Sign in

You're signed outSign in or to get full access.

Jeffrey W. Martin

Chief Credit Officer at Investar Holding
Executive

About Jeffrey W. Martin

Jeffrey W. Martin serves as Chief Credit Officer (CCO) at Investar Holding Corporation/Investar Bank; he joined the Bank in April 2020 as Business Banking Director and assumed the CCO role in October 2021. He is age 59 in the latest proxy and has over 30 years of banking experience, including senior roles in credit risk management, special assets, business development strategy, and commercial banking; prior roles include two years as a Commercial Banking Executive and five years as a Business Banking Executive at Regions Bank . Company-level performance context during his tenure includes Net Income of $35.7M (2022), $16.7M (2023), and $20.3M (2024), with cumulative TSR values of 135.71 (2021–2022 base=100), 96.87 (2023), and 128.37 (2024), informing pay-versus-performance alignment used by the compensation committee .

Past Roles

OrganizationRoleYearsStrategic Impact
Investar BankBusiness Banking DirectorApr 2020–Oct 2021Led business banking, contributing to credit risk and commercial growth foundations
Investar Holding Corporation/Investar BankChief Credit OfficerOct 2021–presentOversees credit quality and risk management across the loan portfolio

External Roles

OrganizationRoleYearsStrategic Impact
Regions BankCommercial Banking Executive2 yearsSenior role in commercial banking execution and portfolio management
Regions BankBusiness Banking Executive5 yearsLed business banking initiatives and strategy development

Fixed Compensation

YearBase Salary ($)All Other Compensation ($)Notes
2022179,857 12,435 2022 base set at $182,011 effective Apr 16, 2022 (proxy disclosure); summary comp reflects paid salary for 2022

Performance Compensation

Annual Incentive Plan (AIP) – 2022

ComponentTarget Opportunity ($)Maximum Opportunity ($)Award Earned ($)AIP Total (% of Target)Key Metrics
2022 AIP26,667 40,000 25,256 95% Quarterly: Bank Net Income (65% weight for non-CEO NEOs); Annual: core metrics (EPS, ROAA, Efficiency Ratio, Delinquencies)

2022 Quarterly component used Bank Net Income as primary metric (65% for non-CEO NEOs) with targets set from budget; Annual component measured core EPS, ROAA, efficiency, and delinquencies; Martin’s total AIP payout was 95% of target for 2022 .

Long-Term Incentive (LTI) – 2022 Grants

Grant YearVehicleShares Granted (#)Target Value ($)AllocationVesting
2022RSUs2,642 50,000 100% RSUs (no options) 20% per year over 5 years (Apr 1, 2023–2027)

RSU Vesting Schedule – As of Dec 31, 2022

RSU TrancheShares (#)Vesting Dates
Time-based RSUs875 One-third each on May 1, 2023; May 1, 2024; May 1, 2025
Time-based RSUs579 One-fourth each on Apr 1, 2023; Apr 1, 2024; Apr 1, 2025; Apr 1, 2026
LTI RSUs (2022 grant)2,642 One-fifth each on Apr 1, 2023; Apr 1, 2024; Apr 1, 2025; Apr 1, 2026; Apr 1, 2027

Equity Ownership & Alignment

As of DateTotal Beneficial Ownership (Shares)% of Shares OutstandingBreakdown
Mar 20, 20239,200 ~0.093% (9,200 / 9,900,648) Includes 4,096 unvested RSUs and 2,625 shares via 401(k)
  • Stock ownership guidelines: Other executive officers must hold stock equal to 2x annual base salary; compliance horizon is April 1, 2024 or five years from becoming subject to the guidelines .
  • Anti-hedging: Executives are prohibited from hedging Company securities; no dividend equivalents on unvested RSUs .
  • Pledging: Ownership tables/footnotes disclose pledging for certain insiders (e.g., CEO), but no pledging footnote is indicated for Martin in the 2023 ownership table .

Employment Terms

  • No individual employment agreement, severance, or change-in-control cash terms are disclosed for Martin in the proxies reviewed; RSUs adhere to double-trigger vesting on change in control (accelerate only upon qualifying termination within 24 months of change in control) .

Performance & Context Tables

Metric202220232024
Net Income ($ thousands)35,709 16,678 20,252
Value of Initial $100 Investment (TSR)135.71 96.87 128.37

Governance and Compensation Program Features

  • Clawback policies expanded in Q4 2023 to comply with SEC/Nasdaq rules; applies to cash and equity .
  • Executive compensation designed around pay-for-performance, with independent consultant (Blanchard) providing benchmarking; peer groups include 16 banks (2022 analysis) and 15 banks (2023/2024 updates) .
  • Say-on-pay support: 69% (2022), 68% (2023); Company engaged with shareholders and modified disclosures and LTI formulaic design for 2024 .

Compensation Structure Analysis

  • Mix and trends: For 2022 (as NEO), Martin’s compensation emphasized salary plus formulaic AIP and time-based RSU LTI; no options, which reduces leverage but enhances retention via 5-year RSU vesting cadence .
  • Program safeguards: Double-trigger change-in-control treatment for RSUs; anti-hedging; no tax gross-ups; clawback policy .
  • Metrics rigor: AIP tied to Bank Net Income and core metrics; LTI values determined with reference to core performance and peer benchmarking (for executives) .

Investment Implications

  • Alignment and retention: Significant unvested RSUs with multi-year vesting create retention hooks and align incentives to credit quality and profitability; absence of option grants for Martin reduces immediate selling pressure vs. executives with near-term expiring options .
  • Insider selling pressure: No Form 4 trading data for Martin was identified in reviewed filings; RSU vesting dates are known and can create periodic tax-related sales, but hedging is prohibited and double-trigger applies on CIC, limiting forced acceleration .
  • Pay-for-performance posture: AIP and LTI design link payouts to core profitability, efficiency, and credit metrics—appropriate for a CCO; shareholder feedback led to enhanced disclosure and more objective LTI formulas for 2024, supporting long-term alignment .
  • Red flags to monitor: Company-level say-on-pay support was modest (68% in 2023), and CEO pledging was disclosed; no pledging for Martin noted. Continued tracking of credit performance metrics vs. incentive outcomes is key for evaluating execution risk in the loan portfolio .