Invesco - Earnings Call - Q1 2025

Executive Summary

• Q1 2025 delivered solid organic growth and profitability: net long‑term inflows of $17.6B, GAAP operating margin 18.1% and adjusted operating margin 31.5%. Adjusted diluted EPS was $0.44 and GAAP diluted EPS was $0.38.
• EPS beat Wall Street consensus (Primary EPS $0.386*) while revenue printed above SPGI consensus due to basis differences (GAAP operating revenues $1.53B vs consensus $1.11B*, while company’s net revenues were $1.11B—near consensus). Values retrieved from S&P Global.
• Capital return stepped up: common dividend raised to $0.21 and $25M of buybacks; announced $1B repurchase of preferred stock (expected May close) with $0.13 run‑rate EPS accretion post term‑loan repayment by 2029.
• Strategic catalysts: new private credit partnership with Barings (MassMutual subsidiary) targeting U.S. wealth channels, supported by $650M initial seed/co‑investment from MassMutual.

What Went Well and What Went Wrong

What Went Well

• Broad-based organic growth: $17.6B net long‑term inflows (ETFs & Index +$16.3B; Fundamental Fixed Income +$8.0B; China JV & India +$2.2B), with EMEA/Americas inflows of $15.0B/$3.0B.
• Profitability improved YoY: adjusted operating income +17.9% to $349.5M, adjusted margin up >300 bps to 31.5%; GAAP operating income +30.1% YoY. CEO: “positive operating leverage of over 500 basis points… improving our operating margin by over 330 basis points to nearly 32%”.
• Capital actions: dividend increase to $0.21/share; $25M buybacks; $1B preferred repurchase and Barings partnership—EPS accretive and strengthens balance sheet flexibility.

What Went Wrong

• Sequential revenue/earnings softness vs Q4: operating revenues −4.0% QoQ; GAAP operating income −11.0% QoQ; adjusted diluted EPS $0.44 vs $0.52 in Q4—seasonal performance fee decline and two fewer days impacted revenues.
• Fundamental Equities outflows persisted (−$7.0B), and Asia Pacific posted modest net long‑term outflows (−$0.4B) on a capability basis; ETF demand cooled in late quarter/April amid volatility.
• Net market losses reduced AUM by $42.2B in the quarter; net revenue yield ticked down with mix shift, and adjusted tax rate rose vs Q4 (24.4% vs 22.2%).

Transcript

Operator (participant)

Thank you for standing by, and welcome to Invesco's first quarter earnings conference call. All participants will be in a listen-only mode until the question-and-answer session. At that time, to ask a question, press star one. This call will last one hour. To allow more participants to ask questions, one question and a follow-up can be submitted per participant. As a reminder, today's call is being recorded. Now I'd like to turn the call over to Greg, excuse me, Greg Ketron, Invesco's Head of Investor Relations. Thank you. You may begin.

Greg Ketron (Head of Investor Relations)

Okay. Thanks, Cedric. To all of you joining us on Invesco's quarterly earnings call, in addition to today's press release, we have provided a presentation that covers the topics we plan to address. The press release and presentation are available on our website, invesco.com. This information can be found by going to the investor relations section of the website. Our presentation today will include forward-looking statements and certain non-GAAP financial measures. Please review the disclosures on slide two of the presentation regarding these statements and measures, as well as the appendix for the appropriate reconciliations to GAAP. Finally, Invesco is not responsible for and does not edit nor guarantee the accuracy of our earnings teleconference transcripts provided by third parties. The only authorized webcasts are located on our website. Andrew Schlossberg, President and CEO, and Allison Dukes, Chief Financial Officer, will present our results this morning.

We will open up the call for questions. I'll now turn the call over to Andrew.

Andrew Schlossberg (President and CEO)

Thank you, Greg, and good morning to everyone. I'm pleased to be speaking with you today, not only about our Q1 results, but also the significant developments that we announced in our ongoing relationship with MassMutual, which we are very excited about. Allison and I will walk through the details of this new strategic product and distribution partnership and the $1 billion repurchase of preferred stock a little later in the call. In recent quarters, I've been commencing our earnings calls with a recap of our strategic focuses and advantageous market position, as seen on slide three of your presentation. During this period of uncertainty in capital markets and economies around the world, I cannot think of a more pertinent time to highlight our position and our steadfast focus.

Our strategic priorities were conceived with conviction that regardless of near-term market volatility, cyclical, structural, or fundamental developments, our focus would leverage the best of Invesco, ignite our growth engines, and deliver durable results. The hallmarks of the global Invesco platform place us in a position of strength to navigate the current operating environment. Our geographic diversity and local presence is a differentiator across the Americas, EMEA, and our significant and unique Asia-Pacific profile. Furthermore, our broad range of public and private market portfolios and active and passive multi-asset range of capabilities provides the opportunity for us to stay closely connected to clients and capture expected reallocations in their portfolios. Furthermore, our diverse profile provides a more resilient asset flow, revenue, and profit growth profile. Our strategic clarity has helped us drive organic growth through various operating environments and continued to prove effective in the first quarter.

We generated $17.6 billion in long-term net asset inflows, or a 5.3% annualized growth rate. We delivered strong, profitable growth with adjusted operating income up 18% and operating margins expanding over 330 basis points when compared to the same quarter last year. Furthermore, against the backdrop of a turbulent start of the second quarter, our diversified platform provided some resilience in our asset flows and an ability to use our global scale for the benefits of our clients and our shareholders. Turning to slide four, I'll cover our first quarter flow performance by investment capability and provide some additional context in which to think about the new uncertain operating environment that we have now entered. Before I begin, though, I want to point out a change we have made to the reporting of our investment capabilities to isolate the performance of our China JV and India business.

It's important to note that this line item now only represents products managed through our China JV and India business. The approximately $10 billion in other assets that were previously in the Asia-Pacific managed capability but not managed directly through the JV or India are now allocated to the representative investment capabilities, with the majority being allocated to fundamental equities. We made this reporting change to better reflect how we view our business and the unique dynamics in the Asia-Pacific region, where we are increasingly able to bring more international products managed outside of the region to our clients in these local markets. A good example of this is our Global Equity Income Fund managed out of the U.K., which has rapidly grown to $14 billion of assets under management, predominantly from clients in the Japanese market.

We've provided an eight-quarter look back in the appendix of today's presentation to help you align to this adjustment. Currently, we'll continue to report our assets and flows sourced from clients in each region, which you can see on page five of the presentation. The Asia-Pacific and EMEA regions account for $276 billion each in assets under management, representing nearly a third of the overall company. Between them, they generated $15 billion in net long-term inflows in quarter one, a positive trend we have seen the past several quarters. This further highlights the importance of our local profile in key markets around the world. Shifting to our recent business results, the year started with a risk-on client sentiment, which shifted to a more cautious stance at the end of the quarter, continuing through April.

