LM
LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP (LMT)·Q2 2025 Earnings Summary
Executive Summary
- Q2 2025 headline results: Sales $18.2B (+0.2% YoY), GAAP EPS $1.46, consolidated operating margin 4.1%; free cash flow (FCF) $(0.15)B as working capital rose and program charges hit earnings .
- Significant charges: $1.6B pretax losses across a classified Aeronautics program ($950M) and Sikorsky’s CMHP ($570M) and TUHP ($95M), plus $66M fixed-asset write-off and $103M tax reserve; total EPS impact $5.83 .
- Guidance: Sales and FCF reaffirmed; segment operating profit and EPS lowered (FY 2025 EPS to $21.70–$22.00 from $27.00–$27.30; segment OP to $6.6–$6.7B from $8.1–$8.2B) .
- Call catalysts: Management outlined corrective actions on problem programs and highlighted demand tailwinds (F-35 deliveries, munitions ramp, CH‑53K multi‑year, GPS orders, hypersonics, “Golden Dome” homeland defense opportunity) .
What Went Well and What Went Wrong
What Went Well
- Demand/operations resilience: Sequential sales growth (“$18B grew sequentially”) with strong contributions from F‑35 production, missiles (JASSM/LRASM/precision fires), and Space (NGI/FBM, Orion) .
- Core franchises performed in live operations: “Our F‑35s, F‑22s, PAC‑3, THAAD, Aegis…performed extremely well in the most crucial and challenging situations,” reinforcing ramp directives from customers .
- MFC momentum: Sales +11% YoY to $3.433B and OP +6% YoY to $479M on production ramps and favorable mix; delivered 8th THAAD battery .
- Space steady: Sales +4% YoY to $3.307B; OP +5% YoY to $362M; additional GPS IIIF satellites ordered; Orion program volume up .
- Capital returns and investment: Returned $1.3B (dividends $771M; buybacks $500M) and invested ~$800M in infrastructure/innovation in Q2 .
What Went Wrong
- Large program charges drove EPS miss: $1.6B program losses plus other charges cut GAAP EPS by $5.83; Aeronautics margin turned negative (‑1.3%) and RMS margin fell (‑4.3%) .
- Cash flow headwinds: CFO $0.201B and FCF $(0.150)B, down sharply YoY, mainly on receivables/contract assets timing (F‑35 awards/ milestones), Sikorsky inventory, and Space billing cycles .
- IRS tax dispute raised uncertainty: Company accrued $103M interest against a $4.6B IRS NOPA on ASC 606 method change; appeals underway .
- RMS sales down 12% YoY (to $3.995B) from helicopter program losses and lower IWSS radar/CSC volume; profit decreased 135% YoY .
- Aeronautics classified program: “Design, integration, and test challenges” led to new schedule/cost estimates and extra $950M reach‑forward loss .
Financial Results
Consolidated Actuals vs Prior Periods and Estimates
Values with asterisks retrieved from S&P Global.
Segment Breakdown
KPIs and Balance/Cash
Guidance Changes
Earnings Call Themes & Trends
Management Commentary
- “We are maintaining full year 2025 guidance for sales, cash from operations, capital expense, free cash flow, and share repurchases.”
- “We are taking a number of charges this quarter to address newly identified risks…while fully focusing on the growth inflection we expect as a result of heightened interest and demand.”
- On Aero classified: “Design, integration, and test challenges…had a greater impact on schedule and costs than previously estimated…we recognized additional pretax reach‑forward losses of $950 million.”
- CFO on cash and awards: “Delay of the combined F‑35 Lot 18‑19 award created approximately $600 million of headwind…tariff impacts ~$100 million…high receivables from milestone timing.”
- CFO on FY25 outlook: “Reaffirming sales…segment OP now $6.6–$6.7B…EPS $21.70–$22.00…FCF $6.6–$6.8B.”
Q&A Highlights
- De‑risking problem programs: Management described enhanced oversight, reconstituted review teams, and potential contract restructuring on Aero classified and Sikorsky programs; emphasized transparency and quarterly “burn down of risk” .
- Cash impact bridge: Aero classified cash usage ~$500M in 2025, ~$400M in 2026, then stepping down; strong 2H working capital liquidation expected with F‑35 Lot 18‑19 and other awards .
- F‑35 budget trajectory: House/Senate marks suggest upside vs President’s request; backlog and international demand provide production flexibility .
- IRS NOPA: Company strongly disputes $4.6B assessment, accrued ~$100M interest; pursuing remedies on appeal .
- Margin run‑rates: Back‑half implied RMS mid‑10s and Aeronautics mid‑9s; management aims to incrementally lift margins as mix shifts to established production .
Estimates Context
- Q2 2025 vs S&P Global consensus: Revenue slight miss ($18.155B vs $18.559B*), EPS large miss ($1.46 vs $6.465*), EBITDA miss ($1.104B vs $2.578B*) driven by program losses and tax/impairment items .
- Q1 2025: Broad beats (Revenue $17.963B vs $17.801B*, EPS $7.28 vs $6.323*, EBITDA $2.676B vs $2.502B*) .
- Q2 2024: Beats (Revenue $18.122B vs $17.013B*, EPS $6.85 vs $6.447*, EBITDA $2.599B vs $2.413B*) .
Values with asterisks retrieved from S&P Global.
Key Takeaways for Investors
- Expect near‑term EPS volatility but improving run‑rate: FY25 EPS reset reflects large program charges; management targets margin normalization as mix shifts and corrective actions take hold .
- 2H cash inflection is a watchpoint: F‑35 Lot 18‑19 definitization and other awards are positioned to release contract assets and reduce receivables; monitor award timing .
- Demand tailwinds intact: F‑35 international plus‑ups, munitions ramps (PAC‑3/JASSM/LRASM/HIMARS/PrSM), CH‑53K multi‑year, GPS IIIF orders, and hypersonics provide backlog support and sales visibility .
- Structural risk mitigation underway: Oversight and potential contract restructuring on Aero classified and Sikorsky programs aim to contain fixed‑price risk exposure; track updates each quarter .
- IRS tax dispute is an overhang but manageable near‑term: Company confident in position; current accrual limited; watch legal trajectory and potential cash consequences .
- Golden Dome could be a multi‑year catalyst: Architecture leadership across ground/space/C2 aligns with LM’s portfolio; watch for RFIs to convert into RFPs/orders .
- Trading stance: Near‑term sentiment tied to execution on program turnarounds and 2H cash; medium‑term thesis supported by durable defense demand and portfolio breadth .