Sign in

LENNAR CORP /NEW/ (LEN) Q1 2025 Earnings Summary

Executive Summary

  • Q1 2025 results were resilient amid affordability headwinds: revenue $7.63B, GAAP diluted EPS $1.96, and adjusted EPS $2.14 excluding mark‑to‑market losses on technology investments . Both revenue and adjusted EPS beat S&P Global consensus (Revenue: $7.43B*, EPS: $1.71*), while GAAP EPS reflects tech investment losses; new orders (18,355) and deliveries (17,834) exceeded guidance highs .
  • Margins compressed: homebuilding gross margin 18.7% (18.8% before purchase accounting), SG&A 8.5%, net margin on home sales 10.2% as elevated incentives (~13%) bridged affordability; ASP declined 1% YoY to $408K .
  • Strategic pivot advanced: completed Millrose spin‑off (asset‑light land banking REIT) and closed Rausch Coleman acquisition to expand footprint; controlled homesites rose to 98%, owned supply fell to 0.2 years, inventory turn improved to 1.7x .
  • Capital allocation: repurchased 5.2M shares for $703M; ended with $2.3B homebuilding cash and 8.9% homebuilding debt/total capital; no drawings on $3.0B revolver .
  • Near‑term guide: Q2 2025 deliveries 19,500–20,500, ASP $390–$400K, gross margin ~18%, SG&A 8.0–8.2%, Financial Services OE $135–$145M; management remains focused on even‑flow production and cash flow over margin maximization .
    Values retrieved from S&P Global.*

What Went Well and What Went Wrong

  • What Went Well

    • Deliveries (17,834) and new orders (18,355) exceeded high‑end guidance, reflecting effective “Lennar machine” (digital/dynamic pricing) and even‑flow execution .
    • Cycle time fell to 137 days (−11% YoY) and inventory turn rose to 1.7x, supporting efficiency gains and cash conversion .
    • Asset‑light transition accelerated: Millrose spin‑off completed; controlled homesites 98%, owned supply 0.2 years—lowest in company history .
    • Quote (Stuart Miller): “We are pleased to report our 2025 first quarter results that were both constructive and strategic…we completed the purchase of Rausch Coleman Homes…” .
    • Financial Services operating earnings increased to $143M on higher Lennar deliveries .
  • What Went Wrong

    • Gross margin compressed to 18.7% (vs. 21.8% LY) and SG&A rose to 8.5% (vs. 8.2% LY) due to higher incentives, land costs, and marketing spend; ASP declined to $408K (−1% YoY) .
    • “Lennar Other” operating loss widened to $89M on technology investment mark‑to‑market losses; NOVA and OPEN were notable detractors .
    • Effective tax rate increased to 24.6% (vs. 22.7% LY) as excess tax benefits and solar credits declined .
    • Management acknowledged ~13% incentives pressuring margins; normalized incentives of 5–6% would imply mid‑20s gross margins longer term .
    • Multifamily was breakeven (vs. $16M loss LY), but apartment market rents remain pressured in overbuilt regions per management commentary .

Financial Results

MetricQ3 2024Q4 2024Q1 2025
Total Revenues ($USD Billions)$9.42 $9.95 $7.63
GAAP Diluted EPS ($)$4.26 $4.06 $1.96
Adjusted EPS ex tech ($)$3.90 $4.03 $2.14
Homebuilding Gross Margin %22.5% 22.1% 18.7% (18.8% pre‑PA)
SG&A % of Home Sales6.7% 7.2% 8.5%
Deliveries (Homes)21,516 22,206 17,834
Avg Sales Price Delivered ($)$422,000 $430,000 $408,000

Segment Breakdown (Q1 2025 vs Q1 2024)

SegmentQ1 2025 Revenues ($MM)Q1 2024 Revenues ($MM)Q1 2025 Operating Earnings ($MM)Q1 2024 Operating Earnings ($MM)
Homebuilding$7,283.9 $6,931.0 $809.3 $1,028.8
Financial Services$277.1 $249.7 $143.5 $131.3
Multifamily$63.2 $129.7 $(0.0) $(15.6)
Lennar Other$7.4 $2.5 $(89.3) $(39.5)