By illustration, money markets for the industry recently topped $7 trillion, a record level for the asset class. Thus far in April, we've seen investors largely stay invested, but they remain more muted with new capital deployments as they rethink their asset allocations. Despite the volatility, we continue to see strong client activity in the first quarter, with significant growth across channels, asset classes, and product vehicles. A key headline for us was the funding of a $10 billion mandate to deliver a range of customized fixed income portfolios for the People's Pension Fund, which is one of the largest master trusts in the United Kingdom. $6 billion of this mandate funded in the first quarter, with the incremental $4 billion funded during April. This is an important mandate as we continue to build Invesco's leadership in the retirement markets in the U.K. and globally.

Our global ETF and index platform continued to produce strong results, recording 13% annualized organic growth in the first quarter. More recently, in the March timeframe and continuing into April, ETF demand has cooled as global financial markets experienced increasing volatility. That said, we have continued to see our ETF flows broaden by asset class and factors across our clients in the Americas, EMEA, and Asia. Strong ETF growth in the U.S. market was augmented by another solid quarter for growth in EMEA, where we saw $8 billion in net new ETF flows. Top net flowing products in the U.S. were led by our QQQM, with a near record flow of $4 billion. Additionally, our factor suite drove significant net flows as precision investments become an even more critical buying decision.

We continue to innovate in the ETF space, launching three new active ETFs in the quarter, with plans for increased expansion this year. Further, our QQQ ETF was successfully listed on the Hong Kong Stock Exchange in February. This launch marks the first cross-listing of Invesco QQQ outside of North America and represents a milestone in the expanding market for ETFs into Asia. Shifting to fundamental fixed income. In the current environment of uncertainty and tight valuations, there is caution around risk-taking. We saw this play out with our fixed income results, particularly during the back end of the quarter. Given our range and strength of our fixed income offering, we garnered $8 billion in net long-term inflows, with an additional nearly $9 billion in global liquidity flows during the quarter.

During the period, demand for investment-grade and certain municipal bond strategies continued to be strong, and we also had net inflows into our ultra-short duration strategies and saw a positive reversal in our stable value platform, with net long-term inflows for the quarter, a trend line that has strengthened into April. Our retail SMA platform, which tends to be more focused on short duration, continued to capture flows and now stands nearly $30 billion in AUM. We have one of the fastest-growing SMA offerings in the U.S. wealth management market, with an annualized growth rate of 25%. Shifting to private markets, in direct real estate, we recorded net inflows of $1.1 billion, driven by the funding of a large U.K. mandate, as well as continued inflows into INCREF, which is our real estate debt strategy targeting the wealth management channel, where we continue to onboard new platforms and clients.

Our real estate team remains very well positioned in the institutional markets, with over $5 billion of dry powder to capitalize on emerging opportunities. Our private credit capabilities recorded modest net outflows for the quarter, as our market-leading bank loan ETF turned from a strong net inflow position at the beginning of the quarter to net outflows in March, which continued into April as recession fears have increased. Client interest in private markets remains high, and we expect to see continued activity in the key areas where we focus in real estate and alternative credit, including the advancements announced today with our partnership with MassMutual and Barings. Moving to our China JV and India capability, we saw continued net long-term inflows of $2.2 billion, which was led by fixed income and augmented by continued growth in ETFs, which have been gaining traction in China.

While six new products were launched in our China JV this quarter, our organic growth in this market was largely driven by existing products, which is a good sign for the strength of our platform. Furthermore, within these markets, we've seen resiliency thus far in April, with continued positive organic flow growth in these local fund ranges. Clearly, the most recent heightened trade tensions have created an overhang for the domestic Chinese economy. Continued anticipated government stimulus, heightened domestic consumption, and reforms on social service will have an impact on the development of capital markets and the retirement system, both of which are benefits for our domestic-to-domestic business. Turning to our multi-asset-related capabilities, we saw net long-term outflows of $1.1 billion, driven by our global risk parity strategies. Finally, the relative pressure on fundamental equities has continued.

We saw outflows in our global equities and developing markets funds in the U..S. region. Importantly, by contrast, in our EMEA and Asia-Pacific regions, we had modest net inflows in fundamental equities, which is an important change in the trajectory. Overall, our focus will remain on delivering strong investment performance and gaining market share in key fundamental equity categories in which we compete. Moving on to slide five, as mentioned earlier, we provide an alternative aggregation of our AUM and our flows to provide additional context for our business results. I've covered most of the key highlights, but I will reiterate that the diversity of our asset flows across geography, channel, and investment style provide a balance to market conditions and an ability to meet a range of client needs, which is an important part of our organic growth potential through various market cycles.

Moving to slide six, which shows our overall performance relative to benchmarks and peers, as well as our performance in key capabilities, where information is readily comparable and more meaningful to driving results. Investment performance is key to winning and maintaining market share despite overall market demand. Achieving first quartile investment performance remains our top priority. Overall, roughly half of our funds are performing in the top quartile of peers across the three and five-year time horizons. Further, over two-thirds of our AUM is beating its respective benchmarks over these measurement periods. Moving on to slide seven, two important strategic priorities for Invesco have been expanding our footprint in private markets, particularly with wealth management clients, and ensuring that we have balance sheet and capital management flexibility to continue to invest in our growth and deliver shareholder returns.

The partnership we announced today with MassMutual and Barings for private market product development and distribution in the U.S. wealth management market and the repurchase of part of our preferred stock are exciting developments in driving these strategic priorities for the benefits of our clients and our shareholders. It also demonstrates the commitment, strength, and strategic nature of our relationship with MassMutual. The near-term focus of our partnership with Barings will be on delivering differentiated and industry-leading private credit-oriented income solutions and product structures suitable to reach a wide set of our U.S. wealth management clients. We're going to leverage both Invesco and Barings' capabilities in global private credit and public fixed income. The partnership is going to rely on Invesco's deep client relationships in the U.S. wealth management channels for our distribution and the extensive product structuring and unique asset allocation capabilities of both firms.

