Sign in

Ralph Baxter

Director at Intapp
Board

About Ralph Baxter

Ralph Baxter (age 79) has served on Intapp’s board since July 2021. He previously served as CEO of global law firm Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe (1990–2013), where he led multiple operating model transformations. He holds an A.B. in History from Stanford University and a J.D. from the University of Virginia. His board term is Class I, expiring at the 2027 annual meeting .

Past Roles

OrganizationRoleTenureCommittees/Impact
Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLPChief Executive Officer1990–2013Led firm-wide initiatives incl. Global Operations Center in Wheeling, WV; changes to talent and pricing models
Integration Appliance, Inc. (Intapp operating subsidiary)Director2016–2021Pre-IPO subsidiary board service
Lex Machina, Inc.DirectorNot disclosedLegal tech domain expertise; dates not disclosed

External Roles

OrganizationRoleTenureNotes
LegalZoom.com, Inc.Legal Advisory Board memberNot disclosedAdvisory capacity (not BoD)
Stanford Law School Center on the Legal ProfessionSenior Advisor; Advisory Board memberNot disclosedLegal industry leadership network
Harvard Law School Center on the Legal ProfessionAdvisory Board memberNot disclosedLegal industry leadership network

Board Governance

  • Board class/term: Class I; term expires in 2027 .
  • Committee memberships: Not listed on Audit, Compensation, or Nominating & Corporate Governance Committees (Audit: Allen, Harris, Neble [chair], Wieck; Compensation: Fichtner, Harris [chair], Moran; Nominating & Corporate Governance: Allen, Fichtner, Wieck [chair]) .
  • Independence: Not identified as “independent director” by the board (independent directors named: Allen, Fichtner, Harris, Moran, Neble, Wieck) .
  • Attendance: Board met 5 times in FY2025; each director attended at least 75% of Board and committee meetings; all 8 directors attended the 2024 annual meeting .
  • Board leadership: CEO John Hall also serves as Chairman; guidelines allow flexibility; no Lead Independent Director is disclosed .

Fixed Compensation (FY2025)

ComponentAmountNotes
Director cash retainer$0Baxter does not receive additional cash for director service beyond Annual RSU .
Committee fees$0Not a committee member; not listed for any committee .
Consulting base fee$240,000Under Baxter Consulting Agreement (Ralph Baxter, Inc.) for advisory board program .
  • Policy context: Non-employee director retainers (FY2025) were $35,000 (Board), plus committee retainers; Board increased the base retainer to $40,000 for FY2026 .

Performance Compensation (FY2025)

ComponentAmountStructure/Terms
Non-Equity Incentive (consulting)$250,900Earned based on objectives tied to chairing Intapp’s advisory board program and certain company operating performance objectives .
Stock Awards (Annual RSU)$220,394Aggregate grant date fair value under ASC 718; Annual RSU equals $200,000 divided by 20-trading-day average price; vests in full by the next annual meeting or first anniversary .

Performance metric framework for the consulting incentive (qualitative disclosure):

  • Advisory board program objectives tied to Mr. Baxter’s role as chair .
  • Company operating performance objectives (specific metrics not disclosed) .

Equity award mechanics for directors:

  • Initial RSU for new directors: $300,000 divided by 20-day average price; vests in three equal annual installments over 3 years .
  • Annual RSU for continuing directors: $200,000 divided by 20-day average price; vests in full by the next annual meeting or within one year .

Director Compensation (FY2025 actuals)

NameFees Earned ($)Stock Awards ($)Non-Equity Incentive ($)All Other Comp ($)Total ($)
Ralph Baxter220,394250,900240,000711,294

Other Directorships & Interlocks

CategoryCompanyRoleInterlock/Conflict Notes
Public company boards (current)None disclosedNone disclosed in proxy .
Private/advisoryLegalZoom.com, Inc.Legal Advisory Board memberAdvisory role; no related-party transaction disclosed .
Academic/non-profitStanford Law School; Harvard Law SchoolSenior/Advisory Board rolesGovernance/ethics expertise; no conflicts disclosed .
PriorLex Machina, Inc.DirectorLegal tech director experience; no conflicts disclosed .

