IS
International Seaways, Inc. (INSW)·Q2 2025 Earnings Summary
Executive Summary
- Q2 2025 delivered solid profitability amid softer product tanker spot rates: net income $62M ($1.25 diluted EPS) and adjusted EPS $1.02; adjusted EBITDA $101.5M, supported by disciplined cost control and balance sheet strength .
- Results beat S&P Global consensus on adjusted EPS and revenue; adjusted EPS $1.02 vs 0.90 estimate and revenue $195.6M vs $191.5M estimate; EBITDA modestly above consensus, reflecting resilient VLCC/Suezmax/Aframax performance despite weaker MR rates .
- Guidance cadence improved: forward spot breakeven lowered to ~$13,000/day and Q3 2025 booked TCE at ~$28,000/day on ~40% of revenue days, pointing to strong free cash flow continuation; Board declared combined $0.77 dividend (4th consecutive ≥75% payout) .
- Capital allocation catalysts: sale of six older vessels ($28M in Q2, ~$57M in Q3) and agreement to purchase a 2020-built VLCC for $119M; secured $240M export-agency financing for LR1 newbuilds (SOFR+125 bps, 20-year amortization) .
- Balance sheet and financing optionality expanded with total liquidity ~$709M, undrawn RCF $560M, and net LTV ~14%; subsequent press releases indicate fixed-income investor meetings and successful $250M unsecured bond at 7.125% coupon (Sept 2025), supporting Ocean Yield refinancing .
What Went Well and What Went Wrong
-
What Went Well
- Adjusted EPS and revenue beat consensus; adjusted EBITDA held up despite product softness, aided by crude segments and cost discipline .
- Balance sheet strength and financing wins: $240M K-SURE/DNB LR1 financing commitments (SOFR+125 bps, 20-year amortization; 12-year maturity), liquidity ~$709M, net LTV ~14%; “We ended Q2 with over $700,000,000 in total liquidity... Our net loan to value is comfortably under 15%” .
- Shareholder returns: declared $0.77 (regular $0.12 + supplemental $0.65), with management reiterating minimum 75% payout ratio consistency .
-
What Went Wrong
- Spot MR and LR1 rates were significantly lower YoY; MR spot ~$18,941/day vs $35,007/day and LR1 ~$32,802/day vs $53,066/day in Q2 2024, compressing product TCE revenues .
- VLCC strategy missed short rate spikes due to long-haul positioning; “Our VLCC rates were impacted by a long haul strategy that didn't allow us to fully capture short spikes” .
- Segment revenue declines YoY: Crude shipping revenues $104M vs $125M, Product $92M vs $132M, reflecting broader rate normalization .
Financial Results
*Values retrieved from S&P Global.
Segment breakdown
KPIs
Guidance Changes
Earnings Call Themes & Trends
Management Commentary
- “Net income for the second quarter was $62,000,000 or $1.25 per diluted share… adjusted net income… $50,000,000 or $1.02 per diluted share, and adjusted EBITDA was $102,000,000” .
- “We ended Q2 with over $700,000,000 in total liquidity… Our net loan to value is comfortably under 15%” .
- “We have sold or agreed to sell six of our oldest vessels… proceeds of $28,000,000 [Q2] … ~$57,000,000 [Q3]; agreed to purchase a 2020-built scrubber-fitted VLCC delivering in the fourth quarter” .
- CFO: “VLCC rates were impacted by a long haul strategy that didn't allow us to fully capture short spikes during the quarter… lightering business contributed about $2,000,000 in EBITDA in the second quarter” .
- CFO on forward outlook: “Blended average spot TCE of about $28,000 per day… forward spot breakeven rate is about $13,000 per day” .
Q&A Highlights
- Sanctions and trade flows: India’s intake of Russian crude increasingly requires compliant tonnage; rising US Gulf exports to India noted; management expects negotiations over ~30 days .
- OPEC+ unwind: VLCCs’ increased engagement in Arabian Gulf lifts crude tanker complex; reduced cannibalization into Suezmax/Aframax routes benefits smaller segments .
- Fleet mix: Management balancing crude vs product exposure; modern MR additions in 2024, first LR1 newbuild in September; opportunistic VLCC purchase to position for crude cycle .
- Financing strategy: $240M LR1 ECA-backed facility appropriate for newbuilds; multiple options for VLCC refinancing post Ocean Yield repayment; aim to lower breakevens (term, margin, amortization profile) .
- Dividend clarity: Minimum ~75% payout ratio emphasized for consistency; share repurchases remain in the mix with $50M authorization .
Estimates Context
Bolded beats/misses:
- Q2 2025: Adjusted EPS beat; Revenue beat; EBITDA beat.
- Q1 2025: Adjusted EPS beat; Revenue beat; EBITDA beat.
- Q4 2024: Revenue beat; Adjusted EPS essentially in line; EBITDA in line-to-slight beat.
*Values retrieved from S&P Global.
Where estimates may need to adjust:
- Product tanker rates softened in Q2 but Q3 booked TCE and improved crude rates suggest upward revisions to near-term EBITDA and EPS if spot strength persists; lower breakevens add operating leverage .
- Fleet optimization (older vessel sales and modern VLCC purchase) likely lifts average earnings power and margins into Q4/Q1, supporting medium-term consensus upgrades .
Key Takeaways for Investors
- Q2 print was resilient with beats on adjusted EPS, revenue, and EBITDA; the setup into Q3 looks stronger on booked TCE versus lower breakevens—constructive for near-term FCF and dividend capacity .
- Capital returns remain a core pillar: $0.77 declared for Q3 payment and minimum ~75% payout ratio reiterated; buybacks remain optionality with $50M authorization .
- Balance sheet strength and financing optionality (ECA-backed $240M facility; later $250M unsecured bond at 7.125%) underpin Ocean Yield repayment and fleet growth while lowering breakevens over time .
- Fleet renewal is ongoing: monetizing older MRs/LR1 and adding modern VLCC improves cycle capture; first LR1 newbuild delivers in September, with six LR1s through 3Q26 contributing to product exposure in a niche pool .
- Tactical positioning matters: VLCC long-haul strategy missed some short spikes in Q2; however, OPEC+ unwind and Arabian Gulf activity are tailwinds for crude segments into Q3/Q4 .
- Watch geopolitical vectors (India sanctions, Hormuz/Red Sea) and inventory normalization; management views compliant fleet positioning and ton-mile dynamics as supportive to earnings .
- Trading implications: near term, strength in spot bookings vs lower breakevens argues for positive revisions and dividend visibility; medium term, tightening supply and fleet age dynamics could support multi-quarter earnings momentum .