We're also excited that MassMutual intends to support this initiative with an initial investment of $650 million in seed and co-investment capital to accelerate bringing these initial and innovative solutions to our clients. This augments MassMutual's previous commitments to Invesco's private market and other strategies, which has exceeded $3 billion in total. Today's announcement of this partnership with an institutional private markets leader like Barings complements nicely the existing strengths of our $130 billion private markets platform and will allow us to expand the existing real estate, alternative, and private credit strategies that we currently have in market for wealth management clients in the United States. It also demonstrates our ongoing commitment to look for opportunities to broaden our private market offerings to meet client needs across all market cycles and across the full spectrum of sectors and geographies.

With that, I'm going to turn the call over to Allison to discuss the important aspects of our announcement with MassMutual, including the details and benefits of the $1 billion repurchase of preferred stock and also our financial results for the first quarter. I look forward to your questions.

Allison Dukes (CFO)

Thank you, Andrew. Good morning, everyone. I'll start on slide eight with the strategic rationale and impact of the $1 billion repurchase of Invesco's preferred stock. We're very pleased that we were able to reach an agreement with MassMutual to repurchase 25% of the preferred stock, which they hold. There are a number of advantages for Invesco in being able to repurchase the stock.

We'll be funding the repurchase with committed floating rate three and five-year bank term loans that have a rate in the 5.5%-5.3% range based on SOFR today, or an after-tax cost in the 4.2%-4.4% range. This compares favorably to the fixed 5.9% dividend rate on the preferred stock, which is not tax-deductible. We expect the transaction, both the repurchase and financing, will close in May. The transaction will be earnings accretive in the second half of this year, and the accretion will increase over time as we pay down the term loan. Ultimately, once the loans are repaid, we expect the EPS accretion related to this transaction will reach $0.13 on a run rate basis. Based on our projected future cash flows, we expect to have the loans fully repaid by mid to late 2029.

We would also anticipate paying the loans off earlier should cash flows provide the opportunity to do so. By repurchasing the preferred stock, we will save $59 million in annual preferred stock dividends that become earnings available to common shareholders. While the initial annualized borrowing costs associated with the term loans will be in the $40-$45 million range after tax, this will decrease as the loans are paid down through future cash flows. The terms and conditions are similar to our floating rate revolving credit facility, and they are prepayable at any stage with no bank hold fees. There are no principal payments required for the first three years. The five-year term loan does have a principal amortization feature in years four and five at 10% per year.

Our balance sheet flexibility will be enhanced by the repurchase in the sense that we are pulling forward a $1 billion reduction in the preferred stock that is otherwise non-callable until May of 2040. This will enable us to further deleverage and increase balance sheet flexibility nearer term. It's important to note that our capital deployment priorities remain intact. We anticipate ample cash flow capacity to repay the bank term loans and a $500 million senior note that matures in January of 2026 without restricting our current capital deployment priorities. These include continued investment and growth initiatives, regular share repurchases, and modest dividend increases, as underscored by our announced common dividend increase today. We do expect that our cash and cash equivalents will remain near $1 billion going forward.

It's also important to note that the repurchase agreement with MassMutual provides for discussions regarding future repurchases of the remaining $3 billion of preferred stock. On the next slide, we show the expected progression of the EPS accretion through time that the term loans are repaid in 2029 and the expected run rate EPS accretion after the term loans are fully repaid. There is a 15% premium being paid to MassMutual to repurchase the $1 billion of preferred stock based on the present value of a 5.9% dividend rate being eliminated 15 years ahead of the first call date. The premium will be included in our second quarter GAAP results, but it will not impact our adjusted operating results. We also show the expected impact the repurchase will have on our leverage ratios and the progression of our debt by maturity.

Looking at the leverage ratio excluding the preferred stock, we do see a near-term increase in leverage from the term loans, but to a very manageable level, near one time, followed by significant improvement as we repay the loans. The change to the leverage ratio, including the preferred stock, is not as impacted near-term as we are effectively replacing the preferred stock with the term loans. However, with this transaction, we're able to meaningfully improve our leverage profile over the next five years in a way we could otherwise not attain without the repurchase. The leverage ratios shown here are pro forma, assuming no change in EBITDA from what we are reporting as trailing four-quarter EBITDA for the first quarter of this year. I'll move on to the first quarter financial results on slide 10.

We continued to see strong growth in assets under management during the first half of the quarter before weaker markets set in during the second half of the quarter. Total AUM at the end of the quarter was $1.84 trillion, nearly flat to the end of the fourth quarter of 2024, and $182 billion, or 11% higher than the end of the first quarter of 2024. Average long-term assets under management were over $1.3 trillion, an increase of 1% over last quarter and 14% over the first quarter of last year. Growth in assets under management during the first quarter was mainly driven by net long-term inflows, net inflows into our QQQ ETF, net inflows into money market funds, and positive FX impacts. The impact of market declines in the latter half of the first quarter offset this growth by quarter end.

Net long-term inflows drove an $18 billion increase in AUM during the quarter, representing an organic growth rate of over 5%. As Andrew noted, net inflows in our ETF and index capabilities, excluding the QQQ, were over $16 billion. Fundamental fixed income contributed $8 billion of net inflows, and the China JV in India added $2.2 billion of net inflows. Net outflows of $7 billion in fundamental equities partially offset these inflows. Net revenues, adjusted operating income, and adjusted operating margin all improved from the first quarter of 2024, while adjusted operating expenses continued to be well controlled. Adjusted diluted earnings per share increased by 33% to $0.44 for the first quarter versus prior year EPS of $0.33.

We continued to strengthen the balance sheet during the first quarter, ending in a net debt position of $143 million, substantially better than the first quarter of 2024's net debt position of $362 million. We ended the quarter with only $74 million drawn on the credit facility, below historical seasonal levels. We also continued share repurchases in the first quarter, buying back $25 million. We intend to continue repurchasing shares at a similar level on a regular basis going forward. Our board also approved an increase in our quarterly common stock dividend from $0.205 to $0.21 per share, reflective of our strong cash position and cash flows. Moving to slide 11, as we've noted in prior calls, secular shifts in client demand have altered our asset mix and net revenue yields as our broad set of capabilities has allowed us to capture evolving client product preferences.

This dynamic has been increasingly reflected in our results. Client demand has led to continued diversification of our portfolio, a trend we have seen for a number of years now. As a result, concentration risk and higher fee fundamental equities and multi-asset products have been reduced. The firm is increasingly better positioned to navigate various market cycles, events, and shifting client demand. Consistent with prior quarters, current net revenue yield trends are included on the slide. The ranges by capability are representative of where the net revenue yield has ranged over the past five quarters. We note the net revenue yield drivers and where in the range the yields have trended more recently.

