LB
LIFETIME BRANDS, INC (LCUT)·Q2 2025 Earnings Summary
Executive Summary
- Q2 top line and EPS missed consensus as tariff-induced shipment pauses and channel mix weighed on results; revenue was $131.9M vs $138.1M consensus and adjusted EPS was $(0.50) vs $(0.14) consensus, while gross margin held at 38.6% on favorable mix and pricing discipline . Revenue Consensus Mean: $138.11M*; EPS Normalized Consensus Mean: $(0.135)*. Actual: Revenue $131.86M; Adj. EPS $(0.50) .
- Management cited an unusual, transient tariff shock—temporary 145% China tariffs and “Liberation Day” policy shifts—triggering uniform price actions and shipment delays (≈$30M shifted/delayed), with cadence normalizing early Q3; some orders slip into 2026 .
- Liquidity remains strong at ~$96.9M, cash from operations YTD was $26.1M, and net debt/Adj. EBITDA improved to 3.5x; TTM Adjusted EBITDA was $50.7M, and net debt fell ~$18M YTD .
- No formal guidance reinstated given visibility limits; dividend maintained at $0.0425 per share (payable Nov 14, 2025). Management highlighted cost actions (> $14M annualized), sourcing shift to enable ~80% production outside China by year-end, and increased unsolicited M&A inbound as potential second-half catalysts .
What Went Well and What Went Wrong
-
What Went Well
- Gross margin held at 38.6% YoY (50.8M vs 54.6M prior year) despite revenue pressure, driven by favorable product mix and pricing actions .
- International segment delivered growth (+12.4% YoY to $12.5M; +6.6% ex-FX), with traction in Europe and e-commerce, and Project Concord on track to improve second-half profitability .
- Cost discipline and liquidity: SG&A fell 2.1% YoY; liquidity ~$96.9M; TTM Adj. EBITDA $50.7M; net debt/Adj. EBITDA 3.5x (improved from March) .
- Quote: “Adjusted EBITDA was consistent with the last quarter…cost efficiency actions…over $14,000,000 on an annualized basis” .
-
What Went Wrong
- Revenue fell 6.9% YoY to $131.9M as tariff volatility (temporary 145% China tariffs, Liberation Day changes) caused shipment halts and delays, acutely impacting e-commerce and club channels .
- U.S. segment declined 8.6% YoY; distribution inefficiencies (WMS transition, DC migration) and lower absorption raised distribution costs; some warehouse club sales bypassed warehouses, worsening ratios .
- Larger GAAP loss from a $33.2M non-cash goodwill impairment; adjusted operating income down to $0.9M vs $5.6M prior year .
- Analysts flagged lack of guidance; management cited poor visibility and pricing pass-through timing into Q3 as reasons not to guide .
Financial Results
Values retrieved from S&P Global*
Segment Net Sales (YoY)
Selected KPIs and Cash/Liquidity
Non-GAAP reconciliations are provided in company materials .
Guidance Changes
Earnings Call Themes & Trends
Management Commentary
- “We view the extreme conditions in the second quarter to be largely mitigated as of today…a notable portion of the revenue impact from our second quarter [is] not indicative of the rest of the year.” — CEO Robert Kay .
- “Adjusted EBITDA was consistent with the last quarter…cost efficiency actions…over $14,000,000 on an annualized basis.” — CEO Robert Kay .
- “Liquidity was approximately $97,000,000…Adjusted EBITDA to net debt ratio…3.5x, an improvement from…March.” — CFO Laurence Winoker .
- “There’s about $30,000,000 plus [of sales] related to [shipment delays and pauses].” — CEO Robert Kay .
- “We’ve thought about [guidance]. We don’t see clear visibility…we will reevaluate that for next quarter.” — CEO Robert Kay .
Q&A Highlights
- Shipment delays magnitude and timing: ~“$30M plus” of revenue shifted/delayed from Q2; most disruption past; some ship dates slide within H2, with risk into Jan 2026 for certain programs .
- Guidance stance: Despite tariff clarity improving, management declined reinstating guidance due to still-poor visibility and pending price pass-through effects; reconsidering for next quarter .
- Pricing cadence and elasticity: Price increases largely implemented; limited Q2 P&L impact; shelf pricing hits in Q3; historically low elasticity on low-ticket items (e.g., can openers), higher sensitivity on larger tabletop sets .
- Dollar General / Dolly: Q2 under-ship tied to tariff disruptions; program expanding, with shipments expected in Q3; discussions to add additional brands at Dollar General ongoing .
- Distribution costs: Higher distribution cost ratios from lower volume absorption, WMS implementation, and DC transition; warehouse club direct import mix also distorted metrics .
Estimates Context
- Revenue: Missed by ~$6.25M (Actual: $131.86M vs $138.11M consensus*). EPS (Normalized): Missed by ~$0.37 (Actual: $(0.50) vs $(0.135) consensus*). Values retrieved from S&P Global*
- Implications: Street likely reduces H2 revenue cadence modestly to reflect some pushed programs and slower club/e-comm normalization, while raising gross margin trajectory on confirmed pricing flow-through and mix stability. Adjusted operating income expectations likely shift into H2 with DC/WMS inefficiencies and Concord cost benefits timing .
Key Takeaways for Investors
- The quarter’s miss was predominantly tariff/disruption-driven rather than demand destruction; shipments and pricing cadence are normalizing into Q3, setting up a cleaner H2 compare .
- Gross margin resilience at 38.6% and cost takeouts (> $14M annualized) provide downside protection as price increases roll through shelves in Q3 .
- International momentum and Project Concord actions pivot H2 profitability higher; watch for Europe/Amazon and APAC contributions and Concord milestones .
- Liquidity remains solid with YTD OCFF of $26.1M and leverage improving to 3.5x net debt/Adj. EBITDA; dividend maintained, signaling confidence .
- Sourcing diversification toward ~80% outside China by YE reduces future tariff volatility; near-term DC/WMS inefficiencies are transitory with 2026 go-live .
- Potential M&A optionality rising with increased inbound interest—could be a catalyst if accretive and strategically aligned .
- Near-term trading lens: stock likely sensitive to signs of Q3 shipment catch-up, pricing flow-through, and any reinstatement of guidance next quarter; medium-term thesis hinges on execution of sourcing shift, Concord, and DC transition to structurally improve margins and cash flow .
Citations:
- Q2 2025 press release and 8-K:
- Q2 2025 call transcript:
- Q1 2025 8-K/Transcript:
- Q4 2024 press release/Transcript:
Values retrieved from S&P Global*: Revenue Consensus Mean (Q2 2025), EPS Normalized Consensus Mean (Q2 2025), Primary EPS Consensus Mean (Q2 2025), Primary EPS/Revenue # of Estimates, Target Price consensus.