LH
Leidos Holdings, Inc. (LDOS)·Q4 2025 Earnings Summary
Executive Summary
- Revenue rose 10% year-over-year to $4.37B with non-GAAP EPS up 19% to $2.37; full-year revenue reached $16.66B and non-GAAP EPS $10.21, reflecting strong Health & Civil execution and improved program performance company-wide .
- Backlog climbed 18% YoY to $43.6B on a Q4 book-to-bill of 1.7, underpinned by notable wins (VBA MDE, TSA logistics, IFPC, C‑HGB/TPS) that bolster 2025 visibility .
- FY25 guidance initiated: revenue $16.9–$17.3B, mid‑high 12% adjusted EBITDA margin, non‑GAAP EPS $10.35–$10.75, and ~$1.45B operating cash flow; CFO cited expected tax rate of ~23.5–24% and buybacks roughly consistent with 2024 .
- Segment mix skewed positive: Health & Civil margin expanded to 21% (non‑GAAP 21.6%), though Defense Systems margin compressed due to a $21M airborne surveillance asset write‑down; management emphasized continued pivot away from lower‑margin work as a 2025 focus .
What Went Well and What Went Wrong
-
What Went Well
- Bookings momentum: $7.6B net bookings in Q4 (book‑to‑bill 1.7) and $23.4B for 2024 (1.4 B2B), lifting backlog to $43.6B (+18% YoY); CEO: “The fourth quarter was especially strong in revenue growth and business development” .
- Health & Civil outperformance: revenue +16% YoY; operating margin 21.0% (non‑GAAP 21.6%) on higher MHS volumes and case complexity, plus net write‑ups; CFO: “Health and Civil revenues and profitability remained strong” .
- Cash generation and returns: Q4 operating cash flow $299M (DSO 59), free cash flow $213M; $406M buybacks and $0.40 dividend declared for March 28, 2025 .
-
What Went Wrong
- Defense Systems margin pressure: operating margin 0.4% (non‑GAAP 3.5%) on a $21M airborne surveillance asset write‑down; non‑GAAP margin declined YoY .
- National Security & Digital margin down YoY: 9.2% vs 10.3% prior‑year Q4 (non‑GAAP 9.7% vs 11.0%) due to immaterial changes across multiple fixed‑price programs .
- Sequential normalization from record Q3: Adjusted EBITDA margin 11.6% vs 13.8% in Q3; CFO noted Q4 included enhanced employee benefit costs and that the quarter had an extra week under their 4‑4‑5 calendar .
Financial Results
Note: Q4 refers to quarter ended Jan 3, 2025; prior year quarter ended Dec 29, 2023; Q3 refers to quarter ended Oct 3, 2025.
- Q4 non‑GAAP EPS reconciliation: +$0.21 amortization of acquired intangibles, +$0.03 asset impairment, +$0.01 restructuring; total non‑GAAP EPS $2.37 .
- CFO note: Q4 included an extra fiscal week under 4‑4‑5 calendar .
Segment performance (revenues and operating margins)
KPI snapshot
Guidance Changes
Subsequent updates (for context):
- Raised at Q2 call (Aug 5, 2025): Revenue $17.0–$17.25B; adj. EBITDA margin mid‑13%; non‑GAAP EPS $11.15–$11.45; OCF ~$1.65B .
- Raised again at Q3 (Nov 4, 2025): Revenue maintained $17.0–$17.25B; adj. EBITDA margin high‑13%; non‑GAAP EPS $11.45–$11.75; OCF ~$1.65B .
Earnings Call Themes & Trends
Management Commentary
- CEO Tom Bell: “2024 was a fantastic year for Leidos… The fourth quarter was especially strong in revenue growth and business development… Our outlook for the future remains decidedly positive” .
- Strategy (North Star 2030): “Keys on growth pillars where customer needs are growing, profitability is robust and Leidos differentiation is evident… we are even more confident our growth pillars position us for success” .
- Capital deployment and valuation: “Since 12 November, our stock has traded down about 25%… we repurchased an additional $400 million of shares in the fourth quarter” .
- CFO Chris Cage on profitability: “Adjusted EBITDA margin of 11.6% was up 20 bps YoY… Q4 margin includes the cost of enhancing some of our employee benefits… For the year… adjusted EBITDA margin increased 210 bps to 12.9%” .
- Portfolio mix: “Currently, 43% of our portfolio is fixed price, up from 39% in 2023. We view the move to more outcome-based procurement as a continued area of opportunity” .
Q&A Highlights
- Administrative disruption: “Short answer is not really… day-long pauses… picked right back up” (Bell); company prepared a playbook if disruptions persisted (Cage) .
- Border security and IRON DOME: Administration priorities “right in our wheelhouse,” with active engagement and RFI responses; broad portfolio applicability to space surveillance, counter‑UAS, cruise/hypersonic defense .
- VBA MDE recompete: Confident on 2025–2026 execution despite new entrant; demand robust; Leidos positioned on outcomes and scale .
- Guidance conservatism: EPS guide reflects investment in a “pivot year,” potential headwinds from refinancing rates/taxes; one‑offs not expected to repeat, but portfolio variability considered (Cage) .
- Defense Systems assets/programs: $21M write‑off in airborne surveillance weighed on Q4 DS margin; IFPC viable domestically and internationally; MACH‑TB 2.0 role as subcontractor to Kratos with meaningful workshare .
Estimates Context
- Wall Street consensus from S&P Global (SPGI) was unavailable due to API request limits during this analysis window; therefore, we cannot provide vs‑consensus comparisons for Q4 2025 revenue/EPS or FY25 guidance at this time (SPGI request limit exceeded).
- Given Q4 non‑GAAP EPS of $2.37 (+19% YoY) and robust bookings/backlog, subsequent intra‑year guidance raises (Q2 and Q3) suggest prior consensus likely trailed management’s updated trajectory, particularly on margins and EPS .
Key Takeaways for Investors
- Durable demand and visibility: $7.6B Q4 bookings and $43.6B backlog (1.7x B2B) across VA medical exams, TSA sustainment, IFPC, and C‑HGB/TPS underpin 2025 growth and mix improvement .
- Health & Civil is the profit engine: Sustained 20%+ margins on higher MHS volumes, complexity, and execution; VBA recomplete supports near‑term trajectory despite added competitor .
- Defense Systems near‑term volatility, long‑term leverage: Q4 write‑down compressed margin, but pipeline (IFPC Enduring Shield, hypersonics) and “Golden Dome” adjacency support multi‑year scaling .
- Cash generation supports balanced capital return and reinvestment: Q4 OCF $299M; significant Q4 buyback ($406M) and consistent dividend; management prioritizes fixed‑price/outcome contracts and selective growth investments .
- FY25 starting point was conservative and later raised: Initial guide ($16.9–$17.3B rev; $10.35–$10.75 EPS; mid‑high 12% margin; $1.45B OCF) was lifted by Q2/Q3 to higher margins/EPS and OCF, signaling estimate momentum as awards/funding normalize .
- Monitor administration/CR cadence and budget timing: Management reports limited disruption and sees constructive shift toward efficiency and outcome‑based procurement, a core Leidos competency .
- Stock catalysts: Continued award flow conversion, DS margin normalization from one‑offs, and execution on large IDIQs (IFPC, TSA, C‑HGB/TPS) could drive upward revisions and multiple support .