Q2 2025 Earnings Summary
Metric | YoY Change | Reason |
---|---|---|
Total Revenue | Essentially unchanged (≈0% change: $2,928.2M vs. $2,929M) | The overall revenue remained flat as gains and losses across segments offset each other; while some segments improved, others continued to face challenges similar to previous periods. |
JBI (Intermodal) | +2% (from $1,408M to $1,437.9M) | Modest revenue growth was driven by higher load volumes — notably in the eastern network — and strong demand, echoing trends observed in Q1 where increased volumes partially offset a slight decline in revenue per load and. |
DCS (Dedicated Contract Services) | Nearly flat (about $846.8M vs. $851M) | Performance was neutral due to offsetting factors: persisted challenges like a decline in average revenue-producing trucks (as seen in Q1) were mitigated by productivity gains, similar to the compensating trends observed in earlier quarters and vs.. |
ICS (Integrated Capacity Solutions) | -3.6% (from $270M to $260.2M) | The decline reflects a continuation of lower overall segment volume—similar to the 6% drop seen in Q1—despite some improvement in revenue per load, as higher contractual rates were not enough to fully offset volume losses, echoing earlier period factors and. |
FMS (Final Mile Services) | Over -10% (from $235M to $210.6M) | A significant drop in revenue continued, driven by weak customer demand across end markets and the absence of one-time benefits (like the prior claim settlement) that boosted performance in earlier periods, reflecting trends seen in Q1 where revenues fell by 12% and. |
JBT (Truckload) | +5%+ (from $168M to $177.0M) | Revenue improvement was achieved through better asset utilization, stronger safety performance, and improved network balance; these factors helped reverse prior weakness, and similar cost management and efficiency measures were seen in Q1 where operating income improved despite revenue challenges and. |
Inter-segment Eliminations | Improved slightly (from $(5.5)M in Q1 2025 to $(4.3)M in Q2 2025) | The reduction in eliminations suggests better alignment and integration across segments relative to the previous period, even though detailed reasons were not fully disclosed, consistent with efforts to streamline inter-segment transactions and prior period disclosures. |
Metric | Period | Previous Guidance | Current Guidance | Change |
---|---|---|---|---|
Tax Rate | FY 2025 | 24–25% | 24–25%, likely towards the higher end | no change |
Net Capital Expenditures | FY 2025 | $500–$700M | $550–$650M | no change |
Cost Initiatives | FY 2025 | no prior guidance | $100M in annual costs to eliminate | no prior guidance |
Intermodal Business | FY 2025 | no prior guidance | Modest rate increases and volume growth | no prior guidance |
Dedicated Contract Services | FY 2025 | no prior guidance | Modest fleet growth with potential startup costs impacting operating income growth | no prior guidance |
Research analysts covering HUNT J B TRANSPORT SERVICES.