To provide context for the net revenue yield trend during the first quarter, our overall net revenue yield was 23.5 basis points, including the impact of two fewer days in the first quarter compared to the fourth quarter, which accounted for a half a basis point or 0.5 tenths of a basis point of the decline. Excluding the day count impact, the net revenue yield declined six tenths of a basis point compared to the fourth quarter yield of 24.6 basis points. The exit net revenue yield at the end of the first quarter was 23.8 basis points, only two tenths of a basis point lower than the day count adjusted net revenue yield for the first quarter of 24 basis points. Turning to slide 12, net revenue of $1.1 billion in the first quarter was $55 million higher than the first quarter of last year, a 5% increase.

Investment management fees were $59 million higher than last year. The increase was driven by higher average AUM, partially offset by the AUM mix shift previously noted. Higher performance and other fees were offset by lower service and distribution fees and higher third-party expense. Operating expenses continued to be well managed, with total adjusted operating expenses only $2 million higher, or 0.3% from the first quarter of last year. Sequential quarter adjusted operating expenses were $8 million lower, despite seasonal expenses and compensation due to payroll tax and other compensation-related expense resets that typically occur in the first quarter. Declines in marketing, property office and technology, and G&A offset the increase in compensation expense on both a year-over-year and sequential quarter basis. We did have $7 million of non-recurring expense benefits in the first quarter that mainly impacted G&A expenses.

Alpha platform implementation costs of $13 million were in line with our expectations for the first quarter and consistent with the $14 million incurred in the fourth quarter. We did move a small first wave of AUM on the Alpha platform in the fourth quarter of 2024. Fees paid on the assets under management that were transitioned over in the first wave were nominal expense-wise in the first quarter. As the implementation continues, we expect Alpha-related one-time implementation costs to be in the $10-$15 million range next quarter. Regarding operating expenses for 2025, we're focused on disciplined expense management. Given the recent market volatility, it's become more difficult to provide specific guidance on operating expenses, but we're managing it carefully day by day. In terms of expense flexibility, without any management intervention, our expenses are approximately 25% variable.

With management intervention, some of which can take several quarters to fully realize, the variability increases to 30%-35%. First quarter year-over-year positive operating leverage was over 500 basis points, driving a $53 million, or 18% increase in operating income, and over a 330 basis point improvement in our operating margin to 31.5%. The effective tax rate was 24.4% in the first quarter. We estimate our non-GAAP effective tax rate will be between 25%-26% for the second quarter of 2025, excluding any discrete items. The slight increase in the rate is driven by shift of income across tax jurisdictions. The actual effective rate can vary due to the impact of non-recurring items on pre-tax income and discrete tax items. I'll wrap up on slide 13. As I noted earlier, we continued to make progress on building balance sheet strength in the first quarter.

We ended the quarter with a net debt position of $143 million, significantly better than the prior year first quarter net debt level of $362 million. We ended the first quarter with just $74 million drawn on our credit facility, substantially lower than what we have drawn historically, with the first quarter being a seasonally high cash usage quarter. Our leverage ratios continue to show improvement versus a year ago, with the leverage ratio excluding the preferred stock at 0.3 times versus 0.54 times a year ago, and including the preferred going from 3.36 times a year ago to 2.77 in the first quarter. We expect continued share repurchases, buying back $25 million, or 1.5 million shares during the quarter. I'm sorry, we continued share repurchases, buying back $25 million, or 1.5 million shares during the quarter.

As noted earlier, our board approved an increase in our quarterly common stock dividend. We intend to continue a regular share repurchase program going forward, and we expect our total payout ratio, including common dividends and share buybacks, will move closer to 60% in 2025 as we continually evaluate our capital return levels. To conclude, the resiliency and strength of our firm's net flow performance is evident again this quarter, and we continue to make significant progress on building a stronger balance sheet, enhanced further by the $1 billion repurchase of the preferred stock. We remain committed to driving profitable growth, a high level of financial performance, and enhancing the return of capital to shareholders. With that, I'll ask the operator to open up the line for Q&A.

Operator (participant)

Thank you. At this time, if you'd like to ask an audio question, please press star one.

You will be announced prior to asking your question. Please pick up your handset when asking your question. To withdraw your request, please press star two. One moment for our first question. Okay, and our first question comes from Alex Blostein with Goldman Sachs. Your line is open.

Alex Blostein (Managing Director)

Hey, good morning, everyone, and congrats on the announcement this morning. Maybe starting with a strategic update, I would love to get your perspective on how you envision sort of the product and distribution opportunities develop with Barings and MassMutual. Is it more of a gradual product build, so it might take some time to scale, or are there places where you guys could see more immediate impact on the business through either kind of a larger sub-advisory arrangement or something along those lines?

Andrew Schlossberg (President and CEO)

Alex, thanks. Hi, it's Andrew. Let me take that one.

The initial phases of this partnership are going to focus, as I mentioned, on areas of private credit, and we have a few capabilities mapped out that we intend to get to market in the next little while, but those need approvals, and we need to work through various details. We see that first phase kind of happening relatively quickly. We will look at second and third phases over time as opportunities create themselves. We're really going to focus on these private credit opportunities in the U.S. wealth management channel to start.

Alex Blostein (Managing Director)

I gotcha. Thanks. Allison, one for you on the prep. Nice to see that done. Maybe just kind of a couple of comments on what ultimately got MassMutual over the hump to agree to this.

As you think about the remaining, I think, $3 billion, how are you guys thinking about opportunities to repurchase more?

Allison Dukes (CFO)

Sure. Look, I think you can tell from the variety of announcements today and just the partnership we've had with MassMutual over the last six years, they're a good partner. While we do have a contract with them and the preferred is non-callable for another 15 years, they also recognize and understand some of the challenges that the preferred has created in terms of the perception overall and just the coupon itself. They've been great partners as we continue to look for opportunities and alternatives to make some progress with the preferred and also even bringing this product partnership to bear through the relationship with Barings.

I mean, it was really multifaceted, and I think a real testament to just the strength of the partnership and the commitment that we have to each other. As a reminder, they are an 18% common shareholder, so they're as invested as everybody else in really continuing to see the stock re-rate, and we think this is a positive improvement. In terms of opportunities we have around the remainder of the $3 billion, I think, as we said, the repurchase agreement provides opportunities for us to continue to think about ways that we can reduce that in the future on terms that are mutually agreeable to both parties.

The way we think about it, it's really going to depend on the nature of our cash flows, the opportunities we have with the free cash flow that we generate, the rate environment, which will be relevant to MassMutual and to ourselves, and really looking at what's the organic and inorganic opportunity set that's out there. I think, look, this is a really strong first step, and we're all very optimistic that this provides opportunities for us to continue discussions in the future.

