Sign in

You're signed outSign in or to get full access.

J. Wesley Sutherland

Chief Accounting Officer at Live Oak Bancshares
Executive

About J. Wesley Sutherland

J. Wesley Sutherland, age 54, serves as Chief Accounting Officer of Live Oak Bancshares, Inc. and Live Oak Bank, a role he has held since 2014 . His background spans founding/owning an accounting and consulting firm, serving as an audit partner in the financial institutions services group of the largest CPA firm based in the South, president of a $300 million mutual savings bank, work in the banking practices of two national accounting firms, and experience as a financial analyst for a Fortune 500 company . Company performance over his tenure has been characterized by rising net income with discrete cycles in revenue; recent years show revenues of $86.0M* (FY2020) to $123.3M* (FY2024) and net income of $59.5M (FY2020) to $77.5M (FY2024) . Values marked with * are retrieved from S&P Global.

Past Roles

Organization/EmployerRoleYearsStrategic Impact
Accounting & consulting firm (not named)Founder & OwnerNot disclosed (proxy) Entrepreneurial leadership; built accounting advisory serving financial institutions
Largest CPA firm based in the South (not named)Audit Partner, Financial Institutions Services GroupNot disclosed (proxy) Led audits in banking vertical; strengthened controls and reporting rigor
$300M mutual savings bank (not named)PresidentNot disclosed (proxy) P&L leadership; operational oversight of a regulated depository institution
Two national accounting firms (not named)Banking practice professionalNot disclosed (proxy) Banking audit/advisory; technical accounting depth
Fortune 500 company (not named)Financial AnalystNot disclosed (proxy) Corporate FP&A exposure; analytical skill set

External Roles

No external public company board service or named external roles are disclosed for Sutherland in the 2024 or 2025 proxy statements reviewed .

Fixed Compensation

Sutherland is not listed among the named executive officers (NEOs) in the 2024 or 2025 Summary Compensation Tables; his individual base salary, target bonus %, and actual bonus are not itemized in the proxies . Program-level context: the Committee used discretionary cash bonuses for NEOs in 2024 and did not award options, with equity primarily delivered as time-vested RSUs; no employment agreements exist for executive officers .

Performance Compensation

Incentive TypeMetricWeightingTargetActualPayout/TermsVesting
Discretionary Cash Bonus (program-level context)Company and individual performance (Committee judgment)Not applicable (discretionary) Not disclosed Not disclosed Determined by Committee annually; bonuses paid to NEOs in 2024 (CEO excluded) Not applicable
RSU Awards (program-level context)Time-vested RSUs (no PSU metrics disclosed)Not applicable (time vesting) Not applicableNot applicableNEO RSUs granted and vest pro rata; e.g., FY2024/FY2025 grants vest 20% annually over 5 years Standard cadence: 20% annually over five years (examples: Feb 12–14, Feb 13, Aug 10/25)

Notes: The company did not disclose formal performance-metric weightings, revenue/EBITDA targets, or PSU frameworks for executives; equity awards disclosed for NEOs are time-vested RSUs with five-year pro-rata schedules .

Equity Ownership & Alignment

TopicDetail
Beneficial Ownership (Sutherland)Not itemized; proxy presents NEOs/directors individually and group-level for 19 persons (23.9% of shares) .
Ownership GuidelinesThe Board has not implemented formal stock ownership guidelines for directors/executive officers; it periodically analyzes ownership and believes interests are aligned .
HedgingProhibited: Insider Trading Policy bans hedging and derivative transactions (puts/calls) in Company stock .
PledgingAllowed with conditions: prior consultation with General Counsel; quarterly reporting to Audit Committee; lenders require ≥2x collateral value to credit outstanding (often more stringent) . CEO and certain directors have pledged shares (example footnotes in proxy) . No Sutherland-specific pledging disclosed.
Options/RSUs (status)Company-level: option awards for NEOs were not granted in 2024; RSUs outstanding vest over 5 years; Sutherland’s individual grants are not disclosed .