Key KPIs and Operating Metrics

KPIQ1 2025Q1 2024
New Orders (Homes)18,355 18,176
New Orders ($USD Billions)$7.43 $7.74
Backlog (Homes)13,145 16,270
Backlog ($USD Billions)$5.77 $7.43
Avg Sales Price (Deliveries) ($)$408,000 $413,000
Gross Margin % on Home Sales18.7% (18.8% pre‑PA) 21.8%
SG&A % of Home Sales8.5% 8.2%
Cycle Time (days)137 154
Starts Pace / Sales Pace (homes per community per month)4.0 / 4.1 n/a
Inventory Turn (x)1.7 1.5
Controlled Homesites (%)98% 77%
Years Supply of Owned Homesites0.2 yrs 1.3 yrs
Share Repurchases (shares; $USD MM)5.2M; $703 n/a
Homebuilding Debt / Total Capital8.9% 9.6%
Homebuilding Cash & Equivalents ($USD Billions)$2.28 $4.95

Guidance Changes

MetricPeriodPrevious GuidanceCurrent GuidanceChange
New Orders (Homes)Q1 2025 vs Q2 202517,500–18,000 22,500–23,500 Raised (sequential)
Deliveries (Homes)Q1 2025 vs Q2 202517,000–17,500 19,500–20,500 Raised (sequential)
Average Sales Price ($)Q1 2025 vs Q2 2025$410K–$415K $390K–$400K Lowered
Gross Margin % on Home SalesQ1 2025 vs Q2 202519.0%–19.25% ~18% (ex purchase accounting) Lowered
SG&A % of Home SalesQ1 2025 vs Q2 20258.7%–8.8% 8.0%–8.2% Improved (lower)
Financial Services Operating Earnings ($MM)Q1 2025 vs Q2 2025$100–$110 $135–$145 Raised
Corporate G&A (% of total revenue)Q2 2025n/a~2% New
Foundation ContributionQ2 2025n/a$1,000 per delivery New
Q2 Tax RateQ2 2025n/a~25.3% New
Weighted Avg Shares (MM)Q2 2025~266 ~261 Lowered

Earnings Call Themes & Trends

TopicPrevious Mentions (Q3 2024)Previous Mentions (Q4 2024)Current Period (Q1 2025)Trend
Asset‑light land strategy / MillroseIntensifying land‑light focus; owned supply 1.1 yrs; controlled 81% S‑11 filed; aiming for just‑in‑time homesite delivery Millrose spin‑off completed; controlled 98%, owned 0.2 yrs Accelerating
Incentives & AffordabilityASP pressure; incentives driving demand Incentives up to 10.8% in Q4; guide Q1 margin 19–19.25% ~13% incentives; gross margin 18.7%; ASP −1% YoY Elevated but stabilizing
Cycle time & costCycle time 140 days (−23% YoY) Cycle time 138 days (−14% YoY); direct cost reductions Cycle time 137 days (−11% YoY); direct construction costs −2.5% YoY Improving
Tariffs / ImmigrationShift to domestic inputs; potential cost risk Monitoring; expect limited impact but preparing No current cost impact; contingency planning with trade partners Watching risks
Digital marketing & dynamic pricing (“Lennar machine”)Matching sales/production pace Used to correct pace in Q4 Core to hitting pace, converting leads, preventing aged inventory Embedded discipline
M&A footprint (Rausch Coleman)n/aAnnounced acquisition; ~4,000 deliveries/orders planned for 2025 Closed acquisition; expanded into AR/OK/AL/KS/MO/TX/FL Executed