Andrew Schlossberg (President and CEO)

Yeah, and just one other thing I'd say is I don't want to get lost in this. The commitment from MassMutual to put up to $650 million of capital behind those initial couple of strategies that I mentioned in phase one in this product partnership is not insignificant in helping us get to those U.S. wealth platforms more swiftly.

Alex Blostein (Managing Director)

Yeah, no, that's great. Congrats to everyone involved.

Andrew Schlossberg (President and CEO)

Thank you.

Operator (participant)

Thank you. Now, next question comes from Craig Siegenthaler with Bank of America. Your line is open.

Craig Siegenthaler (Senior Research Analyst, Broker, Asset Manager, and Exchange)

Thanks. Good morning, everyone. My question is also on the MassMutual announcement relating to the Barings U.S. wealth partnership. I'm curious, could this potentially be a first step in an Invesco-Barings merger, especially given that your capabilities are complementary?

Andrew Schlossberg (President and CEO)

We've got a lot to do as two individual companies, and I think we found this opportunity after discussing ways to get into the U.S. wealth space more productively together and have our complementary capabilities in this particular space come together to put a couple of products to market. We are going to focus exclusively on that going forward.

Craig Siegenthaler (Senior Research Analyst, Broker, Asset Manager, and Exchange)

Thank you, Andrew. This past quarter, we saw EQH take a larger stake in AllianceBernstein, and we are watching MassMutual sell part of their preferred.

I'm wondering, are there any limitations to them increasing their 18% common equity stake or voting interest in Invesco in the future?

Allison Dukes (CFO)

There are some limitations. It's all filed in the shareholder agreement, which was initially filed with the closing of the Oppenheimer transaction back in 2019. I believe it limits them to 22.5%. There are a variety of kind of regulatory kind of considerations around that, why it's at that level. There is some ceiling there in the shareholder agreement as it stands today.

I do not think anyone should view their agreement for us to repurchase a billion dollars of the preferred as anything other than just continued progress in the partnership on all sides, inclusive of, as Andrew said, the continued capital commitment on top of the $3 billion they have already committed, and just their real willingness to continue to support Invesco's growth in a variety of facets.

Craig Siegenthaler (Senior Research Analyst, Broker, Asset Manager, and Exchange)

Thank you, Allison.

Operator (participant)

Thank you. Now, next question comes from Mike Brown with Wells Fargo Securities. Your line is open. Mike, please check your headset. We have got a bad connection.

Mike Brown (Equity Research Analyst)

Hi, good morning. Sorry, can you hear me now?

Allison Dukes (CFO)

Yep.

Operator (participant)

Yes. We can hear you.

Mike Brown (Equity Research Analyst)

Okay. Great. Thank you. On the partnership announcement, just given Invesco and Barings current capabilities, can you just expand on that $650 million? How will that be used specifically?

That's just to seed the new fund vehicle, or is it also to kind of help add capabilities, for example, to maybe expand in the investment-grade private credit side a bit more? In terms of the vehicle, just to clarify, is it planned to launch an interval fund type of structure with a public-private sleeve, and that would then be targeting the below-accredited threshold? Thank you.

Andrew Schlossberg (President and CEO)

Yeah, let me try to address both questions. The initial seed capital is to launch and instigate the initial product or two that we'll bring to market exclusively. That's what it's meant to do. It's not new capabilities for either firm.

Just to clarify, the strengths of Barings and the things that we are going to use in these capabilities include specialty finance and special situations in the higher upper end parts of direct lending where we and Invesco really are not today. It is going to complement where we are today, which is in distressed credit, lower mid-direct lending, bank loans, CLOs, and real estate debt. Think of it truly as just complementary investment capabilities seeded with this initial capital or instigated with this initial capital and brought into a multi-asset type solution to the marketplace. In terms of structures and the like, not something we can get into today. These products are not filed and things like that.

Do think of them as vehicles that will be relevant, credible, and easy to attain by the wealth management platforms that we serve today and similar to strategies we have out there in market already in the real estate and alternative credit space.

Mike Brown (Equity Research Analyst)

Okay, great. Allison, just on expenses, understanding the market volatility here makes it very challenging to kind of forecast where that could be for the year. Maybe if we consider markets stay flattish from here as that kind of a baseline, how should we think about what expenses could look like for the year? Could they be kind of flattish year over year? Does that variable component give you the ability for them to actually be a bit lower year over year? Some helpful thoughts. Some thoughts that would be helpful. Thank you.

Allison Dukes (CFO)

Yeah, maybe I'll take maybe a couple of component pieces just to think through all of that. I'd say compensation, of course, is the most variable component of our expense base as you think about the revenue environment. I think our compensation as a percentage of revenue has been running in that 43%-44% range. That's probably a reasonable expectation of a range as I think about the revenue environment for this year if revenue were to stay flat. I think that gives you some sense around a pretty major element of our expense base. Alpha expenses, keep in mind, we are continuing to implement Alpha, and as I said, we expect implementation costs to continue to be in that $10 million-$15 million range. That is sort of with or without any improvement or deterioration in the revenue environment.

We do intend to continue moving forward in the implementation of Alpha, so that does not have a lot of variability to it. Everything else, we are certainly looking at all of our expenses from a very disciplined perspective, as you would expect in this revenue environment. I mean, I want to be careful to read too much into three weeks of volatility. It has been three pretty volatile weeks, but it remains to be seen how things will unfold from here. Nonetheless, we are being very thoughtful about every element of discretionary expenses we have and think about it from everything from travel and entertainment to just slowing down hiring, all the things we can do to just really slow the growth of our expense base. If revenues flat from here, could expenses be flat?

It's not an unreasonable expectation, but we're going to be looking at everything we can do to continue to pull forward some of the transformational opportunities. We've done a lot of work, as you know, over the last few years on our simplification of our organization. We're working on that all the time. We came into this year continuing to make progress on that. We're going to stay focused and execute and accelerate with speed wherever we can so we can continue to recognize some real disciplined expense management, which we think has really become a hallmark of our operating performance for a number of years now.

Mike Brown (Equity Research Analyst)

Great. Thank you very much.

Andrew Schlossberg (President and CEO)

Thank you.

Operator (participant)

Thank you. Now, next question comes from Dan Fannon with Jefferies. Your line is open.

Dan Fannon (Managing Director and Research Analyst)

Thanks. Good morning. Andrew, you talked about some of the trends in April.

If you could talk more broadly, I think you mentioned China was positive. As you think about other regions or client conversations in this type of market backdrop, how you're seeing things unfold, and maybe also just from a backlog perspective, do you anticipate funding to maybe be slowed as a result of all the uncertainty?

