Chicago Atlantic BDC - Earnings Call - Q1 2025

Executive Summary

• Q1 2025 was steady operationally: total investment income of $11.9M and NII of $7.6M ($0.34/share), with NAV per share essentially flat at $13.19 and no loans on non‑accruals.
• Versus S&P Global consensus, LIEN slightly missed on “revenue” (total investment income) at $11.9M vs $12.46M* and on primary EPS at $0.33 vs $0.34*, with management citing back‑end weighted deployments that limited the quarter’s income contribution.
• Deployment runway strengthened by a new $100M senior secured revolver (SOFR+3%, 6% floor, Mar‑2028), which remained undrawn at 3/31; portfolio FV rose to $289.3M across 31 companies, 79% cannabis/21% non‑cannabis, and 76% floating‑rate exposure with 99% floors.
• Dividend maintained at $0.34 for Q1 (paid Apr 11) and declared $0.34 for Q2 (payable Jul 11), consistent with the strategy to distribute substantially all income while scaling originations.
• Near‑term catalysts: accelerating originations pipeline ($589.5M under evaluation), ample undrawn capacity on the revolver, and continued absence of non‑accruals; watch estimate revisions following modest Q1 underperformance and any deployment pacing updates.

What Went Well and What Went Wrong

What Went Well

• Credit quality and structure: “None of our loans are on non‑accrual status,” with all debt investments senior secured and gross weighted‑average yield ~16.6%.
• Balance sheet readiness: closed a new $100M revolver (SOFR+3%, 6% floor, matures Mar‑2028) to support growth; conservative leverage philosophy reiterated.
• Strategic positioning and alpha: “We are uniquely positioned among BDCs as the only such vehicle focused on and able to lend to cannabis companies… Our weighted average yield… was 16.6%…,” highlighting above‑peer yield potential with disciplined underwriting.

What Went Wrong

• Modest miss vs consensus: Q1 “revenue” (total investment income) $11.9M vs $12.46M* and Primary EPS $0.33 vs $0.34*; management pointed to back‑end timing of fundings that limited the quarter’s income contribution.
• Sequential dip in investment income: total investment income declined from Q4’s $12.7M to $11.9M, driven by timing of deployments and lower fee income ($0.64M vs $0.95M).
• Expense normalization: management fee and certain G&A items increased sequentially (e.g., management fee $1.26M vs $0.76M in Q4), partly offset by a G&A reimbursement waiver and expense limitation agreement in Q1.

Transcript

Operator (participant)

Good day, and welcome to the Chicago Atlantic BDC First Quarter 2025 earnings conference call. All participants will be in listen-only mode. Should you need assistance, please call the conference specialist by pressing the star key followed by zero. After today's presentation, there will be an opportunity to ask questions. To ask a question, you may press star then one on your telephone keypad, and to withdraw your question, please press star then two. Please note, today's event is being recorded. I'd now like to turn the conference over to Tripp Sullivan with Investor Relations. Please go ahead.

Tripp Sullivan (Head of Investor Relations)

Thank you. Good morning. Welcome to the Chicago Atlantic BDC conference call to review the company's results. On the call today will be Peter Sack, Chief Executive Officer; Martin Rodgers, Chief Financial Officer; and Dino Colonna, President. Our results were released this morning in our earnings press release, which can be found in the Investor Relations section of our website, along with our supplemental earnings presentation filed with the SEC. A live audio webcast of this call is being made available today. For those who listen to the replay of this webcast, we remind you that the remarks made herein are as of today and will not be updated subsequent to this call.

Before we begin, I'd like to remind you that certain statements that are not based on historical facts made during this call, including any statements related to financial guidance, may be deemed forward-looking statements under federal securities laws because these forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks and uncertainties that are important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed or implied by these forward-looking statements. We encourage you to refer to our most recent SEC filings for information on some of these factors. Chicago Atlantic BDC assumes no obligation or responsibility to update any forward-looking statements. Please note that the information reported on this call speaks only as of today, May 14th, 2025. Therefore, you are advised that time-sensitive information may no longer be accurate at the time of any replay or transcript reading. I'll now turn the call over to Peter Sack.

Please go ahead.

Peter Sack (CEO)

Thanks, Tripp. Good morning, everyone. It's been six weeks since our fourth quarter call, and I'm more convinced that we've created a tremendous investment vehicle at Chicago Atlantic BDC. We are uniquely positioned among BDCs as the only such vehicle focused on and able to lend to cannabis companies, together with sub-strategies targeted in markets where the more traditional lenders don't provide capital. This distinctive focus allows us to deploy capital with differentiated risk-reward, and I would like to highlight our relative strengths. Our weighted average yield on debt investments as of March 31 was 16.6%, compared with the BDC average of 12.1%, according to recent BDC research from Levfinberg Thalman. All of our debt investments are senior secured, compared with other BDCs who have an average of 19% exposure to second-line subordinated debt or equity.