Management Commentary

  • Strategic focus: “We…focus on our strategy of matching production pace with sales pace and maintaining even flow production…we distributed shares of Millrose…[and] completed the purchase of Rausch Coleman Homes” — Stuart Miller .
  • Margin normalization view: “Our margins are actually quite strong, except for the approximately 13% incentive…normalized incentives should be around 5% to 6%…normalized margin…mid‑20s” — Stuart Miller .
  • Operating efficiency: “Cycle time…down to 137 days…inventory turn improved to 1.7 times…our production‑first focus has positively impacted production times” — Jon Jaffe .
  • Asset‑light metrics: “Years supply of owned homesites…0.2 years…controlled homesite percentage…98%…return on inventory of 29.7%” — Company statement .
  • Capital allocation: “Repurchased $703 million of our common stock…ended the quarter with…cash of $2.3 billion…homebuilding debt to total capital of 8.9%” — Stuart Miller .

Q&A Highlights

  • Normalized margin & SG&A trajectory: Management expects SG&A and corporate G&A rates to trend lower from current elevated levels as efficiencies scale; SG&A historically ~7% and corporate ~1.5% noted as a framework — Stephen Kim Q&A .
  • Land underwriting under current incentives: Team is refreshing land cost basis and underwriting deals to today’s incentive environment to sustain >20% gross margins even if incentives do not fully normalize — Alan Ratner Q&A .
  • Purchase accounting impact & near‑term margin: PA impact ~10 bps in Q1; expected ~20 bps in Q2 given full quarter Rausch activity; selling/closing activity broadly in the guided margin zone — John Lovallo Q&A .
  • Millrose impact & option discipline: ~100 bps margin impact historically from land‑banking migration; bias to work through assets at lower margins vs deposit walkaways, preserving cash flow and overhead coverage — Michael Rehaut Q&A .
  • Cash flow model under asset‑light approach: With land increasingly variable, cash generation is expected to approximate earnings over time; share repurchases likely “robust” post transition — Ken Zener Q&A .

Estimates Context

MetricConsensus (Q1 2025)Actual (Q1 2025)# of Estimates
Revenue ($USD Billions)$7.43*$7.63 12*
Primary EPS ($) (Adjusted)$1.71*$2.14 11*

Values retrieved from S&P Global.*

Implications: Revenue and adjusted EPS beats suggest sell‑side models may need to reflect stronger volume and Financial Services contribution, while gross margin assumptions should remain conservative given ~13% incentives and Q2 margin guide ~18% .

Key Takeaways for Investors

  • Revenue and adjusted EPS both beat consensus (Revenue $7.63B vs $7.43B*, EPS $2.14 vs $1.71*), driven by volume and Financial Services; GAAP EPS $1.96 reflects tech investment losses . Values retrieved from S&P Global.*
  • Even‑flow manufacturing discipline is reducing cycle time (137 days, −11% YoY) and improving inventory turn (1.7x), supporting cash flow resilience despite margin pressure .
  • Asset‑light land model is now structurally in place post Millrose spin; controlled homesites at 98% and owned supply 0.2 years reduce balance sheet risk and enable capital returns .
  • Near‑term margins likely remain constrained (Q2 guide ~18% vs Q1 18.7%) as incentives (~13%) bridge affordability; normalized incentives (5–6%) support mid‑20s gross margin longer term per management .
  • Capital deployment remains shareholder‑friendly (5.2M shares repurchased; $2.3B cash; 8.9% homebuilding debt/total capital; no revolver borrowings), providing optionality for buybacks and strategic growth .
  • Rausch Coleman integration expands lower‑price‑point footprint across key markets; purchase accounting modestly dilutive (~10–20 bps near term) but supportive of volume and market share .
  • Watch Q2 catalysts: execution vs raised deliveries/new orders guidance, pricing/ASP trajectory ($390–$400K), and any tariff/immigration cost impacts (none observed to date) .

Best AI for Equity Research

Performance on expert-authored financial analysis tasks

Fintool-v490%
Claude Sonnet 4.555.3%
o348.3%
GPT 546.9%
Grok 440.3%
Qwen 3 Max32.7%