Andrew Schlossberg (President and CEO)

Yeah, thanks, Dan. Look, we're three weeks into a relatively volatile month, and we're also three weeks away from releasing our April flows, and the facts, as you can imagine, continue to evolve. What I'd say thus far in April, though, is that we've seen investors largely stay pretty well invested, but they are absolutely moving to a more defensive stance as it relates to how they're deploying new capital as they're kind of rethinking asset allocations, but also trying to assess the market environment.

As I mentioned in my comments earlier, I mean, this is where the diversified nature of our business is really helpful, and it puts us in a position to navigate the current operating environment and capture flows as investors gain clarity. What I would say is that in the fixed income, the focus really has remained more on the shorter duration side. With equity strategies in the U.S. facing headwinds, what we are seeing is a broadening and, in many instances, a more positive investment flow environment in places like Europe and in Asia, which is going to be a helpful mitigant for some of those headwinds in the U.S. that you can see on a daily basis. I'd say on the institutional side of the business, it remains pretty resilient and, frankly, pretty positive.

We funded the key retirement mandate that I mentioned in the U.K., but also seeing strength in our U.S. retirement platform in places like Stable Value, and that resiliency and those commitments have not changed. I think China, what I would say is that given that our business is a fully domestic-to-domestic business, as you know, and that we are in a very strong position in that marketplace and known brand, we have seen a lot of resiliency in the region with actually positive organic flow growth into April and in April, which is helping to offset some of the market declines. It is a mixed bag, and we will see when we release in a couple of weeks where the month shakes out.

Dan Fannon (Managing Director and Research Analyst)

Great. That is helpful. And then, Allison, just one more on expenses.

You mentioned a one-time benefit of $7 million in G&A, and you also remind us how much of the seasonal kind of comp was in first quarter to try to get a sense of just the starting points of the jump-off points for 2Q.

Allison Dukes (CFO)

Sure. On the second question, seasonal comp usually runs about $15 million higher in the first quarter. I think about that comp as a percentage of revenue guidance, and that 43%-44% context tends to run on the higher side when revenue is down, and of course, lower as revenue increases. On the $7 million one-time, yes, it is predominantly in G&A. There was some in property office and technology too. As you think about those two line items, quarter over quarter, expect some increase just removing those one-timers as we roll into the second quarter.

Dan Fannon (Managing Director and Research Analyst)

Great. Thank you.

Operator (participant)

Thank you. Now, next question comes from Brian Bedell with Deutsche Bank. Your line is open.

Brian Bedell (Director)

Hello. Great. Thanks. Good morning. Congrats also on the partnership with MassMutual and Barings. Maybe just on that, can you talk a little bit about the economic participation for Invesco? Is it simply a matter of the assets that you are managing in the partnership, and you're getting your fees for that through the economics, or are there other sharing arrangements? Do you expect your asset management participation to be commensurate with Barings, or might it skew one way or the other? I do not know if there's any guideposts of how large you think this could end up being over the next, say, couple of years. Maybe it's too early for that one.

Andrew Schlossberg (President and CEO)

Yeah. Thanks for the questions. The partnership is pretty straightforward, just to put a line under it.

These are going to be Invesco products that we're going to bring to market into the U.S. wealth management channel with parts of the assets managed by Barings and parts by Invesco, and we'll be sharing management fee revenues in an undisclosed way. We did not disclose the terms of the arrangement. Invesco is going to be the distributor. Invesco is going to be the product operator. We'll be compensated for that as well. In terms of the growth, it's really too early to say. We think these are going to be compelling offerings, private credit broadly in an allocated way across all elements of the spectrum that I described before, inclusive of things like real estate debt.

Being able to do that with all of the education that we have, all of the boots on the ground we have around wealth management is going to be a nice complement to the offering we already have, and we think accelerate our brand in private markets in the wealth channel as well as the capabilities that we can put forward to those advisors who are looking for things like this. We will continue to update you as this develops over the next several quarters, but too early to describe how big this could be.

Brian Bedell (Director)

Yep. That's helpful.

Maybe just to go to the global landscape, your local profile globally, both in China and really across the world, how are you seeing, or I guess, are you seeing any substantial differences within those local regions given all of the tariff negotiations that are going on and any kind of sentiment globally towards investment products and investment in U.S. products?

Andrew Schlossberg (President and CEO)

Okay. Yeah. Thanks. Maybe just before we discuss how it's looking right now, just a reminder, $550 billion of our assets are held by clients outside of the United States, and that's evenly dispersed between Asia-Pacific and EMEA. As I mentioned, Asia-Pacific has been a fast grower for Invesco and a really differentiated position because we're so local and because we've been so long-term in those markets. The capabilities that are being brought to those markets are both domestic and international capabilities.

EMEA, where we've been for a long, long time, has started to show some very good growth over the last few quarters from an asset flow perspective, strong investment performance, and a similar sort of local profile that I was mentioning around Asia. We are really well-positioned in those places, and those businesses have been moving forward. As the current market environment takes hold, that diversity, I think, we think is really going to continue to pay off. As people continue to invest internationally but also invest in their domestic markets, this will be good for the resiliency of Invesco.

As I mentioned on our April flows, it's still a little bit early to get a full picture of things, but I will say in the short run, the markets outside of the U.S., in terms of asset flow and resiliency, have been better than the flows in the United States. There are just so many moving parts right now that it's hard to call things a trend.

Brian Bedell (Director)

Yep. And that's super helpful. Thank you.

Allison Dukes (CFO)

Thanks, Brian.

Operator (participant)

Thank you. Now, next question comes from Bill Katz with TD Cowen. Your line is open.

Bill Katz (Senior Equity Analyst)

Great. Thank you very much, and congrats on all the news today. Just maybe on the retirement market, sort of curious, there's an increasing focus for that market to potentially have greater allocation to alternatives.

I was wondering if you could talk a little bit about how you're positioned, both maybe the opportunity set and if there are any threats to the extent that that would move forward and sort of see a pickup in all allocations. Thank you.

Andrew Schlossberg (President and CEO)

Yeah. The retirement markets have been a focus for Invesco for a long time, and we're an investment-only manager, meaning we don't record-keep assets, and we really are not a target date player per se. The opportunity is, I think they're endless, really. If and as alternatives in private markets can find their way into defined contribution plans in the U.S. or around the world, we have the active strategies to do that that are stood up. The partnership today could present even more opportunities for us to create product for that market.