The weighted average secured net leverage of our portfolio companies is 1.4X, an interest coverage ratio of 3.4X. The portfolio is entirely unlevered, compared with the BDC average of 1.1X. Assuming full utilization of our $100 million credit facility during the year, we will still be well below industry averages. We have no non-accruals compared with an industry average of 3.9%. Since October 1, 2024, we originated $52.8 million in gross fundings. In Q1, 2025, we committed $32.3 million and funded $20.8 million. The total amount of originations was in line with what we expected for the first quarter, but the back-end timing limited the impact on our gross investment income. I expect that we will continue to ramp deployment with focus on proven operators, strong markets, diversity of cash flow, low leverage, high amortization, and robust collateral coverage.

Today, we announced a $0.34 dividend, marking the third consecutive quarter at that rate. For the last four quarters, we have now declared a total of $1.27 in dividends. Our intent is to grow this component of our return to our shareholders as we continue to scale the platform. Our hope is that with more settled equity in credit markets, certainly with less volatility than we've experienced since early April, our total returns to shareholders will increase as well. Since our last reporting, the expectation for federal regulatory changes remains relatively unchanged. While the outlook for common-sense reforms such as rescheduling is positive, the timing is unpredictable, and we continue to underwrite our investments based on our borrowers' cash flow and collateral profiles in the current environment. Amid industry uncertainty, we believe Chicago Atlantic BDC is a constant that borrowers and investors can count on.

We deploy capital with consumer and product-focused operators in limited-licensed jurisdictions at low-leverage profiles to support fundamentally sound growth initiatives. Operating in a niche strategy with limited competition, we both generate yields above our BDC peers and can better manage risk. This focus positions us well for 2025, and I look forward to presenting our growth in the quarters to come. Martin, why don't you take it from here?

Martin Rodgers (CFO)

Good morning. Thanks, Peter. Before I start my brief comments, I want to highlight our investor presentation that we filed this morning that serves as our earnings supplemental. Turning to our highlights for the first quarter, gross investment income for this quarter was $11.9 million, compared to $12.7 million in the fourth quarter last year. Net expenses were $4.3 million, which reflects a waiver of the G&A expense reimbursement to the manager. This is compared to net expenses of $4.4 million last quarter, which is net of loan portfolio acquisition expenses. Net investment income was $7.6 million or $0.34 per share, compared to $8 million or $0.35 per share last quarter. Net assets were $301 million at quarter-end, and NAV per share was $13.19. As of quarter-end, there were 22.8 million common shares issued and outstanding on a basic and fully diluted basis.

As we look to the investment portfolio, I'd like to highlight the strength and diversification of our investments. We have 31 portfolio companies. 21% of our portfolio is invested outside of cannabis across multiple sectors. Our average debt position size is 3% of our debt portfolio. 76% of the portfolio is floating rate, and 99% of these loans have a rate floor which shields us from declining interest rates. The gross weighted average yield of company debt investments is approximately 16.6%. None of our loans are on non-accrual status. At the BDC level, we have no debt as of quarter-end as we deployed cash from the balance sheet to fund new investments. As noted in our press release, we closed on a new $100 million credit facility during the quarter, providing ample liquidity to execute on our pipeline.

We are currently underlevered compared with other BDCs, and as we draw down on the credit facility, we expect leverage to increase slightly. I will now turn it over to Dino to talk about our origination efforts.

Dino Colonna (President)

Thanks, Martin. We committed approximately $32.3 million in new debt investments in the first quarter and funded approximately $20.8 million of that total. All these investments were new borrowers to the BDC. As it relates to the pace of investments in the quarter, January was slower, which is typically the case. The pace picked up meaningfully into February, with most of these investments completed in March. During the quarter, we also had loan repayments and amortization totaling approximately $7.7 million. To date in the second quarter, we funded $7.2 million to four borrowers, of which $5 million was to a new portfolio company and the remaining to three existing borrowers. Total unfunded commitments were approximately $12.8 million. The pipeline across the Chicago Atlantic platform as of quarter-end, which includes cannabis and non-cannabis opportunities, totaled approximately $590 million in potential debt transactions across 35 unique companies.

The breakdown of the opportunity set includes approximately $462 million in cannabis opportunities and approximately $128 million in non-cannabis investment opportunities. Talk of tariffs that rattled the broader capital markets in March and early April have started to stabilize, and we have seen a recent pickup in potential opportunities at the top of the originations funnel, both cannabis and non-cannabis, which should translate to more completed investments over the coming months. Speaking of tariffs, we believe there will be limited direct impact on the overall portfolio. As is normally the case, we stay close to all of our portfolio companies, typically receiving financial and performance updates from the vast majority of borrowers on a monthly basis, which certainly helps in times like these. For new potential loans in the pipeline, we are also spending additional time with companies understanding the potential direct and indirect impacts of tariffs.

As Peter noted earlier, we are unique in being able to invest in both cannabis and other industries in a lower middle market that are underserved by traditional lenders. We are not seeing much competition in either strategy as the Chicago Atlantic platform continues to be the dominant originator in the cannabis space and is starting to develop a leading brand in non-cannabis direct lending as well. Both the cannabis and non-cannabis verticals are seeing strong demand for debt capital from a multitude of borrowers with experienced management teams, strong growth outlooks, and leading positions in their respective industries. We have and will continue to be very disciplined in our underwriting approach and extremely selective with our borrowers, which we believe will reap longer-term benefits for our shareholders.