Expertise & Qualifications

  • Deep legal industry domain expertise; former CEO of a global law firm with track record in operations redesign and pricing/talent model innovation .
  • Governance and advisory experience across legal-tech and academic institutions (Stanford, Harvard) .
  • Education: A.B. Stanford; J.D. University of Virginia .

Equity Ownership (as of 9/23/2025)

HolderCommon Shares HeldOptions Exercisable ≤60 daysRSUs/Equity Awards Vesting ≤60 daysTotal Beneficial Ownership% OutstandingBasis
Ralph Baxter5,624117,0003,817126,441<1%81,787,131 shares outstanding
  • Options: 117,000 are vested and exercisable within 60 days; company states it does not currently grant options (legacy holdings) .
  • Hedging/pledging: Company policy prohibits hedging, short-term trading, options transactions, and pledging/margin accounts for directors and officers .
  • Stock ownership guidelines (adopted June 2025): Directors expected to hold Company stock equal to ≥5x annual cash retainer (unvested RSUs count); 5-year compliance window; individual compliance status not disclosed .

Say-on-Pay & Shareholder Feedback (context for governance)

  • 2024 Annual Meeting (Nov 13, 2024) results: Say-on-Pay For 58,986,436; Against 9,199,531; Abstain 13,896; Broker non-votes 1,904,606. Say-on-frequency “1 Year” selected (67,394,413 votes for 1 year) .
  • 2025 proxy again recommends “For” on Say-on-Pay .

Related Party Transactions (Potential Conflicts)

  • Baxter Consulting Agreement: Originated March 2016 (assigned to Ralph Baxter, Inc.); advises on advisory board program. Consideration: $240,000 base fees per year plus up to $260,000 per year tied to advisory board objectives and certain Company operating performance objectives; extended on June 23, 2025 through June 30, 2026 .
  • Governance process: Audit Committee reviews/approves related party transactions per policy; conflicted directors do not participate .

Governance Assessment

  • Independence and conflicts:
    • Not classified as an independent director, consistent with his paid consulting relationship (base and performance fees) with the Company .
    • The consulting arrangement, including performance-contingent fees and annual extension through June 30, 2026, is a meaningful related-party transaction that can raise perceived conflict-of-interest concerns and investor scrutiny if not rigorously overseen by the Audit Committee .
  • Board effectiveness:
    • Baxter is not assigned to Audit, Compensation, or Nominating & Governance Committees, which mitigates some direct oversight conflicts but also limits his role in formal risk, pay, and nomination oversight .
    • Attendance thresholds met (≥75%) and full attendance at the 2024 annual meeting indicate baseline engagement .
  • Alignment and incentives:
    • Receives Annual RSU like other non-employee directors, supporting equity alignment ($220,394 grant-date fair value in FY2025) .
    • Holds 117,000 vested, exercisable options and 5,624 shares; policy prohibits hedging/pledging, and stock ownership guidelines support longer-term alignment (5x retainer target; unvested RSUs count) .
  • Shareholder signals:
    • Strong Say-on-Pay support at the 2024 meeting (significant “For” votes) suggests no broad investor protest on compensation/governance at that time; company set annual Say-on-Pay cadence .
  • RED FLAGS:
    • Related-party consulting agreement with substantial base ($240,000) and performance fees (up to $260,000; $250,900 paid in FY2025), while serving as a director — perceived conflict risk requiring robust Audit Committee oversight and transparent disclosure .
    • Not independent under Nasdaq rules per board determination; combined CEO/Chair structure without a disclosed Lead Independent Director heightens the importance of strong committee oversight and independent voices on the Board .

Overall: Baxter brings deep client-facing legal industry expertise and advisory-board leadership but carries a notable related-party profile and non-independence status. Investors should monitor renewal terms, performance criteria for consulting fees, and continued segregation from key oversight committees to preserve board objectivity .