2025; moving to one rig/one crew later in year 2026 at least as active as 2025 (~≥1.2 rigs); mix flexible Sustained activity
Regulatory/legalOngoing SEC/IR disclosures via 8-K; leadership additions in Q3 timeline Standard forward-looking disclosures; no new legal/regulatory disruptions Stable
R&D/technologyLeadership hire: VP of Technology (cybersecurity/enterprise risk) Continued digital/tech enablement emphasis Capability build
Hedging strategyQ2: Active hedging for return-secure projects Well-hedged through 2025; volumes adjusted as strong well performance increases exposure Prudent with upside

Management Commentary

  • “We delivered exceptional operational performance in the third quarter, with production averaging 36.0 MBoe/d, representing 39% total production growth and 70% natural gas production growth compared to the third quarter 2024… The turn in lines led to a Company single day net production record of 47.9 MBoe/d in October.” — Zack Arnold, President & CEO .
  • “We generated adjusted EBITDA of $60 million during the quarter and an adjusted EBITDA margin of $18.12 per BOE… We expect per-unit costs will continue to decline as we accelerate Pennsylvania production.” — David Sproule, EVP & CFO .
  • “Our land acquisition strategy continues to deliver results… increase our working interest in ongoing development projects… effectively added approximately one net well to our 2025 development program.” — David Sproule .
  • “We are updating our full-year total development capital expenditure guidance to a range of $270–$292 million… inside the higher end of our previous combined DNC and midstream CapEx guidance.” — Zack Arnold .

Q&A Highlights

  • Buyback vs growth investments: CFO emphasized buybacks will not impede development/M&A; shares viewed as significantly undervalued; opportunistic execution .
  • Hedging: Well-hedged through 2025 on gas; hedge percentages vary as strong PA gas performance increases unhedged exposure; approach locks in returns at FID, upsized at completion .
  • 2026 activity and commodity mix: Company expects activity at least as high as 2025 (~≥1.2 rigs); maintains optionality across oil and gas with attractive returns in both states .
  • Production trajectory: October’s 47.9 MBoe/d was a daily spot rate tied to new wells; six Q4 turn-in-lines planned (three already online at call time) .
  • Share repurchase mechanics: Focused on Class A shares (~15.6M outstanding); at ~$11.50, $75M authorization could retire >40% of Class A shares .

Estimates Context

How results compared to Wall Street consensus (S&P Global):

MetricQ1 2025Q2 2025Q3 2025
Revenue Consensus Mean ($USD)$79.848M$83.391M$85.831M
Primary EPS Consensus Mean ($USD)$0.678$0.455$0.458
EBITDA Consensus Mean ($USD)$56.649M$55.250M$60.840M
Primary EPS – # of Estimates565
Revenue – # of Estimates667

Values retrieved from S&P Global.

  • Q3 scorecard: EPS beat (company diluted EPS $0.65 vs $0.458 consensus) while revenue missed ($79.7M vs $85.8M). Adjusted EBITDAX at $60.0M is slightly below the ~$60.8M EBITDA consensus (non-GAAP vs GAAP proxy) .
  • Implications: Models may need to lower revenue assumptions near term (mix/pricing) while incorporating stronger cost performance and higher gas weighting; buyback authorization adds per-share accretion tailwind.

Key Takeaways for Investors

  • Operational execution remains the core driver: record turn-in-lines, improving per-unit costs, and strong PA gas performance support durable margins and FCF cadence .
  • Guidance raised and narrowed: higher confidence in hitting the top end of production and staying within the tightened CapEx range should de-risk Q4 setup .
  • Capital return adds a new catalyst: $75M buyback authorization can be meaningfully accretive given Class A float and management’s undervaluation view .
  • Watch Q4 turn-in-lines and cost trajectory: six Q4 wells (3 gas pending) plus continued cost declines can drive sequential improvement; monitor realized prices vs hedges .
  • Balanced portfolio optionality: flexibility to lean into gas or oil projects based on returns and macro supports resilience into 2026 (≥1.2 rig activity expected) .
  • Risks: Tariffs/macro, commodity prices, and third-party infrastructure (though midstream constraints resolved and internal build-out ongoing) .
  • Liquidity and leverage strengths: net debt ~$71M and liquidity ~$304M post borrowing base increase underpin buyback capacity and optionality for organic/inorganic growth .
Notes: 
- Document citations refer to SEC 8-K/press release and call transcript sources. 
- All S&P Global consensus and “actual” values (if marked with *) are retrieved from S&P Global.