Sign in
KT

KULR Technology Group, Inc. (KULR)·Q1 2025 Earnings Summary

Executive Summary

  • Q1 2025 revenue was $2.45M, up 40% year over year, but down sequentially from Q4 2024 ($3.37M); gross margin compressed to 8% vs 64% in Q4, primarily due to unanticipated labor hours on technical projects .
  • EPS context is mixed: the company reported a net loss of $18.81M or $0.07 per share; S&P Global Primary EPS actual records –$0.4928 versus a consensus of –$0.12 and revenue $2.4486M versus a consensus of $2.85M, implying a revenue miss and a larger EPS loss than expected* .
  • Management highlighted balance sheet strength and strategic pivots: Bitcoin holdings increased to 716 BTC by May 10 and subsequently to 800.3 BTC on May 20; the company launched blockchain supply chain tracking and entered AI-driven robotics via German Bionic partnerships .
  • CFO reiterated operational consolidation (exiting San Diego, consolidating to Webster, TX) to improve efficiency; prior guidance to at least double 2025 revenue was reaffirmed on the Q1 call .
  • Near-term stock catalysts: execution on space batteries (AstroForge K1S 500Wh), Texas Space Commission $6.7M grant, robotics commercialization, and Bitcoin Treasury expansion driving narrative exposure .

What Went Well and What Went Wrong

What Went Well

  • Revenue grew 40% YoY to $2.45M; product sales up 88.7% to ~$1.16M YoY, and first Bitcoin mining revenue of $250K recognized .
  • Strategic wins: $6.7M award from Texas Space Commission to advance cold-temperature KULR ONE Space batteries; AstroForge partnership on a 500Wh K1S pack; launch of blockchain-secured supply chain .
  • Quote: “We extended our streak of record trailing-twelve-months revenue, and we continue to demonstrate our leadership as a bitcoin treasury company.” — CFO Shawn Canter .

What Went Wrong

  • Gross margin fell to 8% from 29% YoY and 64% in Q4; management attributed the decline to unanticipated labor hours on technical projects .
  • Operating loss increased to $9.44M vs $3.54M in Q4; SG&A rose to $7.20M and R&D to $2.45M reflecting higher marketing and stock-based comp and planned R&D consulting .
  • Net loss widened to $18.81M (–$0.07/share), primarily driven by mark-to-market accounting of Bitcoin holdings; S&P’s Primary EPS actual indicates a much larger loss than consensus, highlighting modeling and metric differences* .

Financial Results

Summary P&L and Margins (Oldest → Newest)

MetricQ3 2024Q4 2024Q1 2025
Revenue ($USD Millions)$3.19 $3.37 $2.45
Gross Margin (%)71% 64% 8%
Operating Loss ($USD Millions)$(1.71) $(3.54) $(9.44)
Net Loss ($USD Millions)$(2.00) $(4.62) $(18.81)
SG&A ($USD Millions)$2.74 $4.44 $7.20
R&D ($USD Millions)$1.23 $1.25 $2.45
EPS ($USD)$(0.01) $(0.02) $(0.07)

Segment and KPIs

MetricQ3 2024Q4 2024Q1 2025
Product Sales ($USD Millions)$0.77 N/A~$1.16
Service Revenue YoY Change (%)+22% N/A–8%
Bitcoin Mining Revenue ($USD Millions)N/AN/A$0.25
Cash (Period-End) ($USD Millions)N/A$29.83 $24.00
Accounts Receivable ($USD Millions)N/A$2.60 $2.90
Bitcoin Holdings ($USD Millions or BTC)N/A$20.28 670 BTC EOP; 716 BTC by 5/10
Total Assets ($USD Millions)N/A$63 $94

Actuals vs S&P Global Consensus (Q1 2025)

MetricConsensusActual
Revenue ($USD)2,850,000*2,448,606*
Primary EPS ($USD)–0.12*–0.4928*

Values marked with * retrieved from S&P Global.

Notes:

  • Company-reported Q1 2025 net loss per share was –$0.07; S&P Primary EPS actual was –$0.4928. This reflects metric differences (company-reported EPS vs S&P “Primary EPS” framework). We anchor estimate comparisons to S&P data and note the discrepancy .

Guidance Changes

MetricPeriodPrevious GuidanceCurrent GuidanceChange
RevenueFY 2025“At least double in 2025” (from Q4 call) Reaffirmed on Q1 call Maintained
Operations/Facilities2025N/AConsolidate San Diego into Webster, TX by November 2025 Operational efficiency action

No formal numeric ranges (revenue/GM/OpEx) were issued in the Q1 2025 press release or call beyond directional commentary .

