Katharine Reeping
About Katharine Reeping
Katharine Reeping, age 48, was appointed Chief Accounting Officer (principal accounting officer) of LPL Financial Holdings Inc. on February 28, 2025, reporting to President & CFO Matthew Audette; she signed the company’s Q3 2025 Form 10‑Q in that capacity . She has 20+ years in finance and controls (accounting, financial reporting, FP&A, risk), previously serving as LPL’s SVP, Corporate Controller (Aug 2022–Feb 2025), with prior leadership roles at PNC (2014–2022), E*TRADE, and a career start at Deloitte; she holds a Bachelor’s in Accounting from Penn State, is a CPA, and has a Series 99 designation . Company executive pay‑for‑performance is linked to Incentive EBITDA, Operating Margin, Organic Growth, and Relative TSR; notably, 2022 PSUs paid out at 200% on February 25, 2025 after LPL’s TSR reached ~105% and ranked above the 80th percentile vs comparator group, underscoring strong equity‑linked value creation .
Past Roles
| Organization | Role | Years | Strategic Impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| LPL Financial Holdings Inc. | SVP, Corporate Controller | Aug 2022–Feb 2025 | Led corporate accounting and reporting; foundation for internal control rigor supporting LPL’s growth |
| PNC | SVP, Financial Reporting & Analysis | May 2018–Jun 2022 | Oversaw enterprise reporting/analysis; enhanced reporting quality and discipline |
| PNC | VP, Financial Reporting | May 2014–May 2018 | Advanced reporting processes and regulatory compliance |
| E*TRADE Financial | Various leadership roles (Accounting, Financial Reporting, Accounting Policy) | ~10 years (dates not disclosed) | Built multi‑functional finance leadership across brokerage operations |
| Deloitte | Audit/Accounting (career start) | Years not disclosed | Public accounting foundation; controls and GAAP proficiency |
External Roles
| Organization | Role | Years | Strategic Impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| None disclosed | — | — | No public company board or external governance roles disclosed for Reeping in filings reviewed |
Fixed Compensation
| Component | Value | Effective Date |
|---|---|---|
| Base Salary | $380,000 | Mar 3, 2025 |
| Target Annual Cash Bonus | $228,000 (60% of base) | Mar 3, 2025 |
| Target Annual LTI (Equity) | $266,000 (70% of base) | Mar 3, 2025 |
| Total Target Annual Compensation | $874,000 | Mar 3, 2025 |
Note: Percentages are computed from disclosed amounts .
Performance Compensation
| Incentive Type | Metric | Weighting | Target | Actual | Payout | Vesting |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Annual Cash Bonus | Company financial & business goals; metrics include Incentive EBITDA, Operating Margin, Organic Growth | Not disclosed for CAO | Pre‑established corporate goals set by Comp Committee | Not disclosed for CAO | Funded based on company performance and individual assessment | Cash (no vesting) |
| PSUs (LTI program) | Relative TSR vs comparator group | Award mix for CAO not disclosed; NEOs used 60% PSUs/40% RSUs in 2024–2025 | 50th percentile TSR = 100% of target; 25th = 50%; 80th = 200% | Company TSR 105% in 2022–2025 period; NEO PSUs paid at 200% at vest on Feb 25, 2025 | 0–200% of target; capped at 100% if TSR negative | Later of 3‑year anniversary and committee certification |
| RSUs (LTI program) | Time‑based service | Award mix for CAO not disclosed; NEOs used 40% RSUs in 2024–2025 | N/A (service‑based) | N/A | N/A | Vest in 3 equal annual installments under NEO program |
Company LTI policy details apply firm‑wide under the stockholder‑approved plan; CAO‑specific LTI award mix was not disclosed in the appointment 8‑K .
Equity Ownership & Alignment
| Item | Policy/Status |
|---|---|
| Executive stock ownership guideline | 3x base salary for executive officers; CEO 6x |
| Time to comply | 5 years from becoming an executive officer |
| What counts toward guideline | After‑tax value of all unvested RSUs and all outstanding shares count; stock options and unvested PSUs do not |
| Anti‑hedging & anti‑pledging | Hedging, monetization transactions, margin accounts, and pledging company stock are prohibited |
| Rule 10b5‑1 plan policy | Specific policy applies to executive officers and directors adopting trading plans |
| Personal beneficial ownership | Not disclosed for Reeping in the proxy excerpts reviewed; beneficial ownership table lists NEOs/directors and group totals |
Employment Terms
| Term | Detail |
|---|---|
| Appointment date & role | Appointed Chief Accounting Officer on Feb 28, 2025; principal accounting officer; reports to President & CFO |
| Employment agreement | Company discloses it does not have individual employment agreements with executive officers; executives serve at will; terms via Executive Severance Plan and offer letters |
| Executive Severance Plan (without cause/for good reason) | Continued base salary for 1 year, amount equal to most recent annual bonus, and COBRA subsidy for 1 year |
| Restrictive covenants (severance condition) | Non‑competition, non‑solicitation, confidentiality; 12 months post‑termination; 18 months if within 12 months after a change‑in‑control |
| Change‑in‑control treatment | Double‑trigger required (termination without cause or for good reason within 12 months after a change‑in‑control); modified golden parachute cutback (reduce to avoid excise tax if beneficial) |
| Tax gross‑ups | No tax gross‑ups or make‑whole compensation on severance/change‑in‑control payments |
| Clawback policies | SEC‑aligned clawback for erroneous incentive‑based compensation; supplemental clawback for broader circumstances including willful misconduct |
| Insider trading controls | Formal insider trading policy; anti‑hedging/anti‑pledging; 10b5‑1 plan policy for executives |
Performance & Track Record
- Company TSR outperformance: PSUs granted in 2022 vested at 200% on Feb 25, 2025 after LPL’s TSR reached ~105% and exceeded the 80th percentile vs the comparator group, indicating strong equity value creation during the performance period .
- Executive performance scoring: Annual bonus funding is tied to pre‑established financial/business goals, with metrics including Incentive EBITDA, Operating Margin, Organic Growth, and Relative TSR—reinforcing pay‑for‑performance alignment .
Compensation Committee Analysis
- Committee composition: Independent directors—Edward C. Bernard, H. Paulett Eberhart, William F. Glavin, Allison H. Mnookin (Chair), James S. Putnam; all meet Nasdaq independence standards and are non‑employee directors .
- Process & advisors: Committee sets compensation philosophy, approves executive compensation, engages an independent compensation consultant for market benchmarking, plan design, and risk assessment; consultant determined independent with no conflicts .
- Peer benchmarking context: For compensation decisions, LPL compared its 2023 revenue ($10.1B) and market cap ($17.2B) to a peer group median (revenue $5.9B; market cap $14.9B) to calibrate competitiveness .
Investment Implications
- Alignment: Reeping’s pay mix includes a meaningful variable component (bonus and equity), with equity tied to firm‑wide TSR and profitability metrics—aligning her incentives with shareholder outcomes .
- Retention risk: Standard executive severance with post‑termination non‑compete/non‑solicit (12–18 months) and double‑trigger CIC protection reduces abrupt departure risk; no employment agreement suggests at‑will flexibility .
- Selling pressure: Anti‑hedging/anti‑pledging policies and ownership guidelines mitigate forced or opportunistic selling; RSUs typically vest in 3 installments under the NEO program, which can create predictable liquidity events over time .
- Trading signals to monitor: Future Form 4 filings around vest dates or policy changes; bonus/PSU framework revisions; and any 8‑K 5.02 updates affecting role or compensatory arrangements could signal changes in incentive alignment and retention .