L&
LEGGETT & PLATT INC (LEG)·Q3 2025 Earnings Summary
Executive Summary
- Q3 revenue of $1.04B declined 6% YoY; adjusted EPS was $0.29 (down $0.03 YoY), while GAAP EPS of $0.91 benefited from an $87M gain on the Aerospace divestiture .
- Revenue modestly beat S&P Global consensus ($1.036B vs $1.025B*), and adjusted EPS matched ($0.29 vs $0.29*); management reaffirmed the midpoint of 2025 sales and adjusted EPS and narrowed ranges .
- Deleveraging accelerated: net debt/TTM adjusted EBITDA fell to 2.62x (from 3.51x in Q2) as LEG reduced debt by $296M using Aerospace proceeds and operating cash flow; liquidity stood at $974M .
- Guidance tweaks: FY25 GAAP EPS raised to $1.52–$1.72 (from $0.88–$1.17) on gains; adjusted EPS narrowed to $1.00–$1.10 (from $1.00–$1.20); capex cut to $60–$70M (from $80–$90M); OCF about $300M .
- Potential stock catalysts: visible deleveraging, narrowed guidance, restructuring benefits tracking to $60–$70M EBIT run-rate, and tariff developments; watch Q4 price pressure (Flooring/Textiles) and seasonal mattress slowdown .
What Went Well and What Went Wrong
What Went Well
- Balance sheet: Net debt/TTM adjusted EBITDA improved to 2.62x after $296M debt paydown; total liquidity $974M (cash $461M; $513M revolver capacity) .
- Operational execution: Adjusted EBIT margin held 7.0% (vs 6.9% LY) despite lower volume; bedding adjusted EBIT up 35% YoY on metal margin expansion and restructuring benefits .
- Restructuring ahead of plan: Annualized EBIT benefit expected at $60–$70M; sales attrition trimmed to ~$60M; no customer disruptions; Q3 realized ~$10M incremental EBIT benefit .
Selected management quotes:
- “We are pleased to report solid results… successfully completed the sale of our Aerospace business, further sharpening our focus on core operations.” — CEO Karl Glassman .
- “We are reaffirming the midpoint of our full-year sales and adjusted EPS guidance… significantly strengthened our balance sheet.” — CEO Karl Glassman .
- “We’re meeting or exceeding [restructuring plan metrics]… confident in $60–$70M annualized EBIT benefit.” — CFO Ben Burns .
What Went Wrong
- Top-line pressure: Sales -6% YoY; volume -6% on soft residential, Automotive, and Hydraulic Cylinders; divestitures -2% to sales .
- Segment headwinds: Furniture, Flooring & Textile adjusted EBIT -30% YoY on pricing pressure, especially in Flooring and Textiles; management expects aggressive discounting to weigh in Q4 .
- Bedding volume mix issues: Adjustable Bed and Specialty Foam pressured by a customer exit and retailer merchandising; Q4 domestic mattress production expected to slow seasonally and remain negative YoY .
Financial Results
Headline Metrics: Sequential and YoY
Q3 2025 Actuals vs S&P Global Consensus
*Values retrieved from S&P Global.
Segment Performance (Q3 2025 vs Q3 2024)
KPIs and Balance Sheet (Q3 2025)
Guidance Changes
Notes to EPS framework include restructuring costs ($0.13), special tax item ($0.02), pension settlement charge ($0.11), and gains from real estate, Aerospace ($0.58), and insurance ($0.07) .
Earnings Call Themes & Trends
Management Commentary
- “We used proceeds from the [Aerospace] sale, along with a portion of our operating cash flow, to pay down all of our remaining commercial paper and substantially lower our net debt to trailing 12-month adjusted EBITDA ratio.” — CEO Karl Glassman .
- “We’re reaffirming the midpoint of our sales and adjusted EPS guidance while narrowing the previous guidance range… adjusted EBIT margin is expected to be between 6.4% and 6.6%.” — CFO Ben Burns .
- “This decision [consolidating Kentucky adjustable bed into Mexico] was driven by lower volume and tariffs on imported components… a category that primarily competes with imported products.” — CEO Karl Glassman .
Q&A Highlights
- Restructuring benefits: Execution meeting/exceeding plan; ~$60M EBIT benefit realized in 2025 with up to $10M more in 2026; sales attrition trimmed to ~$60M; strong 25%–35% incremental margins on volume recovery .
- Bedding demand & mix: Sequential stabilization; Q4 seasonality to slow; content gains (Comfort Core, semi-finished) helping margins even with flat-to-down units .
- Rod/billet dynamic: Apparent steel rod volume decline driven by elimination of billets; trade rod mix favorable (more high carbon), supporting margins .
- FF&T/home furniture: Tariffs upended Q2; volumes normalized in Q3; Vietnam factory ramping to improve tariff position for customers and LEG .
- Capital allocation: LT leverage target ~2x; prioritize net debt reduction; small M&A likely in textiles; buybacks possible over time .
Estimates Context
- Q3 2025 results vs S&P Global consensus: Revenue beat ($1.036B vs $1.025B*), adjusted EPS in line ($0.29 vs $0.29*); consensus coverage included 4 revenue and 4 EPS estimates* .
- Implications: With adjusted EPS flat YoY and narrowed FY25 adjusted EPS range ($1.00–$1.10), estimate revisions may be minimal near term; EBITDA softness in FF&T and anticipated Q4 pricing pressure could bias Q4 margin expectations lower .
*Values retrieved from S&P Global.
Key Takeaways for Investors
- Deleveraging is tangible and rapid (ND/EBITDA 2.62x), reducing equity risk and improving optionality for future buybacks/M&A when conditions permit .
- Top-line remains challenged, but margin defense is holding via restructuring and metal margin tailwinds; adjusted EBIT margin steady at ~7% despite volume headwinds .
- FY25 guidance narrowed: GAAP EPS higher from gains; adjusted EPS unchanged at midpoint—watch Q4 pricing pressure in Flooring/Textiles and seasonal mattress slowdown .
- Bedding stabilization with content gains supports profitability even without unit recovery; 2026 innovation pipeline referenced as a medium-term driver .
- Portfolio simplification (Aerospace divestiture) and footprint optimization (e.g., adjustable bed move to Mexico; Vietnam plant in furniture) should structurally improve returns and tariff positioning .
- Capital intensity lower near term (capex $60–$70M); OCF ~$300M affords continued debt paydown and select bolt-ons in textiles .
- Policy watch: Tariffs are a net positive for LEG’s domestic businesses, but broad tariffs risk inflation and consumer demand—key swing factor for 2026 recovery timing .