We are going to utilize the relationships we have with plan sponsors and consultants and record keepers and other inputs into that market to find a way to be a part of whether it is growth and target date for alternatives or some other vehicle types. We have all the requisite pieces to do it. I think that is not just a U.S. phenomenon. That is a global phenomenon. I think examples that we talked about today of our growing retirement business in the United Kingdom or advances we are making in the United States or in the long run in Asia-Pacific, if and as alternatives find their way into defined contribution, we will be right there.

Bill Katz (Senior Equity Analyst)

Okay. Thank you. Just as a follow-up, I think you mentioned your prepared commentary, and not surprising that the institutional decision-makers have been pushed off a little bit.

I was wondering, in those conversations that you are having with them, are allocation dynamics shifting, and if so, to where might they be shifting?

Andrew Schlossberg (President and CEO)

Yeah. I mean, it's really a bit early to say. I mean, one of the key things is the fundings that we expected in April have happened. They're not stopping their fundings. I think during periods like this we've seen in the past in conversations we're having, they tend to pause a little bit in thinking about their future asset allocations. I think they're all trying to digest the same things we're all trying to digest. The conversations are really active. They're looking for consultation, and they're looking for partners that can bring a range of solutions to them, custom or otherwise. That's generally what we're seeing in the market.

It's too early to say exactly where they're placing bets because they're not making those changes.

Bill Katz (Senior Equity Analyst)

Thank you.

Operator (participant)

Thank you. Now, next question comes from Patrick Davitt with Autonomous Research. Your line is open.

Patrick Davitt (U.S. Asset Manager and Senior Analyst)

Hey. Good morning, everyone. I have a follow-up to Brian's question. I think he was trying to get to this, but chatter about large institutions pulling money from U.S. institutions for either ESG or just anti-American sentiment. I think you guys actually won some of that money in motion to your point earlier. Could you speak to what extent you are hearing any of those conversations, how non-U.S. investors are evaluating those issues, and to what extent you believe having that established local presence is enough to avoid being painted with the "U.S. manager" tag? Thank you.

Andrew Schlossberg (President and CEO)

Yeah. I mean, part of it you mentioned in your answer.

I mean, we're winning mandates, so we really haven't seen that, and we haven't heard any of that sort of anti-rhetoric. What I will say, though, is the broadening out of the markets and where people are looking at valuations in Europe or where they're looking at diversification into value or into domestic markets away from where money has predominantly just been very, very focused in the U.S. equity markets, large-cap growth. We're seeing people rethink those allocations, but we have not heard it's an anti-movement. It's a broadening out of markets. That is to the point of our local presence in these local markets. We should do just fine in terms of capturing some of that sentiment of flows, trying to even out. And frankly, it's a good thing for Invesco because we have just such a diverse book of assets. I don't know if you'd add anything else.

Allison Dukes (CFO)

I mean, I think you've said it a few times, but I would just underscore our business in China in particular is a domestic-to-domestic business. It is very much viewed as a business that has started locally over 20 years ago, has grown organically this whole time. That's really a testament to, I think, how our business has grown across all continents. While we happen to be headquartered in the U.S., our business is very local on a number of levels, and our clients see us that way. We've got that broad set of diversified capabilities, and I think that's important as well as you think about some of the trends that are out there in the macro environment right now.

Andrew Schlossberg (President and CEO)

Yeah. I mean, seeing positive flows in that market in April is one good sign.

Allison Dukes (CFO)

Yeah.

Patrick Davitt (U.S. Asset Manager and Senior Analyst)

Okay. Helpful. Thanks.

Obviously, you've been more focused on fixing the balance sheet, organic growth. Historically, big dislocations like this have opened up rare inorganic opportunities for asset managers. Could you update us on your willingness to do a larger transaction if something came up? If so, what would be at the top of your wish list for kind of a once-in-a-lifetime type deal? Thank you.

Allison Dukes (CFO)

I think nothing's changed in terms of our perspective around that and the way we've answered it probably for a few quarters, even a few years now. I mean, we're always looking. I would say our willingness has not changed. One of the things we are always focused on is overlap with existing capabilities and really needing to make sure we're being thoughtful about where we've got capability gaps.

We have been consistent in saying we probably don't have our suite of products as fully built out as we would like in areas like private credit and infrastructure. I think the partnership today is good progress towards actually starting to build that out in a slightly inorganic way. It's a mix of inorganic and organic, I would say, opportunity as you think about how we can continue to fill those gaps in. I don't think anything has changed in our willingness. The announcements we made today in terms of the balance sheet are designed to give us additional capacity. By pulling forward this $1 billion that we otherwise could not have done anything about for 15 years, it gives us an opportunity to fully transition that away over the next few years.

It gives us increased flexibility and opportunity in our balance sheet to do something larger and more substantial on the inorganic side. I would say nothing's changed. If anything, the announcements today underscore our forward focus on making sure we've got the opportunity to be opportunistic.

Andrew Schlossberg (President and CEO)

Yeah. Partnerships like the one we announced today and we've talked about in previous quarters, we really like, and we're really excited about this with MassMutual and Barings and the ability to do alliances and things like this, like we've done in geographic markets around the world, are great opportunities. We're going to continue to be looking to advance those opportunities.

Operator (participant)

Okay. The next question comes from Ken Worthington with JPMorgan. Your line is open.

Ken Worthington (Broker, Asset Manager, and Exchange Equity Analyst)

Hi. Good morning, and thanks for taking the question.

Maybe first, Allison, you mentioned in the prepared remarks the ability to make expenses more variable if needed. Is this largely comp, and how far can you take it? Given that the market volatility or market levels have been more recent but deeper correction, have you already started to take the steps to adjust to the more challenging environment?

Allison Dukes (CFO)

Yeah. Kind of doubling back on that, what we noted in the prepared remarks is that the variability in our expense base, if there is no management intervention, is about a 25% variable component. That is without us doing anything, and that primarily comes out of compensation. There are some other elements of operating expenses that are variable in nature, but it is largely driven by compensation. That is without any management intervention. We start to actually take action.

I think we can drive that to something that's more like 30%-35%, as we noted. Yes, as I said earlier, we have already started to take action. There are things we can be doing immediately, like slowing down hiring and slowing down some of our plans there, slowing down things like internal travel. We are focused on clients. We're going to make sure we are putting that first in everything we do right now. There are a number of other kind of discretionary decisions that get made every day that we can slow down to make sure we try to bend the curve on the expense base as meaningfully as possible and as quickly as possible in light of the volatility in the revenue line that we've seen just over the last few weeks.

