KG
Kodiak Gas Services, Inc. (KGS)·Q1 2025 Earnings Summary
Executive Summary
- KGS delivered record Q1 results and raised FY25 guidance. Revenue was $329.6M, up ~6% sequentially; Adjusted EBITDA was $177.7M; diluted EPS (GAAP) was $0.33. Management cited recontracting at higher rates, operational efficiencies, and strong large-horsepower demand as key drivers .
- Versus S&P Global consensus, KGS beat on revenue ($329.6M vs $325.9M*) and Primary EPS ($0.429 vs $0.379*). S&P EBITDA actual (standard calc) was $169.5M vs $172.1M consensus*, while company-reported Adjusted EBITDA was higher at $177.7M, reflecting non-GAAP adjustments .
- FY25 guidance raised: Adjusted EBITDA to $695–$725M (low end +$10M), DCF to $430–$455M, Contract Services adjusted GM% to 66.5–68.5%; capex recast into Growth ($180–$205M) and Other ($60–$65M), with total growth+other reduced by $10M at the high end vs prior $685–$725M, DCF $425–$450M, Contract Services adj GM% 66.0–68.0%, Growth capex $240–$280M .
- Potential stock catalysts: reinforced pricing power (monthly $/HP rose to $22.48 from $21.97), high utilization (96.9% fleet; ~99% large horsepower), dividend raised 10% to $0.45, and share repurchases, alongside clearer FY25 trajectory and leverage reduction to 3.7x .
What Went Well and What Went Wrong
- What Went Well
- Pricing and mix: Contract Services monthly $/HP increased to $22.48 from $21.97 QoQ; Contract Services adjusted GM% rose to ~67.7% (up ~100 bps QoQ), reflecting recontracting at market rates, high-grading, and efficiency gains .
- Utilization and growth: Fleet utilization increased to 96.9%, with ~49,000 HP of new large horsepower deployed and strong large-HP demand (~99% utilized per management) .
- Capital returns and balance sheet: Dividend increased 10% to $0.45; ~$10M buybacks at ~$36.87; leverage improved to 3.7x with ~81% of interest expense fixed .
- What Went Wrong
- Adjusted EBITDA margin ticked down slightly to 53.9% from 54.6% QoQ, partly due to mix and small “immaterial” items despite overall beat; Other Services adj GM% was 13.4%, below last year’s 20.0% .
- Loss on sale of assets of $9.2M; depreciation and amortization remained high at $70.5M, continuing to weigh on GAAP earnings .
- Free cash flow declined sequentially to $47.2M from $56.7M, with higher growth/other capex outlays partly offset by asset sale proceeds .
Financial Results
Headline metrics vs prior periods and consensus (oldest → newest):
Notes: Consensus values marked with an asterisk are from S&P Global (see Estimates Context for details). Company Adjusted EBITDA is non-GAAP as reconciled in filings .
Segment breakdown (oldest → newest):
KPIs (as of quarter-end unless noted; oldest → newest):
Guidance Changes
No explicit OpEx, OI&E, or tax rate quantitative guidance was provided beyond non-GAAP guidance ranges .
Earnings Call Themes & Trends
Management Commentary
- “We recontracted a significant amount of horsepower at market rates... This helped drive a sequential increase in revenue and adjusted gross margin percentage in our Contract Services segment.” – Mickey McKee, CEO .
- “Adjusted EBITDA for the quarter was just under $178 million... we did have a handful of individually immaterial items... that, when summed up, boosted adjusted EBITDA by about $1.5 million.” – John Griggs, CFO .
- “We raised our contract services adjusted gross margin percentage to 66.5% to 68.5% and increased the midpoint of our adjusted EBITDA and discretionary cash flow guidance.” – John Griggs, CFO .
- “Overall, we do not expect our OpEx or our CapEx to be impacted by tariffs by more than a low single-digit percentage in any given year.” – Mickey McKee, CEO .
Q&A Highlights
- Guidance confidence and sensitivities: Narrow FY25 range reflects high visibility; key swing factor is recontracting execution and inflation assumptions (including tariffs) .
- Outsourcing vs in-sourcing: Potential shift to outsourced compression as customers balance capex/opex; more likely reflected in 2026 budgets .
- Capital allocation: Committed to 3.5x year-end leverage; opportunistic buybacks and support for expected continued block sales by EQT; confident in intrinsic value .
- Pricing/margins drivers: Mix shift to large HP, AI-enabled maintenance extending cycles, fleet repositioning from exits and non-core divestitures, and training investments .
- Supply chain and lead times: Engines ~45–50 weeks; packager/shop capacity also a bottleneck; supply tight, supporting pricing .
- Strategic optionality/M&A: Open to bolt-ons post-CSI integration; fully contracted 2025 new units; early 2026 contracting progressing .
Estimates Context
- Q1 2025 vs S&P Global consensus: Revenue $329.6M vs $325.9M* (beat), Primary EPS $0.429 vs $0.379* (beat), S&P EBITDA (standard) “actual” $169.5M vs $172.1M consensus* (slight miss on S&P definition), while company-reported Adjusted EBITDA was $177.7M (non-GAAP) .
- Implications: Raised FY25 ranges (EBITDA, DCF, Contract Services adj GM%) and stronger pricing/utilization likely prompt upward estimate revisions for FY25 EBITDA midpoint and margin assumptions; capex recast signals lower total growth+other spend at the high end .
Values marked with an asterisk (*) are retrieved from S&P Global.
Key Takeaways for Investors
- Pricing power intact: Recontracting at higher rates and mix toward large HP continue to expand Contract Services margins; watch monthly $/HP and renewal cadence for sustainability .
- Utilization supports cycle durability: Fleet utilization rose to 96.9%, with large HP effectively ~99% utilized—a buffer against pricing erosion absent a severe downturn .
- Guidance credibility improved: FY25 EBITDA low-end raised; DCF and margin ranges lifted; capital framework tightened via capex recast and high-end reduction—enhancing FCF visibility .
- Capital returns and deleveraging: Dividend up 10% to $0.45 and opportunistic buybacks alongside trajectory to 3.5x leverage by year-end; expect continued share absorption in secondary activity .
- Tariff and supply chain risks manageable: Management expects low single-digit OpEx/CapEx impact, with North American sourcing and contract inflation escalators offsetting .
- Operational tech edge: Machine learning for condition-based maintenance and workforce training should underpin margin resilience and technician productivity .
- Watchlist into Q2: Renewal/pricing outcomes, large HP delivery/lead times, Other Services project cadence, and any delta between S&P EBITDA vs company Adjusted EBITDA framing in sell-side models .
Sources:
- Q1 2025 8-K/Press Release (financials, guidance, KPIs, dividend, leverage): .
- Q1 2025 Earnings Call (prepared remarks, Q&A, pricing, $/HP, tariffs, supply chain, capex, buybacks): .
- Prior quarters for trend/guidance baselines: Q4 2024 8-K (financials, guidance, utilization, segment margins): ; Q3 2024 8-K (record EBITDA/FCF, utilization, segment data): .
S&P Global disclaimer: Consensus and S&P “actual” values marked with an asterisk (*) are retrieved from S&P Global.