LG
LanzaTech Global, Inc. (LNZA)·Q3 2024 Earnings Summary
Executive Summary
- Q3 revenue was $9.9M, materially below internal targets due to a delayed LanzaJet sublicensing event (~$8M expected) and softer ethanol pricing; adjusted EBITDA loss widened to $27.1M, and net loss was $57.4M .
- Management expanded the model beyond licensing: first long-term ethanol offtake with ArcelorMittal (one-year ~$6M potential; five-year 5k–10k tons → ~$10–$20M/yr), plus advancement of “Project Drake” with a $5M exclusivity fee and intent to finalize financing by year-end, and Norway/Eramet project moving to Brookfield FID in coming months .
- Liquidity improved to $89.1M in cash/restricted cash/investments at 9/30 (post $40M Aug convertible note); subsequent $10M FPA-related settlement paid to reduce share overhang and potential price pressure .
- Q4 set up for wide outcome range: base ~$10M, potential ~$20M upon Norway transfer (if positive FID), ~$4M from Project SECURE, ~$8M from LanzaJet sublicensing, and material Project Drake impact if agreements finalize; timing is the key variable and some items could slip into Q1’25 .
- Catalysts: execution on Project Drake agreements, Brookfield FID for Norway, Project SECURE contracting, and LanzaJet sublicensing tranches; management continues cost actions and portfolio shifts to own more value chain economics .
What Went Well and What Went Wrong
What Went Well
- First long-term ethanol offtake agreement: ArcelorMittal one-year (~$6M) and five-year (5k–10k tons → ~$10–$20M/yr) expected to strengthen CarbonSmart volumes and enable longer customer commitments .
- Strategic evolution to co-develop/finance projects with infrastructure partners (Brookfield, Olayan JV); advancing Norway (Eramet) to FID in ~6 months and moving multiple early-stage projects forward .
- Project Drake milestone: $5M exclusivity/financing commitment received; management expects material Q4 cash flow/income if agreements finalize and tailwinds into 2025 .
“By controlling more feedstock, operations, and off-take… we are building multiple pathways to cash flow generation and are working to accelerate our timeline to profitability.” — CEO Jennifer Holmgren .
What Went Wrong
- Revenue miss vs plan: ~$7M below target primarily due to delayed LanzaJet sublicensing and weaker China ethanol pricing; gross margin fell to 18% on mix (more low-margin CarbonSmart) and lack of near-100% margin LanzaJet recognition .
- Operating expenses elevated YoY to $34.8M (flat QoQ) as pre-FID project costs were expensed; adj. EBITDA loss widened to $27.1M vs $19.1M prior-year .
- Earnings quality sensitivity to licensing timing persists; management did not reaffirm full-year numeric guidance, instead outlining scenario drivers with timing uncertainty into Q4/Q1’25 .
Financial Results
Guidance Changes
Earnings Call Themes & Trends
Management Commentary
- “Third-quarter 2024 ended on a disappointing note… due primarily to a timing delay related to a LanzaJet sublicensing event… and… softer ethanol pricing.” — CEO Jennifer Holmgren .
- “We are announcing our first long-term committed off-take agreement with… ArcelorMittal… and the advancement of Project Drake… positioning us for greater upside as compared to a pure licensing arrangement.” — CEO .
- “Gross margin… 18%… as a function of revenue mix… and the fact that we did not realize… near-100% margin… associated with another LanzaJet share issuance.” — CFO Geoff Trukenbrod .
- “We expect these moves will allow us to control more of the feedstock, operations and offtake… increase our cash flow generation and accelerate our path to profitability.” — CEO .
- “We ended the quarter in a stronger cash position… attributable to the $40 million investment… Carbon Direct Capital…” — CFO .
Q&A Highlights
- Project Drake accounting: $5M exclusivity fee expected to be recognized in Q4 as part of broader development services revenue and incremental to base ~$10M run-rate .
- Costs: Elevated OpEx reflects pre-FID project work (internal/external); management reducing many OpEx line items vs budget, with project cost recoup expected upon transfer .
- Infrastructure partners: LNZA aiming for more control without taking binary project risk; exploring multiple infra partners beyond Brookfield; retaining licensing/equipment/engineering/services economics .
- Q4 lumpiness: Timing (12/31 vs 1/1) can materially swing revenue; management views it as when, not if .
- LanzaJet status: Freedom Pines has started FID/shakedowns; not yet producing SAF; updates forthcoming .
- SECURE specifics: Site identified; potential to integrate hydrogen sources; staged CI improvements over time .
- Ethanol offtake economics: ~$6M tied to first-year 5k tons; $10–$20M p.a. for 10k tons in subsequent years; pricing/volumes drive outcomes .
Estimates Context
- Wall Street consensus (S&P Global) for Q3’24 EPS and revenue was unavailable at time of analysis due to data access limits; as a result, we cannot quantify beats/misses vs consensus. Values would normally be retrieved from S&P Global.
- Given estimate unavailability, comparisons to consensus could not be included; management indicated an internal miss (~$7M below target) primarily due to LanzaJet timing and ethanol pricing .
Key Takeaways for Investors
- Mix and timing matter: Without LanzaJet sublicensing, margins compress sharply; expect volatility until licensing tranches and project transfers normalize cash/revenue cadence .
- Business model pivot is material: Owning offtake and project participation (Drake, Norway/Eramet, ArcelorMittal) can unlock higher-margin, recurring economics vs pure licensing .
- Q4 is event-driven: Track Brookfield FID on Norway (
$20M revenue on positive FID), Drake agreements ($5M already received; potential material Q4 impact), Project SECURE contracting ($4M), and LanzaJet sublicensing (~$8M) . - Liquidity strengthened; overhang reduced: $40M PIK convertible note, $89.1M cash/investments at 9/30, $10M settlement to reduce share pressure .
- CarbonSmart trajectory improving with structural offtake: ArcelorMittal agreement should stabilize volumes; watch ethanol pricing and ICC certification for EU access .
- New platform optionality: Nutritional protein opens significant TAM with compelling LCA; early partnerships needed to scale demand .
- Trading setup: Near-term stock drivers are binary project/timing outcomes; medium-term thesis hinges on replicable “lift & shift” platform with infra capital, SAF tailwinds, and chemicals (SECURE) scaling .