In addition to all of that, as I said earlier, we're going to stay focused on pulling forward some of the transformational opportunities that we have had underway for a number of years now. You've seen our expense base be very well managed over the last several years as we're constantly looking for opportunities to simplify our organization, to create capacity, to reinvest that capacity, or perhaps in this environment, to delay reinvesting some of that capacity. Those are some of the ways in which we'll continue to manage the expense base.

Ken Worthington (Broker, Asset Manager, and Exchange Equity Analyst)

Okay. Thank you. On the wealth management side with the announcement today, is what you plan to launch different from what you're seeing in the market already, either by structure, distribution, or target customer?

What we're seeing is maybe more success from the alternative managers sort of launching alternative products into the wealth management channel than traditional asset managers launching alternative product into the wealth channels. If your products or focus is similar to what's already there, how do you frame what drives success for you when maybe some of your direct peers have not been as successful going along this path?

Andrew Schlossberg (President and CEO)

Yeah. I mean, look, Invesco is a private markets player. I mean, we have $130 billion in assets. We've been serving institutions for a long time. What we've done over the last few years is bring those capabilities into interval-type vehicles and leverage our very, very strong U.S. wealth management distribution relationships that we have. We have been seeing success, in particular with our real estate debt strategy that we mentioned before, INCREF, working through those networks and channels.

We, going forward, expect to use capabilities like we described today with Invesco and Barings to bring similar-type capabilities with all those same attributes of our distribution, our product structuring, all the education that we have, and the success that we've started to build. We think those attributes differentiate managers that are going to win and those that are not going forward into the marketplace. We think we have all those attributes, and we're going to continue to progress them.

Ken Worthington (Broker, Asset Manager, and Exchange Equity Analyst)

Okay. Great. Thank you.

Operator (participant)

Thank you. Now, next question comes from Michael Cyprys with Morgan Stanley. Excuse me, Morgan Stanley. Your line is open.

Michael Cyprys (Research Analyst)

Hey. Good morning. Thanks for taking the question. Just wanted to dig in for a moment on the SMA platform. Sounds like you guys are having some good traction and success there. I think you mentioned $30 billion of assets, 25% organic growth.

Maybe just remind us how many strategies you guys offer in SMAs today, how you see that evolving. If you could just talk about your ambitions, how you think about meaningfully scaling these capabilities as you look out the next couple of years.

Andrew Schlossberg (President and CEO)

Yeah. The growth there has been almost exclusively on fixed income. It's actually one of the reasons we've been able to grow is that we're pretty differentiated in the fixed income space in particular. There are several dozen strategies. They're placed on all the well-known platforms. A lot of that growth has been in short and intermediate duration, some taxable, mostly tax-free. It's right in the sweet spot of growth for both SMAs as a vehicle into wealth as well as fixed income being a little less represented by some of our competitors.

That is where we have been able to pick up a lot of that growth, and we expect to continue. On the equity side, we have several traditional fundamental equity strategies but also tax-optimized strategies that we have brought to market on some unique indexes. It is pretty well placed, but I think it is hitting the sweet spot of two big trends, which are more income-oriented strategies and the SMA vehicle. It scales well with deep technology, and we have made those investments in those technology platforms. We already have all the requisite distribution, and we will continue to kind of invest behind the operational elements of it so that we can continue to get incremental margin and profit expansion too.

Michael Cyprys (Research Analyst)

Great. Thank you. Just a quick follow-up on the Alpha platform implementation. I think you mentioned, Allison, $10 million-$15 million range for the next quarter.

Maybe you could just remind us how we should think about the cadence of that throughout the remainder of the year and into 2026. Ultimately, how do we see the path of that and timing for that falling off?

Allison Dukes (CFO)

Yeah. $10 million-$15 million is the implementation costs guidance. In terms of timing of waves, as I noted, we moved a small wave over at the end of the fourth quarter. We are expecting to move a second wave of assets onto the platform sometime in the second half of the year. Timing on the additional waves would progress late into 2026. It could even drag into that first quarter of 2027. I think we are really looking at 2027 before we actually start to see kind of the benefit of reducing some of the redundancy of systems that we currently run today.

Michael Cyprys (Research Analyst)

That $10 million-$15 million continues till early 2027. Is that right? Then trails off pretty quickly after that?

Allison Dukes (CFO)

That $10 million-$15 million we said was an expectation for this year, for 2025. Back in January, we gave the guidance of expect $10 million-$15 million a quarter for this year. Reiterating, that is a good guide for the second quarter. Beyond 2025, too hard to say. As you start to get waves behind you, the nature of the implementation changes. We will update that guidance as we get later into this year.

Michael Cyprys (Research Analyst)

Great. Thank you.

Greg Ketron (Head of Investor Relations)

Cedric, we have time for one more question.

Operator (participant)

Okay. Our last question for today comes from Benjamin Budish with Barclays Capital. Your line is open.

Benjamin Budish (Director)

Hi. Good morning, and thanks for squeezing me in. Just one final follow-up, perhaps, on the Barings deal.

Could you just maybe talk about the sort of distribution timeline? You have the relationships already with a lot of the platforms, the wires, the RIAs. Once you're able to file a registration statement, how long does it take to start getting the product available on the platforms? When might we start to see some more meaningful inflows? Could you maybe provide some color on the investment required here in terms of advisor education, placement fees, anything like that? Thank you.

Andrew Schlossberg (President and CEO)

Yeah. Let me start on the back end. We have everything built out in terms of the distribution, product structuring, distribution specialist relationships. We are going to leverage off of the complete existing platform that we've developed with private market specialization. Those have already been made. In terms of timelines, it's difficult to speculate. I'll say quarters from now.

We're also going to look at ways to enhance existing strategies that we have. Some could be sooner than others, but it's going to be, I would think, quarters is the best way for you to think about that. We'll look forward to giving everybody an update on the next quarterly call.

Benjamin Budish (Director)

Great. Thanks for, again, squeezing me in.

Andrew Schlossberg (President and CEO)

No problem. Okay. Thanks, everybody. Let me say in closing that we feel very well positioned to help clients navigate the impact of evolving market dynamics and the subsequent changes to their portfolios. As market sentiment has become more uncertain, it's important that we stay close with our clients.

While we do think that uncertainty creates challenges over the short term, we do believe over the long term that client convictions will strengthen and should create opportunities in the future for greater scale, performance, and improved profitability for Invesco. Given all the work we have done to strengthen our ability to anticipate, understand, and meet evolving client needs, we are very excited for the future of Invesco. I want to thank everybody for joining our call today. Please reach out to our investor relations team for any additional questions. We very much appreciate your interest in Invesco and look forward to speaking with you all again soon.

Operator (participant)

Thank you. That concludes today's conference. You may all disconnect at this time.