We pride ourselves on building durable investment portfolios regardless of sector-specific trends or broader macro conditions and will continue to leverage Chicago Atlantic's track record and experience in methodically deploying capital and delivering differentiated credit alpha to our shareholders. We look forward to reporting additional progress as we work to deploy the ample liquidity on the balance sheet. Operator, we're now ready for questions.

Operator (participant)

Thank you. We'll now begin the question-and-answer session. To ask a question, please press star then one on your telephone keypad. If you're using a speakerphone, we ask that you please pick up your handset before pressing the keys. To withdraw your question, please press star then two. Once again, that's star then one if you have a question. Today's first question comes from Pablo Zuwanich with Zuwanich & Associates. Please go ahead.

Pablo Zuwanich (Analyst)

Good morning, everyone. Look, just a general macro question. In my read, listening to other finance companies in this space, is that they seem more cautious about the industry outlook, assuming no state-level or federal-level regulatory changes this year. They sound more cautious than they sounded three, six months ago. In this context, right, you're ready to deploy $100 million in loans this year, which is a base much higher than what we're seeing at other companies. I'm just trying to reconcile the two, if you can just make some comments there on that point. In terms of your industry outlook and the context in which you would be deploying $100 million, where apparently very few are doing that. Correct me if I'm wrong. Thank you.

Peter Sack (CEO)

I think we're focused on, since our inception at Chicago Atlantic, we've put aside the idea of the broader U.S. cannabis industry because we view the U.S. cannabis industry as really a grouping of 40 individual states that each have their own supply and demand dynamics at each level of attractiveness and growth profile that changes over time. We keep a more narrow focus on the markets that we're excited about, the operators and the relationships that we're excited about, and we spend our time building relationships with those operators in boom times and times where equity markets aren't so enthusiastic. For us, it's a longer-term view of partnership building to support growth initiatives of operators that are successful in their markets.

I think that's what a lot of that investment in a platform and a team is what drives us to be able to continue to deploy in a very disciplined manner consistently throughout different cycles of when the market may view the sector as a whole differently because, frankly, we don't spend a lot of time thinking about the U.S. cannabis market as a whole. We spend a lot of time thinking about 40 individual states.

Pablo Zuwanich (Analyst)

Understood. Not to push back on that comment, but when you talk about the pipeline on the cannabis side and the pipeline on the non-cannabis side, is there any nuance there, again, compared to three, six months ago where you might be a bit more active on the non-cannabis side? I think the ratio last quarter was 77% cannabis and the rest non-cannabis. Should we assume that that ratio remains pretty stable throughout the year?

Peter Sack (CEO)

No significant difference. I think the change of deployments in first quarter is ordinary fluctuations, not a deliberate change or a market-driven change.

Pablo Zuwanich (Analyst)

Right. And then just staying on the growth plans, I mean, obviously, you have the revolving facility, $100 million. If you're viewing the industry stays as it is or even improves, right, and you feel that there's room to deploy more capital, how do you feel about the BDC's flexibility to increase that facility?

Peter Sack (CEO)

We think about building a differentiated risk-reward platform in two ways. One is by deploying into industries and to companies at risk levels that we think are differentiated from the broader BDC market. Two, we think about managing a vehicle that overall can generate differentiated returns even on a basis that is more under levered than the broader BDC market. We do think that there is room to grow our senior secured credit facility. There is room to add modest unsecured notes as we have been able to achieve in other vehicles managed under the Chicago Atlantic platform, but that will be done in a disciplined and deliberate manner in conjunction with the pipeline.

Pablo Zuwanich (Analyst)

Right. And just a reminder, in terms of what's your debt leverage threshold? I know you said the BDC average is 1.1 times. Would that be the same number for yourselves, or would you be looking at a lower ratio, longer term?

Peter Sack (CEO)

We're likely to be well below industry averages for the foreseeable future.

Pablo Zuwanich (Analyst)

I know we cannot—last question. I know we cannot guide. Based on the growth momentum of the book, on my math and what you're saying on this call, you should be in a position by the third or fourth quarter to increase the dividend. Just a reminder, how should we think about that? Thanks.

Peter Sack (CEO)

We don't provide dividend guidance, but the BDCs are required to distribute nearly all of their income every year. All of its income will be distributed by the end of the year.

Pablo Zuwanich (Analyst)

Right. Thank you very much.

Operator (participant)

Thank you. It appears that there are no further questions. At this time, I'd like to turn the conference back over to Peter Sack for any closing remarks.

Peter Sack (CEO)

Thank you for the support. We look forward to presenting results in the quarters to come. Please feel free to reach out with any questions.

Operator (participant)

Thank you. This concludes today's conference call. We thank you all for attending today's presentation. You may now disconnect your lines and have a wonderful day.