Earnings Call Themes & Trends

TopicPrevious Mentions (Q3 2024, Q4 2024)Current Period (Q1 2025)Trend
Space Batteries (KULR ONE Space)Building 100/200/400Wh platforms; NASA 20793 focus; expanded Army DEVCOM work AstroForge 500Wh K1S partnership; Texas Space Commission $6.7M award; continued NASA JSC alignment Expanding engagements and funding
AI/Data Centers & Xero VibeKXV licensing deal; data center cooling opportunity Continued AI focus; broader platform narrative; no new KXV financials this quarter Narrative continuing; monetization cadence TBD
Robotics/Physical AIPreviewed strategic move forthcoming German Bionic Apogee ULTRA partnership; exclusive NA distribution; business unit formation Entered robotics, execution phase
Bitcoin TreasuryInitiated; ~668 BTC by late March; long-term holding stance 716 BTC by May 10; 800.3 BTC by May 20; BTC Yield KPI disclosed Rapid accumulation; treasury centrality
Supply Chain/BlockchainN/ABlockchain-secured supply chain; Base L2 rollup; NFT-based custody tracking New initiative; digital ops
Facilities/OperationsHQ expansion; Webster TX designation Consolidation: exit San Diego lease; move ops to Webster Cost/efficiency focus
EV Batteries StrategyTesting services exposure; avoided EV pack manufacturing due to margins Reiterated staying away from EV pack provision; focus on testing/services Consistent stance

Management Commentary

  • CEO framing: “2025 is a transformational year… With over $100M in cash and Bitcoin holdings… we are well capitalized to grow our battery and AI Robotics businesses,” underscoring BTC-first strategy and dual focus on batteries and robotics .
  • CFO on earnings quality: “We extended our streak of record trailing-twelve-months revenue… While our earnings saw the impact of a non-cash mark-to-market non-operational expense… We remain steadfast in our BTC treasury strategy” .
  • Operations: “We will consolidate operations into Webster, Texas… aligns with our ongoing efficiency and productivity improvement efforts” — CFO Shawn Canter .
  • Strategic positioning: accelerated battery development cycles and a 31,000 sq ft facility doubling production capacity .

Q&A Highlights

  • Revenue outlook: Prior statement that revenue would at least double in 2025 reaffirmed on Q1 call .
  • Facilities: Decision not to renew San Diego lease; consolidate into Webster, TX by November .
  • EV batteries: Company avoids EV battery pack manufacturing due to razor-thin margins; continues extensive testing services for major OEMs .
  • Partnerships: Continued pursuit of UPS SafeCase deal; design partnerships with Amprius for space/DoD/drones/robotics .
  • Launch plans: Paid SpaceX rideshare with CubeSat and battery planned (timing reference in Q&A indicates 2027 for that mission), tying to low-temperature program and SafeStax platform .

Estimates Context

  • Q1 2025 S&P Global consensus: Revenue $2.85M vs actual $2.4486M (miss); Primary EPS –$0.12 vs actual –$0.4928 (larger loss than expected)*.
  • Company-reported EPS was –$0.07/share; differences reflect S&P’s “Primary EPS” methodology versus company-reported metrics. Analysts may need to reconcile basis differences and the non-cash digital asset mark-to-market effect when updating models .
    Values marked with * retrieved from S&P Global.

Key Takeaways for Investors

  • Margin compression and higher OpEx overshadowed YoY revenue growth; watch near-term gross margin recovery as labor normalization and project mix improve .
  • Strong pipeline and funding in space batteries (Texas grant, AstroForge) and new robotics entry provide diversified growth vectors beyond legacy battery services .
  • Bitcoin Treasury is central to the equity narrative; marked-to-market volatility can materially swing GAAP earnings, affecting EPS comparability vs consensus frameworks .
  • Execution milestones to monitor: NASA 20793 certification progress, robotics commercialization (Apogee ULTRA deployment and leasing/sales model in North America), blockchain supply chain adoption by key customers .
  • 2025 revenue “at least double” guidance was reaffirmed; delivery depends on scaling KULR ONE platforms, licensing monetization cadence (KXV and other IP), and BTC strategy optics .
  • Operational consolidation (San Diego to Webster) should support cost discipline; track SG&A normalization and productivity gains in H2’25 .
  • For trading: catalysts include additional BTC acquisition updates, Russell 3000 addition, contract wins in space/DoD/robotics, and margin stabilization; risks include BTC price volatility’s non-cash P&L impact and execution timing on new initiatives .

Citations: Press release and 8-K Q1 2025 ; Earnings call transcripts Q1 2025 ; Prior quarters’ releases/calls Q3 2024 -; Q4 2024 - -; BTC expansion PR ; Blockchain PR ; AstroForge PR ; Texas Space Commission grant . Values retrieved from S&P Global: Q1 2025 consensus and actuals for Primary EPS and Revenue (table marked with *).