Employment Terms

ProvisionCompany Policy/Terms
Employment AgreementsNone for executive officers; all serve at Board’s discretion .
SeveranceNo standard severance agreements; any severance would be negotiated individually at termination .
Change-in-Control (CoC)Under the 2015 Omnibus Stock Incentive Plan: unvested RSUs for some executives become fully vested upon termination within 12 months following a Corporate Transaction (double-trigger acceleration; NEO examples shown) .
Award Forfeiture on Voluntary/Involuntary TerminationUnvested equity awards forfeited; vested stock options typically exercisable for 3 months post-termination unless terminated for Cause (then no post-termination exercise) .
ClawbackSEC/NNYSE-compliant clawback policy applies to incentive compensation received on/after Oct 2, 2023; recovery required upon restatement regardless of misconduct .
Anti-Hedging/Pledging ControlsHedging prohibited; pledging allowed subject to controls; quarterly reporting to Audit Committee; minimum collateral coverage by lenders .

Company Performance During Sutherland’s Tenure

MetricFY 2020FY 2021FY 2022FY 2023FY 2024
Revenues ($USD)$86.0M*$157.0M*$221.8M*$97.1M*$123.3M*
Net Income - (IS) ($USD)$59.5M $167.0M $176.2M $73.9M $77.5M

Values marked with * are retrieved from S&P Global.

Context: The Committee highlights business/profitability momentum and strong growth/expense control in 2024 . Say-on-pay support declined to 76.45% in 2024 (from 85.8% in 2023), though the Committee made no significant structural changes .

Say-on-Pay & Compensation Committee Context

YearSay-on-Pay Approval %Notes
202385.8% Annual advisory votes; Committee retained program structure based on support .
202476.45% Continued annual vote; Committee did not implement significant structural changes .

Compensation Committee members (2025): William H. Cameron (Chair), Tonya W. Bradford, David G. Lucht, Milton E. Petty . The Committee did not use an external compensation consultant or external benchmarking for 2024 .

Vesting Schedules and Potential Selling Pressure (Program-Level Cues)

Award Examples (NEOs)Annual Vest DatesVesting Cadence
RSUs granted Feb 12, 2024 (Losch/Phifer/Derraik/Seward)Feb 12, 2025–202920% per year
RSUs granted Feb 13, 2023 (Losch/Derraik/Seward)Feb 13, 2024–202820% per year
RSUs granted Feb 14, 2022 (Losch/Derraik/Seward)Feb 14, 2023–202720% per year
RSUs granted Aug 25, 2024 (Losch)Aug 25, 2024–202820% per year

Notes: These vesting clusters indicate potential periodic liquidity events for executives. Sutherland’s individual vesting dates/awards are not disclosed in proxies reviewed. Attempt to fetch Form 4 data for “Sutherland” (to assess transactions/ownership) failed due to API authorization (401), so current insider transaction data could not be retrieved.

Investment Implications

  • Compensation alignment: Executives are primarily compensated with time-vested RSUs and discretionary bonuses rather than metric-based PSUs; this structure emphasizes retention over explicit pay-for-performance linkages and may reduce direct incentive sensitivity to operating KPIs (e.g., revenue/EBITDA targets) .
  • Retention risk: Five-year pro-rata RSU vesting is a strong retention mechanism for those with equity grants, but the absence of employment agreements and standardized severance terms introduces negotiation uncertainty upon departure; double-trigger CoC acceleration can be protective in M&A scenarios .
  • Trading signals: Company-level RSU vesting clusters in February and (for certain awards) in August could create periodic selling pressure due to tax withholding or liquidity needs; Sutherland-specific transactions are not disclosed in proxies and could not be fetched via Form 4 due to API authorization limits .
  • Alignment and governance: Hedging is prohibited, but pledging is allowed under controls, which introduces collateral-call risk in severe drawdowns; there are no formal ownership guidelines, though the Board views executive interests as aligned given substantial insider ownership (group 23.9%) .
  • Oversight signals: Say-on-pay support decreased in 2024 (76.45% vs. 85.8% in 2023), potentially reflecting investor preferences for more performance-conditioned pay structures; the Committee did not use external consultants and retained overall design .